Asee peer logo
Displaying results 1111 - 1140 of 1425 in total
Conference Session
Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum, Part II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Agnes Galambosi, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Ertunga C. Ozelkan, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
State University, Ames, IA, US √ Many electives None Page 22.916.7 Johns Hopkins University, 13 Baltimore, MD, US √ Concentration: Ecology and Sustainability (no details on the E/S Loyola Marymount University, Los Courses)14 Angeles, CA, US √ Massachusetts Institute of Course: Leadership
Conference Session
Thinking Outside the Box! Innovative Curriculum Exchange for K12 Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Victor Mejia, California State University, Los Angeles; Jessica Alvarenga, California State University, Los Angeles; Jianyu Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Huiping Guo, California State University, Los Angeles; Israel Hernandez, California State University, Los Angeles; Eun-Young Kang; Phanit Pollavith; Adriana Trejo, Roosevelt High School; Nancy Warter-Perez, California State University, Los Angeles
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
, or g(x) = f(x-c), which will shift theoriginal graph of f(x) to the right by c units. These transformations do not change the shape ofthe graph. However, there are also transformations that changes the shape of the graph, such asg(x) = 2f(x), or g(x) = f(3x).Quadratic Functions Another mathematical concept used in the demonstrations is quadratic functions.Students first learn that the height of an object in free fall follows this quadratic function:Where, is the height of the object (in meters) at any given time t (seconds), is the initialvelocity (meters per second), is the initial height, t is time, and is the gravity constant, 2which is 9.8 m/s .The time it takes the object reach its maximum height is given
Conference Session
Ethical Perspectives on the Grand Challenges of Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Page 22.1104.12Society, S. Jasanoff, et al., eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.4. Wisnioski, Matthew. "'Liberal education has failed': Reading like an engineer in 1960s America." Technology andCulture 50 (4), 2009, pp. 753-782.5, Azarin, Samira, Nicola Ferrier, Stephen M. Kennedy, Daniel Klingenberg, Kristyn Masters, Katherine D.McMahon, Jeffrey Russell and Susan C. Hagness. "Work in Progress: A First-Year introduction-to-engineeringcourse on society's engineering grand challenges." 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008,Saratoga Springs, NY.6. Aronowitz, Scott. "Duke and NC State Launch Joint Program to Stimulate K-12 STEM interest" CampusTechnology. March 55, 2010. Available at: http://campustechnology.com
Conference Session
Design Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kristin L. Wood, University of Texas, Austin; Joseph J. Rencis, University of Arkansas; Ashland O. Brown P.E., University of the Pacific; Christina Kay White, Columbia University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
. Page 22.1121.21 10. Myers, I. and M. McCaulley (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the 19Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA.11. Felder, R. and R. Brent (2005). "Understanding student differences." Journal ofEngineering Education. 94(1): 57-72.12. Felder, R. (2004). "Changing times and paradigms." Chemical Engineering Education.38(1): 32-33.13. Smith, K. and A. Waller (1997). "New Paradigms for Engineering Education." InCampbell, W.E. & Smith, K.A. (Eds.). New paradigms for college teaching. Edina, MN:Interaction.14. Smith, K., S. Sheppard, et al. (2005). "Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-basedpractices." Journal of Engineering
Conference Session
SPECIAL SESSION: Interdisciplinary Course Design Opportunities for Chemical Engineers
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeffrey A Nason, Oregon State University; Bill J. Brooks, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
Conference Session
BME Courses and Learning Activities
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jorge E. Bohorquez, University of Miami; Ozcan Ozdamar, University of Miami; Jonathon Anthony Toft-Nielsen, University of Miami
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
, such as a pre-and-post course skillsassessment, can be implemented in the future to address this shortcoming. Additionally, an even Page 22.1397.12closer interaction between lecture and laboratory seems to be required; perhaps only one course,in a mixed lecture-lab classroom should be implemented. As indicated by the student feedbackand by design the presented course does well to help closes the gap between college educationand BME professional practice.References1. Lee J. S., Biomedical Engineering Entrepreneurship. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 20102. Semmlow, J. L., Biosignal and Medical Image Processing, CRC
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John V. Tocco, Lawrence Technological University; Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
