and science. The program must aim to foster students’ interest in coresubjects, engagement in learning activities, and improved self-efficacy, which is central to thedevelopment of students’ academic motivation [10].Studies have shown that rural students are less likely to attend colleges, have greater gapsbetween high school graduation and entering college, and are less likely to be continuouslyenrolled in college [11]. In addition, many rural students don’t see the connection between theirhigh school education and careers. Math and science focused programs can help rural studentsaim high while providing real-world, experiential learning opportunities. These experiences canmotivate students to engage in more rigorous coursework, envision
include: o Exceptionally high stress levels associated with successful transition into the college/university, as well as, pressures related to academic performance, o Feelings of isolation and/or a lack of “belonging” within the college/campus setting (ESP. First Generation students). This may pose negative effects on student confidence and perception of self-efficacy, o Assistance avoidance behaviors related to asking for help both inside and outside of the classroom. Utilizing campus support services if efforts to avoid association with negative stereotypes historically attribute to their cultural, ethnic, or gender group (11). o Perceptions of isolation which result in USP students becoming less involved in
program provided both knowledge about research, andincreased the student’s self-efficacy related to graduate school. The majority of students alsoindicated a high-level of confidence in doing standard and new technical tasks related to theproject. The team-framework was viewed by students as beneficial to both their learning and theresearch progression. The mixture of different (vertical) researcher levels was perceived to havea positive impact on the research performance, as well as the multi-disciplinarity of the team. Foritem-(iii), all participants rated the aspects of the program administration at ~5.5 out of 6 (Likertscale: 6 = very satisfied). Overall, the participants responded positively on the programadministration, housing (improvement
been caused by the participants’ unfamiliarity with the 3D printing software/hardware,inadequate supplementary instruction material, and/or the complexity of the device (anintermediate level project). The purpose of the second face-to-face session was to prepare theparticipants adequately for their independent project, and in retrospect, more hands-onexperience with the hardware/software is necessary for participant success. Future individualengineering projects should start with a simpler model that could be upgraded to a moreadvanced design for participants that are more skilled. The authors believe this shift inphilosophy would boost participant success and self-efficacy, as they would be more likely toconstruct their initial device
expand a student’s personal and professional networks,and provide validation and critical feedback on their academic progress. For these reasons,faculty and student interactions are critical to the undergraduate student experience. Additionalstudies done by Crisp and Cruz have found that mentoring can help with student persistence incollege and overall adjustment [14].Impact on Underrepresented StudentsSeveral studies indicate the critical role mentoring and social support networks play specificallyin the educational progress of students from racial and ethnic groups who have been traditionallyunderrepresented in the STEM fields [15], [16]. Studies have demonstrated that mentoring canlead to higher grade point averages, increased self-efficacy
do, and some of the supportive benefits offered by theUniversity. Mentor training will be guided by a series of evidence-based and student-centeredframework[34]:1. Mentor Selection: The near-peer mentors will complete an application process including apersonal statement expressing commitment to provide the students the necessary academic andmotivational support]. The selection process will include interviews using set criteria (e.g.,maturity level, enthusiasm toward the mentoring role, communication skills). The mentors willfunction as student ambassadors, will assist with recruitment, and participate in professionaldevelopment addressing ethics, professional obligations, and socio-psychological issues (e.g.,motivation, persistence, self
Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emergingchallenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal ofInformation Management, 57, 101994.[3] Prada, E.D., Mareque, M. and Pino-Juste, M., 2022. Teamwork skills in higher education: isuniversity training contributing to their mastery?. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 35.[4] Rockinson-Szapkiw, A.J., Sharpe, K. and Wendt, J., 2022. Promoting Self-Efficacy,Mentoring Competencies, and Persistence in STEM: A Case Study Evaluating Racial and EthnicMinority Women's Learning Experiences in a Virtual STEM Peer Mentor Training. Journal ofScience Education and Technology, 31(3), pp.386-402.[5] Diggs-Andrews, K.A., Mayer, D.G. and Riggs, B., 2021, June
