as itmeets project requirements. Many other courses follow this same practice, including the Intro toIE Data Visualization project, which was the first project included on students’ e-Portfoliosduring the first iteration of implementation, serving as a baseline for further e-Portfoliodevelopment considerations. It is key that students can publicly publish the links to their e-Portfolio websites, so academic integrity was a key consideration when discussing curriculuminclusion in the portfolios. This approach to project selection meets these conditions as outlinedby the CoE and the research team, and these conditions are reflected in the project selectionprocess previously outlined. Given that these projects are typically specific to a given
people from different culturessignificantly enhances intercultural competencies. It is important to note that this insight hasbeen developed from the perspective of undergraduate students. Students’ reflection on wherethey are currently will aid in the development of better educational practices for them. Moreover,this insight underscores the importance of creating educational environments that encouragediverse interactions. Such environments allow students to engage with and learn from individualswith different perspectives, ultimately preparing them for the global workforce. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceReferences[1] “Criteria for
summer bridge program and its impactson student success. First, we will assess our outreach efforts to recruit students for the Summer 6Bridge program by analyzing students’ demographic characteristics (e.g., socio-economic status,race, gender, current/prior high school) to understand how we serve underserved students. Wewill gather course-specific feedback for each summer bridge course including student grades,artifacts for student learning outcomes, course evaluation data, and formative student feedbackcollected by faculty throughout the course. Using surveys, focus groups, and/or interviews, wewill gather summative and reflective feedback from
housing needs • Students will begin to apply “money plan” to off campus housing student case study example • Students will create their own “money plan” emphasizing planning, tracking, and evaluating expensesSeminar 4: FAFSA & • Students will reflect on their fall semester experience and identifyScholarship specific successes and challenges.Application, • Students will identify strategies, habits, resources, or other factors that they believe supported success during fall semester.Review Retreat • Students will identify
. Questions for Discussion We hope that sharing our in-progress unit at the ASEE conference will createopportunities for us to share our unit design with others seeking to embed engineering designexperiences into required high school science courses. Acknowledgement This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 2149782. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M
interviews, starting in week six of their co-opterm and concluding in the final, 16th week. The first interview asked them to reflect on the firstsix weeks of their term. Interviews two through nine had them reflect on the previous week’sevents, and any ongoing design issues that they worked on over several weeks that were still thefocus of their attention. In the final week, the participants were asked to reflect on their overallexperience of designing that term, and what they learned over their co-op. Altogether, thisresulted in a dataset of 772 minutes of transcribed interview data, with an average of 257 minutesof transcript per participant.The interview transcripts were analyzed using an iterative thematic analysis approach [22]. Thedataset was
Catia Biochemistry White Woman Russia Chaaya Chemistry Indian Woman United States Chloe Chemistry White Woman United StatesData CollectionThe data for this study is composed of thirty-two semi-structured interviews. Each participantwas interviewed once per year, typically in or immediately following the spring semester. Theinterviews generally lasted between forty-five minutes and one hour and followed a protocoldevised for the broader UKSA project. The protocol sought to capture a wide variety of thestudents’ perspectives on the prior academic year, including reflections on their assessments,preferred class
, including students, staff, faculty, and alumni • Develop a career plan, including a plan of study that will support that career plan • Develop an awareness of curricular and co-curricular opportunities • Build foundational skills for college success, including self-reflection, study skills, time management, and goal settingHistoric EffortsEngineering Orientation is a long-standing course at ONU, and has long sought to encouragestudents to engage with the college through co- and extra-curricular activities. Historically,students enrolled in engineering orientation were required to attend two professional societymeetings during the semester and report their attendance at these meetings to their faculty viaemail. However, anecdotal
tointegrate the software.Literature ReviewIntuition helps professionals make quick and accurate predictions and decisions. It has beendefined in many fields, but it has only recently been defined in engineering as “subconsciouslyleveraging experience to assess a present situation or predict a future outcome[1]. Intuitiondevelops in engineering learners and is often reflected in the speed, automaticity, andengagement of information when problem-solving. Humans have a visual intuition for materialsand structures we interact with on day-to-day basis and an intuition for shapes and materials thathelps to negate flawed designs[2]. Yet, construction and building engineering learners mustinteract with materials and structures from abehavioral design