Conference Session
Computers in Education General Technical Session II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel J. Waldorf, California Polytechnic State University; Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
: Globalization, Localization, and Individualization, Springer, 2005.7. Posnick-Goodwin, S., “Meet Generation Z,” California Educator, February 2010, p. 8.8. Wells, D., Ed., Manufacturing Education for the 21st Century, Vol. 1 Curricula 2002 Report, SME, 2002.9. Harasim, L., Hitz, R.S, Teles, L., and M. Turoff, Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online, The MIT Press, 1995.10. Tsay, M. and M. Brady, “A case study of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference?” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 2010.11. Mourtos, N.J., “The Nuts and Bolts of Cooperative Learning in Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, Jan
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Potpourri I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Erin Crede, Virginia Tech; Maura J. Borrego, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
to answer (43)In addition, information about the students’ major, year in program, graduate degree(s) beingconsidered, and participation in undergraduate research was also collected. These will beoutlined and discussed further as part of the study results.B. Data CollectionData were collected via an online survey administered through a commercial web interface.Faculty or administrators from each of the participating institutions sent survey invitationsthrough undergraduate student listservs with a link to the survey. This link directed participantsto another website with the questionnaire. To ensure student responses remained protected,survey information could only be viewed by the research team.. As an incentive, students whocompleted
Conference Session
Project-Based Education in Energy Curriculum
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Radian G. Belu, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
, Wind and Solar Power Systems, CRC Press, 1999.12. T. Currin, The Capstone Design Course and Its failure to serve as an effective outcome assessment tool,Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.13. R. Pecen, and M. Timmerman, A Hands-on Renewable Energy Based Laboratory for Power Quality Education”Session 1333, Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.14. K.C. Davis, Enhancing Communication Skills in Senior Design Capstone Projects, Proceedings of the 2002ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition15. R. M. Ford, and C. S. Coulston, Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers, McGraw Hill, 2008.16. E. O’Neill-Carrillo, E. Marrero, and A. Irrizarry-Rivera, Integrated Experiences in Power Engineering courses
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
C.J. Egelhoff, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Susan Donner Bibeau, U.S. Coast Guard; K.L. Burns, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Corinna Marie Fleischmann P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Youngman, J.A, and C.J. Egelhoff, “Best Practices in Recruiting and Persistence of Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering: A 2002 Snapshot,” Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, 5-8 November, 2003.17 Goodman, Irene F. et al, 2002, "Final Report of the Women's Experiences in College Engineering (WECE) Project," Goodman Research Group, Inc., Cambridge, MA19 May, Gary S. and Daryl E. Chubin, “A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for Underrepresented Minority Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.83, No.1, 2003.18 Jacquez, Ricardo B.; Garland, Jeanne; King, J. Phillip; Auzenne, Michele; Peralta, Steven; Rubio, Hilario “The Minority Engineering Transfer and Articulation (META) program: Building stronger
Conference Session
Special Session: Discovering implications of the Academic Pathways Study for YOUR Campus
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington; Sheri Sheppard, P.E., Stanford University; Samantha Brunhaver, Stanford University; Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Deborah Kilgore, University of Washington; Micah Lande, Stanford University; Gary Lichtenstein, Quality Evaluation Designs; Dennis Lund, University of Washington; Karl A. Smith, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Page 22.1316.14 different audiences when talking about their work or a problem? Are they able to listen to others and effectively incorporate input? Can they communicate their ideas to multiple audiences in the many modes they need to?References 1. Atman, Cynthia J., Deborah Kilgore, and Ann F. McKenna. 2008. Characterizing Design Learning Through the Use of Language: A Mixed-methods Study of Engineering Designers. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 97(3): 309-326. 2. Atman, Cynthia J., Sheri D. Sheppard, Jennifer Turns, Robin S. Adams, Lorraine N. Fleming, Reed Stevens, Ruth A. Streveler, Karl A. Smith, Ronald L. Miller, Larry J. Leifer, Ken Yasuhara, and Dennis Lund. 2010. Enabling
