tomake a positive impact and minimize our unintended harms. We also describe individual storiesof this transformational process, examining our collective positionalities as “outsiders within”seeking to change an institution we are a part of but not entirely aligned with [4]. Finally, wedescribe the directions we are moving in to further encourage reflection and action to centersustainability and community agency in our efforts [5] [6].IntroductionThe authors on this paper are students, faculty and alumni who have dedicated multiple hours toEngineers Without Borders (EWB) at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo(Cal Poly, SLO). We care about each other and our partners across the globe, yet we have deepand almost existential
(Roehl et al., 2013). Even so,students may not value cooperative learning or find it to be a positive experience because of theirdesire to get “correct” information from the instructor that they can memorize after class(Herreid, 2013). This idea is supported by the focus group responses desiring online videos or in-person lectures instead of or in addition to online reading and web-based resources. In anengineering class focusing on problem-solving approaches, it is challenging to help studentsdevelop an intuitive sense for risk-taking and innovation when multiple problem-solvingtechniques are possible. Although the flipped course structure with many low-stakes practiceproblems should have encouraged students to try approaches with low risk of
Page 15.1118.7open the question of whether non-participants did not hear from their peers about the EFLCs, orwhether they were uninfluenced by what they heard.The general agreement between the electronic survey results and the EFLC course evaluationresults lends confidence to some tentative analysis of the remaining electronic survey data, inspite of the low response rate.Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL) at Ohio University denotes an optional, limited-enrollment, 1-credit class associated with a regular course. PLTL sections are led by upperclass students whohave succeeded in the course, with an experienced faculty member coordinating sections,training peer leaders, and providing study exercises. Questions on the electronic survey coveredPLTL
“rigid classroom dynamics.” This resonates with another respondent’s descriptionof AB Engineering Studies classes as “more collaborative” than BS engineering. (Although thiswas a common observation, a single respondent felt that BS classes had “more camaraderie” thanAB classes.) Another response described the effect of different classroom styles on the student:“In BS classes, my thinking was myopic, and I was focused on simply absorbing the curriculum.In AB classes, I felt much more curious and open-minded.”Each of these responses related to an aspect of the “Faculty/Classes in Engineering Studies,”suggesting that a strength of the program is its faculty members and the classroom environmentsand experiences they facilitate. One aspect of this
faculty mentoring policy. Prior to working at MSU, she held full time positions at Northeastern University, Boston College, and National Geographic Society. McDaniels has over twenty years of experience in graduate student and faculty de- velopment, undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning and organizational change. She has had the pleasure of doing research and consulting domestically and internationally.. McDaniels holds degrees from Michigan State University (Ph.D.), Boston College (M.A.), and University of Michigan (B.A.). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Equity, Inclusion and Ethics: Adapting a Mentoring Curriculum to Develop an Ethics Workshop for
towards thehighest level of quality within research projects. This paper presents the approach of how auniversity team (professor and graduate students) collaborated with the National Society of BlackEngineers (NSBE) to conduct a longitudinal analysis of a summer engineering program fundedthrough an Early CAREER faculty award from the National Science Foundation’s EngineeringEducation Broadening Participation (BPE) program. According to the literature, there is a greatneed for longitudinal analysis of STEM outreach programs, especially informal ones, and supportstudents from historically excluded backgrounds. This paper contributes to the academia-non-profit partnership literature within the context of longitudinal studies by mapping out the
their own decisions or courses of action(i.e., where the stakes and tradeoffs are real to the learner). As one author describes it, theseapproaches “[allow] students to draw on their own experiences…to create a focal point andmeaning around abstract ethical concepts” [19, p. 1390].While the literature on experiential learning in engineering ethics has grown substantially inrecent years, extensions of this strategy into the realm of engineering leadership education iscomparatively rarer in published research. Our development of The Mystery Lab, therefore,leverages an opportunity to explore how the strengths of an experiential approach to ethicsinstruction can be applied not just to personal decision making, but to the collective behaviors
