, no. 1. Wiley- Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 6–27, 2012. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x.[9] K. G. Ricks, J. A. Richardson, H. P. Stern, R. P. Taylor, and R. A. Taylor, “An Engineering Learning Community To Promote Retention And Graduation Of At-Risk Engineering Students,” 2014.[10] M. J. Grimm, “Work in progress - An engineering bridge program - the foundation for success for academically at-risk students,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2005. doi: 10.1109/fie.2005.1612214.[11] S. J. Gates Jr and C. Mirkin, “Encouraging STEM students is in the national interest,” Chron High Educ, vol. 58, no. 39, 2012.[12] Florida International University (FIU
promote relationship development, educate students about library resources and services,and to learn about the needs of the academic community [94]. These efforts could includedeveloping relationships with disability services offices and other offices and centers thatprovide direct support to disabled and struggling students, as well as to affinity groups andcenters that offer community and specific supports for students with various diverse identities oncampus. Building relationships with such groups could allow librarians and educators to interactdirectly with students, giving them the opportunity to share their experiences, frustrations,interests, and needs. Such outreach could provide insight into the needs of a wide variety ofstudents and
WiSTEM is theobservation that Black women are underrepresented in STEM for a variety ofreasons that include (1) anxiety pertaining to mathematics and computing (2) a lackof exposure to STEM disciplines and tangential careers (3) a lack of exposure toculturally responsive pedagogy, and (4) a lack of communities of support. Key Words - STEM Identity, Sense of Belonging, Persistence, Community, Self AwarenessINTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM STATEMENTMany institutions of higher education in the US do not reflect the racial and ethnicdiversity of our nation amongst its degree recipients. Clearly, we must acknowledgethe barriers to STEM education for individuals underrepresented in these disciplinesand develop interventions to mitigate them [1]–[3]. Racial
State University, and a PhD student in the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Insti- tute of Technology. Ancalle earned a B.S. from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez and a M.S. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, both in civil engineering. He has a passion for teaching undergraduate engineering courses, which has driven his teaching career for the past six years. He recently began working in the area of Engineering Education and plans to continue this path after completing his graduate studies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Validity evidence for measures of statistical reasoning and statistical
self-identified as Hispanic (6.33%). Of these 840 Hispanicstudents, undergraduates made up 664 (5% of GCOE), and graduate students made up 176 (1.3%of GCOE) [14]. Throughout the program, we hosted workshops to enhance mentoring participation withtopics such as the importance of mentoring, leadership skills development, and career pathwayexpectations. Social events were also included to build community among participants. Weinvited speakers who identified as Hispanic and held a graduate degree to promote visibility ofHispanics in STEM. Participants were also encouraged to meet independently, virtually or inperson. Our contributions are listed below: • We create a program structure for the development of Hispanic engineering students
. This framework guided the development of our RQs as well as the analysis andinterpretation of our findings.2.2 Cultivating EmpathyThere are a number of approaches educators have employed towards the goal of cultivatingempathy in students [3]. Engagement with community partners as part of an engineering designcourse has been described as a way to enhance empathy and students’ interpersonal interactions[25]. Moreover, application scenarios via role play have been shown to be valuable for improvingempathetic communication [26]. Role play can allow students to take on worldviews that may bedistinct from their own through consideration of alternative perspectives while craftingempathetic and non-empathetic responses.Other scholars have described
competence in engineers," Eurpoean Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 119-131, 2006.[4] B. Blandin, "The Competence of an Engineer and How It Is Built Through an Apprenticeship Program: A Tentative Model," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 57- 71, 2012.[5] J. Trevelyan, THe Making of an Engineer, Taylor & Francis, 2014.[6] C. Rottmann, R. Sacks and D. Reeve, "Engineering Leadership: Grounding Leadership Theory in Engineers’ Professional Identities," LEadership, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351-373, 2015.[7] R. A. Atadero, C. H. Paguyo, K. E. Rambo-Hernandez and H. L. Henderson, "Building inclusive engineering identities: implications for changing engineering culture," Journal of