students had about the application of activelearning strategies in science courses for undergraduates. More than 250 students' writtenresponses provided a comprehensive understanding of the reasons behind their perceptions ofthese strategies' benefits or drawbacks for their learning process. According to the study, third-year students and female students saw in-class active learning strategies as crucial to enhancingtheir comprehension and interactions with peers and professors, while fourth and fifth-yearstudents were more likely to consider these strategies as a waste of lecture time. Self-efficacy,experience, and motivation are key constructs that active learning strategies are recognized toimprove among students [10]. Social and intellectual
positively impacted by hosting such events due to increased opportunities formentoring and networking, entrepreneurial achievement, and acting as community role models[3]. Organizers provide opportunities for students to gain real-world advice and increaseentrepreneurial self-efficacy by inviting entrepreneurs to their programs [3].In general, there is also a significant difference between running competitions and organizinginnovation contests within the public and private innovation sectors. The public sector addressessocietal challenges within government functions, while private sector innovation creates productsand ideas within private organizations [9]. In the public sector, various contests are integrated,ranging from hackathons and pitch
. K., & Riccio, A.Promoting science, technology, and engineering self-efficacy and knowledgefor all with an autism inclusion maker program. Frontiers in Education, 5.2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00075.[Accessed January 23, 2021].[7] Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use forparticipatory needs assessment. Health education & behavior: the officialpublication of the Society for Public Health Education, 24(3), 369–387. 1997.[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309. [AccessedMarch 18, 2021].[8] Kornblau, B.L. & Robertson, S.M. Special Issue on Occupational TherapyWith Neurodivergent People. American Journal of Occupational Therapy.75(3
Attrition Reason Women Leave Engineering [15, p. 7] Input Output 1. Lack of self-confidence and engineering self-efficacy Black Box[10] 2. Lack of pre-college experience and knowledge in engineering 3. Curricular focus, pedagogy, and climate in engineering 4. Lack of female peers and role models 5. Gender and societal issues Dropout
study the effectiveness of online lab experiences with the goal of improvingstudent success and self-efficacy. Online lab sessions must offer active learning experiences,which may include ample opportunities for students to interact with their peers and instructors,and tackle real problems by experiencing trials and errors. This research on the online labs cangreatly contribute to enhancing EE engineering student learning. Further, it will address thecritical component of EE engineering - experiential learning - with a lot of hands-on lab learningexperiences that can lead to a deeper understanding of engineering concepts. Well-designedonline labs can help students maintain enthusiasm for engineering fresh and can also increase theretention rate
36 We hope to add more data about the demographics and admissions attributes of the students who opt to take the preLUsion LWE…. Different SAT? Is it advisable to do a pre-program assessment about their engineering identity, self efficacy? Or is this time before the semester of their first year begins not the time to ask? Would it undermine their success? What else can be done? A gauge for the success of the program might be inherently in the fact that women keep signing up for this preLUsion. ○ Is this simply a self-selecting group of excellent students? We don’t know. ○ Want to normalize our data, to determine if preLUsion women doing better than the
,” Science Education, vol. 101, no.3, pp. 486–505, 2017. [4] K.B. Wendell, C.G. Wright, and P. Paugh, “Urban elementary school students’ reflective decision-making during formal engineering learning experiences”. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA. [5] J. Gale, M. Alemdar, J. Lingle, S.H. Newton, R. Moore, and J. Rosen, “Developing engineering proficiency and self-efficacy through a middle school engineering course”. Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. [6] M. Honey, G. Pearson, and H. Schweingruber, (Eds.), STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects
andposttests of students’ basic knowledge, understanding of concepts and the ability to apply them.Also, students’ self-efficacy, satisfaction with the curriculum, attitudes towards team work,instructors teaching practices, and the impact of the “hybrid” curriculum( project/problem-based) on the instructional environment. The results of the Louvain assessment are extremelysupportive of the “hybrid” (project/problem-based) curriculum. Students in the “hybrid”curriculum expressed their satisfaction with the new curriculum, because: they received a lot ofsupport from the instructors, saw more connections between theory and practice became morewilling to use autonomous learning strategies, and were less reliant on rote memorization relativeto students in
