AC 2012-5247: A NEW VISION FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN INSTRUC-TION: ON THE INNOVATIVE SIX COURSE DESIGN SEQUENCE OFJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering
- wide Undergraduate Teaching Award at the University of South Florida St. Petersburg (2003-2004). For his research, he received the North Carolina Association for Research in Education’s Distinguished Paper Award (2000) and the Best Paper Award from the American Society for Engineering Education, K-12 Engineering Division (2010). His current research focuses on applying motivation and cognitive theories to instruction. He developed the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation with the hopes that novice, as well as experienced, instructors would find it useful as a tool for improving their instruction (see http://www.MotivatingStudents.info/).Mr. Philip R. Brown, Virginia Tech Philip R. Brown is a graduate student in the
AC 2012-3646: BUILDING A CLASSROOM CULTURE THAT PAVES THEWAY TO LEARNINGDr. Brian Swartz P.E., University of Hartford Brian Swartz is Assistant Professor of civil engineering at the University of Hartford. He received his degrees from the Pennsylvania State University, where he also taught for two years. He was a visiting faculty for one year at Bucknell University before joining the University of Hartford. He teaches courses in structural engineering and pursues research related to concrete bridges. Page 25.274.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Building a
of FE theory, along with practical experience in applyingcommercial FE software to engineering problems. The lack of experience in using numericalcomputational methods in designing solutions to structural, vibrational, electromagnetic,biomedical electromagnetics, computational fluid dynamics, and heat transfer is a noted problemfor some engineering graduates.6,20 The 2012-2013 Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology, Inc. (ABET, Inc.) Criteria for Engineering Programs specify that engineeringprograms must demonstrate that their engineering students attain in Criterion 3, (k): "an ability touse the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice."21Hence, engineering schools have, or are planning
AC 2012-4303: OPEN PROCESS FOR ENTREPRENEURING TEAM COL-LABORATION: PARALLELS FROM AN ACADEMIC RESEARCH TEAMTO THE START UP THEY STUDIEDProf. Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. teaches graduate design methods and a new REVS class on the car experi- ence in the College of Engineering at Stanford University, using applied psychology and art for story- telling to facilitate student progress from the idea and prototyping phases to delivery. With a focus on entrepreneurial leadership, Karanian makes productive partnerships with industry and forms collaborative teams from the areas of engineering, design, psychology, and communication. She was the Michael T. Anthony Professor at Wentworth
. Page 25.282.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Capstone 101: A Framework for Implementation of an ABET-Compliant Capstone SequenceIntroductionAccreditation of an engineering or engineering technology degree program depends on theinclusion of a Capstone Design (CD) sequence in the required curriculum. Specifically, ABETCriteria 5 for Accrediting Engineering Programs states, “Students must be prepared forengineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on theknowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and incorporating appropriate engineeringstandards and multiple realistic constraints.” ABET Criteria 5 for Accrediting
Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department at Texas A&M University, Kingsville, Texas. His current research interests include adaptive array processing, signal processing, and smart antennas.Prof. Reza Nekovei, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Reza Nekovei is a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at Texas A&M Univer- sity, Kingsville. He has many years of experience in developing graduate and undergraduate programs. Nekovei is currently co-PI for two NSF projects related to teaching by design research and development, one in nanotechnology (NSF-NUE), and another in robotics (NSF-CCLI). He was a senior Fulbright grantee at Bucharest Polytechnic University
. Page 25.1063.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Preparing to Use Rapid Prototyping: Lessons Learned from Design and Manufacturing ProjectsAbstractRapid prototyping (RP), also known as 3D Printing, has gained an important role in engineeringeducation. It can be used to fabricate mechanical designs in a timely manner and hence is usefulfor design and manufacturing courses. In fact, many higher education institutions now have RPmachines for research and teaching. Current literature reports that involving RP in design andmanufacturing courses can significantly enhance active learning by providing quick and directfeedback on their designs via prototypes. In some cases
, passenger-freight integration, multi-modal competition and cooperation, strategicsystem decision-making, and economic and land development impacts at the urban and mega-region scales.In order to serve as a useful teaching tool as well as a useful input to real policy and technicaldecisions in Portugal, these varied research efforts demanded a unifying engineering systemsframework. The CLIOS Process was chosen as the integrating engineering systems framework.The rather ambitious challenge made to the students was to design at a relatively macro-level,using the CLIOS Process as well as inputs from active research and guidance from activeresearchers, a complete HSR system for Portugal (excluding detailed design of infrastructureelements and focusing
schools. Boynton is currently continuing teaching the high school courses to students virtually.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and design education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is co-PI on several NSF grants to explore identity and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design
teach- ing both undergraduate and graduate design and education-related classes at Stanford University, she con- ducts research on weld and solder-connect fatigue and impact failures, fracture mechanics, applied finite element analysis, and engineering education. In addition, from 1999-2008, she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). Sheppard’s graduate work was done at the University of Michigan.Ms. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Stanford University Samantha Brunhaver is a fourth-year graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on