significant increase from the 17.8% recorded in 2010[1]. However, this growth has not been reflected in the workplace. Between 2001 and 2019, thenumber of women engineers in the workforce only rose from about 10% to 14% [2]. Theunderrepresentation of women is particularly pronounced in mechanical, electrical, and computerengineering, with only 17.5%, 15.6%, and 20.4% of bachelor’s degrees in these fields awarded towomen [1]. Furthermore, women represent only 9%, 10%, and 12% of working engineers inthese respective fields [3].For underrepresented minorities, the statistics are even more dismal. Bachelor’s degrees inengineering awarded to Black or African American individuals have risen only slightly from4.5% in 2010 to 4.7% in 2021 [1]. Hispanics now
anticipated as manyfaculty members continued to expand and refine the resource well beyond the original timeline.In addition to the more reflective studies, there are multiple guides for aspiring OER authors andthose wishing to set up OER adoption and authorship programs at the institutional level. TheOER guide on authoring OER, Authoring Open Content [11], offers many solid advice toprospective OER authors. The resource covers far more than we can summarize here, but the listof ten tips for OER authors does reiterate some of the same lessons learned in the previouspapers. 10. Good authoring begins with planning 9. It’s going to take longer than you think 8. Share the load 7. Do the prep work (understand the licenses) 6
academia and industry to better understand industry’s specificcommunication needs and priorities [19]. There have been many attempts to alleviate theseconcerns, which include requiring technical writing courses, modifying assignment structure toimprove the iterative writing process, introducing engineers to interdisciplinary writing contexts,and teaching writing via self-reflection for experimental lab report writing [20]-[22]. Theseefforts are a useful start to address these issues, but there is a dearth of studies that demonstratethe long-term effectiveness of these interventions.Spatial and Verbal Skills for Engineering StudentsPrior work by Project Talent, which conducted a longitudinal study following 400,000 highschool students 11+ years
spy gadgets and their countermeasures, consumers are drawn tospy detector devices. [6]. Spy detectors typically have a common set of features, including RFdetection for wireless cameras and microphones, magnetic field detection for GPS trackers, andflashing LED infrared lights that capture camera lens reflections [1][2]. The more expensivedevices come with sounds and haptic vibrations to alert for possible detection. Unscrupuloussellers make inaccurate claims that devices prevent camera spying when, in reality, the devicesonly provide detection, giving their customers the false impression that a camera is no longercapable of spying on them.This paper presents a project by a senior capstone team of four students who aimed to develop anadvanced
performbetter on the PSVT:R compared to freshmen. Additionally, it is worth noting that the literaturesuggests that once a certain threshold is reached (e.g., above 20), further discrimination in scoresmay not necessarily reflect additional performance gain. In other words, a score of 22 versus 23may not significantly impact the interpretation of spatial skills, as both are considered strong.Further AnalysisWhile this initial analysis provides valuable insights, there are additional analytical methods thatcan be employed, such as factor analysis and item response theory, to gain a deeper understandingof the findings. These methods can help elucidate the underlying factors contributing to spatialskills and provide a more nuanced perspective.One of the
thegame for all three cohorts, and qualitative analysis based on students’ de-identified responses toa reflection question at the graduate level. Students were informed that grading was solely basedon completion of their quantitative and/or qualitative responses with good faith effort. Each student participant in the game represented an imaginary province, and studentsalso formed groups of four students each, where each group represented an imaginary nation.Each imaginary nation and province was allocated ten points at the beginning of each of the fourdecades. For each decade, students had to make individual provincial decisions as well ascollective national decisions to determine how to allocate ten points to protect their province
-distance culture in India [12], where students do notquestion or openly disagree or complain about faculty, to a low power-distance culture in the USwhere students are expected to discuss, question and share expectations created challenges inteacher-student interactions. Also, in the US institution, expectations from students for activelearning are high, and they do not hesitate to express their displeasure.At the US institution, the program has seen a relatively high rate of turnover among non-whitenon-male new hires, which could also be reflective of the culture. The work culture and dailyroutine at the workplace is also quite different compared to India. For example, consistent withan individualistic society, faculty in the US institution
, S. Zappe, and I. Osunbunmi, “Lessons Learned: FacultyDevelopment Book Club to Promote Reflection among Engineering Faculty on Mental Health ofStudents,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2024.[9] “About,” Mental Health First Aid, Oct. 18,2013. https://www.mentalhealthfirstaid.org/about/[10] Calm, “Experience Calm,” Calm, 2019. https://www.calm.com/ (accessed Jan. 25,2024).
