done by Heywood and Montagu Pollock in the radio astronomysection of a course in physics for arts (humanities) students.34 Case studies are oftenused in the teaching of engineering ethics and carefully chosen ones can be used toillustrate the role of science in design. In respect of the former the well-documentedfailure of the Challenger Space Shuttle disaster that exploded and killed its crew isstill in use even though the event occurred more than twenty years ago. It shows quiteclearly the need to understand how other people think through illustrations of thethinking of managers and engineers as they tried to determine if the shuttle should belaunched. It also deals with the problems in the relationships between professionals(engineers) and
thatcalligraphy class he was interested in? (As a first-semester freshman, Steve Jobs was nota computer science major, by the way.) We should hope so, but as engineering programsare under pressure to demonstrate that their students have knowledge of contemporaryissues, have an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, have an ability towork within political/economic/social constraints, etc., the question that needs to beanswered is: Where does calligraphy fit into ABET’s Criterion 3(a-k) outcomes?Jobs ended his story by reiterating: Again, you can’t connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future. You have to trust in
, where hard skills refers to math and science aspects of theeducation and soft skills refers to professional abilities. The soft skills include “functioning onmultidisciplinary teams; understanding professional and ethical responsibility; ability tocommunicate effectively; the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions within a global, economic, environmental, and social context; recognition of the needfor and an ability to engage in lifelong learning; and a knowledge of contemporary issues”9.Flight testing research involves most aspects of aerospace engineering education: aircraft design,composite structures, flight dynamics, flight simulation, propulsion, and system engineering toname a few. Furthermore, flight
improved in my ability: 1 to analyze and solve open-ended engineering problems. 12 20 4 1 37 4.14 0.81 2 to manage a project and to complete it on time and within budget. 13 22 6 41 4.17 0.66 3 to communicate more effectively. 12 18 8 3 41 3.95 0.88 4 to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 10 29 2 41 4.20 0.50 5 to function on a multi-disciplinary team. 9 23 7 1 1 41 3.93 0.84 6 to understand professional and ethical considerations. 8 18 11 4 41 3.73 0.88 7 to design and conduct
skills to the larger business environment in order to address cost and economic issues, change management, management of innovation, ethics, etc. 2. Data analysis and uncertainty: Refers to the ability to specify information requirements and gather and analyze data in an uncertain environment. 3. Design, innovation and problem solving: Refers to the ability to define, develop specifications and design solutions to industrial problems. 4. Information systems and programming: Refers to the ability to use computers for extracting information from data, and for using and (where necessary) developing software for solving common engineering problems. 5. Communication and teamwork: Refers to the ability to work in
9.883.9 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education” • Connection of education to “real-life” problems • Student’s understanding and retention of knowledge (Angelides et al. 2000).ConclusionsIf the next generation of engineers are to be “more than technical functionaries in the nextmillennium, there is a need to provide young engineers with an understanding of the socialcontext within which they will work, together with skills in critical analysis and ethical judgmentand an ability to assess the long-term consequences of their work” (Beder 1999). To solve thebig problems facing the U.S
budget. 13 22 6 41 4.17 0.66 3 to communicate more effectively. 12 18 8 3 41 3.95 0.88 4 to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. 10 29 2 41 4.20 0.50 5 to function on a multi-disciplinary team. 9 23 7 1 1 41 3.93 0.84 6 to understand professional and ethical considerations. 8 18 11 4 41 3.73 0.88 7 to design and conduct experiments or tests, as well as, analyze and interpret data. 10 19 9 2 1 41 3.85 0.93 8 to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems
participate in the REM program. Eachsemester, the REM program began with a Research Studio lasting approximately 8 hours beforestudents began the laboratory experience. The Research Studio included an introduction of tissuetest systems and overall EFRI project goals, completion of laboratory safety training, anintroduction to research ethics, technical writing, and basic laboratory practices, participation ina team building exercise, discussion of the projects to which each student would be exposed, anddiscussion of the expectations for and of RPs. Once RPs completed the Research Studio, each RPwas paired with a graduate student mentor and the mentor’s project. After completion of theResearch Studio, each student was required to spend 3 hours on lab
introduction to engineering through a community/university collaboration in assistive technology, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Session 3253, pp. 2363-2365.48. Pritchard, M.S. and E. Tsang (2000). Service learning: A positive approach to teaching engineering ethics and social impact of technology, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Session 3630.49. Siegler, R. (1991). Piaget’s Theory on Development, In Children’s Thinking, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 21-61.50. Swan, C., T. Rachell, and K. Sakaguchi (2000). Community-based, service learning approach to teaching site remediation design, American Society for
requirements, this course emphasizes topics such as professionalism, technicalcommunication, engineering law, and ethics. Prominent guest speakers are invited from variousindustries to offer students valuable insights. Throughout the course, students are required tomake three presentations: preliminary, midpoint and final presentations.Survey methodsIn order to evaluate the effectiveness of these design projects in student learning, in the spring of2012 and 2013, two anonymous online surveys were conducted for first, second and fourth yearstudents. The survey consisted of (1) general questions pertinent to design projects in all of theaforementioned courses, (2) course-specific questions, and (3) questions related to futureimprovements of the existing