build upon our previous studies and examine the beliefs and behaviorsof engineering students entering in Fall 2021, including longitudinal research analyzing theeffects of various pre-college experiences and student attitudes on self-efficacy, SI usage, andfirst-semester outcomes [7].Consequences of Preparedness for First-Year Engineering StudiesPre-matriculation credits, defined as classes taken in high school that are equivalent to college-level courses, have historically been a key indicator of student success in undergraduate STEMeducation programs [8]. Students receive these credits based on results from AdvancedPlacement (AP) and/or International Baccalaureate (IB) tests, or through dual enrollmentprograms at community colleges and other
were identified using internetsearch engines and professionally-oriented development websites (e.g., Burning GlassTechnologies). To be included in the subsequent analysis, degree programs were required tomeet all of the following criteria: (1) contain “mechatronics” in the name, (2) culminate in acertificate/credential, or more formal degree (i.e., Bachelor’s degree), (3) offered through acollege, university, or accredited online education institution, and (4) consisted of multiplecourses (i.e., not just one mechatronics course offered within a degree in another field). Graduateprograms were excluded to ensure results would be comparable to the Phase 1 survey of industryprofessionals. This search identified 29 mechatronics-related
advisor for Women in Computing club at Farmingdale, contributed in Grace Hop- per Celebration as a technical committee member and reviewer. Dr. Aydin has published and presented in peer reviewed venues about women in computing and broadening the participation over a decade.Lisa Cullington, National University Lisa Cullington, Ph.D. is an educational researcher with expertise in curriculum development, learning outcomes and educational assessment best practices. She focuses on building and evaluating academic programs that promote inclusive excellence for all learners. Currently, Dr. Cullington serves as the Director of Learning Outcomes for National University. Previously, she was the Founding Co-Director of the Honors
program, specifically, werecommend checking out the 2022 paper by Reyes and colleagues.1Early successes from the PINC program have contributed to the development of seven additionallarge-scale, NSF- and foundation-funded projects that focus on increasing equity and diversity incomputing through the use of peer mentoring, career-building and professional development, andevidence-based teaching practices, including real-world applications of course material. Weoutline these grants and their goals below and explain their conceptual ties to components of thePINC program.Expansion and Sustainability EffortsGOLD: The Graduate Opportunities to Learn Data Science (GOLD) program (2019-2022) wasfunded by NSF Innovations in Graduate Education to support the
—most notably is: Where do we, asmembers of the engineering education community, start? Is an entirely new approach needed orcan we find ways to complement current pedagogical approaches to engineering curricula? Aswith most debates, the solution most likely is somewhere in between; this means recognizing theexisting conventions effectively employed amongst experts while developing new conventionsthat make the foundations of engineering education easier and more accessible for novicesinterested in entering this profession that brings form and function to the world we live in.Theoretical Background:In the early 1970’s, Jerome Bruner, a prominent American psychologist, disparaged theprevailing educational practice of rote memorization as a
regional and national conferences such as ANTEC,National Plastics Expo (NPE), the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), andSolidWorks World. ANTEC, NPE and SolidWorks World have hundreds of thousands ofattendees from businesses all over the world. ASEE also has thousands of attendees who aremostly in Institutions of Higher Education (IHE). While presenting at these conferences we willmake our project information and outcomes available to all who are interested. By sharing thisinformation IHEs will be able to replicate our learning modules, review how we work withindustry partners, and build upon our successes.Pittsburg State University also has an annual professional development day for facultyimmediately prior to the start of the fall
paper, Engineering Problem Identification in Surgery (IDENT), EngineeringProblem Solving (SOLVE), and Engineering Proposal Writing Skills (WRITE). Participantswere asked to rate their level of certainty with which they believe they can perform each task ona Likert scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree). To ensure content-relatedvalidity, this instrument was reviewed by two professors in engineering education who haveexpertise in self-efficacy research and survey design. To gather validity evidence based onresponse processes, think aloud protocols were used with two students to improve the wording ofthe survey before its broader use. Undergraduate and graduate biomedical engineers from avariety of universities across the
