% ofthe cause the attrition [3]. Therefore, an ancillary research question is: Can mandatory studygroups formed in an introductory engineering course, help students succeed in other gatewayclasses? The results to the two research questions are reported with links to supporting videos.An Introduction to Human Centered DesignIn order to discuss design thinking and, by extension, IBM Enterprise Design Thinking (EDT) -paraphrased as human-centered design at scale (and speed) - we must first ground ourselves in thedefinition of general human-centered design (HCD) and the root meaning of design. A design isdefined as the purpose, planning, or intention that exists behind an action, fact, or material object.In and of itself, design is neither good nor
and polling questions were also perceived aspositive on average across demographic groups. The slightly lower score may be due to students’resistance to active learning formats [25]. The largely positive responses to the course structuresupport the plan to continue with this overall template. However, some results warrantadjustments: as mentioned JiT quizzes were already replaced. Assigned groups were rated in thebottom three for both female and black students. This could mean that more care is needed increating groups, or additional support is needed for developing group cohesiveness.This paper presented a small subset of the data collected in the study; much more work is left tobe done. Ongoing analysis will look at other student aspects
. The breadth and depth of engineeringmeant any individual branch within engineering, such as chemical engineering, could easily have46 episodes devoted to within that branch, or even within a single engineering course likethermodynamics. The direction to cover all of engineering meant that achieving a balance betweenall branches of engineering, with appropriate breadth and depth to cover key topics within eachfield, would take significant planning and effort before the series could even be filmed. Mappingout the series took ten months of research, which occurred while the series was being initiallywritten, filmed, animated, produced, and released. The series effectively broke down into several components. The first six episodes
people, equipment, and materials that are housed in our labs, facultymembers’ labs, research labs as well as within other companies. The members share what isneeded and house supplies in whatever location is logical for each project at the time. As plans,partners, and project needs change, our equipment and supplies change and move.One of the priority ongoing projects is the operation of a makerspace laboratory that providesadditive manufacturing services to students, faculty, and external customers. A business graduatestudent oversees the laboratory and other students who staff the facility (Figure 1). The lab isopen to all our university students, and printing is free (up to 500g). Trained student staffmembers operate software and assist
instead of hand cutting the pieces. To cut out the folding mechanism, a press or waterjetcould be used to create the general shape. The pedaling mechanism would have to be pressedtogether with the sprocket and axle parts. Roller chain would be best put on by a human. Theremaining pieces could be purchased from a vendor similarly to how it was done to complete thescooter now. After the rest of the parts are purchased, they could all be attached to the boardeither by a human or a robot.Testing and Refinement Scootie gang planned to test the prototype in the following areas: Plywood deflection,Steering range of motion, maximum height of obstacle, maximum user speed, security of lockingmechanism, protection from the elements. To test each of
Software Engineering , vol. 37 No. 4, no. July/August, pp. 509-525, 2011.[7] "P90X Extreme Home Fitness," [Online]. https://www.beachbody.com/product/fitness_programs/how-p90x- works-muscle-confusion.do. [Accessed 24 12 2019].[8] Stulberg, B. "CUT," 28 Aug 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.thecut.com/2016/08/workout-plans- based-on-muscle-confusion-dont-work.html. [Accessed 25 12 2019].[9] Rolandsson, L. "Changing computer programming education: the dinosaur that survived in school. An explorative study about educational issues based on teachers' beliefs and curriculum development in secondary school" The 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, IEEE, 2013.[10] Pappano, L. "The iGen Shift
second pyramid layer. Another viewpoint would be “understanding starts at the secondlayer” without a pyramid construct. A 2014 PNAS report classified prospective cognition intofour columns of simulation, prediction, intention, and planning, with two orthogonal rows ofepisodic and semantic processes [17]. Therefore, the prediction deliverable should be includedin an assessment rubric. Furthermore, the ASEE Assessment-White-Paper stated that “programimprovement is the objective of assessment and program modifications over relatively shortintervals are likely to make assessment ineffective” [18]. The assessment rubric designs duringasynchronous delivery should be blended into face-to-face instruction upon society reopen. Anassessment rubric example