.• Professional Skills - Problem solving and managerial skills, positive attitude and motivation, business writing skills, communication skills (internal and external), foreign language proficiency (especially Spanish), respect for cultural differences, leadership and supervision skills; human resources knowledge e.g., organizational measurement), an understanding of marketplace differentiators, a mature work ethic with the goal of advancing professionally.The needs expressed by the industry leaders at the round table are reinforced through peer-reviewedjournal articles, such as those published by Akridge (2004) and Urutyan & Litzenberg (2010)[12, 13].Background Food and foodstuff is a stable industry poised for significant
Page 24.528.5well as the reduced ethical concerns regarding their isolation (compared to embryonic stem cells)made them an attractive cell reservoir for applications of tissue engineering and regenerativemedicine, including for cartilage repair 29. We selected the bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived MSCs for several instructional and practical reasons: i) they are the best characterized ofall adult MSCs, ii) they manifest different potency for chondrogenesis 30, 31, iii) they differ intheir availability, abundance, and morbidity associated with their isolation methods 32, 33, and iv)are available commercially. This comparative analysis will provoke the students to furtherexplore why MSCs from different sources have distinct requirements
evidence to support that their program is meeting ABET outcomes A through K[25, 28-29].Engineering programs strategically locate capstone design courses within the last year ofundergraduate engineering studies, where students can apply the fundamental technicalknowledge gained in previous courses in an authentic real-world context. Several institutionshave identified Capstone Design as an ideal place for teaching professional skills, which aretypically not emphasized earlier in the curriculum [30]. Howe’s Capstone Design survey of 232engineering institutions showed that the five most common topics taught were: writtencommunication, oral communication, engineering ethics, project planning and scheduling, anddecision making. Only 48% of the survey
sophisticated engineering software package/tool for design or computation; (4)addressing engineering ethics and societal context in addition to the engineering math andscience; and (5) understanding of the "engineering roadmap" regarding engineering education(specifically addressing opportunities at Tufts University) so students could recognize theavailable pathways beyond the first semester.“Simple Robotics” is an evolution of a previous course14 taught throughout the last decade thatleverages the LEGO MINDSTORMS robotics toolset (originally RCX and more recently theNXT) as well as the LabVIEW graphical programming environment to introduce students to avariety of engineering topics: from mechanical and structural to electronics and computerengineering
programs minimally expectedoutcomes of a technological education. ABET introduced the revised outcomes for EngineeringCriteria 20001 to drive changes in engineering education practice—such as promoting more sub-stantial education in communication and ethics—but many programs’ and institutions’ ap-proaches to the ABET requirements have now become codified, and administrators now exam-ine proposed changes to curriculum or pedagogy, asking whether they pose any risk to continu-ing accreditation. Programs that have been successfully placing graduates into desirable jobsmay be similarly constrained by their own success. Such factors can reinforce an institutional
grade to advance in their studies. For those students,the bridge program successfully advanced their math education by at least a semester.From Figure 3, the results for the bridge program students in College Algebra are muchmore varied. First, it is clear that bridge program students who did not improve theiroriginal math placement tend to not get a grade of C or better in their first attempt inCollege Algebra, as over the four years only 1 of 7 students accomplished that. As such,there may be a problem with the work ethic of students who did not improve their mathplacement, or these students have fundamentally reached their mathematical abilities andcannot complete the work in Math 116 successfully. Participation in the bridge programappears
Paper ID #8790Assessing Metacognition During Problem-Solving in Two Senior ConcurrentCoursesMiss Sheila Reyes Guerrero, Universidad de las Am´ericas Puebla Sheila Reyes Guerrero is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches Databases, Networks & Telecommunications, Contem- porary Ethics, Basic computer, Internet protocols, Legal Aspects of Information Technology Information Technologies, Foundations of educational technology.. Her research interests include faculty develop- ment, outcomes assessment, and creating effective learning
) to 100 (high). The Engineer of 2020 survey asksstudents to provide self-ratings from 1 (Weak/None) to 5 (Excellent) for the following fouritems: 1) Knowledge of contexts (social, political, economic, cultural, environmental, ethical, etc.) that might affect the solution to an engineering problem; 2) Knowledge of the connections between technological solutions and their implications for the society or groups they are intended to benefit; 3) Ability to use what you know about different cultures, social values, or political systems in developing engineering solutions; and 4) Ability to recognize how different contexts can change a solution. More details about these
frequently by those respondents who had indicated multiple“extremely important” variables were: high school grade point average, math standardized testscore, comprehensive standardized test score, and the quality of the high school course load.Notably, students’ track records in calculus, physics and chemistry were ranked a bit lower thanthe overall quality of the high school course load. These variables will be used in the next phaseof our ongoing research to quantify the pool of engineering admissible students by demographicbreakdown.The math and physics high school participation rates by females and students from historicallyunderrepresented ethic and racial minority groups represent a significant barrier to equity,challenging engineering’s
