Conference Session

Works-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brittany Lynn Butler; Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Reaction,” Internet:http://www.csb.gov/assets/1/19/T2_Final_Copy_9_17_09.pdf, Sept. 7, 2009 [Oct. 10, 2017].2) S.J. Dee, B.L. Cox, R.A. Ogle, “Process Safety in the Classroom: The Current State ofChemical Engineering Programs at US Universities,” Process Safety Programs, vol. 34, no. 4,pp. 314-319, 2015.3) D.C. Shallcross, “Safety Shares in the Chemical Engineering Classroom,” Education forChemical Engineers, vol. 9, pp. 94-105, 2014.4) D.C. Shallcross, “Safety Education through Case Study Presentations,” Education forChemical Engineers¸ vol. 8, pp. 12-30, 2013.5) J. Rest, D. Narvaez, M. Bebeau, S. Thoma, “A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT andschema theory,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 11, pp. 291-324, 1999.6) Q. Zhu, C.B. Zoltowski, M.K

Conference Session

Faculty Development Work-in-Progress Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tershia A. Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan; Stephanie Marie Kusano, University of Michigan; Grenmarie Agresar, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Faculty Development Constituency Committee

and future discussions will help us refine ourprogramming to better tailor professional development opportunities to the needs ofundergraduate and graduate student instructors.References: 1. O’Neal, C., Wright, M., Cook, C., Perorazio, T., & Purkiss, J. (2007). The impact of teaching assistants on student retention in the sciences: Lessons for TA training. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 24-29. 2. Jardine, H. E., Friedman, L. A. (2017). Using Undergraduate Facilitators for Active Learning in Organic Chemistry: A Preparation Course and Outcomes of the Experience. Journal of Chemical Education, 94 (6), 703-709. 3. Lewis, S. E. (2011) Retention and Reform: An Evaluation of Peer-Led Team Learning

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul A Bender, Ohio Dominican University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

reason(s) would you give to recommend students participate in projects found onsocialcoder.org?What reason(s) would you give to recommend students not participate in projects found onsocialcoder.org?Students generally answered the first question with a variation of ”it is a potential source ofprojects where you can gain experience”.In the second question, the students made notes about the relative lack of project choices, and thelack of communication from the project leaders.The question of why there is a contradiction between these two statements stems from two factors.The first factor was simply the number of projects that the students could apply to. While studentswere allowed to view approximately 20 projects, fewer than 10 were accepting

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session on Conservation and Optimization

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farshid Zabihian, California State University, Sacramento

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

Google Drive. This practice had several majorbenefits. The most important impact of this practice was that the knowledge and experiencestudent gained in their project accumulated and stored in a single location. The students workingon the same topic had access to the folder as well as the instructor(s). When new students startedto work on the same topic, the Google Drive folder from past teams was shared with them andthey had access to everything the previous team(s) had done and used.The final overall course assessment was according to the following items:  Proposal 15%  Interim report 15%  Final report 30%  Progress reports or meetings 20%  Poster

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Huihui Qi, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

students’ knowledge about sustainable engineering:  Question 1: What does sustainability mean to you now? How do you define sustainability?  Question 2: Who can contribute to sustainability? In what way(s)?  Question 3: What can engineers do for sustainability?  Question 4: What sustainable engineering design tool/principle do you know?  Question 5: Have you heard of any individual or organization take any initiatives for sustainability? If yes, explain the details.The answers before and after showed an obvious progress in students’ knowledge ofsustainability and sustainable engineering approaches. Overall, at the beginning of the semester,a lot of students had the very limited knowledge of all of the questions

Collection

2018 ASEE Conferences - Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration / San Antonio proceedings

Authors

Te-Shun Chou

understandingof the subjects of network management after taking this course.Bibliography1. Burke, J. R. (2004). Network management concept and practice: A hands-on approach, Pearson.2. Clemm, A. (2007). Network management fundamentals, Cisco Press.3. Yemini, Y. (1993). The OSI network management model. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 31(5). 20-29.4. M.3400: TMN Management Functions. (2000), International Telecommunication Union, Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-M.3400-200002-I/en Retrieved February 165. Chou, T. S. (2017). Curriculum Design and Project Evaluation of a Network Management Course Implemented in Distance Education and On-Campus Classes. IGI Global International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course