implications across time and within ict studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2):486 – 499, 2012. ISSN 0001-8791. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.005. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879111001126.[13] R. A. Ash, J. L. Rosenbloom, L. Coder, and B. Dupont. Personality characteristics of established IT professionals I: Big Five personality characteristics. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2006. pp. 983?989.[14] Nicole Zarrett, Oksana Malanchuk, Pamela Davis-Kean, and Jacquelynne Eccles. Examining the gender gap in it by race: Young adults decisions to pursue an it career. Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation, pages 55–88, 02 2006.[15] S. Katz, J. Aronis, D. Allbritton
College, Columbia University. Her BA is also from Columbia.Dr. Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin Dr. Mia K. Markey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow in Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Professor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. A 1994 graduate of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, Dr. Markey earned her B.S. in computational biology (1998) from Carnegie Mellon University and her Ph.D. in biomedical engineering (2002), along with a certificate in bioinformatics, from Duke University. The mission of Dr. Markey’s Biomedical Informatics Lab is to develop decision
Page 24.157.4not learned otherwise14. While there is certainly a place for good lectures in effective teaching,faculty need to involve students in discussions, team-based activities, laboratory experiences,peer-led learning, and hands-on participation to maximize learning outcomes.While the Kolb Experiential learning model is a good standard for experience-based learning, itis difficult for instructors to implement without further explanation. With more research havingbeen done on experiential learning, several elements of implementation stand out: 1. Leadership education should be implemented early on in an academic career – Early implementation gives more time for students to develop the leadership skills desired. Because the
student and faculty affairs. They additionally initiated a pilot faculty launch programin 2017 to provide support and guidance to junior faculty launching their career at JHU, withdepartments prioritizing the hiring of URM or women faculty members. Finally, in 2019, the Tandon School of Engineering at New York University (NYU)formed an Inclusion @ Tandon committee that created the college’s first strategic plan forInclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Belonging (IDBE). This committee includes a facultyrepresentative from each department to lead the departmental IDBE plans. In 2020, Tandonlaunched its Office of Inclusive Excellence (OIE) and hired four Inclusion Officers to coordinateDEI efforts in the Tandon School, which includes one officer
, working with a paraplegic to create an adaptivetechnology exercises items c), g), h), and j). Building a Baja vehicle for competition is usuallydone by a team of engineering students. This expands the experience to include item d) andchallenge item g) in different ways.2.3.4 IDENTITY ParallelThe Curriculum of Identity capitalizes on the cognitive and affective development of learners bydeveloping their interests, expertise, strengths, values, and characteristics. In the early days ofuniversity education, students were assigned a preceptor or personal advisor. They would meetregularly with this mentor and discuss various intellectual topics. The advisor took an active rolein helping plan the students’ future and invariably would know if any
project targetsrecruitment and retention of engineering ethnic minorities, women, and economicallydisadvantaged and/or First Generation college-bound students. The strategies include: cohortbuilding, networking, and pathway to graduate school. Cohort building includes buildingproductive academic relationships among students, between students and faculty, and betweenstudents and the university administration. The networking strategies include building andupholding a professional network with all people the students meet within their education andfuture career field, such as advisors, faculty members from whom they take classes, professors intheir major, internship supervisors, employers or administrators, and throughvolunteer/community activities
and employment opportunities. In addition, the DI thread providesexciting real-world challenges [3,5] that can enhance students’ education. The graphic whichillustrates the DI process and Mindsets associated with each process step is shown in Figure 1. The4 design phases represented by the 4 Ds, cycle through divergent and convergent thinking methodsthat contribute to exploring both problem spaces and solution spaces [3,15].BACKGROUND RESEARCHThe cooperation and synthesis of engineering and liberal arts programs has been both an excitingand complex challenge in modern academia. In our research into this challenge we found thatmany universities including Bucknell, Yale, Denver University, and Johns Hopkins havedeveloped degrees attempting to
students in a traditional,lecture-based, engineering education experience no significant growth as self-directedlearners. Prior studies by multiple researchers indicate students experiencing PBLcurricula have experienced significant growth. These studies all used the Self-DirectedLearning Readiness Scale (SDLRS), a commercially available tool that has beenadministered to 120,000 adults and as been used in over 90 PhD studies.The researchers developed a qualitative study in an attempt to characterize how the PBLgraduates experienced self-directed learning. 27 PBL graduates were interviewed. Aphenomenographic methodology was used to determine how the graduates experienceSDL in their engineering practice.The result of the qualitative study is a set