of engineering as learning outcomes in civilengineering coursework requires, as a first step, the development of a baseline understanding ofcivil engineering undergraduate and graduate students' awareness of social justice, theirperception of social justice, and their previous experiences with social justice-related educationalcontent. Contributing to the development of this baseline knowledge is the objective of thispaper. We conducted a survey to assess the awareness of these students towards social justice,their conception of social justice, and their previous educational experiences with social justicecontent in an academic setting. In addition, we recognize that social justice is related toquestioning and changing the structures of
capital, and researchers’ schema development through the peer review process. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, and a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002) in Bioengineering from Clemson University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Understanding Needs of Undergraduate Engineering Students Who View Degree Attainment as “Transactional”AbstractThis research paper explores the story of an undergraduate engineering student who
theimpact of self-guided final projects. Farah et al. [9] similarly address the needs of non-STEMmajors by presenting work developing computational thinking via a single web application. Thisapproach requires no software installation and minimizes the challenges of working withmultiple applications including integrated design environments, digital education platforms, andfile system management.This paper presents a course building upon student competency in computational thinkingacquired during prerequisite work. These students expand their learning and expertise tointegrate various applications and technology stacks through robotics. Developing the ability tointegrate contributes to both student satisfaction and professional competency.Robot
development of “trading zones” between Faculty Fellowsin different disciplines. Even by analyzing just pre-activity interviews with Faculty Fellows andfinal interviews with Student Fellows, we can build insights related to this engineering-focusedcontext which frames conditions for both the interdisciplinarity pedagogy and the studentengagement that we are working to foster. Our findings illustrate that both interdisciplinarity andengagement are limited by the institutional context of engineering education, while alsorevealing how this kind of work can help students reflect on the limits of a traditionalengineering education and consider their own ability to advocate for change.Interdisciplinary Trading Zones In and Through PedagogyOur CREATE/STS
still perhaps not a “hottopic” in engineering education, its developing prominence in the conversation [8].We feel the most useful way to think about discourse is through the way Gee [9] describes small-d discourse and big-D Discourse. Small-d discourse is simply the features of a language,including the way it is spoken or written, whereas big-D Discourse is “the ways in which peopleenact and recognize socially and historically significant identities or ‘kinds of people’ throughwell-integrated combinations of language, actions, interactions, objects, tools, technologies,beliefs, and values” (p. 418). By examining how people use language (little discourse), we candetermine how they align themselves with different social groups (big Discourse
study, technicians are primarily characterized asmatriculants of 2-year community college programs or vocational technology high-schools.Roadmap Study: Workforce Education and Skills GapsAn education roadmap survey was developed for manufacturing operations managers across thesilicon-based PIC and fiber optics supply chain, to identify and prioritize workforce needs acrossthe supply chain. Over 50 firms evaluated their skills gaps, hiring and training challenges, andfuture worker demand for middle-skilled technical occupations, commonly known as technicianpositions. Results confirm an increasing demand for technicians in these two industries,especially for photonics technicians, CNC tool operators, and electrical engineering technicians(see Fig
Paper ID #36451”The only difference is now it counts:” Exploring the Role of a SummerBridge Program in Shaping Student Expectations of EngineeringTaylor Y. Johnson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Taylor Y. Johnson is a graduate student at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, where she serves as a graduate research assistant. Taylor earned her Bachelor’s from The University of Texas at Austin in Biomedical Engineering. She was previously a member of the student support staff for the Virginia Tech Center for the Enhancement of Engineering
Paper ID #40032Measuring the Impact of Extra-/Co-Curricular Participation onProfessional Formation of EngineersDr. Aimee Monique Cloutier, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Holly Matusovich is the Associate Dean for Graduate and Professional Studies in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in