, internships andpractical courses (Provitera, 20078). This paper describes a case in which a well designed andsuccessfully integrated Capstone Course can serve as an amalgam of theory and practice andprovide benefits like reinforcing learning, developing skills, and improving congruence withthe discipline.Background of the InstitutionLa Universidad de Monterrey (UDEM) is a private, non profit institution founded in 1969 inthe city of Monterrey in northeastern Mexico. UDEM offers 35 undergraduate degreeprograms in fields such as business, medicine, architecture, engineering, education and law.It serves 3,000 preparatory, 8,000 undergraduate and 1,000 graduate students.Its undergraduate degree program in Industrial and Systems Engineering is focused
Theory & Techniques Society (MTT-S). Schwartz has authored or co-authored 25 papers and conferences including one Best Student Paper (ANTEM/URSI), and co-authored one book chapter on Optoelectronic VLSI. His expertise spans a broad variety of topics including photonics, analog and integrated circuits, microwave and mm- wave technology, and recently, sensing applications.Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov, ABET Ashley Ater Kranov is ABET’s Managing Director of Professional Services. Her department is responsi- ble for ensuring the quality training of program evaluators, partnering with faculty and industry to conduct robust and innovative technical education research, and providing educational opportunities on sustainable
proper support or scaffolding that can minimize students' frustrationwhile guiding them in developing the necessary skills to learn and solve the given problem. This paper describes a study which investigates the perception of third year students in aclass while learning in a difficult, mathematically intensive engineering course. Although thelecturer for the class had gone through a series of pedagogical training on active, cooperative andproblem-based learning, this is the first time the lecturer implemented CPBL. This study isactually part of a larger research on training and supporting academic staff in implementingCPBL.III. STUDY DESIGN This study was conducted in a three-credit course called "Process Control andDynamics
Page 25.27.20outcomes for the graduate program, and incorporate other assessment media (designreports, theses, presentations, field journals, photographs, etc.). This preliminaryassessment completed at Michigan Tech will be continued to assess post-programattitudes and lives of alumni, expanding it to other similar international programs withinthe university, and offered to other universities, all with a desire to share best practices ininternational community engagement, enhance the sustainability of such programs, andmost importantly, make meaningful contributions to communities around the world.26References1. Boyer, E. L. (1996). The Scholarship of Engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7):18-33.2. Grandin
for accessibility, and engineering design education.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering students through the lens of identity theory (NSF BRIGE grant), advancing problem
AC 2012-4210: THE FOUR PILLARS OF MANUFACTURING ENGINEER-ING: WHAT ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY GRADUATES SHOULDKNOW ABOUT MANUFACTURINGProf. Robert L. Mott, University of Dayton Robert L. Mott is Professor Emeritus of engineering technology at the University of Dayton, member of the Steering Committee of the SME Manufacturing Education & Research Community, Senior Staff of the NSF-sponsored National Center for Manufacturing Education, author of four textbooks in the mechanical engineering technology field, and a Fellow of ASEE.Prof. Ronald J. Bennett Ph.D., Univeristy of Saint Thomas Ronald J. Bennett holds the Honeywell Chair in Global Technology Management in the School of Engi- neering at the University of St
AC 2012-4683: DESIGNING AND BUILDING COMPETITIVE HYBRIDELECTRIC RACING VEHICLES AS A VALUED TEACHING AND LEARN-ING METHOD FOR UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS: ATWO-YEAR REVIEW WITH A PROJECTION OF FUTURE PLANSDr. Robert W. Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University Robert W. Fletcher joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Lawrence Techno- logical University in the summer of 2003, after several years of continuous industrial research, product development and manufacturing experience. Fletcher earned his bachelor’s of science degree in chemical engineering from the University of Washington, in Seattle, Wash., a master’s of engineering in manufac- turing systems from Lawrence Technological
andexploring topics, and electronic document sharing, to name a few. The devices that can beutilized for education also are shifting. Students and instructors have access to information andinstruction not only from a desktop or laptop computer, but also digital tablets, smart phones, anddedicated readers. However, the form of delivery is not as important as the design of theinstruction. Technology does not automatically improve instruction unless the instructiondelivered through the technology is designed to be better. A number of studies havedemonstrated that the technology alone does not improve students’ learning and has nosignificant impact on student achievement. Researchers insist that these studies are asking thewrong question8. They state
T. Allen, University of Texas, Austin David Allen is the Gertz Regents Professor of chemical engineering, and the Director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Resources, at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of six books and more than 200 papers in areas ranging from coal liquefaction and heavy oil chemistry to the chemistry of urban atmospheres. For the past decade, his work has focused primarily on urban air quality and the development of materials for environmental and engineering education. Allen was a Lead Investigator for the first and second Texas Air Quality studies, which involved hundreds of researchers drawn from around the world, and which have had a substantial impact on the
; • To develop and field-test engineering communication assignments; • To contribute these assignments to a central library (maintained at UCLA), accessible to all CPR users; • To assess the impact of the integration of visual communication on course development, student performance, and student confidence levels in visual communication skills.Re-designed through successive iterations during the grant period, CPR5 extends the platform’scapability to allow for the creation and evaluation of student work, be it graphics, visuals, oralpresentations, movies, or posters.Basic Features of CPR: Four structured workspaces perform in tandem to create a series ofactivities that reflect modern pedagogical strategies for using writing in