students, are facilitated by experiences that encourage deeper engagement, thesmall size of the program, and relationships with faculty and staff themselves. In the same waythat prior experiences impact feelings of competency, student narratives reveal that meaningfulrelationships played an important role in the series of decisions that led to their enrollment in theengineering program. For example, Thomas notes that helping his dad work on cars increased hisinterest in making, the amputation of someone close to him got him interested in biomedicalengineering and having a relative graduate from this university got him interested in this schoolin particular. Long before the students enter this program, relationships are playing a pivotal rolein
shaping and supportingstudents’ group-learning experiences.6 While faculty practices are important in all group-learningapproaches, they can be particularly important for supporting under-represented students, whooften experience marginalization in such settings. Both faculty and peers can marginalizeindividual students in a variety of ways, including through assignment of work tasks, validationof work tasks, validation of ideas or perspectives, and the nature of the group task itself.First, at the onset of an activity, task assignment biases can often result from unconsciousexpectations about who may be more (or less) suited to certain tasks.7, 8 While each team isdifferent, with a different set of identities and personalities, there is also
industry educational program development with the MU Research Reactor, and the MU Energy Systems and Resources program. She is a founding member and Secretary of the Missouri Energy Workforce Consortium (an affiliate of the national Center for Energy Workforce Development).Ms. Valerie Deitz Taylor, Center for Energy Workforce Development Valerie Taylor is an educational consultant for non-profits, including the Center for Energy Workforce De- velopment (CEWD). For the center, Taylor focuses on career awareness, workforce development models, and processes, as well as initiating and managing partnerships with related associations, youth-focused groups, and the military. Before becoming an independent consultant, Taylor
by President Obama as a Champion of Change for Women in STEM, and participates in a number of diversity-enhancement programs at the university including serving as the Deputy Chair of the Women’s Commission and as a member of the ADA Task Force.Miss Catherine McGough, Clemson University Catherine McGough is currently a graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Joseph Murphy, Clemson University Joseph Murphy is a Fall 2018 graduate of
procedures. The findings of this paper may bebeneficial to students as they graduate and become a member of an organization. For example,being aware of local, national, and global issues could assist a firm to make correct financial andmanagement decisions. Therefore, the issues presented in the paper may assist engineers to bebecome truly professional and an asset to an organization.AcknowledgementThe authors wish to recognize Ms. Linda Dousay for her assistance with the production activitiesinvolved in preparing this paper.Bibliography1) Anon “Application in the Construction Industry Source”, Safety through Design, 2000, p- 217-2262) Ashford, J. L. (1990). “The management of quality in construction.” E & FN Spon, London.3) Carpenter, D. “Using
curriculum expert and a learning sciences researcher investigating learning, cognition and knowing in authentic practices. She is currently an Associate Professor in the area of Curriculum Studies at the Faculty of Education in Western University in Canada.Jingyi Liu, Nanyang Technological University Jingyi Liu is a master’s student at the National Institute of Education (NIE) at Nanyang Technological University (NTU). She is presently working on STEM+C educational-focused projects in Dr. Yeter’s Research Team at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. With a background in educational studies, Jingyi Liu brings a unique perspective to the role of technology in education, leveraging her expertise to explore
Paper ID #8004Development of an Open-Source Concurrent Enrollment Course that Intro-duces Students to the Engineering Design and Documentation ProcessProf. Richard Cozzens, Utah Educational Network This paper will be presented by four of the TICE Grant Curriculum Development Team members: Richard Cozzens Professor at Southern Utah University Jeremy Farner Professor at Weber State University Thomas Paskett PhD Isabella Borisova Professor at Southern Utah UniversityMr. Jeremy Ray Farner, Weber State University Assistant Professor Design Engineering Technology Weber State University, Ogden Utah Bachelors in Design
students tothe program. However, the program struggled with the historically high DFW rates in both theintroductory mechanical engineering course and Statics. Through a series of faculty meetings inAY 2018-2019, the program decided to emphasize the following two aspects in the introductorymechanical engineering course: 1) improving students’ interests in mechanical engineeringdiscipline and career, and 2) instructing foundational engineering principles to enhance students’success rate in Statics, a 2nd year course. Most students who pass Statics pass other 2nd yearcourses to enter the 3rd year.2.2 The Introductory Mechanical Engineering Course Contents in 2019 and 2020.Table 1 summarizes the course topics and the design project offered in-person