Conference Session

First-Generation Track - Technical Session IV

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Jennifer Blue, Miami University; Brielle Johnson, Miami University; Amy Summerville, Miami University; Brian P. Kirkmeyer, Miami University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, First Generation

, students indicated whether they had no computer science,introductory computer science, or advanced/PA computer science and if they had taken the APComputer Science A or Computer Science Principles and/or IB Computer Science exams andtheir score(s). For Physics, …. Students in both courses indicated their highest level of highschool mathematics (algebra; geometry; trigonometry/pre-calculus; calculus; advanced calculusor higher) and whether they had taken an AP examination in Calculus and/or an IB exam inMathematics and their score(s). Participants then completed the measures of efficacy, mindset, belongingness, and goalaffordances described above. 2) Post-exam survey. Participants who had completed the intake survey received anemail

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Susan F. Freeman, Northeastern University; Jennifer Ocif Love, Northeastern University; Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University; Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

faculty teach new concepts in programming,design, microelectronic control and graphical communication in relation to needing such skills inorder to solve a problem related to their Cornerstone theme. We see firsthand the positiveoutcomes of this approach in both student and faculty satisfaction and will continue to refine ourcourses based on feedback and research.References[1] First Year Engineering Learning & Innovation Center, Northeastern University, 2018.[2] National Academy of Engineering. Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[3] S. Ambrose and C. Amon, "Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie

Conference Session

Division for Experimentation & Lab-oriented Studies Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David F. Radcliffe, Swinburne University of Technology; Mary K. Pilotte, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

Conference Session

Supporting Faculty in Course Development and Pedagogy

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; James A. Middleton, Arizona State University; Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University ; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Kara L. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

Conference Session

Teacher Attitudes, Beliefs, & Self-efficacy

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erica J. Marti, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Erdogan Kaya, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Ezgi Yesilyurt, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Johana Iglesias, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

self-motivated andheld high self-efficacy in teaching. Having teachers with above average motivation may havecaused a deeper learning of engineering design, which resulted in high scores and holdinginformed NOE views.AcknowledgementsOpinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Thismaterial is based upon work that was partly funded by the National Science Foundation undergrant number IIA1301726.References[1] National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices,crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.[2] National Research Council. (2006). America's lab

Conference Session

Practice I: Academic Success

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kirsten A. Davis, Virginia Tech; David Reeping, Virginia Tech; Ashley R. Taylor, Virginia Tech; Cherie D. Edwards, Virginia Tech; Homero Gregorio Murzi, Virginia Tech; David B. Knight, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

establish a clear purpose for mixing,with Kajfez and Creamer calling upon the engineering education community to clearly explainhow mixing aligns with the research question(s) [18].Heeding these calls from literature, our mixed methods study uses a fully-integrated approach toexamine the complex experiences of students in a global engineering program. By using anunderexplored mixed methods approach to data analysis, we respond to Bryman’s request thatthe community more broadly incorporate mixing strategies in data analysis [19]. We also followKajfez and Creamer’s suggestions by making explicit our purpose for mixing, emphasizing thealignment between this mixed methods approach and our research questions [18].BackgroundThe Rising Sophomore Abroad

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University; Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Best Papers

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University; Amena Shermadou, Ohio State University; Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

individuals in the future. Students embraced the potential of growthmindset to lead to more productive reactions and behaviors both in their academic and personallives. This indicates a need for additional work to understand concrete strategies for individualswho have learned about growth mindset to begin to implement such productive practices intotheir everyday habits. Future work should also capture the ways in which the culture(s) ofundergraduate engineering education can be shifted to develop and sustain growth mindset.Appendix: Focus Group Prompts Used to Solicit Student Reflections, Adopted from [19]Chapters 1 and 2 1.1. Think about someone you know who is steeped in the fixed mindset. Think about how they're always trying to prove

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William W. Tsai, California State University, Maritime Academy; Amber Janssen MLIS, California State University, Maritime Academy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

and potential collaborationbetween engineering librarians and mechanical engineering faculty. For the course in this study,the plan for next year will be to use these instructional activities again. It also has started thediscussion of where additional library collaboration earlier in the mechanical engineeringprogram would be appropriate and beneficial. This additional exposure and training will buildfamiliarity with information fluency skills, which may be perceived as difficult, but are essentialin the professional environment.Works Cited[1] G. Kerins, “Information seeking and students studying for professional careers: The cases of engineering and law students in Ireland,” Inf. Res. Int. Electron. J., vol. 10, no. 1, Oct. 2004.[2] S

