. Perkins, J. Gesun, M. Scheidt, J. Major, J. Chen, E. Berger, and A. Godwin, “Holistic wellbeing and belonging: attempting to untangle stress and wellness in their Impact on sense of community in engineering,” International Journal of Community Well-Being, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 549-580, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s42413-021-00149-z.[4] K. J. Jensen, E. M. Johnson, J. F. Mirabelli, and S. R. Vohra, “CAREER: Characterizing Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Experiences with Mental Health in Engineering Culture” in 129th ASEE Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2022, https://peer.asee.org/41926.[5] K. J. Jensen, S. R. Vohra, J. F. Mirabelli, A. J. Kunze, I. M. Miller, and T. E. Romanchek, “CAREER: Supporting Undergraduate
, and a published author. He is a former McNair Scholar, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine-Ford Foundation Fellow, Herman B. Wells Graduate Fellow, Inter- national Counseling Psychologist, former Assistant Professor at the University of Kentucky, and current Post-Doctoral Research Scholar at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Z.’s research program focuses on examining the impact of intersectional oppression on historically excluded groups & creating culturally relevant interventions to enhance their well-being. Within this framework, he studies academic persis- tence and mental wellness to promote holistic healing among BIPOC. He earned Bachelor’s degrees in Psychology &
). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Currency; Illustrated edition. ISBN-10 : 9781524758868. 192 pages. 2. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2021). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 –2023. 51 pages. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineeri ng-programs-2022-2023/ 3. F. Z. Moser. 2007. "Faculty Adoption of Educational Technology". Educause Quarterly. Nov. 1, 2007. 66-69. 4. N. P. Wingo, N. V. Ivankova, and J. A. Moss. 2017. "Faculty Perceptions about Teaching Online: Exploring the Literature Using the Technology Acceptance Model as an Organizing Framework." Online Learning. 21(1), 15-35. S. Y. Yousafzai, G. R
. Borneman, J. Littenberg-Tobias, and J. Reich, “Developing Digital Clinical Simulations for Large-Scale Settings on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Design Considerations for Effective Implementation at Scale,” in Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Virtual Event USA: ACM, Aug. 2020, pp. 373–376. doi: 10.1145/3386527.3405947.[4] S. Kaka et al., “Digital Simulations as Approximations of Practice: Preparing Preservice Teachers to Facilitate Whole-Group Discussions of Controversial Issues,” no. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.35542/osf.io/95gyd.[5] M. Thompson, K. Robinson, Y. Kim, J. Reich, and K. Owho-Ovuakporie, “Teacher Moments: an online platform for
interpersonalconflicts.Acknowledgements: This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China(AIA220013).References Brown P R, Matusovich H M. Career Goals, Self-Efficacy and Persistence in Engineering Students. IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016. Chenchen Zhu and Luze Han. 2021. CV chatbot based on “STAR” method. In Proceedings of HumanInterface Technologies 2020/21 Winter conference (CPEN541). ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6 pages. Choi D S, Loui M C. Grit for Engineering Students. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. David D. Woods. Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering [J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2015(141):5-9. French B.F, Immekus J C, Oakes
. Furthermore, monitoring factors such astemperature, humidity, pH, and algae nutrients is vital for the maximum biomass yield.How to calculate energy yield• The number of algae that is produced: This can be calculated using the following equation: Algae biomass (g) = Light intensity (μmol/m2/s) x Photosynthetic efficiency (%) x Culture volume (L) x Culture period (days) as per Brennan et al.[1]• The energy content of the algae: The energy content of algae varies depending on the species,but it is typically around 20-40% of the dry weight.• The efficiency of the biofuel production process: This can be calculated using the followingequation: Biofuel yield (L/kg) = (Algae dry weight (kg) x Energy content (kJ/kg)) / Energy content
differentiate fromsources in my normal reference list (e.g. [A27] instead of [27]). For in-text citations, I only usethe generic term ‘authors’ when referring to the writers of a text, never the author’s or authors’last name(s). Finally, for the few articles quoted twice, I have assigned them a unique number foreach quote. While this does introduce redundancy to the reference list, it avoids drawingadditional attention to the articles in-text.Structural useThe structural use category characterizes articles based on how neurodiv* was used relative tothe article’s purpose. In other words, it describes what role neurodiv* played in the article. Thiscategory consists of four usage groups: casual, minor context, major context, and focus. Iassigned each