Conference Session
Topics Related to Telecommunications
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James O. Everly, University of Cincinnati; Xuefu Zhou, University of Cincinnati
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
Relay League, 2003 [17] Rumley, S. (1995). “A Precision Two-tone RF Generator for IMD Measurements”, QEX, April/May, pp. 6-12 [18] Rumley, S, op. cit., p.8 [19] Tenma, RF Signal Generator 72-585, Retrieved January 18, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://www.newark.com/tenma/72-585/rf-signal-generator-frequency-450mhz/dp/66F3578 [20] Portland State University, Engineering Notebooks, Retrieved January 18, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~warren/Capstone/index.cgi?PAGE=engineering_notebook [21] Blackboard, A Global Learning System, Retrieved January 18, 2011, from the World Wide Web: http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Blackboard+Learning+System [22] MSProject, Project Management Software, Retrieved
Conference Session
Computer Science and Information Technology in K-12 Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tony Docal, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State University; Adrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Keisha B. Walters, Mississippi State University; Priscilla J. Hill, Mississippi State University; Carlen Henington, Mississippi State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees
IntensificationProcess intensification was identified by the NSF as early as 1993 as a specific area in whichresearch endeavors should be concentrated to meet the needs of the chemical industry;1 almostone hundred archival articles were published on process intensification topics in 2008.2 Thenumber of such articles identified using the term "process intensification' in SciFinder Scholar in2009 and 2010 are 103 and 95, respectively.Benefits of process intensification activities include:3,4 1) novel or enhanced products; 2)improved chemistry; 3) enhanced safety; 4) improved processing; 5) energy and environmentalbenefits; 6) capital cost reduction; and 7) low inventories. Key to the endeavor is an ability toidentify the limitation(s) in a process, and knowledge
Conference Session
Professional Identity
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Caitlin Hawkinson, Seattle Pacific University; Jennifer J. VanAntwerp, Calvin College; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Crystal Bruxvoort, Calvin College
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Engineers National Survey about Engineering: Are Women More or Less Likely Than Men to Be Retained in Engineering after College?” SWE Magazine 53(4): 22-25.2. Hewlett, S., Luce, C., Servon,L., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., Sumberg, K. (2008), The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review.3. Foust-Cummings, H., Sabattini, L., Carter, N., 2008, Women in Technology: Maximizing Talent, Minimizing Barriers, New York: Catalyst. Retrieved January 11, 2011 from www.catalyst.org.4. Anita Borg Institute (2009), “Recruitment, Retention and Advancement of Technical Women”, 2009 Technical Executive Forum. Retrieved January 11, 2011 from http
Conference Session
Thinking Outside the Box! Innovative Curriculum Exchange for K12 Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Micah Stickel, University of Toronto; Bruno Korst, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marilyn Barger, Hillsborough Community College; Richard Gilbert, University of South Florida; Marie A. Boyette, FLATE
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees
to trisect the entirecamp experience into pre-camp, camp and post-camp components.Pre-campAlthough making money is not the goal of most robotics camps, organizers must still collectmoney and must distribute those funds to meet the needs of the camp. This reality leads to thefirst decision. Is your summer robotic program(s) going to be operated by a not-for-profit entity,or is it being conducted to earn revenue? Revenue generating types of camps, a for-profitorganization, will include different planning, budgeting, and taxation concerns not discussed hereand our recommendation is to organize your camp within a not-for-profit structure. Either way,there are two general avenues for funds that camp organizers can pursue to assist in financing
Conference Session
Biological & Agricultural Technical Session II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Frankie Santos Laanan, Iowa State University; Balaji Narasimhan, Iowa State University; Monica H. Lamm, Iowa State University; Carlos Lopez, Iowa State University ; Dimitra Lynette Jackson, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Biological & Agricultural