the software has been successful forhomework, there were still several challenges during the transition to utilize it fully forsynchronous online labs. The main challenge was management of student expectations. Studentsinitially demonstrated disappointment that they would not be able to directly apply skill sets tophysical equipment. The students soon saw; however, that the simulation software presentedmore of an opportunity to practice and grasp the key aspects of automation. The availability ofthe simulation software on the student’s PC provided more opportunities for them to practicetheir skill sets (e.g. EDS planning and implementation) as opposed to the hard-wired physicalunits, which have limited access even under normal (pre-pandemic
dean of engineering and thedepartment chairs of computer engineering and computer science. These visits consisted ofdiscussing Herbie’s presence and influence on campus as well as plans for the future. We tookpictures of Herbie with the campus administrators, which ended up on the university’s majorwebsites, giving Herbie significant exposure to the university community and expandingHerbie’s social network.As Herbie’s recognition progressed, we began to do “Herbie Giveaways.” These giveawaysbegan by having a basket full of candy attached to Herbie’s head and running Herbie around thehallways of campus. Students would recognize Herbie, take a piece of candy, and sometimestake pictures or videos of him. When the social media account first
Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills, vol. 57, no. 3. Springer Netherlands, 2016.[5] B. A. Burt, D. D. Carpenter, C. J. Finelli, and T. S. Harding, “Outcomes of engaging engineering undergraduates in co-curricular experiences.”[6] L. C. Strauss and P. T. Terenzini, “The Effects of Students’ In- and Out-of-Class Experiences on their Analytical and Group Skills: A Study of Engineering Education,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 967–992, Dec. 2007.[7] A. L. Miller, L. M. Rocconi, and A. D. Dumford, “Focus on the finish line: does high- impact practice participation influence career plans and early job attainment?,” High. Educ., vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 489–506, 2018.[8] S
supportcomputational thinking while planning a programming instruction [9]. To examine practices andperspectives in Computational thinking learning research, a proposed methodology of datacollection will be asking students to verbalize their thought process using think aloud protocolwhile programming and their on-screen programming activity could be captured and analyzed[9]. As for the instructional implication, it is proposed that a constructionism-based problem-solving learning environment, with information processing, scaffolding and reflection activities,could be designed to foster computational practices and computational perspectives.Although constructionism was the dominant learning theory to teach computational thinking.Additional frameworks were also
propercontext, and did not adequately prepare students to integrate knowledge across courses.Furthermore, labs were not used effectively. The study recommended a so-called “spiral model”and effective use of labs (by basing them on design projects):“… the ideal learning trajectory is a spiral, with all components revisited at increasing levels ofsophistication and interconnection. Learning in one area supports learning in another.” [1]-[2]A digest version of the study is available online. It compares a “linear components” model (of acurriculum) to their proposed “spiral model”—using two helpful diagrams [3].Chu’s approach applies the spiral model by introducing certain lab component themes (forfreshman labs) and then maps out a plan to revisit them with
reflect on their full rangeof projects. We conducted one focus group interview with three students from one team in energyengineering and six individual interviews with students from energy engineering, civil engineering,and computer engineering (Table 2). Since this is a work-in-progress, we reported our primaryfindings based on the group interview and six individual interviews. In our next step, for triangulationand enrich data with different aspects of students’ learning experiences in PBL, we planned to conductfocus group interviews firstly, and then invite same students from focus group interviews toparticipant in individual interviews.In the data analysis process, all interviews involved in this study were transcribed and reviewedcarefully
. Department of Commerce (see Figure 1a). All high schoolsin the Norfolk Public School system have students who reside in qualified opportunity zones (theirattendance zones are given in Figure 1b). Figure 1: Qualified Opportunity Zones in Norfolk, VA [15]Norfolk Public Schools Activities in Career and Technical EducationThe work plan will develop, assess, and improve the course curriculum and hands-on activities inthe area of computer science principles with Norfolk High Schools, Old Dominion University, andindustry partners for the Career and Technical Education (CTE) program. Figure 2 illustrates theComputer Science and Cybersecurity Pathway for the CTE Logical Model. One of the ways toengage more underrepresented students in STEM