AC 2011-1678: ASSESSMENT OF ABET STUDENT OUTCOMES DUR-ING INDUSTRIAL INTERNSHIPSDr. Karyn L. Biasca, University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point Karyn Biasca is a Professor in the Paper Science and Engineering Department, where she has taught since 1989. She received her B.S in Chemical Engineering from the University of California at Los Angeles in 1981 and worked for Kimberly-Clark Corporation as a process engineer for three years. Finding the career paths available within the corporate environment unappealing, she returned to graduate school, earning her Ph.D. from the Institute of Paper Chemistry (Appleton, WI) in 1989. Her current research interests include the scholarship of teaching and learning, especially on
course, focusing on how the incorporation of choice supports the courselearning goals. This analysis will provide insight into how choice may be leveraged withinfirst-year engineering courses to foster self-authorship, decision-making, and the development ofa Personal Action Plan.ENGR 110: Design your Engineering Experience is an introductory, two-credit elective coursethat serves the first-year engineering class at the University of Michigan. The design of thisintroductory course helps foster student autonomy as students explore the breadth ofopportunities available to engineers in both their education and careers. Students learn anengineering design process as a mechanism for making personal and academic decisions, andthrough a scaffolded
testing of a new assessment instrumentthat was designed to evaluate the dispositions of engineering faculty members regardingparticular classroom strategies. The instrument, named the Value, Expectancy, and Cost ofTesting Educational Reforms Survey (VECTERS), was designed to assess attitudes regardingspecific student-centered classroom strategies and to collect self-reported use of those classroomstrategies. The desire to develop this instrument emanated from the project evaluation of anNSF-funded Improving Undergraduate Science Education (IUSE) project at a large college ofengineering in the southwestern United States.The IUSE project provides professional development for pairs of faculty members from multipleengineering disciplines (e.g
engineering careers, 40 (45%); Feeling like an outsider in advancedmath/science/technology classes, 21 (24%); Low self-esteem/confidence related tomath/science/technology courses, 20 (22%); Lack of understanding of courses needed for gettingaccepted into engineering program, 11 (12%); and Lack of interest in engineering field, 9 (10%).Once again, this finding reveals that the study participants consider that their lack of knowledgeregarding engineering careers was a hindrance to their academic decision process, and that theydid not receive sufficient information regarding engineering careers while in high school. Inaddition, the findings may reveal that feeling like an outsider in advanced technical classes couldhave affected the students’ self
challenging but also presented lots of opportunities for personal growthand cross-cultural learning.This transition into an engineering education program involved immersing myself in the newly developedengineering education field. It was very different to what I had done as an engineer or what I had studiedin college. I had to attend very small classes, with a lot of discussions, in a foreign language. I facedseveral challenges as an international student, but they made me more resilient, I developedproblem-solving abilities and I learned to find different people for different types of mentorships andadvice I needed during that time.After completing my PhD in engineering education, I became a faculty member in a smaller engineeringeducation
-inspired) projects using photovoice. Photovoice is a participatoryaction research strategy, an ethnographic and experiential technique combining photography andimages, narrative and critical dialogue, and reflection to uncover social issues and promotechange [13], [14]. In return, that will enable students to share information and allowinterpretation processes at a deeper level.1.1 Problem IdentificationSustainability is a complex problem and a decision-oriented endeavor that requires the expertiseand integration of business, architecture, engineering, technology, community, policy, and law[15]. Subsequently, engineering curricula must cultivate an ability to recognize the importance ofdiverse knowledge to solve this emerging problem. In addition
interest is in civil engineering curriculum development that enhances student engagement and inclusion. One of the first to develop and teach an introductory course on Geomatics in 1993 at Georgia Tech. A similar course is now required in numerous CE curriculums including Clemson’s.Mr. Matthew Ryan Stanley, Clemson University Hello! My name is Matthew Stanley and I am a graduate student in the Clemson University Glenn Department of Civil Engineering. I am pursuing a master’s degree in transportation systems, and plan to pursue a career in surveying engineering or roadway design. I am a graduate teacher’s assistant for the Geomatics course offered at Clemson University. American