measure these responses. Future studies should examine therecruitment policies of engineering students, in order to increase female and minorityrepresentation in the program. Also future studies can discuss if there are any differencesbetween the experiences of the international student versus domestic students in the engineeringfield. Additionally, analysis by gender can also be done to better understand specific experiencesof students in engineering majors. Page 22.288.13 References1 Zidney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K.W. (2002). Faculty perspective regarding theundergraduate
Conference Session
High School Engineering Programs, Curriculum, and Evaluation
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kelly B Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University; Galen E. Turner III, Louisiana Tech University; James D. Nelson, Louisiana Tech University; Jane A. Petrus, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
electronic communication, weshow clips from Frontline‟s documentary Digital Nation.13 This video explores the concept ofmultitasking and other issues associated with our digital-heavy culture. This discussion is used asa starting point to have the students think about the concept of focusing on a topic. At this point, we have spent approximately an hour-and-a-half on material leading up to the catapult. Instead of delving straight into calculations, we have the students build a catapult from plans and parts that we provide. The catapult is largely constructed from foam core; therefore, we spend 5 to 10 minutes discussing techniques for working with the
Conference Session
New Trends in ECE Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Juan F. Arratia, Interamerican University of Puerto Rico; Martina Y. Trucco, Hewlett-Packard Labs; Luis F. Font, Ana G. Mendez University System
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
Avila, Polytechnic University, David Irwin, University of Massachusetts Amherst, “Pervasive Outlet-level Energy Data Monitoring and Archiving”, AGMUS Research Symposium, September 2010, San Juan, Puerto Rico, SACNAS Conference, Anaheim, CA, 20104) Francisco Palou, Polytechnic University, David S. Touretzky, Carnegie Mellon University, “Tekkotsu Support For The Calliope Robot”, AGMUS Research Symposium, September 2010, San Juan, Puerto Rico, SACNAS Conference, Anaheim, CA, 20105) Katherine Calderon, University of Puerto Rico, Humacau Campus, Devashis Dejumdar, Jackson State University, “Probing the Cation-π Interaction of Metals (Ca++, Mg++) and Ammonium (NH4+) Ions with Benzene and two Model Amino Acids”, AGMUS Research Symposium
Conference Session
WIED Olio
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University; Lori L. Bakken, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
://www.advance.latech.edu) and our OWISE Graduate Student Seminars focus on re-packaging these resources for a graduate student audience(http://www.latech.edu/coes/owise_seminar).In addition to the materials developed for this project, there are other excellent resources. Theseinclude the ADVANCE Portal (www.portal.advance.vt.edu), which contains materials developedby and posted on ADVANCE project websites across the country, and the WEPAN KnowledgeCenter (http://www.wepanknowledgecenter.org), another excellent source of material, researchreports, initiatives and organizations pertinent to women in STEM. The National Academy ofEngineering’s Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CASEE), in conjunctionwith the Society of Women Engineers (SWE)’s
Conference Session
Innovative Curriculum In Engineering Technology
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Derek M. Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
job pyramid that started with manufacturing jobs in the 80’s and 90’s. CAD/CAM graduates will increasingly have to compete with skilled and lower paid workers from countries like China, India and the developing world.• An Expansive Curriculum: A stand-alone program will need to have opportunities to expand the curriculum to allow specialization. The current curriculum through the proposed technical electives already to some extent captures alternatives. However, there is room for additional courses that would both compliment and supplement the current experience. These would be in the following areas: o Product Lifecycle Management (PLM): Exposure to the setup and use of a Product Data Management system would be
Conference Session
Assessing Student Learning
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James E. Bluman, U.S. Military Academy; Kathryn Purchase, U.S. Military Academy; Christopher Thomas Duling, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
. Liebler, R. J. “The five-minute quiz.” Journal of Accounting Education 2003, 261-265.2. Mahwhinney, V.; Bostow, D.; Laws, D.; Blumenfeld, G.; Hopkins, B. “A Comparison of Students Studying-Behavior Produced by Daily, Weekly, and Three-Week Testing Schedules,” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,1971, 257-264.3. Carney, A.; Fry, S. W.; Gabriele, R. V.; Ballard, M. “Reeling in the Big Fish: Changing Pedagogy to Encouragethe Completion of Reading Assignments.” College Teaching, 2008, 56 (4), 195-200.4. Sappington, J.; Kinsey, K.; Munsayac, K. “Two Studies of Reading Compliance Among College Students.”Teaching of Psychology, 2002, 29 (4), 272-274.5. Kugel, P. “Improving Learning Without Improving Teaching,” Computer Science Education 1989, 145-152.6
