AC 2012-5188: ASSESSING EVOLVING CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGEIN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING STUDENTSProf. Kevin A. Gary, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Kevin Gary, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering within the College of Technology and Innovation at Arizona State University’s Polytechnic campus. At ASU, Kevin led the development of the new bachelor’s of software engineering program, and the revised design of the master’s of computing studies. Gary designed and implemented the Software Enterprise, an NSF-funded hybrid pedagogical method for conducting project-based courses. More than 40 industry projects have been conducted by the Software Enterprise over the past eight years, and the
thedifficulties faced by some engineering courses. An alternative course structure is presented,which allows for the new principles and concepts, and consequently might make advances inengineering education. The proposal is focused on the Systematic Planning Approach and bringsan instrument - a Knowledge Based System which embodies the new principles and concepts - topragmatically assist course designers in the development of their tasks. Some preliminary resultsfrom ongoing experiences are discussed. IntroductionAn evolutionary revolution has been taking place in the world due to the impact of technology ingeneral and information technology in particular, both of which are expanding at ever increasingrates
-phase 2 goals were development of the Iron Man version of the Guide Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationbased on the feedback gathered in sub-phase 1 and an extensive review process similar to thereview process for the Stone Man phase.126 Accreditation Initiatives In order to understand the accreditation initiatives for software engineering, it is worthwhileto examine the accrediting agencies here in the United States. The Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) is a federation of 28 professional engineering andtechnical societies. Representatives from these societies, who
Paper ID #38145Scaffolding Social Justice in the Engineering Classroom:Constructing a More Restorative, Inclusive, EngineeringPracticeSydney Turner Sydney Turner is a Doctoral Fellow at the University of Virginia in the Department of Engineering Systems and Environment. With her research focused on the intersection of access to safe drinking water and the reduction of mosquito-borne diseases, she finds herself drawn to multi-faceted public health solutions that build empowerment and resilience in underserved and historically marginalized communities utilizing inclusive and universal design principles
Paper ID #24028Engineering/Design Frictions: Exploring Competing Knowledge Systems viaEfforts to Integrate Design Principles into Engineering EducationDr. Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Associate Dean for Curricular Transitions, Associate Professor in Science and Technol- ogy Studies, and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering/Design Frictions: Exploring Competing Knowledge Systems via Efforts to Integrate Design Principles into Engineering EducationIntroductionHuman-centered design
rather than just recipients ofengineering expertise and technology” (p. 3). In association with sustainability education,DuPuis and Ball [33] “promote receptive / reflexive exchanges and deliberation” using “carefullistening techniques taken from nonviolent communication.” Lucena [34] extensively analyzesthe interplay between sustainable development and listening to clients, stakeholders, users, andcitizens.Despite the importance of listening, engineering classes rarely give students the opportunity tointeract with communities to develop this skill. Service-learning and community engagement(including co-curricular activities such as Engineers Without Borders) may be notable exceptions[23, 35]. Listening skills are also essential in Participatory
Godwin, Cornell University Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is the Dr. G. Stephen Irwin ’67, ’68 Professor in Engineering Education Research (Associate Professor) in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. She is also the Associate Director of the Cornell NanoScale Science and Technology Facility and a McCormick Teaching Excellence Institute Research Fellow. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse groups of students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging, motivation, and identity development. Dr
2006-2015: ROBOTICS OLYMPIADS: A NEW MEANS TO INTEGRATE THEORYAND PRACTICE IN ROBOTICSDavid Ahlgren, Trinity College David J. Ahlgren is Karl W. Hallden Professor of Engineering at Trinity College and is Director and Host of the Trinity College Fire-Fighting Home Robot Contest. His scholarly interests lie in robotics, modeling and simulation, and broadband communications amplifiers. He received the B.S. in Engineering from Trinity College, the M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Tulane University, and the Ph.D. in E.E. from The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Igor Verner, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Igor M. Verner is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Education in Technology &
engineering education. He has authored and co-authored various journal and conference publications. His research interests include: virtual reality, CAD/CAM, Multi-agent based manufacturing systems control and automation, robotics, holonic manufacturing systems, agile manufacturing and wireless sensor networks.Dirk Schaefer, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Dirk Schaefer is an Assistant Professor in the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Over the past ten years, Dr. Schaefer has been conducting research in the interface domain between Engineering, Computer Science, and Information Technology principles in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United
Hopkins University Whiting School’sEngineering Management & Leadership Course Complements Senior DesignIntroduction According to the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), STEMgraduates must be “prepared with the knowledge, skills and aptitudes to meet workforcedemand” [1]. ABET adopted Engineering Criteria 2000, updated several times since, thatfocused on what students learn rather than what programs teach. The new framework includedskills such as “critical thinking, communication and teamwork” [1]. The guidelines areinfluenced strongly by industry workforce needs as hiring managers turn to ABET-accreditedprograms because they know graduates will have certain skills based on student outcomes” [1]. To prepare