.Kuhn, D. (2010). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.) Handbook of ChildhoodCognitive Development, Chapter 19, p. 497-523. 2nd Ed. Wiley-Blackwell.Lawson, A. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research inScience Teaching, 15(1), 11–24. doi:10.1002/tea.3660150103.Lawson, A. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: a synthetic view. International Journal ofScience and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 307–338. doi:10.1007/s10763-004-3224-2.Lawson, A. E., Banks, D. L., & Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy , reasoning ability , and achievement in collegebiology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 706–724.Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock
21 100%Of the 21 students, 10 were granted full scholarship to attend, one received a half-scholarship,and the remaining 10 paid the full amount. In addition, the gender composition is shown below: Gender N % Male 15 71.4% Female 6 28.6% Total 21 100%The overall program demographics indicate a lower percentage of under-represented minoritygroups in STEM (28%) while the female population composed 36% of the population.Of the 21 students enrolled in this section, 19 were given parental permission to take the exit(self-efficacy) survey
paper.Conclusions and discussionIn this paper we reported on three studies that focused on examples of adding ClassTranscribeinto multiple engineering classes with multiple goals of improving digital accessibility,self-efficacy in the course (i.e., self confidence and self-beliefs in succeeding in their major) andeffectiveness (at all levels of student ability). Learning outcomes and examples of adoption werepresented under a diverse set of educational uses including use as a primary source of lecturecontent (CS, Spring 2019), secondary or supplemental review of recorded live lectures (ECE,CS,Fall 2019,Spring 2020) and pre-lab training for lab techniques and equipment use(Bioengineering, Spring 2020). Per-student learning data was used with gradebook data
thescholarship. In addition, many of the activities develop to enhance the learning experience of thescholars has been opened up to all ET students to participate. Such exposure and experienceimproved the self-efficacy of the selected scholars and their friends enrolled in the program. Theretention and timely graduation rate of these selected scholars are phenomenal. Their leadershipquality also influenced the mindsets of their friends, many of them are from non-traditional students’population, just like them. In summary, we feel our SETS project achieved its goal and positivelyenhanced scholars’ learning experience on campus and transformed our targeted programs. In thispaper, the project team shares the hurdles they have to handle when external
2023,shortly after they completed their respective interventions.SurveysTo understand the interventions’ impact on sense of belonging and engineering identity, programparticipants responded to a retrospective pre- and post-questionnaire that combined two validatedsurvey instruments: Godwin’s [9] engineering identity scale and Hanauer et al.’s [11] measure ofpersistence in the sciences (PITS). The PITS combines five other validated instruments thatmeasure project ownership-emotion, project ownership-content, science identity, self-efficacy,scientific community values, and networking on a five-factor scale. These variables have beenshown to predict psychological factors that influence students’ intent to stay in science andengineering
Paper ID #43282Students’ Use of The Engineering Design Process to Learn Science (Fundamental)Mr. Diallo Wallace, Purdue University Diallo Wallace is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University focusing on the benefits of integration of physics first and engineering curriculums for student self-efficacy in engineering. Diallo holds a Bachelor of Science in Electronics Engineering and a Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics from the University of Illinois. At the graduate level, he has attained a Master of Science in Astronautical Engineering from the Naval Postgraduate School and a Master of Project
modified from severalvalidated instruments related to the 21st Century Skills listed above 33, 34. In addition to 21stCentury Skills, student engagement and self- efficacy were also measured. This instrument,developed by researchers at Georgia Tech for this project, included forty-five items on a 5-pointLikert-type rating scale (e.g., ranging from “Strongly Agree” to Strongly Disagree”), with aCronbach’s α of 0.91, and internal consistency for each of the five scales ranging from 0.84 to0.95. Engineering design portfolio assessment. In addition to affective data, studentachievement data were collected using an engineering design portfolio assessment (EDPA). Foreach project, students used a digital log to document their progress through the
IraqiUniversity. Each faculty member had excellent content knowledge of their respective disciplines.After a series of meetings with members of the school administration, we sent out a needsassessment survey via personalized links to the 161 faculty members in the college of engineering.The survey consisted of 11 sections including background and qualifications, current work,individualized approach to teaching, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) self-efficacy and perceived usefulness, professional development history, school climate, and schoolculture. The primary goal of this analysis was to facilitate conversation and inform stakeholdersof the areas of interest to concentrate the efforts of the proposed faculty development workshop.The