Percentage of participants Coping strategy Coping strategy using strategy (N=55) using strategy (N=55) Music/art/performance/ Alcohol use 11% (n = 6) 4% (n = 2) movies (not at home) Caffeine use 5% (n = 3) Pet(s) 7% (n = 4) Eating to relax 35% (n = 19) Planning or scheduling 24% (n = 13) Errands/shopping 4% (n = 2) Reading 16% (n
consider it to be the appropriate time to share said details. However, future publicationswill discuss data collection and analysis in more detail.AcknowledgementThe material is based upon work supported by the NSF 2217477. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect those of theNSF.ReferencesAmerican Association of University Professors (AAUP). 2018. https://www.aaup.org/news//data-snapshot-contingent-faculty-us-higher- ed#.YKqu9ahKg2wvAn, S. 2016. “Asia Americans in American History: An AsianCrit Perspective on Asian American Inclusion in State and U.S. History Curriculum Standards, Theory, and Research in Social Education.” Theory and Research in Social
follow-up mentoring toensure the long term dissemination of the benefits of Boyer’s model.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank Dr. Angela Bielefeldt for her active support of this workshop.Furthermore, the authors wish to thank the organizers, students, and staff who provided asafe and successful AEESP conference in 2022 at Washington University in St. Louis!References 1. D. Boyer, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Farnam, UK: Jossey-Bass, 1997. 2. D. Sedlak, “Crossing the imaginary line,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 50, pp. 9803-9804, 2016. 3. J. Mihelcic, “What line?” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 51, pp. 1055, 2017. 4. M.A. Edwards and S. Roy, “Academic research in the 21st century
an interdisciplinary group. The Civil Engineering professors at theuniversity reviewed the students´ applications. They selected a team of six members: three civilengineering juniors, a first-year student, an architecture student, and a graphic design student.The team also had the participation of a faculty advisor and a weekly meeting of consultants forquestions. The team had three weeks to develop the idea and prepare a solution, from initialbrainstorming to video production. The advisor supervised, guided, and supported the student´swork, which allowed the team to choose different viewpoints and approaches that maximizedthe student´s strengths working as a team. One objective was to guide the team to workinterdisciplinary, allowing every
created overlaysonto the real-world machines within their cleanroom facility.[11] Their AR software currently didnot have a “training” aspect to it yet, but exemplifies the exciting possibilities of how these ever-expanding extended reality technologies can be applied within the nanofabrication industry. Itshould be noted that virtual and augmented reality solutions are used extensively in otherindustries. An example is the use of augmented reality in surgery [12] with new developments inHead’s Up Displays progressing rapidly. These would allow the surgeon(s) to stay focused on theprocedure without having to look at multiple screens to interpret digital images, patient data andprogress. Similarly, oil and gas industries are increasingly adopting
learners to participate in an inclusive, productive, and engaging classroomenvironment is for instructors to embed a Culturally Responsive-Sustaining (CR-S) framework. TheCulturally Responsive framework proposes creating student-centered learning environments that affirmcultural identities; foster positive academic outcomes; develop students’ abilities to connect across lines ofdifference; elevate historically marginalized voices; empower students as agents of social change; andcontribute to individual student engagement, learning, growth, and achievement through the cultivation ofcritical thinking [18]. Ladson-Billings introduced the term culturally relevant pedagogy over two decadesago based on her research on effective teachers of African
good experimentalist, though, willcarefully plan the experiment, considering how to tell if the results of the experiment aretrustworthy and, furthermore, providing a quantitative estimate of how trustworthy they are. Thisis where the idea of quantifying experimental uncertainties becomes useful.Quantifying Experimental UncertaintiesAn experimental measurement should always be reported along with an uncertainty estimate(e.g. 𝑔 = 9.7 ± 0.5 m/s 2 ). The idea behind an uncertainty estimate is that the true value of theresultant – in this case g - is never actually known; an uncertainty estimate is intended to providean upper and lower bound on where the true value is expected to fall. Uncertainty is inherent inthe process of taking experimental
assessment specific to fluid mechanics,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[2] J. M. Bekki, M. Huerta, J. S. London, D. Melton, M. Vigeant, and J. M. Williams, “Opinion: Why EM? the potential benefits of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset.” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, no. 1, p. n1, 2018.[3] J. L. Gorlewicz and S. Jayaram, “Instilling curiosity, connections, and creating value in entrepreneurial minded engineering: Concepts for a course sequence in dynamics and controls,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60–85, 2020.[4] “Engineering unleashed powered by KEEN,” https://engineeringunleashed.com, accessed: 2022-02-12.[5] M. Nasir, J. Seta, and E. G. Meyer, “Introducing high
