://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/09/why-is-college-so- expensive-in-america/569884/. [Accessed 9 January 2019].[5] K. Hopkins, "New Three-Year Degree Programs Trim College Costs," 29 February 2012. [Online]. Available: www.usnews.com/education. [Accessed 22 November 2018].[6] A. R. Kukreti, T. C. Keener, P. L. Bishop and S. T. Kowel, "The Accelerated Engineering Degrees (ACCEND) Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Cincinnati," in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003.[7] K. R. Leitch and E. B. Butler, "Creating a New Civil Engineering Program in the 21st Century," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2015.[8] N. M. Safai and L. Reaveley, "Universal Model - A Partnership for
-distributed engineering teaming and early engi- neering education development and has over 30 years of combined academic and industrial management experience. He received his BSME and MSME degrees from Michigan Technological University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 20194/11/2019 A Study of Augmented Reality 2019-Draft for final - Google Docs A Study of Augmented Reality for the Development of Spatial Reasoning Ability Abstract This study builds on prior work testing the use of augmented reality (AR) on smartphones for
responsibility in a Circuitscourse,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Tampa, FL, June 2019.[4] https://www.1773innovationco accessed February 2, 2019.[5] B. Przestrzelski, E. Reddy, and S. M. Lord, “Integrating Experiential with Technical: HowMaterials Science Modules Can Help Redefine the Traditional Engineering Canon,” ASEEAnnual Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018.[6] B. Przestrzelski, E. Reddy, and S. M. Lord, “Mission Possible: Blending the social andtechnical through an innovative biodesign challenge module for a materials science class,”Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference Proceedings, San Jose, CA, October 2018.[7] B. Przestrzelski, S. M. Lord, and M. Camacho, “Trash Teachings: How a materials sciencemodule series
a computational design instructor in the Art and Design department at the California Polytechnic State University (CalPoly), San Luis Obispo where she leads the Computing for the Interactive Arts minor.Dr. Aaron Keen, California Polytechnic State UniversityChristian Eckhardt, California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo c American Society for Engineering Education, 20193/3/2019 ASEE CIA paper - Google Docs A crossdisciplinary minor to engage student’s creativity and engineering skills Zoë Wood (Computer Science), Enrica Lovaglio
these concerning attributes, mostengineering graduate students consider writing to be a “knowledge transforming” process [3]. Inour most recent work for ASEE 2019, we observed the differences between international studentsand U.S. domestic students, finding that international students differ from U.S. domesticengineering graduate students in statistically significant ways on nearly all the attitudinal facets onwhich we characterize students [5]. Interestingly, international students tend to view academicwriting ability as an “innate ability,” whereas domestic U.S. students do not.These results directly inform the development of interventions for engineering graduate students,and inform our work-to-date on the Broader Impacts of this research
-programs-2018-2019/#GC5 [Accessed: Jan. 27, 2019].[6] B. Harding and P. McPherson, “What do employers want in terms of employee knowledge of technical standards and the process of standardization?” in Proceedings of the 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, USA, June 20-23, 2010.[7] C. Leachman and C. Pezeshki, “What’s standard? Industry application versus university education of engineering standards,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14-17, 2015.[8] J. L. Gbur and D. Solomon, “Promoting technical standards education in engineering,” in Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA
Institute of Technology in the department of Chemical Engineering. She coordinated STEM outreach for the Leonard C. Nelson College of Engineering and Sciences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 P12 RESOURCE/CURRICULUM EXCHANGE ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE. JUNE 16-19, 2019 Computer Security Activities for a Middle School Classroom or Outreach Event Stephany Coffman-Wolph (sscw@cs.utexas.edu) and Kimberlyn Gray (kimberlyn.gray@mail.wvu.edu)IntroductionChildren are familiar with the Internet including online shopping, variousforms of social media, and video streaming (YouTube, NetFlix, etc).However, few understand the computer science concepts within