and M. C. Linn, “How Does Identity Shape the Experiences of Women of Color Engineering Students?,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 14, pp. 483–493, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10956-005-0223-1.[19] H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” in Political Psychology, 0 ed., J. T. Jost and J. Sidanius, Eds. Psychology Press, 2004, pp. 276–293. doi: 10.4324/9780203505984-16.[20] J. Buontempo, C. Riegle-Crumb, A. Patrick, and M. Peng, “EXAMINING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ENGINEERING IDENTITY AMONG HIGH SCHOOL ENGINEERING STUDENTS,” JWM, vol. 23, no. 3, 2017, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017018579.[21] M. R. Kendall, M. Denton, N. H. Choe, L. M. Procter, and M
two years, the effect of this program on retention is promising. The Fall 2006 program hasbeen enhanced and is anticipated to further increase continued enrollment. Assessment of theprogram will be ongoing, focusing on retention and academic performance.IntroductionAs the economy changes and more emphasis is placed on jobs in technology-related industries, itfalls to the higher education system to prepare students for careers in these fields. Many collegesof engineering, especially those with an urban mission, have recognized that a poor preparationin math and science reduces their students’ chance for success in an undergraduate engineeringprogram. However, for many students it is lack of opportunity – rather than lack of ability – thatis
battalion, a SEABEE Regiment, and all Reserve CEC officers for the Atlantic Division of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. He is a retired Captain in the Civil Engineer Corps (CEC) of the U.S. Naval Reserve. Page 13.1004.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Professional Practices in Civil Engineering: Meeting and Exceeding the New Civil Engineering Program CriteriaIntroductionThe emerging global nature of the worldwide marketplace for products and services coupledwith the exponential rise in technological advancement in the industrialized world has led to thenear-term, long-term, and
Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE, Indianapolis, Indiana.10. Barr, R., Krueger, T., Aanstoos, T., and Juricic, D. (2003). Engineering and Computer Graphics Workbook Using SolidWorks 2001Plus, Schroff Development Corporation, Mission, Kansas.11. Engineering Accreditation Commission (2002). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Baltimore, Maryland.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to acknowledge the following corporations who contributed to this educational researchpaper:a. Ford Motor Company and Applied Materials for sponsorship of the Project Centered Engineering Education (PROCEED) grants to the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at
identifying high school factors that influence thepersistence of females in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines.Funded by the National Science Foundation, PRiSE is a large-scale study that surveyed anationally-representative sample of college English students about their interests and experiencesin science and engineering. The development of the PRiSE survey was guided by three majorcomponents: i) an extensive literature review to extract factors that might influence persistencein STEM fields, ii) open-ended, free-response questionnaire responses from 259 high schoolscience teachers and 153 scientists/engineers on what factors, especially in high school, influence
physics, or Page 11.901.2engineering science, as many of these are institutions that do not offer doctoral programs inengineering and are therefore included in this list.The U.S. News Methodology and Self-DescriptionThe following heading and self-description were given by U.S. News for the most recent surveyand report: “Methodology: Best undergraduate engineering programs” “The U.S. News rankings of undergraduate programs accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology are based solely on the judgments of deans and senior faculty who rated each program they are familiar with on a scale from 1 (marginal) to 5
includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and
’ epistemic thinking. Considering theimpact of students’ epistemic thinking on their academic performance, this study focuses onunderstanding the impact of international collaborative engineering education uponengineering students’ epistemic thinking. To achieve this goal, we examine engineeringstudents from an international joint program.Context of the StudyThe international joint program described here aims to help Chinese engineering studentsdevelop different global competencies through various in-class and out-of-class activities.The SPEIT (SJTU-ParisTech Elite Institute of Technology) program was established underthe strategic alliance of the Paris Tech Group and SJTU on 2012. The whole education lasts 6years, composed by two cycles (Figure 1
engineering significantly increased immediately after the Engineers Weekevent. This finding agrees with those reported in much of the literature1-13. Although,there is a significant drop in student interest in studying engineering one year afterparticipation in the Engineers Week activities, the percentage of students interested inengineering one year after the event was still higher than the percentage found in theinitial pre-exposure results. What is the reason for this decrease in interest? Based on theone-year after survey results, 11.5% (22 out of 192) of students said they had participatedin some other engineering-related activities during that year. These activities includedscience events held in another university, drafting and technology
Engineering in 1998 and Missouri University Science & Technology in Civil Engineering in 1999, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 2004. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Michigan.Dr. Bret J. Wagner, Western Michigan University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Leadership for Engineers: A Course for Developing Professional and Business Skills for EngineersAbstractEmployers consistently cite leadership and professional skills as some of the most desirableabilities for engineering graduates. Unfortunately, it is rare to have these skills explicitlytaught to engineers in the classroom, so graduates are left to develop these skills on theirown