classroom observation was conducted by two trained observers. Following the observation,the observers met with each faculty member to discuss each person’s goals as they pertain to theRTOP rubric. An individualized follow-up plan was devised among the participants andobservers and was also used to guide subsequent observations and instructional coaching. Inorder to examine how the active learning strategies that were presented in the workshopsimpacted student achievement, course-level data for undergraduate engineering classes betweenthe academic years of 2012-2013 (before the faculty development program) and 2017-2018 (afterthe faculty development program) was gathered. Seven disciplines of engineering were sampled:aerospace, biomedical, chemical
, pp. 115-149. Available: http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/55296/80979_1.pdf?sequen ce=1[30] Enterprise Florida. (2008). Statewide strategic plan for economic development: Rural priority. Available: http://www.floridajobs.org/REDI/EFI_2006- 08_RuralStrategicPlanofWork.pdf[31] U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2015). Rural America at a glance. 2015 edition. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/1952235/eib145.pdf
of wheels, and 3D printing [26] Entrepreneurship: business planning, business model canvas [27], product development process, market analysis, product market matrix [28], Porter’s 5 forces [29], technology S- curve [30], venture capital, crowd funding, grants, social entrepreneurship, and managing intellectual propertyCorresponding to each lesson on fundamental concepts, participants worked on hands-on learningtasks in teams. VEX Robotics Clawbot kit [31] and Arduino UNO microcontroller [32] were usedfor building the chassis of the robot and the microcontroller circuitry of the robot, respectively.The research team introduced participants to operating principles, electrical schematic, coding, andmicrocontroller interfacing of
the author with multipleideas as to focus on how to achieve more efficient student learning. The author plans to work onimproving his classroom assignments to address the issues generated in this research activity.The above set of conclusions are almost identical to the ones the author has arrived at, in hisprevious research publications (Narayanan, 2019).APPENDIX A: Procedure Followed by the Author 1 Continuous Review Improvement Assignment 5 2 Select Draw
effective in teaching math and science concepts to middle schoolstudents. They indicated during the professional development that the math and science teachershad the opportunity to work together to prepare collaborative math and science lessons with theintegration of technology. They were motivated to work with their colleagues in their schools toprepare collaborative math and science lesson plans to demonstrate the connection to theirstudents.The flight simulator software/hardware has been installed in two middle school (Figure 5) and isbeing installed in a third middle school so that teachers can implement the pedagogical approachin their classrooms.AcknowledgementThis research is supported by NSF Grant# 1614249.References[1] NCES (2018) https
it is a requirement for being hired to understand this technology and these programs. Oneadditional survey involved students exposed to this new technology. Students were asked to respondto a series of statements pertaining to the inclusion of BIM for the purpose of structural design as partof the intermediate design courses taught within the authors’ program. With the data from the resultsof these surveys, a plan can be formulated for the inclusion of these new technologies into theteachings of engineering students.For the survey sent to engineering programs, the 24 ABET accredited architectural engineeringprograms were contacted, as well as similar programs at other universities. A total of 32 programswere sent the survey, with 20
teaching contents of Engineering Drawing course have included the introductionof tolerance and fit, important elements of engineering drawings and the use of at least oneCAD software such as SOLIDWORKS, AutoCAD. The task of “disassembling andredrawing the provided XY positioning mechanism” is set in the plan of the project referringto the idea of “reverse engineering” used for teaching. An example of the disassembly andmapping process of the screw slide table is shown in Fig. 4. In this way, students can discernthe components of “handwriting robot” and apprehend how these components work togetherto achieve system functions by disassembling the provided machinery, which is necessary forbeginners. Tasks such as writing measure reports, drawing
Effectively communicating, building rapport and relating well to all kinds of people Leadership Organizing and influencing people to believe in a vision while creating a sense of purpose and direction Negotiation Listening to many points of view and facilitating agreements between two or more parties Personal accountability Being answerable for personal actions Planning and organizing Establishing courses of action to ensure that work is completed effectively Problem solving Defining, analyzing and diagnosing key components of a problem
ambiguity of many of the objectives from each analyzed set was identified during theanalysis process for this study. Some of this lack of clarity resulted from the fact that many of theobjectives were deemed too difficult to objectively measure in a course, such as to “demonstrateconstant curiosity about our changing world.” The solution to this current lack of clarity is toimprove specificity and measurability in EM objectives. Measurable course outcomes ofteninvolve observable criteria, time frames, and numerical goals. For example, rather than “Studentswill develop and demonstrate proficiency in writing and verbal skills,” an effective objectivemight be "Present an original business plan at a design showcase."Many other objectives, although