several papers on engineering education and the unique undergraduate curriculum at Rowan University, especially the Engineering Clinics. She has been involved in various outreach activities to recruit more women and minorities into engineering and is Program Chair Elect of the Women in Engineering Division of ASEE. She is the recipient of the 2011 New Jersey Section of ASCE Educator of the Year award as well as the 2013 Distinguished Engineering Award from the New Jersey Alliance for Action. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #26105Dr. Ralph Alan Dusseau P.E., Rowan University
with natural fiber composite materials. He is also interested in entrepreneurship,sustainable engineering, and appropriate technology in developing countries. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 What Skills Do Engineering Students Really Need for the Workplace and Life?AbstractEach year technology changes impacting the requirements has for engineering entry level jobs.Students must increasingly be prepared for the unexpected in the workplace. Disruptivetechnologies will have a profound impact on industry and society as a whole. Faculty must alsobe ready for these changes and adapt engineering programs to this new world. Thus, it is good toperiodically
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Long-Term Study of Software Product and Process Metrics in an Embedded Systems Design CourseIn response to input from advisory employers, market demands, and academic studies [1], manycomputer engineering programs have increased focus on embedded computer systems.Embedded systems form a rich application through which computer engineering education canbe made relevant. Embedded computer systems are a timely subject that is immediately useful tostudents in their senior capstone design projects. Furthermore, a large number of our computerengineering graduates currently use or design embedded computer systems in their jobs.A team-based progressive embedded systems
instantiationof the project for Fall 2017 has already been described in detail in an ASEE 2018 paper [23] and(b) each student employed the AD2 functionality in an individual way. The second instantiationof the project is described in an ASEE 2019 manuscript accepted for publication [24].Table 1. Fall 2017 and Fall 2018 laboratory experiences that employed Analog Discovery 2units for circuit excitation and signal acquisition/visualization. Laboratory Experience Representative Graphic Lab 1 – Getting Started with the Analog Discovery 2 The goal of this session is to introduce the student to functionality supported by the Analog Discovery 2 unit and the Waveforms 2015 companion software [10
work systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Co-Designed Research Agenda to Foster Educational Innovation Efforts Within Undergraduate Engineering at HSIsAbstractThe responsibility to educate and empower underrepresented groups in undergraduate educationoften relies on the commitment of educators and the curricula they design. Without financial orinstitutional support, there are limited opportunities for educators from different Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) to engage in conversations about their curricula developments andshare their vision for the future of engineering education. This multi-institutional research projectadopted a participatory research design to
completed his Doctor of Philosophy degree in Information Security and a Graduate Certificate in Information Security Policy at Purdue University. His dissertation work investigated the relationships of social cognitive career theory factors and cybersecurity research self-efficacy of former and current college students.Dr. Helen Turner, Chaminade University Helen Turner is the Dean of Natural Sciences and Mathematics and VP for Innovation at Chaminade University.Dr. Mark Speck, Chaminade University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Module and Kemp instructional design approaches to integrate STEM issues and public policy into Data Science curricula at a
