Dean of Professional Programs and Academic Computing. She currently acts as co-PI for the CREATE NSF ATE Renewable Energy Support Center and as PI of a NSF ATE targeted research project. Dr. Alfano served as a Program Director at the National Science Foundation and co-lead of the ATE program in 2007-2008. Dr Alfano also was the only community college representative on the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Workforce Trends in the U.S. Energy and Mining Industries which released their report in March 2013. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 NSF ATE CREATE Targeted Research Study A Case Study of Community College Transfer and Success in a 2+2 Program
State University–Bozeman Emma Annand is striving for a B.S. in Industrial and Management System Engineering at Montana State University – Bozeman. Emma is a research assistant for MSU’s NSF supported engineering leadership identity development project. She is also the fundraising team lead for MSU’s chapter of Engineers With- out Borders (EWB@MSU). Over the summer of 2018, Emma traveled with EWB@MSU to Khwisero, Kenya to implement a borehole well at a primary school there. During the summer of 2019, Emma will once again travel to Khwisero – this time to assess for a structure at a secondary school.Monika Kwapisz, Montana State University Monika Kwapisz (they/them) is an undergraduate at Montana State University
flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Instructor Use of Movable Furniture and Technology in Flexible Classroom SpacesAbstractFlexible classroom spaces, which have movable tables and chairs that can be easily rearrangedinto different layouts, make it easier for instructors to effectively implement active learning thana traditional lecture hall. Instructors can move throughout the room to interact with
students’ development as learners.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty
identification (BID) systems identifya person among a set of people whereas biometric verification (BV) systems accept orreject a person’s claimed identity. Five biometric systems are considered in this project,namely, face, speech, iris, signature and fingerprint. Although fingerprint recognitionforms the largest share of today’s market [15], there are practical tradeoffs with othersystems as given in Table 1 [15]. This exemplifies the need for further research andeducational activities pertaining to a variety of biometric systems. Face-based andspeech-based recognition systems are particularly promising as their accuracy isimproved. Ease of User Ease of System Accuracy Use
Education, 2015DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A BIOMETRIC IRIS VERIFICATION SYSTEMABSTRACTThis paper describes an iris verification project focused on design and performanceevaluation under both matched and mismatched training and testing conditions. Trainingis always performed on clean iris images. Testing is performed on both clean and noisyiris images. This project is part of a senior undergraduate course on biometric systems. Inimplementing an iris recognition system, students go through each step, namely,preprocessing, feature extraction, classification (training and use in rendering a decision)and performance evaluation. The Chinese Academy of Sciences - Institute of Automation(CASIA) eye image database known as the CASIA
students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related
networks, among other areas. He also focuses on enhancing recruitment and retention of underrepresented minorities in the STEM areas in general, engineering in particular.Dr. Deborah Walter, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Deborah Walter is an associate professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches courses in circuits, electromagnetics, and medical imaging. Before joining academia in 2006, she was at the Computed Tomography Laboratory at GE’s Global Research Center for eight years. She worked on several technology development projects in the area of X-ray CT for medical and industrial imaging. She is a named inventor on nine patents. She has been active in
Paper ID #8011Engaging Community College Students in University ResearchDr. Maria Teresa Napoli, UC Santa Barbara Dr. Maria Teresa Napoli received a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara, in 2004. In 1999, she also earned a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Padova in Italy. Currently, she holds positions as project scientist in the Mechanical Engineering Department, and as Community College education coordinator at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Prior to this appointment, she worked for several years as a microsensors system
. Our experiences indicate that early face-to-faceinteractions are essential to user satisfaction and patience with technological glitches, tocommunity building, and ultimately in establishing strong mentoring relationships. All of thesehave the potential to lead to a productive discussion-based seminar and to the long-term successof collaborative student project teams, although challenges need to be addressed as they arise.IntroductionFacilitating professional development and mentoring for STEM students can be a challenge forprograms but is important for students’ ultimate success and satisfaction with their careers. Inconjunction with a National Science Foundation-sponsored scholarship program, we havedeveloped an interdisciplinary peer
and supporting learning environments in academic settings, including 35 computing labs and 2 academic buildings. She is currently co-PI on two active NSF projects, including a Cyberlearning project to de- velop collaborative design environments for engineers, and an Ethics in Science and Engineering project to develop online course modules to develop moral reasoning abilities in engineers. Her research has also been funded by the Department of Homeland Security, by corporate foundations, and by the Purdue Research Foundation and College of Engineering. She is a member of the Purdue Advisory Council for instructional computing, and has been awarded a Service Learning award, a Diversity Fellow award, and the