Compared to Men: Lack of Mathematical Confidence a Potential Culprit.,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 7, p. e0157447, 2016.[29] J. Wang, H. Hong, J. Ravitz, and M. Ivory, “Gender differences in factors influencing pursuit of computer science and related fields,” in Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 2015, vol. 2015–June, pp. 117–122.AppendixBelow please find question in the survey which studied for the purpose of this study.Q. (field plans). “Mark all that apply.”Which of the following options best describe what field(s) you wanted to pursue?q6ms… = desired field in middle schoolq6bhs… = desired field at the beginning of high schoolq6ehs… = desired field at the end of high schoolq6col
community partners. To evaluate the effectiveness of the critical learning community,students will be prompted at various points in the quarter to use the reflection journals todescribe any aspects of the community partnership that have influenced how they understandthemselves, others, and the communities with whom they will work. Students’ reflection journalswill be analyzed for themes that emerge.(c) Community partners’ perceptions: Finally, because this course collaborates withinternational partners, their feedback must be sought in understanding the impact of the course.We plan to design a questionnaire that is collaboratively informed by the community partnersand faculty. We wish to understand the expectations and priorities of the community
idea. Students start from thebasics, such as drawing a line, and are well-supported with lesson videos and visual guidance foreach lesson. Practice may be pursued through a structured plan, or by selecting their own paththrough the lessons. The most popular item is an award-winning gamified line sketching activitywhereby points are awarded for achievement levels of three basic sketching metrics.Instructor ObservationsAll three tools provide digital formative assessments with immediate feedback to the studentsfrom the tools. PhET and Sketchtivity respond with visual stimuli to be interpreted by thestudent, while Mechanix is designed to provide textual hints and guidance.PhET is an online simulation tool widely utilized at all levels of
measures when considering socioeconomic status,gender, ethnicity, and race of test takers (Gilborn & Mizra, 2000; Weissglass, 2001).Muddying the water- how qualitative data provide further reinterpretations of impactIn our initial plans for studying scholars over time, we brought naïve assumptions about whomour scholars would be, and how to address a “fair comparison” in our study of the impact of ourprogram. As we began interviews and focus groups in our studies at multiple institutions, wefound context variables that further complicated our work. As we take a mixed method approach,the data help inform our evolving quantitative study. The following are realities we did notprepare for in our study of “time to degree” with students studying
example, it would beuseful to know what aspects of the project they found the most challenging and why.Future WorkOutcomes of the pilot study provide insight into student’s technical problem-solving andtinkering self-efficacy. Due to limitations with survey completion (e.g., not all studentscompleted pre and post and not all survey items were included), instructor plans to conduct alarger more comprehensive study in spring 2020. In addition, given the focus on a maker-inspired pedagogy, there is a need to provide students with engaging low-stake opportunities tocreate and share projects early on to better develop their technical confidence. 11References
Development of Veteran Friendly, Military Technology and Instrumentation Mechanical Engineering CourseAbstractThe University of North Carolina at Charlotte developed a veteran friendly, military technologyand instrumentation course as part of their ongoing efforts to recruit and retrain members of themilitary community and to expand the military science and technology workforce. The largerproject included four interrelated initiatives (e.g., systematic veteran recruitment activities,specialized mentoring support for student veterans) and institutional data analysis on veteranrecruitment and graduation. ENGR3999 (pseudonym) was originally planned to link priormilitary experience of veterans to what they learn in academic courses and to
a more basic level. Forexample, it is less likely in an introductory Physics course for an instructor to assume studentsalready know what a gravitational force is and how it acts on a body, whereas in Statics it isoften assumed to be known. It may be true, then, that students who are taking Physics as acorequisite with Statics may struggle in Statics with concepts that are not explained in Physicsuntil a later time. Table 2 below provides information on the planned topics for a ten-weekcourse in Statics and Physics I to provide a basis for comparison. Table 2. Comparison of topics in Statics and Introductory Physics Statics Physics I Week 1