network of university resources, and guide students in the exploration and selection of amajor and career direction.360 Coaching builds on the Advising-as-Teaching learner-centered approach to advising atNorthwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science [4], andsimilarly aims to leverage a naturally developing community within our first-semesterengineering design course, EGR 101L – Engineering Design and Communication. While manyof our 360 Coaches are involved with our first-semester design course as either an instructor or adesign team technical mentor, this is not universally true; some of our 360 Coaches are notinvolved in our first-semester course. This is a distinction between our 360 Coaching programand
Paper ID #38826Attracting Black Students to Undergraduate Engineering Programs: A RapidReview for Broadening ParticipationMicaha Dean Hughes, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Micaha Dean Hughes is a doctoral student in the Educational Psychology program in the Teacher Educa- tion and Learning Sciences department at North Carolina State University. Her research interests include community-engaged approaches to educational equity and access in STEM education, college recruitment and K-12 outreach practices for minoritized groups in STEM, mathematical identity development for rural adolescents and young adults, and
on equity, inclusion in the classroom, and easing student transition to the workforce catering to STEM graduates.Marcos Jose Inonan Moran, University of Washington Marcos Inonan is a PhD student and research assistant in the Remote Hub Lab (RHLab) of the depart- ment of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington in Seattle. His research is centered on developing remote laboratories with a lens of equitable access to engineering education, and driven by his commitment to promote diversity, equity and inclusion in STEM education. In addition to his research on remote laboratories, Marcos has expertise in digital communication theory, signal process- ing, radar technology, and firmware
Paper ID #38994Why Should You Join? Exploring the Role of Engineering Clubs on theUndergraduate Engineering ExperienceMs. Katherine Drinkwater, Duke University Katie Drinkwater is a recent graduate of Duke University with a Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering. She is excited to begin working towards her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in the Fall. Her interest in Engineering Education began through a project where she helped to design a makerspace inside a shipping container. Since then, she has explored design and engineering education through in- dependent projects and extracurricular leadership in SWE
provide hands-on, real-world learning; a combination of technicaland professional skills; and opportunities for new experiences and coursework. Improvementscan be made in community building, access to possible career information, better marketing toemployers, and more mentoring opportunities.IntroductionThe demand for engineers and other STEM related occupations is increasing [1], yet therecruitment and retention of students to their engineering programs continue to be a source ofpressure for universities [2, 3]. Currently there is limited research concerning how and whystudents choose certain engineering degrees, which becomes an issue as universities compete todraw in more students through innovative engineering programs. More recently, there
Pennsylvania and an M.S. and B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from OSU.Ms. Amanda Marie Singer, The Ohio State University Amanda Singer is a second-year PhD student in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She graduated in 2021 from Michigan Tech with a Bachelor’s and Master’s of Science in Environmental Engineering. Her current research interests include engineering identity formation, community college engineering education, and mixed methods research.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State
continueto develop ML/AI educational programming in response to the growing demand: promotingmeaningful social connection, defining and sharing numerous pathways within ML/AI, and thinkingcarefully about building programming confidence and avoiding the weed-out effect.Prior work has shown that social belonging intervention through worksheet-style materials improvedperformance, confidence, health, and social engagement, particularly for women and Black studentsin engineering and CS [48], [49]. Our study proposes a potential alternative form of social belongingintervention through diverse opportunities for social connection. Extroverted individuals may enjoyweekly socials, but introverted individuals may prefer 1-on-1 mentorship. Institutions should
NahmaniAmanda SeskoKa Yee Yeung ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 ACCESS in STEM: An S-STEM Project at University of WashingtonTacoma Supporting Economically Disadvantaged STEM-Interested Students in their First Two YearsAbstractAchieving Change in our Communities for Equity and Student Success (ACCESS) in STEM atthe University of Washington Tacoma started as a Track 1 S-STEM program in 2018 and hassupported 69 students to date. This year we received Track 2 funding and welcomed our fifthcohort to campus, with funding to support ~32 additional students through 2026. University ofWashington Tacoma is an Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-servinginstitution (AANAPISI