multidisciplinary Capstone Design projects is also suggested.KeywordsMultidisciplinary, capstone design, senior design, electric drive control systemIntroductionLike many universities in the country, Capstone Design is a culminating course offered toundergraduate students in several disciplines at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Studentswork in teams to design, build, and test prototypes with real world applications. At the end ofeach semester students showcase their efforts at the “Capstone Design Expo”. Three of theimportant outcomes of this capstone experience involve learning about professional ethics,teamwork skills, and design methodologies1. Traditionally, at the Georgia Institute ofTechnology, Capstone Design is monodisciplinary with teams
local industry on an actual mission that will be launched intospace.I. IntroductionEngineering and computer science programs often require a culminating senior design project.Several of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditationoutcomes1 are best demonstrated in the context of such a project. These include: • The ability to design a system, process or component to meet desired needs • The ability to function on a multidisciplinary team • The ability to communicate effectively • The understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityAt California State University, Northridge (CSUN) engineering and computer science studentsare assigned to work on group design projects during their senior year
of engineering students a force in the worldaround them. The structure of the courses within a department could expand to all requiredcourses as in the following. The communication elements in each course are shown below.EGR 100 – Intro to Engineering Design (Freshman)Resumes, email, short engineering focused reports, engineering writing demands, problemsolving, speaking, ethics, and orientation to the university/college/majorsME 201 – Thermodynamics (Sophomore)Student communication survey, refresher for past grammatical expertiseME 332 – Fluid Mechanics (Junior) ME 371 – Machine Design ILaboratory Reports: (Approx. 9 @ 4-6 Short Technical Reportingpages each) Design Analysis Reports (2 @ 4-6
Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Ms. Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ming-Chien Hsu is a doctoral candidate of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She was an elec- trical engineer working on semiconductor devices before stepping into the realm of education research. Her current research explores and characterizes learning experiences in engineering such as design and interdisciplinary learning.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica Cardella is an Associate Professor of Engineering
., E. Douglas, and W.J. Hilson Jr. (2008) Qualitative research basics: A guide for engineering educators.West Lafayette, IN.24. Rayne, K., T. Martin, S. Brophy, N.J. Kemp, J.D. Hart, and K.R. Diller. (2006) The development of adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2):165–73. Page 24.707.14
University of Louisville in Educational Administration with a cognate in urban education. Dr. Feldhaus spent 20 years as a classroom teacher, principal and district administrator in public education. His research interests include P-12 STEM education, STEM workforce education, post- secondary STEM education discipline based research, engineering technology recruitment and retention, and engineering ethics. Page 24.734.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 1Increasing Female Participation in Engineering: Evaluating POWER
largest privately held construction firms in the nation. Its success is theresult of a strong work ethic and industry knowledge combined with innovation andcollaboration. The GC in cause is a recognized builder of one of the world’s largest aquarium,which is a model of project efficiency, superior quality, and exceptional service from start tofinish. The calculated stadium expansion project duration is approximate to 10 months. ThisStadium Expansion Project includes many key players. The University’s Athletic Foundation isthe owner of the project. There are also two major subcontractors handling concrete work andstructure pertaining to development of stadium expansion
already been shared with aresearch team exploring high school students’ pathways to engineering.Second, the researchers’ experiences with recruiting participants provides a contribution to theengineering education community. Our team explored a variety of approaches for recruitmentand found that using a third-party recruitment firm was the most expedient approach. For othersto follow this approach, however, they would need to work closely with their IRB to determinethe most appropriate and ethical process. Our team also found that sharing the study flyer withdifferent groups’ e-newsletters was an effective recruitment strategy.Third, while we generally received more screening survey responses from boys than from girls,this difference was
the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM). Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in structural mechanics, biomechanics, appro- priate technology, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He is PI of two NSF sponsored research projects and is co-author of Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis. Pa- padopoulos is currently the Program Chair Elect of the ASEE Mechanics Division and serves on numerous committees at UPRM that relate to undergraduate and graduate education.Dr. Aidsa I. Santiago-Rom´an, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez CampusDr. Genock Portela-Gauthier, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus
group is responsible of only one designcomponent: architecture, structure, HVAC or Lighting/electrical. An office standard prepared by thedepartment of civil and architectural engineering is distributed over the students.This course teaches the student how to prepare a final set of discipline specific construction documents,including engineering calculations production drawings, and specifications. The student will discusscontracts, ethics, and construction administration as they relate to the project.Autodesk Revit 2013 is pivotal in system design. This program allowed students to layout the architectureplans, sections and elevations of the architecture plans, structural, ductwork, piping, lighting fixtures,power panels, power and lighting