, 2024 NSF RED: Transformative Change through the Capability ApproachAbstractOne of the future challenges facing academic disciplines—traditional STEM as well as the socialsciences and humanities—is how to prepare students to address complex socio-technicalproblems that require a range of disciplinary perspectives to address. The National ScienceFoundation RED project at Bucknell University is focused on enabling students to gain a moreintersectional engineering education by expanding individual pathways for students through anelectrical and computer engineering degree program. Towards this end the departmentundertook significant curricular reform prior from 2014 to 2017 to seeking support from theRED program in 2019.While there has been
NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation” and Innovations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) ”Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity of the Professional Workforce”. As a graduate researcher, she is conducting qualitative research related to the experiences of neurodiverse graduate students in STEM fields. Previously, she spent eight years as a K-12 teacher in Connecticut, where she maintained a focus on providing a varied learning environment and differentiated instruction for all types of learners. She is currently pursuing a doctoral
consistent with the bifurcation suggested in theGrinter Report. The rationale for this recommendation includes a ‘flattening of the engineeringhierarchy’ and the development of a ‘legitimized and equal pathway to engineering careers formany African Americans’ [8].Rebranding ET as applied engineering in an attempt to ‘elevate’ its position in the engineeringhierarchy does not address the systemic issues and racial inequities that contribute to the racialstratification of the engineering profession. In this project, we aim to not only understand thereasons Black students choose ET in college and the potential ramifications of this choice onthe attainment of their career goals, but also to contribute to the dismantling of the racialinequities that
–such as increased likelihood of graduate school attendance – may not be appropriate measures ofa successful experience. To develop the definitions, we have surveyed and interviewed studentswho have been engaged in undergraduate research experiences in engineering, faculty memberswho have supervised undergraduate students working on research projects, and industrialrepresentatives who have employed recent engineering graduates. In this paper, we present theperspectives of these groups. With the perspectives of the three groups as input, the definitionsof a successful undergraduate research experience for non-elite engineering students have beendeveloped and are presented.In addition to these definitions of a successful undergraduate research
Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
funding and publishing for various research projects. She’s also the founder and advisor of the first ASEE student chapter in Puerto Rico at UPRM. Her research interests include investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in engineering sciences, especially for underrepresented populations (Hispanic students). She has studied the effective- ness engineering concept inventories (Statics Concept Inventory - CATS and the Thermal and Transport Concept Inventory - TTCI) for diagnostic assessment and cultural differences among bilingual students. She has also contributed to the training and development of faculty in developing and evaluating various engineering curriculum and courses at UPRM, applying the
Paper ID #6352Three Training Programs for Preparing Undergraduates to Conduct ResearchDr. Susan L. Burkett, University of Alabama Dr. Susan L. Burkett earned the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Univer- sity of Missouri in Columbia, Missouri in 1985, 1987, and 1992, respectively. She joined the University of Alabama in 2008 as the Alabama Power Foundation Endowed Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering. From 2005 to 2007, she served as program director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education. She has funded research projects with the National
Paper ID #36968Board 402: The Importance of Career Competencies for Engineering Stu-dentsDr. Karen L. Webber, University of Georgia Karen Webber, is Professor Emeritus of Higher Education in the McBee Institute of Higher Education at The University of Georgia and the PI of the NSF-funded project related to this proposal. Professor Webber’s research includes a variety of issues related to postsecondary institution and student success including undergraduate research, gender studies, institutional research and data analytics in higher edu- cation.Amy Stich, University of Georgia Associate ProfessorMatthew Grandstaff
to commit as much time to their project,and scheduling of the rotations before the program began did not showcase exciting experimentsin the individual labs. The current program incorporates flexible group lab visits, where studentsor mentors invite the group based on ongoing lab activities. In addition, participants flourishedwith flexibility, and often spent more time in other labs given their level of interest on a specificproject.Modifications were also made to the application to encourage non-traditional students to apply.Students were given the option of uploading a Statement of Purpose in written format oruploading a short audio/video file describing their research interests and experience, their goalsbeyond earning a baccalaureate
Scholars Program. She has made extensive con- tributions to the methodology of forming the engineer of the future through her work in creating strategies to recruit, retain, and graduate engineering students. The network of transformational strategies she has developed addresses informing early, preparation for success, increasing diversity of the field, establishing strong identity as an engineer, and enhancing critical thinking and professional skills. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Move to Sustainability: Launching an Instructor InterfaceAbstractSketch Mechanix, an NSF-IUSE funded research project, launched a new feature with the Fall2022 semester: an instructor