something tangible that serves as evidence of success, potentially increasing theirsense of belonging in this space. Figure 3: A completed wooden dieResults and DiscussionAmong the 1600 or so student responses analyzed from the assigned post lab reflection, theauthors found that that the student submissions fell into two categories: a. Beginner: Students who had no or some experience with tool usage b. Expert: Students who had a lot of experience in hand tool usage.Representative responses that were typical to both categories to three relevant questions askedare included below:In responding to the question, ‘Prior to today’s lab, have you ever worked with hand tools? Didyou enjoy working with them today? Why
course framework is described to help with first-year students’ professional development. A common practice of growing professional skill sets isto obtain internship opportunities as the industry is generally looking for applicants who are atintermediate or advanced levels. However, the first-year students generally would have few solidtechnical skills. Therefore, the research question is how to help first-year students gain essentialskills before they apply for internships and become future workforce [1, 2]. Constructivism is thetheory that states that learners can construct knowledge rather than passively absorb informationfrom educators. As people experience the world and reflect on those experiences, they constructtheir own representations
Paper ID #45090FULL PAPER - Implementing Exam Wrappers in a First-Year EngineeringCourseDr. Andrew Charles Bartolini, University of Notre Dame Director, First-Year Engineering Program, University of Notre Dame Associate Teaching Professor, University of Notre Dame 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE): Boston, Massachusetts Jul 28 Implementing Exam Wrappers in a First-Year Engineering CourseIntroductionThis full paper examines the implementation of exam wrappers into a first-year engineeringcomputing course. Exam wrappers allow students to reflect on how prepared they were forcourse exams and how
phases.4. Faculty Reflections and Plans for Future ImprovementsAddressing core concerns like fair assessment, structured guidance, and emphasis on engineeringfundamentals can significantly enhance the ENG 102 course. Feedback suggests incorporatingmore frequent classes and better resource availability to align the course with engineeringdemands. Responding to this, faculty will focus on popular components like the Arduino and 3Dprinting workshops, shifting towards more project-based learning by reducing lecture hours. Otherproposed improvements include introducing peer evaluations to balance team contributions,adjusting the computer application workshop to cater to diverse student backgrounds by includinga range of computing tools, and ensuring
over teamwork. Civil engineering students' priorities were closelyaligned with those of chemical engineering students, emphasizing effective teamwork and timemanagement. Conversely, in the computer and electrical engineering department, managing timeand self-directed learning emerged as top priorities, reflecting the unique demands of thesedisciplines.Engineering projects in upper-level engineering classes often require collaboration among teams.Effective teamwork ensured that team members could communicate ideas, delegate tasks, andwork together efficiently to achieve project goals. Also, teamwork and time management werecritical skills in engineering because they facilitated collaboration, improved efficiency, enhancedproblem-solving
student persistence in the College ofEngineering. A total of 7723 students were enrolled in the College of Engineering in their secondyear (88.5%), while 1004 students reported leaving Virginia Tech or enrolling in other colleges(11.5%). The demographic data are presented inTable 3 of the Appendix.Data LimitationsWe report here only on whether students remain in the College of Engineering at the institutethey started in. We would therefore not differentiate between students who left the universityaltogether and those that transferred to a different institution. These data span the period leadingup to the COVID-19 pandemic and do not reflect the dramatic changes experienced across manyeducation contexts. Although this analysis does not include
