instruction. Yet, standard instruction may have myriad impacts onstudents' ethical development. This study explores students’ ethical formation when ethics is aperipheral or non-intentional aspect of instruction in departmental courses in BiomedicalEngineering and Earth Science. The research question that we seek to address is, “In whatdifferent ways and to what extent does participation in departmental engineering and sciencecourses cultivate STEM students’ ethical formation?” To address our research question, wedisseminated a survey to students before (pre) and after (post) their participation in one of 12courses offered in Earth Science or Biomedical Engineering during the Fall 2017 or Spring 2018.The survey included four instruments: (1) the
Counselors’ Beliefs about Engineering in High School: A Case Site in Virginia (Fundamental)IntroductionThe importance of engineering education in K-12 has been substantially articulated in multiplereports and publications. For example, Brophy et al. [1] provide an overview of the state of K-12engineering education, whereas the National Research Council report [2] moves further byproviding seven recommendations to improve K-12 engineering education through research andscholarship. As one of the expanding domains within K-12 engineering education, K-12 actors’beliefs about engineering are important areas of study because understanding how the actors(student, teacher, school counselor parents/guardians, etc.) believe, perceive
studies. Currently, Esm´ee is the Visual Manager at the Playful Learning Lab, led by Dr. AnnMarie Thomas, where she creates, designs and implements educational materials focused on incorporating joy, whimsy and play into education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Exploring Music and Technology through Code + Chords PlayfulLearningLab.org Playful Learning Lab, University of St. Thomas Dr. Annmarie Thomas apthomas@stthomas.eduWhat is Code + ChordsDescription: Code + Chords is a computersoftware that takes in audio and creates areal time visual display.Broken Down Description:1.) “a computer software”: Code and
correlations that emerged among the parents’knowledge and awareness of engineering and their students’ summer camp learningexperiences and outcomes. Because this study explores’ parents’ knowledge andawareness of engineering concepts, it is unique and has the potential to generate newquestions in engineering education research.IntroductionA talent pool with workers competent in the science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) disciplines are necessary to be able to compete in the globaleconomy [1]. STEM workforces play an important role advancing technology andgenerating new approaches, ideas, and technologies [1]. While there is a high need forpeople who are proficient in STEM areas, there is a scarcity of interest for students whoare
challenge that many instructors, coursedevelopers, and other stakeholders within first year engineering programs encounter every day.When trying to reach this goal, it is necessary to understand the extent to which students intendto engage in the classroom environment, and how pedagogical and curricular approaches affectstudents’ academic motivation [1]. Introductory engineering courses are one common element inmany engineering colleges nationwide. There is growing recognition in research thatexperiences related with courses taken in the first year, and the level of success in these courses,are directly related to students’ achievement and retention, more than many other factors [2,3].This evidence-based practice paper describes the examination of
; Turner, 2010; Turner et al., 2017; Turner, Smith et al., 2015; Turner, Trotter et al., 2006). She has been awarded over $1 million to sup- port her research. She currently is PI on an EEC EAGER award focusing on factors that affect Native Americans’ entry into and persistence in the engineering faculty.Dr. Gale Mason Chagil, Culture Inquiry Consulting, LLC Dr. Gale Mason-Chagil, Cultural Inquiry Consulting, LLC, has 18 years’ experience conducting culturally- competent educational and career development research with Native American communities. She special- izes in social change and social justice research and in consultation for projects administered by schools, community-based organizations, and foundations. She
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Exploring the Impact of a MATLAB Programming Interactive e-Textbook in a First-Year Engineering CourseIntroductionThe use of electronic or e-textbooks continues to find greater acceptance and enjoy increasedprevalence as in 2019, most undergraduate students have functioned in a digital world for thegreater part of their lives. This has been occasioned in part, by improved technology as well asthe corresponding increase in availability or access. E-textbooks are being introduced acrossseveral disciplines including engineering and medicine. Öhrn et al [1] compared the use oftraditional textbooks vis-à-vis interactive computer learning for medical residents studying
requiredparts kit or lab fee. At the same time laptops have become ubiquitous among students allowinguniversities to save money on computer labs and IT expenses by requiring students to providetheir own laptop. Not all students are able to afford laptops, and even among those that can thereis a disparity between the quality and capabilities of the laptops purchased. These increasedexpenses can add an inequitable burden on students of different social and economic status. Thispaper explores the impact of these expenses on students of different social and economic status.The impacts are measured using student survey data from a variety of computer and electricalengineering courses.1 IntroductionThis draft is for a full paper in the Research track and