department because I don’t have a degree in industrial design even though I do research that’s related to product development. So ironically the best fit for me has been, so far, has been in a marketing school even though that’s not my background at all. It’s just that they, in this particular situation, they understand how the research that I'm doing relates… is useful when you’re trying to understand customers which is a huge part of marketing. We see that Ignacio's experience with his colleagues lead him to understand who he is asa professional. While trying to secure a job as engineering faculty, he has a hard time convincingother engineering faculty of his worth. However, his interactions with faculty in
questions, specific next steps in the project include: Analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of survey results via a project report (released in 2012) Development of outcome statements for each attributes, informed through the literature and best practices of CMC member organizations Validation of outcomes statement for attributes through focus group research held at ASEE’s 2012 Annual Conference in San Antonio in June; at the International Conference on Engineering Education in Finland in August; and at the World Engineering Education Forum in Argentina in October Pursuit of grant funding to develop and pilot test engineering-related curricular modules related to key attributesConclusion
identified two intrinsic problems for instructional planners19. When researchersengage in inquiry, it is not in a vacuum. Rather, they are motivated to a particular courseof action by the context of their field. There may be unanswered questions from previousresearch, or technological problems defined by a larger agenda. Hence the first practicein the new Framework for Science Education is “Asking questions (for science) ordefining problems (for engineering)”. But doing this requires familiarity with the currentcontext. So there is a Getting-on-Board Problem. In actual research, this is oftenaccomplished through the apprenticeship structure of graduate studies: new researcherspiggy-back on the work of practicing researchers. But this approach is
they wanted to study and practice that topic in whatever way seemed best, as long as theycould demonstrate mastery of a computer architecture. This final learning agreement gave thestudents autonomy that was comparable autonomy to a senior design course (see Figure 2). Figure 2: Comparison of learning activities for the Control IE and Experimental IM sections.Increased levels of choice and autonomy in the Experimental IM sections are highlighted in bold. The level of autonomy in a Senior Design course is included for reference. Page 25.357.83.3 IM Course Design Procedure To create this autonomy-supportive environment, we
: Engineering Process – The engineering design process is amulti-step, iterative process that engineers use to design a product for a specific customerneed. Identify (Identify the Need) Describe (Describe the Need; Characterize and Analyze the System) Generate (Generate Concepts; Select a Concept) Embody (Embody the Concept; Test and Evaluate the Concept; Refine the Concept) Finalize (Finalize and Share the Design)Learning Objectives Area 3: Engineering Skills and Habits of Mind Systems thinking— Systems thinking is not one thing but a set of habits or practices within a framework that is based on the belief that the component parts of a system can best be understood in the context of relationships with each other and
. engineeringeducation to identify ways in which alternative pedagogies and applications of engineering mightbe foreclosed by these “best practices,” however well-intentioned. It focuses on ABETformulations regarding undergraduate engineering since 1980 as a set of epistemic and sociallyregulatory instruments. Analyzing both the purported function and the content of outcomesincluded in ABET documents over the last three decades, the paper shows how ABET hasprojected a formative role for outcomes in curricular development and institutional credibility. Inparticular, impacts of ABET outcomes-focused practices upon diversity, public participation, andthe pursuit of social justice in engineering education (and thus in the profession of engineering)will be examined
design process, and the importance of teamwork6. Reformers have tried and, thus far,have failed to significantly influence students’ beliefs concerning engineering when theintervention occurs at a secondary level6. Secondary education may be too late to significantlyinfluence the subjects that students’ value. It is now time to examine the impact of such programswhen these programs are implemented at a younger level.This paper describes an engineering outreach program that is being implemented at anelementary level between the Colorado School of Mines and elementary schools in AdamsCounty District 50. Our program has been developed based on best practices from othersuccessful engineering outreach programs for pre-college schools, such as the
AC 2012-4444: IMPLEMENTATION OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING TECH-NIQUES TO INCREASE MINORITY STUDENT INTEREST IN RF/MICROWAVEENGINEERINGDr. Michel A. Reece, Morgan State University Michel A. Reece is currently a tenured professor and Research Director of the Center of Microwave, Satellite, and RF Engineering (COMSARE) in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Morgan State University. In this center, she pursues research in the areas of high frequency device char- acterization and modeling, highly efficient solid-state power amplifier design, and adaptable components design for software defined radio applications. She became the first female recipient at Morgan State to obtain her doctorate degree in
pedagogical techniques and best practices with fundamentals of howlearning occurs and participants’ personal experiences to respond to the needs of industrypersonnel as well as increasing enrollment and interest in NE.2. Course DesignSeveral factors guided the course design. One factor was the profile of the students who mightenroll in the course. Additional factors included the approach used by Virginia Tech for onlinecourse design. Next, considerations of students’ math skills led to the design of a refreshermodule on math to help those who needed additional help with these concepts. Finally, thetechnology available guided our course design.A. Profile of Students’ interested in online offering of Graduate Nuclear CertificateProgramResearch revealed