Paper ID #40671Advancing Inclusion: A Professional Development Series for Faculty at aHispanic Serving InstitutionDr. Dianne Delima, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dianne G. Delima is the Project Policy Analyst for The Institute for Meaningful Engagement (TIME). Dr. Delima received her doctorate in Higher and Postsecondary Education at Teachers College, Columbia University, where she focused on the learning experiences of first-generation college-going students of color and faculty members’ use of a funds of knowledge approach for teaching in college classrooms. Her research has been published in College Teaching and
completedactivating different sounds and musical notes in theirScratch programs! This project fuses art and musiccomposition in an incredibly inventive way. 10 Foiled @Mon View Housing ProjectsIn a similar workshops, students construct foil sculpturesthat connect to the Makey Makey invention kit andScratch to trigger sounds and music when touched. Theirimaginations shape both the 3D artwork and the soundsthey design. 11 AMAZE-ing Creations @ beSocial CharlotteAnd one of my favorites, students code maze games inScratch using arrow keys to move characters through thelevels. The students created a game controller out ofPlay-Doh which when
focuses on how school structure and curricular emphases both result from and perpetuate social inequalities.Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. She works on the evaluation of several projects aimed at improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM.Pauline Charlotte Dott, University of Washington Pauline C. Dott is a Ph.D. candidate in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington in Seattle. She received her BS in Applied Learning and Development from the University of Texas at Austin and her M.Ed. from the University of
Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelorˆa C™Aimee Sayster, Aimee Sayster is an undergraduate student in the Mechanical Engineering department at Clemson Uni- versity. She is in an undergraduate researcher investigating Black immigrant students’ experiences in engineering. She will graduate with her BS in Mechanical Engineering in August 2023.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including tDr
+), which cultivates gender equity across all of the activities of STEM profes- sional societies; the ADVANCE and INCLUDES I-Corps Inclusion Collective, which aims to create more equitable and inclusive I-Corps programs; the New Jersey Equity in Commercialization Collective, which works with technology transfer offices and investors across the state of New Jersey to build a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive commercialization ecosystem; and the Commemorating 20 Years of ADVANCE: Design Thinking Sessions for a Digital Exhibit and Archive project. She is also PI for the WEPAN Accel- erator, an entrepreneurship accelerator program for women in engineering funded by the Small Business Administration. Prior to joining
graduate programs? ▪ How can we better reach and serve first-generation college students? ▪ Differences between first-generation college students and first-generation graduate students? ▪ How can we also serve indigenous students, women from MENA and Central Asian countries, and rural Appalachian students? (targeted by some CEED Outreach Programs)30 30 A Step to the Doctorate: Future Projects Funding & Expanding Research & Networking ▪ Locate potential funding ▪ Literature review and "deep sources dive" into peer programs ▪ Partner with HBCUs, HACUs, ▪ Best
academic disciplines. This understanding is critical to ensuring that students from allbackgrounds are appropriately supported in pursuing their degrees and faculty are equipped todiscuss these topics with their students. In this pilot project, researchers from RowanUniversity’s College of Engineering and College of Education who were interested in exploringDEIJ implementation in the classroom in a cross-collaborative manner explored the followingresearch questions: (1) What level of relevance do faculty members place on DEIJ as part oftheir degree program curriculum? and (2) How do faculty members’ conceptions of DEIJcompare across disciplines?There is scant literature on faculty members' conceptions of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, andJustice
eventually led her to a position in IT for a semiconductor IP start-up. Fast forward through coast-to-coast moves to Boston, San Diego and finally Rochester, Kathy spent many years in the fitness industry while raising her daughter, wearing every hat from personal trainer and cycling instructor to owner and director of Cycledelic Indoor Cycling Studio. Kathy draws upon these many diverse career and life experiences while directing WE@RIT. In the spring of 2020, Kathy earned her Master of Science degree in Program Design, Analysis & Manage- ment through RIT’s School of Individualized Study, combining concentrations in Project Management, Analytics and Research, & Group Leadership and Development. An unabashed
agenda toconfront social oppression at whatever levels it occurs [22, p.9]. The lead author is an outsider toengineering and comes from the discipline of education– more specifically a critical and focusedon racial literacy. It was his task to examine engineering culture through the literature inengineering/education and Whiteness. The themes that emerged might often be seen simply asproblems the discipline faces rather than their own findings. In this paper, we follow Jerry Rosiek and Kathy Kinslow (2016) in choosing to capitalizeBlack but not white, because “Capitalized, it signifies a conscious project of resistinginstitutionalized racism. We chose not to capitalize “white” because at this point in our historythere is no collective
article is to bring students’ viewpoints to the forefront in order to initiate aconversation with other entities, which will aid in the future in the construction of a “cultureof wellness” [29-30] for all.4.5 PositionalityThe first author is a cis-female international graduate student from a South Asian countrystudying in the College of Engineering. She has been working on this project for the past fewmonths, intending to increase awareness of the university and the support programs andservices. As an overseas student, she is unfamiliar with the university system, which has ledher to learn more about university support from engineering students, whom she consideredexperts in this issue. This intent likely contributed to establishing rapport and a