; ChineseuniversitiesIntroduction The landscape of international student mobility in global higher education hasbeen changing over the last two decades. In addition, the countries (e.g. China,Singapore, and Malaysia) that have large study-abroad student populations are nowtaking an increasingly large market share of global higher education and are attractinga mass of international students [1]. As shown in the Global Mobility Trends, a reportreleased by the Institute of International Education, Mainland China has taken up a 10%market share in 2016, as the third-largest destination for international students [2]. Topfive countries that have sent international students to study in China in 2016 includeSouth Korea, the US, Thailand, Pakistan, and India [3]. In 2016
performance in engineering programs. Toaid in the retention and success of all students, many first year programs have special classes forstudents who many need additional math skill development. Math skills are recognized as essential tothe success of future engineers. However, other skills are integral to the engineering career path.Within industry, it is communication skills that often make or break careers. Technically capableengineers will find their careers stagnating without well-developed communication skills, which are anessential part of engineering work. In fact, it has been shown that engineers spend over half theirworking days (55-60%) communicating both orally and in writing [1]. When engineers were surveyedabout the most important
almost two generations, industry and some in academia have been calling for engineeringgraduates who are better prepared to immediately make a positive impact working on complexengineering problems [e.g. 1, 2-4]. These calls have often taken the form of highlighting the dearthof “professional skills” in engineering graduates, including communication and ability to work inteams . Over the last decade, with the impetus of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)Grand Challenges, more are also calling for engineers who are prepared to lead, given theinterdisciplinary teams required to solve these problems. These calls have, in turn, led to greaterrecognition by engineering educators of the need for engineers who can lead. This recognition
examscores as well as took measures of achievement goal and learning approach. We conductedcorrelational analysis of three goal types: task-related, self-related and other-related, and twolearning approaches: deep learning and surface learning strategies and student’s final performancein the class. Lastly, we conducted multiple regression analysis to determine the relative contributionof each variable to predicting students’ academic performance. Implications of these findings forstudent engagement in engineering classrooms will be discussed.IntroductionThe way students engage with learning or the learning-related tasks they encounter in school areoften rooted in the achievement goals they embrace [1]. The Achievement Goal Orientation (AGO)theory
sophisticatedknowledge of instrumental methods and scientific principles, but perhaps it still fails to preparestudents for complexities and uncertainties of engineering practice in real contexts (Bucciarelli &Kuhn, 1997). We have found that most graduate engineering curricula continue to focus on 1 of 20technical concerns at the expense of the broader social, human, environmental, and ethicalcontext of engineering (Copeland & Lewis, 2004); however engineers need such meta-disciplinary knowledge to see the legitimacy of contextual problems and to deal with thosecontexts effectively (Christensen & Ernø-Kjølhede, 2006). In an effort to close the gap between engineering education and education
orbiracial, and 1% Native American or Hawaiian (University of Maryland, Clark School ofEngineering, 2018).The choice to conduct our study at the Clark School is an important one given its status as a PWIand ranking in recent years as one of the top 10 producers of Black bachelor’s and master’sengineering degree recipients (Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 2018). To date, HistoricallyBlack Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have been heralded by scholars and practitioners asbeing the most successful at bolstering the enrollment and retention of Black students in STEMfields (Gasman & Nguyen, 2014; Palmer, Davis, & Thompson, 2010; Utpon & Tanenbaum,2014; Solórzano, 1995). PWIs, on the other hand, have been largely regarded as inhospitable
that students need to have to succeed in senior capstone projects orin professional practice. APM is used to respond to students’ struggles with PBL’s projectmanagement. APM is an iterative approach with ability to respond to issues as they arisethroughout the course of the project. In this approach, students performed a series of agile ritualssuch as showcases, retrospectives, stand-up meetings and iteration reviews.2. IntroductionThe implementation of Project-Based Learning (PBL) in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) education has gained much interest in recent years [1-3]. PBL is a dynamicclassroom approach in which students actively explore real-world problems and acquire deepcontent understanding by taking over the