, they are inherently benefitting society.Missing from the conversations were discussions of civic responsibility for an engineer. Onestudent talked about wanting to positively affect society by working on building codecommittees, and two other students highlighted an engineer’s ability to educate the public aboutissues like hydraulic fracturing. None of the students, however, talked directly about the needfor engineers to influence legislation or guide public policy. With only six of the 535 membersof congress being engineers, and only 11 from Science, Technology, Engineering orMathematics (STEM) backgrounds17, it is not surprising that ideas of civic responsibility arelacking in the discourse surrounding the role of engineers in society.(c
., Engineering Ethics, 4th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.2. Lathem, S., M. Neumann, and N. Hayden. 2011. The Socially Responsible Engineer: Assessing Student Attitudesof Roles and Responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3):p. 444-474.3. Redish, E., Smith, K., Looking Beyond Content; Skill Development for Engineers. Journal of EngineeringEducation. 97(3):p. 295-307.4. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. 1997.ABET Code of Ethics ofEngineers.http://wadsworth.cengage.com/philosophy_d/templates/student_resources/0534605796_harris/cases/Codes/abet.htm (accessed January 3, 2014).5. Gilbane Gold. 1989. 24 min. Lubbock, TX: National Institute for Engineering Ethics, Texas Tech University.(DVD)6. Sweeney, R. 2013
. New York, NY: Henry Holt.11. Mead, G.H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.12. Musil, Caryn McTighe. Gender, Science and the Undergraduate Curriculum: Building Two-Way Streets. Washington, DC: AACU, 2001. wee www.acu-edu.org/publications13. National Council for Research on Women, Balancing the Equation: Where are Women and Girls in Science, Engineering and Technology? (2001)14. Nelson, M.B. (1998). Embracing victory: Life lessons in competition and compassion. New York: William Morrow.15. Rosser, Sue V., ed., “Building Inclusive Science: Connecting Women’s Studies and Women in Science and Engineering,” Women’s Studies Quarterly, 200016. Rosser, Sue V.ed., Teaching the Majority: Breaking the
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3561Jones, Elizabeth A. Transforming the Curriculum: Preparing Students for a ChangingWorld, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 29(3), Adrianna J. Keyser, Series Editor,San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2003.Myers, Chet and Thomas Jones. Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the CollegeClassroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.National Academy of Sciences. “Improving Undergraduate Instruction in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Report of a Workshop,”http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309089298/html, The National Academy of Sciences,copyright 2003.CHARLES E. LEISERSONProfessor Leiserson
their ETCS 101Introduction to Engineering, Technology and Computer Science course2. Without a doubt, the introduction of early intervention programs and application-orientedfreshman engineering courses are significant steps toward increasing student retention,motivation and success in engineering. That said, the correlation between retention rates andthe inability of incoming students to progress through the required calculus sequence cannot beignored. This problem is not unique to WSU, and in recent years has received substantialattention in the engineering education literature10-16. The general consensus thus far is that thetraditional approach of teaching students the required mathematical theory simply as aprerequisite to subsequent
Physics and Chemistry courses. This is one of theadvantages of five-year programs, which prepare versatile professionals with a solid backgroundformation, as noted by a recent ABET accreditation visit to this campus. Students’ opinionsconcur since they are aware that any additional skill learned represents an edge for their eventualjob search.References1. J. A. Jacobs, Advanced Engineering Materials: Products from Super Stuff, The Technology Teacher, 52 [8],(1993): pp.15-22.2. D. R. Askeland, The Science and Engineering of Materials, 3rd. Edition, PWS Publ. Co., Boston, MA, (1994).3. W. D. Callister, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, NY,(1999): pp. 40-45.4. S. M. Kresta, Hands-on
the mechanism ofinteraction of biophysical factors in the processes of tissue development, healing, and adaptation. Dr. McLeodreceived a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1986. Page 6.440.9 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education
’ attitudes towards engineering, design, and technology with anintroduction to makerspace [14], the researchers analyzed the sense of belonging among studentsby utilizing an adaptation of a previously validated scale [15]. For the sorting procedure, threesurvey statements were sampled to represent and assess belonging.Methods and ResultsA total of 43 survey statements were sampled from 5 different sources (described in the previoussection) by mapping each statement to the intended construct. Table 1 provides a detailedaccount of the statements that were extracted from each survey instrument.Table 1: Survey statements sampled with intended sub-construct. Intended sub- Statement
as a social experience particularly in terms of gender and race among underrepresented college students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). He has presented his scholarship at research conferences organized by the American Educational Research Association, Association for the Study of Higher Education, and Out in STEM Incorporated. Luis holds professional experience in various STEM student support initiatives at Rutgers University including the STEM Talent Expansion Program, Upward Bound Math-Science, and Project Advancing Graduate Edu- cation. He is a certified K-12 mathematics teacher in New Jersey with a Master’s degree in Mathematics Education and Bachelor’s degree in Mathematics from
for Engineering and Technology(ABET) states that “to succeed in these global professions, graduates must be prepared to thrivein diverse and inclusive environments” [37]. Furthermore, the American Society of EngineeringEducation affirms that “diversity and inclusiveness is essential to enriching educationalexperiences and innovations that drive the development of creative solutions in addressing theworld's challenges” [38]. Many professional societies reiterate these sentiments in their ownstatements. For example, the Society of Manufacturing Engineers is “commit[ed] to promotingdiversity and inclusion of all within our community [and] believe that diverse perspectives andtalents are essential within manufacturing research” [39].Rationale