significant time commitmentrequired by the program - 15 hours a week per week for each team member over seven weeks –may have hindered some student’s ability to engage in the project entirely. A more feasibleapproach may students enrolled in multiple IBL courses, as this would better align better with thetime demands of the NSF program. Some results are based on self-assessed opinions, which maynot reflect actual outcomes. Further analysis may be needed to better understand the impact of I-Corps and IBL on engineering education.VII. Conclusion As this study is in its early stages, a definitive conclusion regarding the impact ofintegrating IBL principles with the NSF I-Corps program in engineering education is yet to bedrawn. However, the
years. There is no formal assessment has been taken after using this unitother than a reflection in laboratory reports. The author will conduct a formal and summative assessmentof this demonstration unit along with other demonstration units that are currently used in the classroom.References:1. Dollár, A. and P.S. Steif. Learning modules for the statics classroom. in Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville. 2003.2. Vasquez, H., A.A. Fuentes, and R.A. Freeman. Improving student retention and engagement in statics through online formative assessments and recitations. in American Society for Engineering Education. 2012. American Society for
Paper ID #44474Work-in-Progress: Human Capital Formation as a Framework for Entrepreneurshipand Venture Design EducationDr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a Research Scientist in the Designing Education Lab in Mechanical Engineering and co-founder of the Integrative Learning Portfolio Lab in Career Education at Stanford University. She earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford. Her scholarship is focused on engineering and entrepreneurship education, portfolio pedagogy, reflective practices, non-degree credentials, and reimagining how
entering industry, but recognition only represents base knowledgeacquisition based on Bloom’s Taxonomy principles. Here we describe a set of curricular modulesto enhance students’ understanding of standards in engineering practice that reflect learning at alllevels of Bloom’s Taxonomy (i.e. recognition/understanding, application, revision, and creation).The modules and their implementation will enhance students’ understanding of standards,including 1) searching and identifying appropriate standards, 2) writing appropriate protocols forthe verification of standards, 3) proposing revisions to standards, and 4) developing newstandards. With this methodology applied to different engineering/technical disciplines, we hopeto establish a distinct value
Apprenticeship Environment for AspiringEngineers,” Advances in Engineering Education, November 2016.[10] S. D. Brookfield, “Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher,” John Wiley & Sons, 2017.[11] M. Hernández-de-Menéndez, A. Vallejo Guevara, J. C. Tudón Martínez et al., “Active learning in engineeringeducation. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” Int J Interact Des Manuf 13, 909–922 (2019).
Indiacoming in second with 21.05%, Mexico with 10.53%, and all other countries with 5.26%. Theresults of the first authors' affiliation country distribution in the mental health field in engineeringeducation research point to an American source for this kind of work. It is crucial to recognize anypotential biases in these results. The inclusion criterion of articles written only in English is onesignificant factor that may distort the representation of nations and thus artificially increase theamount of research from the United States. Moreover, the apparent dominance of Americanresearch may not fully reflect the amount of funding or involvement that practitioners in othercountries have given to research on mental health in engineering education
mathematicians. He instituted similar study groups forAfrican-American students, which turned the tide on their high failure rates. Treisman’s modelhas been implemented in universities nationwide since, with consistently powerful effects,including at the University of Texas, Austin, where he currently teaches.Despite the demonstrated success of PLSGs over the past 40 years, we have yet to find empiricalevidence that the model's effectiveness has resulted from peer interactions. The current studysought to capture peer discussion features reflective of discipline-based cognitive processing. Wehypothesized that when group members asked questions and had discussions at higher levels ofthe cognitive processing dimension of Bloom’s revised taxonomy, a tool