work environments in exchange forhuman labor. Robots have been used to replace humans in boring and repetitive jobs, e.g.,welding [1] and assembly [2]; as substitutes for humans in unknown environments, e.g., Marsexplorations [3, 4]; in decreasing human exposure in dangerous work environments, e.g., repairsin nuclear plants [5]; and in the collection of specimen and cleaning after hazardous spills [6].Robots can lift very heavy loads, perform repetitive tasks with excellent accuracy, and withrecent advancements in artificial intelligence, they can complete extremely complex tasks [7-9].Recent developments in autonomous robotics have led to advanced flying robots, or drones.Drones have been used in both civilian and military applications [10
compression, tension, or axial force andflexure and (ii) bolted or welded connections. Students develop a familiarity with the strengthand serviceability requirements of AISC 360 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings [1] thatis utilized in structural engineering design practice. Traditional methods of steel design lectureinvolve instruction on the failure modes and design criteria for an individual member orconnection type in isolation without exposing students to the systems-level perspective of howthese components are integrated into a building structure.This introduction section explores innovations in the context of these types of traditionalstructural steel design courses within the groupings of: project-based learning, computersimulation
, stricter government safety or environmental regulations also need to bemet. There are many examples, like cars and home appliances, that reflect this challengingscenario. Consequently, industry needs mechanical engineering graduates that have the necessaryknowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) to successfully participate in the design and developmentof complex products or systems.The fact that companies need engineering graduates with a good foundation in the process todesign and develop products and systems is reflected in the new ABET accreditation criteria [1]and in references such as the Engineering Competency Model that was jointly developed byAmerican Association of Engineering Societies (AAES) and the United States Department ofLabor (DOL
data on the extent of video viewing(coverage) of pre-class videos in three flipped undergraduate engineering courses (numericalmethods for engineers, fluid mechanics and engineering statics) as an initial step towardsimproving engagement with pre-class resources.Literature ReviewWhile the literature on flipped classes is extensive [1]-[3], studies on student engagement withpre-class materials are fewer, especially those related to viewing of pre-class videos designed toprimarily substitute (not supplement or review) traditional in-class lectures and instructor-ledproblem-solving sessions. Initial studies on engagement with pre-class videos were based onstudent self-reports that suffer from usual self-reporting biases and only recently have
implementation and outcomes of educational interventions at the K-12 and collegiate levels. She received her MS and Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2013, respectively. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 External representation design- for-sustainability intervention in engineering graphics courseIntroductionIntroduction to Engineering Graphics and Visualization is a freshman-engineering coursein many universities. In 1999, when Georgia Tech converted from quarter to semestercurricula, the College of Engineering created a three credit hour introductory engineeringgraphics course for undergraduates [1]. The fifteen-week course included
HistoryThe transition from high school to college can be difficult for many students, causing many todrop out of school. The first discussions of retention in higher education go back to the 1930s,but early research on this topic was focused mainly on why students fail instead of why theysucceed [1]. Vincent Tinto is credited with bringing this subject to the forefront and examiningother non-academic factors as to why students drop out of college [2]. Using this data, manyuniversities and colleges have implemented programs to assist students and improve retention,such as bridge camps, specialized introductory courses, tutoring and learning centers, andmentoring programs, to name a few [3]. Universities first started offering bridge camps overthree
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Facilitating Collaborative Engineering Analysis Problem Solving in Immersive Virtual Reality1. IntroductionThough immersive virtual reality technology has existed for over half a century, early hardwarewas inaccessible for the vast majority of potential applications due to cost and issues thatincluded significant discomfort and nausea [1]. Fortunately, the latest generations of immersivevirtual reality equipment have largely mitigated many of these issues through more responsivesensing and display as well as the incorporating of several decades of usability research intoapplication and interface design [2]. As a result, there has been a notable rise in the
freshmen at the institution, with lessaccess to student supports such as housing, orientation, retention efforts, or scholarships, as theytransition to the four-year institution [1]. Transfer students also have fewer opportunities toparticipate in high-impact learning experiences such as undergraduate research and internshipsthan first-time freshmen [2]. STEM transfer students can have challenges as they adjust tocampus life [3], [4], including course credit loss [5], which can delay graduation or lead toattrition, perception of lack of advisor support or misinformation [6], or perception of “stigma”as a transfer student [3]. Providing resources, supports, and access to select activities in the earlytransfer period thus is a critical time to