Conference Session

Student Empathy and Human-Centered Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benedikt von Unold, Stanford University; Annette Isabel Böhmer, Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory; Nicolas Ledl, Stanford University; Udo Lindemann, Laboratory for Product Development and Lightweight Design; George Toye, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bettina Jeanine Casad, University of Missouri, St. Louis; Monica Palomo P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Natalie Mladenov, San Diego State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

Conference Session

Problem Solving, Adaptive Expertise, and Social Engagement

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University; Rose M. Marra, University of Missouri; Douglas J. Hacker, University of Utah; John Dunlosky

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Research, 16, 235-239.Atman, C., Adams, R., Cardella, M., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners, Journal of Engineering Education 96(4), 359-379.Atman, C. J., & Bursic, K. M. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design process. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 121-132.Ball, L. J., Ormerod, T. C., & Morley, N. J. (2004). Spontaneous analogizing in engineering design: A comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies, 25(5), 495-508.Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148

Conference Session

Studies in Engineering Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

May-Ling Tan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Jamalludin Harun, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert A Ross, University of Detroit Mercy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

are different the lights will flash the same color at least one-third of thetime–it will be more than one-third if the instruction sets RRR or GGG ever occur. Note thatMermin subsequently “revisits” and “refines” this discussion with thought experiments that donot require perfect correlations between the particles.7,8 In our modern language we would saythat the “things” that traverse the path from transmitter to receiver have undergone “quantumentanglement.” Schroeder points out that the word entanglement was first introduced bySchrödinger in 1935 but has been virtually absent from publication until the 1980’s.9Dirac Notation – Vectors and Operators/MatricesPaul Dirac introduced a new mathematical notation to describe quantum mechanics that

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Ann Gelles, Utah State University; Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University; Marialuisa Di Stefano, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Roslyn Montecalvo, American University; Teresa L. Larkin, American University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

generalpopulation.The revised instrument and methodologies were employed with a larger sample of approximately120 of American University’s undergraduate students in late fall 2017. The data collected fromthe larger study are presently being analyzed and will be presented in a future full paper. Wehope that the revised survey instrument will be adapted for use by other physics and STEMeducators so that additional comparisons across an even wider range of student populations canbe made.References[1] S. B. Cook, M. Druger, and L. L. Ploutz-Snyder, “Scientific literacy and attitudes towards American space exploration among college undergraduates,” Space Policy

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

commonalities in their individual ways of experiencing innovation(see Table 1). These categories formed a hierarchical progression from less comprehensive tomore comprehensive ways of experiencing innovation along two dimensions: Focus ofInnovation Activities and Extent of Innovation Process (see Figure 1). It should be noted that thefinal four categories (5–8) were each at the highest level of comprehensiveness in the outcomespace. They differed primarily on the Focus of Innovation Activities dimension.The Focus of Innovation Activities dimension addressed the area(s) that individuals prioritizedduring innovation activities (e.g., technical, human, or enterprise). In less comprehensivecategories (1–4), this dimension represented participants

Conference Session

Novel Classrooms

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie L. P. Jessop, University of Iowa; Anna L. Flaming, University of Iowa

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

contribute ideas for activities based upon their more recentexperiences learning the material.How can I start flipping a large class with no graduate or undergraduate TA support?Julie – Since I don’t really know the institutional constraints involved, I’m just going to throwout some ideas. Maybe one will work; hopefully, one will get you thinking about what couldwork for you specifically. Could you conscript your graduate student(s) to TA for you pro bono(as part of their broader impact fulfillment on a research stipend)? Could you have anindependent study class for undergraduates that would focus on teaching, mentoring and

Conference Session

Engineering Workforce Track - Session VI

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Lesley M. Berhan, University of Toledo; Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Engineering Workforce

year engineering technologydegree programs in the mid-1950’s in response to a need for more practically trained graduateswho would be able to enter the workforce without the need for specialized on the job training.ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.), the accreditation body forboth engineering and engineering technology programs, describes engineering and engineeringtechnology as “closely related professional fields that differ in curricular focus and careerpaths”[3]. Graduates from engineering programs are called engineers, graduates of four yeartechnology programs are known as technologists, and graduates from two year technologyprograms are called technicians. In general, engineering curricula are mainly focused