) influencing students’ decision to drop out of STEM majors. Students withweaker academic backgrounds were at higher risk of leaving STEM majors. This directlypoints to a student’s schooling, and skills and abilities prior to joining the institution.Intentions, goals, and commitments were identified as attitudinal factors (motivation,confidence, and self -efficacy to STEM) in the report. Formal academic experiences such aslow academic performance and rigor involved with introductory STEM courses lead studentsto drop out while informal academic experiences such inadequate advising, negativeexperiences with faculty were cited as reasons for the same. The report did not highlight anyexperiences in the social system as defined by the framework.Figure 4
education, choosing and engineering, and determining their career goals.According to Eccles and Wigfield’s categories, it is a theory focused on the reasons forengagement[9]. SDT asserts that actions are motivated by the desire to fulfill three basic humanneeds: competence, autonomy, and relatedness [10]. Competence is the knowledge and skills onemust possess to succeed and feel effective in dealing with the environment. Perceivedcompetence is often compared to self-efficacy, which is a person’s beliefs about their capabilitiesto produce designated levels of performance that exercise influence over events that affect theirlives [11]. Competence is built through providing optimal challenges, promoting task feedback,and freedom from demanding
requirement for graduation.Other studies provide insights into the usefulness of HIP for underrepresented students. Servicelearning is reported to contribute to substantial improvements in underrepresented studentoutcomes. Song, Furco, Lopez and Maruyama [9], for example, analyzed the effects of servicelearning on underrepresented students enrolled at a Midwestern university. Their findingssuggested positive relationships between STEM undergraduate participation in service learningand several academic outcomes, including cumulative grade point average and continuedenrollment. Service learning has also been shown to effect student self-efficacy and self-concept[10]. Because service learning has been shown to produce several benefits, it is
, and others. 81% of the population was male and 19% was female. Noattempt to oversample women or minorities was made in collecting this sample. 8.2% of thesample were freshman or sophomores, 59% were juniors, and 33% were seniors (including fifthyear seniors).C. InstrumentsThe questions analyzed in this study were included in a survey that included basic demographicsand affective indicators including self-efficacy, task value, belonging, and job values that maymediate or otherwise influence the way in which the primary indicators grow and evolve over theundergraduate years. The primary indicators included various measures of sustainability values(e.g. social responsibility, consumer responsibility), and five short answer questions related
lonely position, disconnected from her femalenon-engineering friends and a close female parent. Does being a “smart engineer” mean all of these non-engineers that she cares about are not smart? Perhaps in direct contradiction to what one would expectabout positive self-efficacy and identity in engineering, she stands in solidarity with her female non-engineering network as a support mechanism. And yet, Rebecca also enjoys a sense of solidarity withmale engineering peers. Here, once again, the label of “smart engineer” would be a dangerous identity toembrace, if smartness and high grades could come at the expense of social connections to these malepeers who underperformed Rebecca. One could argue that Rebecca’s actual self-efficacy and
classroom or workplace is not measured by a deepattention to issues of race, ethnicity, gender, etc. Conceivably, many Clark School alumnirepresented in the study were trained in more of a traditional engineering pedagogical tradition,and therefore did not explicitly need to grapple with issues of race in order to persist in theircourses. Foregrounded by these prior studies and the implications described here, it may not beespecially surprising that some study participants did not respond strongly to the idea that therewas any type of negative treatment based upon their race or gender identity. At the same time,the lack of attention to identity based on race may have allowed these alumni to see faculty in amore positive manner.Notwithstanding
,encouraging teacher-student dialogue, improving student motivation and self-esteem, bridgingthe gap between current and expected performance, and ultimately improving teaching.32Narciss33 identifies two components of feedback – the evaluative part, which assesses the qualityof the answer, and the informational part, which provides direction for progress. Shute1 reviewsa similar model, according to which feedback contains both verification and elaborationcomponents. A more informative feedback is found to be related to better performance, and insome cases, better motivation33. Whether or not more information in the feedback improvesstudent motivation depends on the student’s confidence in their own abilities (or self-efficacy)34.Different frameworks