science students decide differently from their peers in other disciplines when facingcomputing ethics dilemmas. This study expands on previous research on ethical decision makingamong computing majors. The findings of this research have important implications for researchand practice. For example, it examines the arguments from previous literature regarding thedifferences of ethical decision making among different professions. Moreover, it will haveimportant implications for design of ethics courses in undergraduate level.The data is collected from two groups of students in a large Midwestern University: (1) 33computer science undergraduate students enrolled in a course on computing professional ethics,and (2) 40 undergraduate students enrolled
fields has studied textbook utilization, authentic real-worldproblems, problem-based learning strategies, and representation engagement [1]–[9]. Additionalproblem-solving research has compared novices (students) and experts (engineeringpractitioners) to understand the differences in their problem-solving behaviors [10]–[14]. Themajority of this research has focused on how problems are solved and what resources orrepresentations are used to solve them. Some anecdotal evidence can be found in research thatstarts to uncover reasons for why decisions are made during problem solving [15]. Additionally,recent related research with engineering practitioners has focused on the reasons particularproblem-solving decisions are made [16], [17]. However
Interest Levels of Male versus Female Students going into STEM Fields (Evaluation)IntroductionThe fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, also known as STEM, haveexperienced rapid growth in terms of their importance and the demand for qualified graduates[1]. STEM careers provide an essential driving force behind new innovations and growth in theUnited States. STEM fields have seen a job growth rate three times that of non-STEM careers,and are continuing to grow [2]. Despite efforts to increase the number of STEM graduates, TheUnited States is struggling to supply enough qualified workers to fulfill these demands. TheUnited States is facing a problem as students’ interest, and therefore literacy in STEM has
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Faculty embrace collaborative learning techniques: Sustaining pedagogical changeIntroduction Faculty development in teaching for university is often scattered and not supported in acoordinated way by science, technology, engineering, and mathematics departmentadministrators [1], [2]. For many years Professional Learning Communities (PLC) have been acommon practice in the K-12 teaching community and they provide means for teachers to learn,share, and encourage each other to develop and test new pedagogies [3]. More recently,practitioners of higher education have adopted a similar community professional developmentmodel to assist university teaching development and encourage
inspiring and empowering K-12 female students to pursue STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) majors and careers. Created in 2013, theFemineer® Program enhances the College of Engineering’s commitment to support underservedpopulations by recruiting and graduating increased numbers of historically underrepresentedstudents. Research has shown that men outnumber women in the STEM field. According to theNational Science Foundation, 20.5% of Engineering Bachelor degrees were awarded to women in2004 and 19.8% were awarded in 2014 [1]. This data has shown that women are earning lessEngineering Bachelor degrees and there has not been much progress since 2004. The Femineer®Program wants to fix this problem by giving K-12 girls access
2016, theconcept of engineering education accreditation which emphasizes student-centered,outcome-based education (OBE) and continuous improvement, has been more widelyrecognized and promoted [1][2]. Practical teaching, especially field practice teaching, isconsidered to be an important part of engineering education [3][4] and plays a crucialrole in cultivating students' ability to combine theory with practice, think independentlyand communicate, work in a team as well as solve complex problems, and in improvingstudents' sense of social responsibility and interests in engineering [5][6][7].Compared to common practice teaching course, field practice teaching courses(especially those involving the accommodation at the site of practice
1“Plug and Chug” of specification equations is not design. Letting students have thisimpression is doing them a huge disservice.Teaching is tricky business. How one teaches structural design has some particularly impactfulconsequences. Students expect to learn the specifications (or codes) but over emphasizing thecode may leave students without a deeper understanding of the mechanics and structuralbehaviors involved in structural design. There must be a balance between teaching the code andbehavior because many students likely have become programmed, trudging through many mathand science courses, to solve problems in a very methodical fashion of reading a prompt,recognizing the method or formula to use, and arriving at the single correct