understand major choice in specific engineering disciplines, but this study will focus on engineering major choice generally. igure 1FConceptual Model from Main et al.’s study[40]. ote: This study focuses on the high school life stage from the conceptual model. The figure wasNadapted to highlight this portion of the model. ethodologyMQualitative researchers study things in their natural setting to make meaning of phenomena as people experience them[41]. A common type of methodologyin qualitative research are case studies – a case study allows researchers to study a phenomenon in its bounded context[42]. This project used a case study to understand the factors influencing women students' pursuit of
expect to see broader outreach toprospective students and focused efforts to yield students into our college ofengineering. The next slide projects our indicators of success and assessment planfor our new Outreach and WIE Ambassadors. 14 Indicators of Success & Assessment Plan Impact of WiE Ambassadors Impact on Recruitment & Yield • # of families impacted • # of WiE Students Contacts • # of tour request • UT Applied • # of Ambassador Hours • UT Accepted • # of Ambassador Service • TCE Accepted Events • UT Enrolled
Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Prof. Stephen L DesJardins Stephen L. DesJardins teaches courses related to public policy in higher education, economics and fi- nances in postsecondary education, statistical methods, and institutional research and policy analysis. His research interests include student transitions from
6meetings in the Fall semester with an average participation rate of 82%. GROUP had 368participants and 5 meetings in the Fall semester with an average participation rate of 51%. GOALhad 69 participants with 6 meetings and an average participation rate of 56%. For more informationon the M&M program visit https://www.purdue.edu/wiep/.Data Collection and Assessment ToolThe data for this project were collected using the online survey software Qualtrics. The survey wasdisseminated at the end of the Fall 2020 semester. A total of 124 of the 597 program participantscompleted the survey voluntarily and anonymously, resulting in a response rate of 20.77%.The survey was comprised of multiple-choice questions about demographics, intrinsic motivation
stories from the past of computing trailblazers, as well as specific information about different networks and projects aimed toward increasing the participation of Black people in computing and computer science. Videos and podcasts feature personal insights from current students and professionals in computing, as well as strategies on how to overcome common struggles in computing such as the impostor syndrome. In addition, Twitter, an online platform that provides a space for people to post short segments of text as well as media, is a space to hear directly from and engage with Black people in technology and computing. Together, these media resources provide opportunities to hear the thoughts and experiences of people in computing and computer
this study was to learn from Black immigrant students in graduate level engineering howthey experience their racial and/or ethnic identities in their engineering pursuits. As part of thebroader reach of this project, we have established a rapport with those engaging in this workwith us through our participatory action design. Participatory research co-creates theknowledge and centers the perspective of the community under study with the overall effort tocreate actionable outcomes for the advancement of their community (Baum et al., 2006). Basedon our centering of the voices in this work, and our development of a community of solidarity,rather than participants, we refer to those who have engaged in this work with us as members.Five members (n
as a tester for Apple long before the pandemic; this was anawakening into a kinder, more structured world. I recovered from the deep traumaof hardships of my BA in computer science at the school that cannot be named (hiss).For me, the virtual world has gotten better and better as the pandemic causedeveryone to hone their tools. Everyone now knows how to attend a virtual meeting,and the platforms continue to improve.I was intrigued by how this world I chose to be in and wanted to keep was affectingother people. A surprising number of them seemed to want to make virtual a thing ofthe past, just an an unwelcome thing that happened that they could say “goodbye”to.So, I started a research project to understand the benefits, drawbacks, and
, an outcome spaceemerged with five main categories of description about the kinds of obstacles studentsencountered in regard to the hiring process in computing and industry practices: Uncertainty,interview techniques, time demands of preparation, anxiety management, and improvinginclusivity. Yet, our goal was not to focus on the issues faced, but the solutions to resolve them.As such, the perceptions of the students’ experiences guided the creation of a set ofrecommendations for students, academia, and industry, to mitigate concerns with the currentprocess and to consider avenues for improvement.1 IntroductionOver the next decade, computer and information technology occupations are projected to rise11% [1]. However, disparities in the
attrition in the biomedical sciences," Journal of College StudentRetention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 205-226, 2020.[31] B. J. Barnes and J. Randall, "Doctoral student satisfaction: Anexamination of disciplinary, enrollment, and institutional differences," Researchin Higher Education, vol. 53, pp. 47-75, 2012.[32] E. Zerbe, G. M. Sallai, and C. G. Berdanier, "Projections as preparationfor persistence: Exploring expectations for engineering graduate school," in2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[33] M. Artiles and H. Matusovich, "Doctoral Advisor Selection in ChemicalEngineering: Evaluating Two Programs through Principal-Agent Theory,"2022.[34] M. Bahnson, M. Wyer, C. Cass, and A. Kirn, "Graduate
key readings, provide more time for completion, incorporate structured opportunities to discuss and apply concepts.2. Offer practical guidance - Share models and provide opportunities to practice applying concepts to deliverables and initiatives beyond the classroom.3. Give project feedback - Provide mechanisms like office hours, mentors, or peer groups to give deliverable feedback.4. Build in accountability - Use tools like checklists, 18 partnerships, or program completion certificates tied to deliverable implementation.5. Facilitate community building - Incorporate networking opportunities within and across Cohorts. Clarify expectations around Fellows