Research Experiencefor Teachers (RET) site grant titled “RET Site: High School Teacher Experience in EngineeringDesign and Manufacturing.” The goal of the project is to host 12 high school teachers each summerto participate in engineering design and manufacturing research and then convert their experienceinto high school curriculum. Given the experience from the first year’s operation and assessment,it was noted that the extant teacher self-efficacy surveys need to be further improved according tothe specific needs of RET site. As such, an updated set of assessment tools was developed toevaluate the impact of RET site on high school teacher participants. In particular, a new teacherself-efficacy survey was created from synthesizing multiple
Agency (CEA) is a theoretical framework adapted from the earlier Critical ScienceAgency framework. CEA is used to understand students’ subject-related identities and agency beliefs,precursors to developing an interest in engineering [9]. Engineering agency beliefs define how studentsperceive their ability to positively impact the world through an engineering career. For women students,math and physics recognition as well as agency beliefs were positive predictors of choosing engineeringmajors [9]. The CEA framework has been used to understand how identities and agency beliefs ofwomen enrolled in engineering majors were strengthened by hands-on projects early in college througha Community of Practice for participants [10]. We asked if a similar
University Todd Haskell is a cognitive scientist interested in learning and the development of expertise, especially in STEM fields. He is currently Associate Professor of Psychology at Western Washington University. In previous projects Dr. Haskell has worked on understanding how chemistry novices and experts navi- gate between macroscopic, symbolic, and small particle representations, and how pre-service elementary teachers translate an understanding of energy concepts from physics to other disciplines.Mr. Liam G. O’Bannon, Whatcom Community College Liam O’Bannon is a undergraduate engineering student at Whatcom Community College, expecting to graduate in the Spring of 2021. He works in the school’s engineering lab
unfolding response to this mandate provided a unique, one-time opportunityto study instructors’ teaching experiences at an R1 University during the initial period of thiscrisis-induced (forced) change to instruction. Studying this forced change will provide insightinto instructors’ adaptability.The overall goal of this project was to identify cognitive and emotional themes concerninginstructors’ teaching-related activities and community engagement during a forced change.The purpose of this paper is to describe the data collection instruments used to captureinstructor adaptability during a crisis and demonstrate the nature of the findings that may begarnered from their use by examining a one-week slice of the data.BackgroundReform efforts in
rotations. The goal is for students to be able to acquire accurate quantitative measurements with resolutions of 0.05 mm using only an inexpensive 720p or 1080p webcam connected to their laptop. We also continue to develop Design, Build, Test (DBT) thin-wall beam projects that can be carried out using 3D printed beams with various open and closed thin-wall cross sections. For example, in the classroom students learn that a beam with an unsymmetrical cross section will not only deflect in the direction of the load but also in the lateral direction as well. In the related DBT project, they are challenged to design either an open- or closed-section thin-wall Figure 5. Experimental free response results. (a) time domain and (b
Paper ID #33221Preliminary Themes about Engineering Identity and Community Developedfrom Longitudinal InterviewsShaylin Williams, Mississippi State University Shaylin Williams is invested in figuring out ways to improve the engineering education experience for future generations of engineers. She completed her Bachelor’s in General Engineering with a Business Administration Emphasis at the University of Mississippi in May 2020. As an undergraduate McNair Scholar, Shaylin participated in several research projects. She worked on two projects in a chemical engineering lab related to creating thermal barriers for food
of funded research, with a credit share of more than $1,750,000. Dr. Abbas is an award recipient of $600,000 of the Federal Highway Administration Exploratory and Advanced Research (FHWA EAR). The objective of the FHWA EAR is to ”research and develop projects that could lead to transformational changes and truly revolutionary advances in highway engineering and intermodal surface transportation in the United States.” The award funded multidisciplinary research that utilizes traffic simulation and advanced artificial intelligence techniques. He has also conducted research for the National Cooperative Highway Research Program on developing ”Traffic Control Strategies for Oversaturated conditions” and for the
Paper ID #22564PEEPS S-STEM Partnering with Americorps CSU STEM VISTAsDr. Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is an Associate Dean and a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engi- neering. In her current role so advocates for access and equity for undergraduates at the university. She has been teaching for 25 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAIN SLO learning initiative she and her colleagues have been active researching in transformation in higher
with the faculty members supervising their projects, graduatestudents, and one or two industrial mentors. Students also take part in other activities such asindustrial research lab and facilities tours, weekly group meetings, meetings with workingengineers and automotive researchers, an SAE conference, and seminars. The summer researchexperience is then capped with students giving oral and/or poster presentations of their researchprojects both at OU and at research conferences.Students participating in the REU program receive a stipend, free on-campus housing, as well asa small meal allowance and membership to the campus recreational facilities. Travel expenses toOU are reimbursed and if students get a conference paper accepted, funds are