: http://www.oiles.co.jp/en/menshin/building/menshin/products/fps/. [Accessed: Feb. 3, 2019].[17] N. Kravchuk, R. Colguhoun, and A. Porbaha, “Development of Friction Pendulum Bearing Base Isolation System for Earthquake Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 2008 American Society of Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference, Flagstaff, AZ, USA, March 27-28, 2008.[18] N.I. Jaksic, “New Inexpensive 3D Printers Open Doors to Novel Experiential Learning Practices in Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2004.[19] E. Ghotbi, “Applying 3D Printing to Enhance Learning in Undergraduate Kinematic and
Health Organization, “Human Resources for Medical Devices. The Role ofBiomedical Engineers,” WHO Medical Device Technical Series, 2017. [Online]. Available:https://www.who.int/medical_devices/support/en/. [Accessed January 28, 2019].[3] G. Baura, “Educating for Industry. A Call to Auction for Bio-/Biomedical EngineeringProfessors and Students,” IEEE Pulse, March/April 2015. [Online]. Available:https://pulse.embs.org/march-2015/educating-industry/. [Accessed January 28, 2019].[4] O. Imas, J.A. LaMack, I. dos Santos, L. Fennigkoh, and C.S. Tritt, “Streamlining BiomedicalEngineering Capstone Design Process.,” ASEE 2018, Salt Lake City, UT, June, 2018.[5] J.A. LaMack, I. dos Santos, L. Fennigkoh, O. Imas and C.S. Tritt, “Spicing Up Instruction
engineering leadership core competencies:communication, innovation / creativity, execution, teamwork, leadership toolboxand personal drive [12-18, Figure 1]. Each workshop was evaluated to determinewhich topics were covered and, by the end of the first year, students had touchedupon each one.FIGURE 1: Leadership core competenciesApplication process and selection criteriaFor the 2017-2018 academic year, each academic college vetted their ownstudents for the Chevron Leadership Academy. However, this lent itself to a lackof consistent communication of the program expectations amongst thestudents. For the 2018-2019 academic year, all applicants, regardless of degreeprogram or college, followed the same application process and were vetted by thesame
objective of a gamified application in an educational context might be to improve thelearning performance of students by motivating them to review different class materials orparticipate in learning activities6,7.2019 ASEE Zone 1 Conference, April 11-13, 2019 – University at BuffaloEducational gamified applications are an emergent paradigm that researchers and educators areimplementing to engage students during the learning process8–10. Studies indicate thatgamification can help improve students’ motivation and performance in a variety of learningenvironments11–15. Nowadays, there exist several applications that facilitate the implementationof game elements in learning environments, such as Kahoot! (www.kahoot.com), Socrative(www.socrative.com
, simulationsand plots are presented in the class. They are encouraged to work out the problems first usingpaper/pencil (“back of envelope” calculations), calculator, and then use simulation tools asneeded to better understand abstract, mathematical and theoretical concepts. R E F E R E N C E S[1]. Engineering Electromagnetics, 9th edition, by Hayt and Buck, McGraw Hill, 2019.[2]. Applied Electromagnetics, Early Transmission Line Approach, by S. M. Wentworth, JohnWiley, 2007.[3]. Elements of Electromagnetics, 5th edition, by Sadiku, 5th edition, Oxford University Press,2010.[4]. Electromagnetics, B. M. Notaros, Prentice Hall, 2011[5]. ASEE Annual Conference Paper, AC 2010-821: Enhancing Electromagnetics InstructionUsing
above principles have been discussed in greater detail by the author in hisprevious ASEE conference proceedings and publications (Narayanan, 2007, 2009 &2019). Some of those ideas have been reproduced here as deemed appropriate, for sake ofclarity and completeness.Assessment and the ‘ACORN’ Model The use of ACORN model suggested by Hawkins and Winter to conquer andmastering change, may offer some helpful hints for the novice professor (Hawkins &Winter, 1997). These five ideas provide guidelines as to how an instructor cansuccessfully try to implement the Concept Mapping Model or the Structured ContentModel in a 21st century classroom.Action : It is possible to effectively change things only when a teaching
. InFrontiers in Education Conference. FIE'96. 26th Annual Conference., Proceedings of, vol. 2, pp.725-729. IEEE, 1996.[14] zyBooks. https://www.zybooks.com/. Accessed Feb. 2019.[15] Vahid F., Edgcomb A., Lysecky S., and Lysecky R. New web-based interactive learningmaterial for digital design. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ConferenceProceedings, June, 2016.