Conference Session

Faculty Track - Technical Session IV

Collection

2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference

Authors

Scott Franklin, Rochester Institute of Technology; Eleanor C. Sayre, Kansas State University; Mary Bridget Kustusch, DePaul University

Tagged Topics

Faculty

/newfaculty/nfw.cfm. [3] D. R. Sokoloff and R. K. Thornton, Interactive Lecture Demonstrations. John Wiley & Sons, 2001. [4] K. Perkins, W. Adams, M. Dubson, N. Finkelstein, S. Reid, C. Wieman, and R. LeMaster, PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2012, pp. 702–709. [5] “PhysPort: Supporting physics teaching with research-based resources,” https://www.physport.org. [6] M. Dancy and C. Henderson, “Pedagogical Practices and Instructional Change of Physics Faculty ,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 78, pp. 1056–1063, 2010. [7] “Interdisciplinary Research Institute in STEM Education,” https://www.facebook.com/interdisciplinaryresearchinstituteinstemeducation/. [8] A. D. Robertson, L. J

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill Davishahl, Bellingham Technical College; Xichen Jiang, Western Washington University; Sean P. Dever, Western Washington University; Lindsey Bear, Bellingham Technical College; Tim Mark Christman, Western Washington University; Dana Hickenbottom, Itek Energy/Western Solar; Sam Winters, Itek Energy

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, Dittrich Y, Gorschek T, Grahn H. “The success factors powering industry-academiacollaboration.” IEEE Software. 2011 Jul 22(2):67-73[6] Pertuze, J. A., Calder, E. S., Greitzer, E. M. & Lucas, W. A. “Best practices for industry-university collaboration.” MIT Sloan Management Review. (2010) Vol. 51 No. 4[7] ELI Report, “7 things you should know about cross-institutional collaboration.” EduCause,ELI Report, July 2015[8] Beckman, et al. “Closing the Industry-Academic Gap.” IEEE Software. 1997 Nov/Dec: 49-57[9] Jones S, Clulow S. “How to foster a culture of collaboration between universities andindustry.” Higher Education Network, The Guardian, 2012(https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2012/aug/02/the-value-of-research

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Molly A. McVey, University of Kansas; Caroline R. Bennett P.E., University of Kansas; William N. Collins, University of Kansas; Remy Lequesne, University of Kansas; Carl W. Luchies, University of Kansas; Sara E. Wilson, University of Kansas; Elaina J. Sutley, University of Kansas; Matthew F. Fadden, University of Kansas; Chris Melgares, University of Kansas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

answers.Students who viewed video content were asked to answer multiple choice survey questions,including: “How much time did you spend watching the videos,” “How many different videosdid you watch,” “Which video topics were the most valuable to you,” and we asked for the gradereceived in the prerequisite course. Only students who did watch videos were asked furthersurvey questions which were Likert-scale questions asking about their level of agreement withthe following statements: “The videos helped me to better understand the topic(s) in the videos,”and “The videos created were relevant to me.” They were also asked to rate video quality asExcellent, Satisfactory, or Poor. Figure 1. Feedback on effectiveness of short video projects from students who

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; Ally Kindel Martin, The Citadel; Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel; Kevin C Bower P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Towards Community Integration and Academic AtmosphereStudents were asked to reflect on several statements related to their attitudes towards communityintegration and academic atmosphere. Overwhelmingly, 74.1% of students strongly agreed that“[their] interaction[s] with [their] professors were positive and beneficial, thus helping [them]succeed during [their] first semester” (Figure 7A). In contrast 37.0% of students strongly agreedand 51.9% agreed that “…[they knew] other students in [their] classes and [felt] part of anacademic learning community” (Figure 7B). While students certainly cited satisfaction withtheir professor and peer relationships, they were most satisfied with their professorialrelationships.Student responses were generally

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emre Tokgoz, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

). Construction of the vector space concept from the viewpoint of APOS theory, Linear Algebra Appl. 432 (8), 2112-2124.15. Piaget, J, & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science (H. Feider, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1983).16. Piaget, J., J.-B.Grize, A., Szeminska, & V.Bang (1977). Epistemology and psychology of functions (J. Castellano`s and V.Anderson:Trans.)17. Slavit, D. (1995). A growth-oriented route to the reification of function. In D. T. Owens, M. K. Reed, and G. M. Millsaps (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, 1, 284-290