, "Socialization Processes of Engineering Students: Differences in the Experiences of Females and Males," Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice & Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 96-106, 2012.[3] C. C. De Cohen and N. Deterding, "Widening the Net: National Estimates of Gender Disparities in Engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 211-226, 2009.[4] M. Borrego, "Feminist Theory in Three Engineering Education Journals: 1995-2008," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 281-303, 2011.[5] T. Swartz, A. Palermo, S. Masur and J. Aberg, "The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity," Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 220, pp
ing Web application and the one of an IoT system? 5 Preferred learn- What is/are the method(s) that helped you better learn software ing method architecture?methods, and critical thinking) is to specify a set of closed questions (e.g., using Likertscale and variable categories) and use inference statistics techniques. Since, we do notknow the different categories for each of the dependent variables, we conducted aqualitative study. The study uses students’ free-text responses to a questionnaire as thedata source. We discuss the preparation of the study, the data collection, and the dataanalysis activities.Preparation of the study. We discussed the course with colleagues and identified a setof factors that we
, creating MS PowerPoint slideshighlighting members of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), and creating a tutorialvideo for coding a rock-paper-scissors game. The following paragraphs provide additionaldescriptions of the projects. Please note that any identifying information about the students andparticipants has been excluded from the descriptions.Student 1 interviewed three members of the Society of Hispanic and Professional Engineers(SHPE) from Student 1's university. The interviews were about the members' perspectives andexperiences as underrepresented minorities pursuing engineering degrees. Student 1 thensummarized the main findings from the interviews and presented them to approximately 20students in a high school that educated
-personversus virtual delivery.5. ReferencesBauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 210-230.Cox, M. F., & Andriot, A. (2009). Mentor and undergraduate student comparisons of students’ research skills. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 10(1).Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297-306.NSF. (2019a). Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU). Retrieved from https://beta.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/research-experiences-undergraduates-reuNSF. (2019b). Research Experiences for
based on theevaluation results as needed.We are in year 3 of this project and we will continue executing the project goals and other activities. Weplan to present the final findings of the project in another NSF poster session.AcknowledgementCurrent funding for this project has been provided by the National Science Foundation through awards –award number HRD-1912085, and award number HRD 1912284. Additional resources were providedby SC State University. The author wish to acknowledge and thank NSF and SC State University for thisgrant support.References[1]. Top U.S Universities failing at Cybersecurity Education. Retrieved from https://www.cio.com/article/3060813/it-skills-training/top-u-s-universities-failing-at-cybersecurity
Paper ID #37663A Study of EAC-ABET Civil Engineering Accreditation CurriculumRequirements and Exemption Provisions of State Licensure Laws and RulesDr. Matthew K. Swenty, Virginia Military Institute Dr. Swenty obtained his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He returned to school to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridges. He is currently a professor of civil engineering and the Jackson-Hope
inquiry activity was done during lecture in ChE 3084, a junior-level chemical engineeringcourse. The course content is roughly 2 credit hours of separations, 1 credit hour of simulations,and 1 credit hour of mass transfer. The experiment was to measure a diffusivity, to compare it toliterature values, and to develop of list of weaknesses of the experiment.The diffusivity is a measure of how quickly a compound moves through another due to aconcentration gradient. Fickian diffusivities of alcohols in air are on the order of 1 x 10-5 m2/s atroom temperature [1]. Experimental data were analyzed with the concept of diffusion time, inwhich the time for a molecule to diffuse an average distance in one dimension is given byEquation 1 [2
Society for Engineering Education, 2022A Practical Method for Improving Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Nuclear Science Mr. James Olson, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dr. Li Liu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Mr. Malcolm Porterfield, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteBackground and Motivation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) is the oldest operating private school of scienceand school of engineering among those that were established in any English-speaking country[1]. Starting with civil engineering in the 1820's, RPI has continually evolved available curriculato meet societal goals. Since the early 1990's, societal progress