Engineering Education, 2019 The CEBOK3 and ABET Accreditation Criteria: A Gap AnalysisIntroductionUndergraduate civil engineering curricula must satisfy a variety of constraints, notably anyinstitutional requirements and, to be accredited by ABET [1], the minimum requirements definedin the ABET General Criterion 3: Student Outcomes (see Appendix A), General Criterion 5:Curriculum (see Appendix B), and the Program Criteria for Civil and Similarly NamedEngineering Programs (also referred to as the civil engineering program criteria, or CEPC, seeAppendix C). The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) serves as the lead societyresponsible for content of the CEPC. ASCE also maintains and publishes the Civil
Philosophical Perspective on ABET’s Proposed Changes to Criterion 3,” Presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana[9] Walesh, S., “Proposed Revisions to ABET General Criteria 3 and 5: A Practitioner’s Perspective,” Presented at the Forum on Proposed Revisions to ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission General Criteria Outcomes and Curriculum, National Academy of Engineering, Washington D.C., February 16, 2016[10] Rationale for Revising Criteria 3 and 5, https://www.abet.org/rationale-for-revising-criteria-3-and- 5/, ABET web site, accessed on January 4, 2019[11] ETAC General Criteria changes (version 3.0A, 05-05-17), http://www.engtech.org/wp- content/uploads/2016/04/ABET-General-Criteria
Paper ID #26737Critical Thinking in Manufacturing Engineering EducationDr. Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University Arif Sirinterlikci is a University Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and the Depart- ment Head of Engineering at Robert Morris University. He holds BS and MS degrees, both in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Technical University in Turkey and his Ph.D. is in Industrial and Systems En- gineering from the Ohio State University. He has been actively involved in ASEE and SME organizations and conducted research in Rapid Prototyping and Reverse Engineering, Biomedical Device Design and
ASEE Board of Directors’ Advisory Committee on P-12 Engineering Education.Dr. Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University Richard J. (Rick) Freuler is a Professor of Practice and the Director for the Fundamentals of Engineer- ing for Honors (FEH) Program in Ohio State’s Department of Engineering Education in the College of Engineering. He teaches the two-semester FEH engineering course sequence and is active in engineering education research. He is also affiliated with the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department and conducts scale model investigations of gas turbine installations for jet engine test cells and for marine and industrial applications of gas turbines at the Aerospace Research Center at Ohio State
University in College Station. A native of Columbus, Ohio, she attended North Carolina A&T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) mycotoxin risk assessment and treatment in stored grains and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biological and Agricultural Engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Connecting specific knowledge areas throughout core courses in Biological and Agricultural
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 20194/29/2019 ASEE Paper_2019_Final - Google Docs Examining how undergraduate engineering educators produce, reproduce, or challenge technocracy in pedagogical reasoning Abstract Sociologists and historians of science/engineering have documented the salience of meritocracy and technocracy in engineering and engineering education (Cech, 2014; Slaton, 2015; Riley, 2008). Some engineering education scholars have begun to document how technocracy and meritocracy have been mechanisms of marginalization within engineering education (Slaton, 2015; Foor
to the US Armed Forces in his 32-year military career. He was elected an ASEE Fellow in 2018. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student-Led Study of Energy Flow and Storage in an Emergency MicrogridAbstractStudents investigate the feasibility of forming a microgrid in the downtown area of a larger cityin the Pacific Northwest. The objectives of this study are twofold: 1) Create a microgrid toprovide for prioritized urban loads and 2) prepare students who will likely design and installseveral microgrids in the region in the next few years. Generation is two hydroelectric units anda nearly equal amount of distributed photovoltaics. The grid is
ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE 2018, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 23-27, 2018,[Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/29754, accessed on April 5, 2019.[7] J. Watson, J., F. Vondra, I. Fidan, “The Development of a Framework for 3D Printing,Casting, and Entrepreneurship,” Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE 2017,Columbus, OH, USA, June 24-28, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/28955,accessed on April 5, 2019.[8] C. Pellicane, J. A. Blaho, “Lessons Learned from Adapting the NSF I-Corps Curriculum toUndergraduate Engineering Student Entrepreneurship Training,” Proceedings of the 2015VentureWell Open Conference, http://venturewell. org/open/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/PELLICANE. Pdf, accessed on April 5, 2019.[9] R
publication[8]; Book chapter (in publications and global educators review); Plenary Talk at the 11th networks. International Workshop on Design Theory; ASEE 2019 Workshop Biomimicry Educators Network contribution Evaluate the learning impact of the evidence-based instructional resources. Objecti ve 2 a. Assess student engagement in learning. Reflection analysis for JMU and
Paper ID #25469Board 101: Project Based Learning for a Mechanical Engineering Major Stu-dent: The Sustainability of Internal Combustion Engines (Student Poster)Mr. Aaron Price Barnett Aaron Barnett is currently a sophomore at Salt Lake Community College studying Material Science En- gineering with a minor in Chemistry. His academic focus includes renewable energy and sustainable materials. As well as helping shape a new generation of engineers and scientists to continue improving the world.Dr. Nick M. Safai, Salt Lake Community College Dr. Nick M. Safai is an ASEE Fellow. He has been an ASEE officer and member for the past