hall oncampus for the duration of the program and take non-credit courses in subjects that arehistorically challenging and required for first-year students, such as calculus, chemistry, andengineering fundamentals. Although the courses are designed to replicate courses offered in thesemester (i.e., assign homework, group projects, and exams) the students do not receive creditfor the courses. Thereby, the SBP provides the space and time for students to grapple with thedifficulty of the academic subjects without penalty to their academic standing or grade pointaverages (GPAs). Throughout the program, students also participate in informational seminars presented byvarious offices on campus to understand the range of opportunities and
global leader in innovation is of utmost importance especially during a time weresolving the world’s most pressing and complex issues, including the recent pandemic, climate,environmental challenges, and a sustainable economy require innovative solutions. This need isreflected in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) occupation growthwhich has increased 79% since 1990 and is projected to grow by 10.8% by 2031 (U.S. Bureau ofLabor Statistics, 2022). The demographics of the United States are undergoing a profoundtransformation, marked by the significant and growing presence of Hispanic and Latinoindividuals within the population. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, as of 2020, Hispanicsand Latinos constituted approximately 18.7
ongoing research project. Students are provided with housing and paid a stipend for the summer. This experience intentionally provides an opportunity for students to establish a network at VT prior to starting classes while gaining familiarity with the institution and surrounding area. METHOD - PART ICIPA NTS Participants in an S-STEM grant (n = 60). • US Citizen • Full-time students - at least 12 credits per
faculty and administrative positions. She is a licensed civil engineer with a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech.Dr. Sarah Rodriguez, Virginia Tech Sarah L. Rodriguez is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. Her engineering education research agenda centers upon engineering and computing identity development of historically marginalized populations at higher education institutions. Currently, Dr. Rodriguez is involved with several large-scale interdisciplinary research projects focused on institutional environments and STEM identity development are sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Kapor
Black engineering students to find each other, I guess. Or even just black STEM students in general. I think there is a chapter of the National Society of Black Engineers here on campus. I think.Yeah. But I didn't know that until probably after the second semester of after I transferred in to it. And that was only because I was working on a non-school related project. And I was trying to find, I used to volunteer for, what's it called? It was basically an organization that promotes commercial space travel, because that's the industry I want to go into. And so, I was looking for student groups that I could potentially get volunteers from. So, I was looking at all the different STEM and business
majority counterparts? Participants We excluded anyone that identified HC as positive since the scope of our project was tosee how HC is negatively impacting FG students and their intersecting disenfranchised identities(self-identified women, Latino, and Black bodies). Asian identities were excluded from thisstudy since they are statistically overrepresented in science and engineering [22]. An initialround of coding the data revealed that out of n984, n341 answered the emotion question on thesurvey. Of the n341, n157 answered the survey question with either a negative emotion orlacking any memory of HC experiences. The demographics of the n157 participants is listed inthe chart below. Table 1: Participant Demographics
interaction support of non-traditional doctoral students. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 187.OECD, 2005, “The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Oslo Manual, Third Edition” prepared by the Working Party of National Experts on Scientific and Technology Indicators, OECD, Paris, pg. 71.O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Rigler Jr, K. L., Anastasia, C. M., El-Amin, A., & Throne, R. (2021). Scholarly voice and academic identity: A systematic review of doctoral student agency. Handbook of Research on Developing Students
participants’ experiences andengagement may not be similar. Practitioner C shared that that it is incumbent upon thepractitioner to create numerous opportunities and options for engagement in virtualprogramming. In addition to learner diversity, adaptability to the participants’ environment andtheir access to resources is important. Practitioner B stated: “In a classroom setting, I typically provide all the materials needed for a structure challenge. In preparing for the virtual structural challenge, I gave the students a lot of options for the challenge. I made sure that all project materials needed could be easily found in the home. For example, for our structure challenge, I suggested students use items like empty
Education. Her research focuses on the interactions between student mo- tivation and their learning experiences. Her projects focus on student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, development of problem solving skills, self-regulated learn- ing, and epistemic beliefs. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022Lived Experiences of African American Engineering Students at a PWI Through the Lens of Navigational CapitalIntroduction There are significant disparities
minifigures. Inone study conducted with girls aged six to eleven, some girls preferred the look of the minidollsbecause of the different clothing options that they have, while others projected body image idealsonto the minidolls, claiming that they “could never be that skinny” [14, p. 258]. The lattercomment raises concerns about the target audience of the LEGO Friends minidolls. If girls arenot able to identify with the minidolls, they may feel excluded from playing with these toy sets.In addition, LEGO’s choice of introducing minidolls for the LEGO Friends sets instead ofusing the traditional, block-shaped minifigures may suggest to girls that their LEGO toys areinherently different and the original LEGO product lines aren’t “meant for them