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Potpourri II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen R. Hoffmann, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University; Ranjani L. Rao, Purdue University; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
meaningswith engineering, and how educational experiences may need to be designed and assessed toaddress the complete (and varying) meaning(s) of the concept.In this paper, we present portions of a larger research project motivated in part by the researchquestion: What is the set of concepts, ideas, approaches, tools, methods, and philosophies that could be included as the “necessary knowledge of sustainability” for all engineering students?Our approaches to answering the research question include three parts: (1) an in-depth collectionand analysis of published descriptions of sustainable engineering in practice, in research, and ineducational innovation; (2) a set of interviews conducted with undergraduate students at
Conference Session
Teaching Strategies for Solid Modeling
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Seokyoung Ahn, University of Texas - Pan American; Robert A. Freeman, University of Texas, Pan American; Stephen W. Crown, University of Texas, Pan American; Gregory Allen Potter, The University of Texas - Pan American
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Design Graphics
, S., and Freeman, R., 2007, “Challenge- Based Instruction: The VaNTH Biomechanics Learning Modules,” Advances in Engineering Education, pp. 1-30. 2. McKenna, A., Walsh, J., Parsek, M., and Birol, G. , 2002, “Assessing Challenge-Based Instruction in Biomedical Engineering,” Proceeding of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 12783-12795. 3. LaPorte, James, 1995, "Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking." Journal of Technology Education, pp. 1-7. 4. Freeman, R., & Vasquez, H., & Fuentes, A., 2010, “Development and Implementation of Challenge-based Instruction in Statics and Dynamics,”, AC 2010-2141, Proceeding of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference 5. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K
Conference Session
DEED Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Bryce Holloway, U.S. Air Force Academy; Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kristin L. Wood, University of Texas, Austin; Al Mundy, U.S. Air Force Academy; Bradley Adam Camburn, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
defined as the ability to easily be moved or carried1. A key component of manymilitary systems is their ability to be quickly assembled/disassembled, moved to differentlocations, and to use minimum manpower and equipment in order to accomplish the mission.One problem in redesigning systems to increase portability is that there is not currently anestablished rubric for measuring portability. The portability of a system is a function of severaldifferent aspects. We have developed a rubric to measure a system’s portability. The rubricincludes 18 parameters (Table 1) as discussed in detail below.In order to use the rubric, each of the 18 portability measures identified above is quantified forthe system(s) being evaluated. This information can then be
Conference Session
Biological & Agricultural Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
lourdes gazca, American University, Puebla, Mexico; Aurelio Lopez-Malo, American University, Puebla, Mexico; Enrique Palou, American University, Puebla, Mexico
Tagged Divisions
Biological & Agricultural
el g /1 in od Community centeredness el s /2 M pt od ce
Collection
2011 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Radian Belu
emphasis on alternate energy sources and their technology and the mostcommon applications. This course covers the principles of energy conversion in the three distinctareas of wind, solar/PV, and fuel cell power generation, system planning and design6-10,19. It alsocovers the modeling, analysis of major components of an AEDG system shown in Figure1. Thetopics covered also include the need and the benefits of AEDG, energy storage devices, controland power electronic interfacing. The benefit of such broad coverage is to give the students abroad view of the various components of AEDG.Each student picks one area to explore furtherby studying and presenting one or two research paper(s) to the class as well as doing a projectdeveloping a written report
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching: Statics
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sheryl A. Sorby, Michigan Technological University; Carl R. Vilmann P.E., Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
. Table 2. Mean Scores from Common Test Items Online Course Recitation Course Significance of Difference in MeansTest #1 23.82 27.43 p<0.05(Std Deviation) (9.63) (8.19)Test #1 Adjusted 24.96 27.43 N. S.(Std Deviation) (9.74) (8.19)Test #2 24.14 17.10 p<0.001(Std Deviation) (8.81) (10.06)Test #3 9.93 24.29 p<0.0001(Std Deviation) (8.33