, 2016, 2014, 2011 and also 2010 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Summer Faculty Fel- low at the NASA Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio. For over 36 years, he has supported the professional development of over 300 graduate Manufacturing Engineers and over 600 CSU STEM and non-STEM student graduates who are now serving as Plant Managers, Senior Executives, Supervisors, Quality Control Engineers, etc., these graduates are all supporting Manufacturing and allied industries and businesses in the U. S and across the World. He was an Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Summer 2013 Faculty Fellow at the Eglin Air Force Base in Eglin, Florida and a Summer 2018 AFIT/WPAFB Research Faculty. He
andlived experiences. This overarching theme places importance on others’ perspectives and livedexperiences and connects the approaches, but they also have distinct differences. The differencesand commonalities will be discussed with references to how these could inform the global,economic, environmental, and/or societal contexts. Table IV presents the contexts that eachapproach addresses followed by a detailed description of the five approaches with specificreferences to how they incorporate perspective-taking. TABLE IV APPROACHES AND THE CONTEXTS THAT THEY ADDRESS Proposed Framework/Model/ Population Context(s) e.g., global, economic, Theory/Approach
concepts they do not understand [13]. Therefore, the formation of home-culture studygroups could be considered an oppositional behavior because many of the faculty do notencourage it.Another example of community conformism occurred through teaching assistants’ office hours.Students found that TAs were more approachable than professors because they were morewilling to help and were more like peers. At TA office hours, students not only received helpfrom TAs, but also found help and community among other students there who were working onthe same assignments. The final example of community conformism was Student 5’s effort torecruit more minority students to undergraduate research opportunities, thus helping them adapt.We observed one example of
?” and “What isyour experience with the student leader’s help?” Their responses indicated one hundred percentpositive feedback to the introduction of conceptual questions and a student leader to the class.References[1] Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness, “Fall 2021 Facts & Figures,” lccc.edu.https://portal%2Dna.campusm.exlibrisgroup.com/assets/LehighCarbonCommunityCollege/LehighCarbonCommunityCollege/CS-Assets/Intranet/Institutional-Research/Fall-2021-Fact-Book-Intranet.pdf (accessed: July 14, 2022).[2] R. Ajjawi, M. Dracup, N. Zacharias, S. Bennett, and D. Boud, “Persisting students’explanations of and emotional responses to academic failure,” Higher Education Research &Development, vol. 39:2, pp. 185-199, 2020.[3] V
governments and universities [1] [2]. Chile is no exception.In 2019, 28.7% of students who entered STEM disciplines were women, increasing only by 1.3% in2020 to 30%. Family, cultural, economic and social factors influence this under-representation, factorswhich tend to reduce women´s self-concept on learning and ability in this area. Women have lowerself-concept in the STEM disciplines than do men, consequently the dropout rate for women is doublethat of men [3].An intervention was designed aiming to promote and increase self-concept in learning capabilities infirst-year engineering students in Computer Engineering and Industrial Engineering. Such interventionwas based on three types of collaborative activities within the classroom, which seek to
Expositions, June, 2014, Indianapolis, IN.[7] M. V. Huerta, J. S. London, A. Trowbridge, M. A. Avalos, W. Huang, and A. F. McKenna, “Cultivating the entrepreneurial mindset through design: Insights of thematic analysis of first-year engineering students’ reflections,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2017, Columbus, OH.[8] M. J. Jensen and J. L. Schlegel, “Implementing an entrepreneurial mindset design project in an introductory engineering course,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2017, Columbus, OH.[9] A. Ferrar and D. Roberts, “Sustainable senior design: MVP engine,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2019, Tampa, FL.[10] A. Ali, D. M
-wide focus on the student experience, https://www.naspa.org/images/uploads/main/Learning_Reconsidered_Report.pdf , Jan. 2004.3. H. Schattle, The practices of global citizenship, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008.4. A. W. Chickering and L. Reisser, Education and identity, 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.5. L. Patton, K. A. Renn, F. M. Guido, S. J. Quaye, D. S. Forney, & N. J. Evans, Student Development in College, 3rd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.6. M. S. Hevel, “Toward a History of Student Affairs: A Synthesis of Research, 1996- 2015,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 844-862, 2016.7. D. P. McAdams, “The psychological self as actor, agent, and author