teachers. These teachers will expand ontheir previous research and assist other teachers with their own curricular development to preparefor final publication to www.teachengineering.org. We will document at least twenty curricularpieces.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1609089. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.This work has also been supported by the Institute for Critical Technology andApplied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech.References [1] V. Lohani and T. Younos, “Implementation and assessment of an interdisciplinary
resulting in a call to view the concept of belonging as complex,multi-faceted, and impacted by extra-institutional factors [6]. Recent research on sense of belonging among graduate students has begun to consider demographicattributes and characteristics of the academic environment [7-10]. Gardner et al.’s [8] exploration ofdoctoral students’ sense of belonging across different disciplines indicates that engineering doctoralstudents reported a relatively lower sense of belonging within their academic department compared tostudents in other disciplines. Recent work by O’Meara et al. [11] echo this claim, reporting that fewerfacilitators of sense of belonging exist within STEM doctoral program environments than in non-STEMprograms. These
, and A. S. Malik, “The influences of emotion on learning and memory,” Front. Psychol., vol. 8, no. 1454, 2017.[3] M. J. Riemer, “Integrating emotional intelligence into engineering education,” World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 189–194, 2003.[4] D. Kim and B. K. Jesiek, “Work-in-Progress: Emotion and intuition in engineering students’ ethical decision-making and implications for engineering ethics education,” 2019.[5] A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman, 1997.[6] F. Pajares, “Self-efficacy in academic settings,” in American Educational Research Association, 1995.[7] D. W. McMillan and D. M. Chavis, “Sense of community: A definition and theory,” J
., & Leifer, L. J. A1 (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and 1613 learning. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 103-120. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison A2 433 of students and expert practitioners. Journal of engineering education, 96(4), 359-379. Carberry, A. R., Lee, H. S., & Ohland, M. W. (2010). Measuring A3 engineering design self‐efficacy. Journal of Engineering 192 Education, 99(1), 71-79
, has gained attention from the computingeducation community over the last few years [1]. The focus in PI is active student engagementthrough discussion, involving students in the answering and discussion of multiple-choicequestions. This is typically accomplished by obtaining real-time student feedback through theuse of student response systems in class as the students learn the topic.SOLID is an acronym that denotes five basic principles widely used in designing software builton the .NET platform. S stands for SRP (Single Responsibility Principle), O for OCP (OpenClosed Principle) L for LSP (Liskov Substitution Principle), I for ISP (Interface SegregationPrinciple) D for DI (Dependency Inversion Principle). The main purpose of these
Paper ID #44107Whistle While You Work: Drivers and Impacts of Happiness at Work forEngineersMr. Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he worked in consulting in the private sector and as an analyst in the U.S. Government. Heˆa C™s earned ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Whistle While You Work: Antecedents and Impacts of Happiness at Work for EngineersAbstract This research explores the
engineering students. 11 References[1] R. W. Bybee, “The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications,” Sci. Child., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 10–13, 2014.[2] S. Rodriguez, K. Allen, J. Harron, and S. A. Qadri, “Making and the 5E Learning Cycle,” Sci. Teach., vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 48–55, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.2505/4/tst18_086_05_48.[3] R. P. McCurdy, M. L. Nickels, and S. B. Bush, “Problem-based design thinking tasks: Engaging student empathy in STEM,” Electron. J. Res. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 22–55, 2020, Accessed: Jan. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ejse.southwestern.edu
(CEAS), the Integrated Teaching and LearningProgram (ITLP) emerged in the 1990’s from student demand and with college recognition thatattrition was a concern. At the time, CU offered hands-on experiences only in select junior- orsenior-design courses. “‘From an engineering perspective, lab classes are good because they giveyou a feeling for what you’re learning, and if you’re a visual learner, ITLP can help you learnfaster and better,’ said Eric Peers, an electrical and computer engineering senior,” who chairedthe student movement to launch more access to hands-on learning [28]. Envisioning an approachthat was more targeted for specific populations was not yet on the table.Improved student retention and satisfaction were early ITLP outcomes [29
, Aurora University, United States – Illinois, 2018. [Online]. Available:https://www.proquest.com/docview/2384858972/abstract/CD5B029B15BE4E11PQ/1[3] H. Jabbar, L. Schudde, M. Garza, and S. McKinnon-Crowley, “Bridges or barriers? Howinteractions between individuals and institutions condition community college transfer,” TheJournal of Higher Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 375–398, Apr. 2022. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1953339.[4] J. Koyama and S. Desjardin, “Building bridges and borders with deficit thinking,” Educ.Real, vol. 44, p. e86415, Apr. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623686415.[5] “Dismantling Deficit Thinking: A strengths-based inquiry into the experiences of transferstudents in and
institution.” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 297-312, 2021.[4] M. F. Rogers-Chapman. "Accessing STEM-focused education." Education and Urban Society, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 716-737, 2014.[5] J. L. Petersen and J. S. Hyde. "Trajectories of self-perceived math ability, utility value and interest across middle school.” Ed. Psych., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 438-456, 2017.[6] D. L. and Z. Lavicza, “Dissecting a Cube as a Teaching Strategy for Enhancing Students’ Spatial Reasoning,” Proceedings of Bridges 2019, pp. 319–326,[7] u/diegolieban, “GeoGebra and 3D printing: Mathematics as a creative practice,” GeoGebra, Feb. 03, 2020. www.geogebra.org/m/pkfzccjw (accessed Jan. 16, 2021).[8] Y. Gao, S. Liu, M. M. Atia, and A
Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. pp 1-11. 10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0011[2] Bajwa, M. (2014). Emerging 21(st) Century Medical Technologies. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 30(3), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.303.5211[3] Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. MIT Press.[4] Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., & Stienstra, M. (2004, 2004/01/01). Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(1), 30-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259190[5] Cutting, K., & Hedenborg, E. (2019). Can Personas Speak? Biopolitics in Design
from application & practice & toward theory, math, engineering sciencethe US • By 1980’s hands-on training had dropped significantly • National Science Foundation-funded university Coalitions in the 1990’s tried to bring some of the hands-on approach back to the curriculum For much of its history, engineering has worked to weed out all but the perceived brightest and best, with the belief that theBrief History of majority of students did not have what it takes to make an engineer.Engineering We have broadened our view of whichEducation in students have
more educators aboutour curriculum in an attempt to achieve wider adoption of CS Frontiers.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants1949472, 1949492, and 1949488. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] B. Broll, Á. Lédeczi, G. Stein, D. Jean, C. Brady, S. Grover, V. Cateté and T. Barnes, "Removing the Walls Around Visual Educational Programming Environments," in Proceeding of the 2021 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), St. Louis, Missouri, 2021.[2] L. Alvarez, I. Gransbury
development efforts, and served in several administrative roles. She has been recognized for her teaching, advising, service, and research and as an Exemplary Faculty Member for Excellence in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Evolution of a Student Transition and Success Program Reflections on a 10 Year JourneyAbstractA lot has happened since 2012 – in society, in education, and in one engineering studentdevelopment program, called The Academy of Engineering Success (AcES)! AcES started in2012 at West Virginia University (WVU), a large, mid-Atlantic, R1 institution, and receivedNSF S-STEM funding beginning in 2016 and corporate
. She received undergraduate and graduate degrees in mechanical engineering from Duke and NC State, respectively. Her research interests include engineering education and precision manufacturing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Use of Personas in Rating Scholarship ApplicationsIntroductionThis evidence-based practice paper introduces a method for creating subjective, holistic rubricsbased on the human-centered design concept of personas. It can be difficult to align assessmentmetrics with subjective artifacts, especially when the goal of the artifact itself is subjective. Thefaculty team who collaborated on an NSF S-STEM project faced
= 1, 2, 3,….,N, where N isthe parameter form calculated byN 2m 1. Finding N is required in order to compute theperiodogram and Fisher test. In addition, we take our deterministic random phase θ in the interval[-π,π]. The problem of detecting the periodical components in a time series (described in (2)) isequivalent to the problem of detecting peaks in a periodogram in2,9.We focus in detecting aperiodicity from (2) in frequency domain and the periodogram that is coordinated at Fourier in9.In spectral analysis, therefore, we take ∆t as sampling time, and we convert it in to frequency bycalculating Nyquist frequency f which is going to observe in frequency domain as double sideband with the interval S f , f from1-2 which can be defined
show typical Mossbauer spectra of iron film prepared by spin coating and sol-gel method respectively. The Mossbauer spectrum of samples prepared by spin coating can befitted with two Lorenzian doublets. This indicates presence of two different forms of iron. Theisomer shift,0.53 m/s relative to iron foil spectrum, and quadrupole splitting, 0.8 mm/s, of line Bagree with octahedrally co-ordinated Fe3+. However, line A shows very little isomer shift, 0.04mm/s relative to iron foil spectrum, and quadrupole splitting of 1.3 mm/s. The isomer shift ofline A is compatible with Fe0 but presence of quadrupole splitting indicates non-symettricelectron density at the site of iron nuclei. But the intensity of line A is significantly lowcompared to line B
the authors, and the Commission cannot be heldresponsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.7. References[1] S. Swarat, P. H. Oliver, L. Tran, J. G. Childers, B. Tiwari, and J. L. Babcock, “How Disciplinary Differences Shape Student Learning Outcome Assessment,” AERA Open, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 233285841769011, 2017.[2] G. W. G. Bendermacher, M. G. A. oude Egbrink, I. H. A. P. Wolfhagen, and D. H. J. M. Dolmans, “Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review,” High. Educ., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 39–60, 2017.[3] B. J. Harper and L. R. Lattuca, “Tightening Curricular Connections: CQI and Effective Curriculum Planning,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 51, pp. 505–527, 2010.[4
will be presented to high school students as part of Siant LouisUniversity engineering summer camps in June and July 2017.BibliographyDeWalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Rowman Altamira.Elam, M. E., Fonseca, D. J., & Lindly, J. K. (2011). Transportation Systems Curriculum for High Schools. Retrieved February 2, 2011.Islam, S., & Brown, S. (2013). Transportation-OPOLY: An Innovative Tool to Promote Transportation Engineering. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2(3), 31–36.Luken, B., & Mumbower, S. (2010). Poster: Engaging Transportation Engineering Activities for Middle School and High School Students. Louisville, Kentucky
1734834. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. We also wish to thank Mr. William Michael Anderson and Ms. ClaudiaDesimone for help with data collection.References[1] S. Byun, J. L. Meece, M. J. Irvin, and B. C. Hutchins, “The role of social capital in educational aspirations of rural youth,” Rural Sociology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 355–379, 2012.[2] C. Carrico, H. M. Matusovich, and M. C. Paretti, "A qualitative analysis of career choice pathways of college-oriented rural central Appalachian high school students," Journal of Career Development, 2017.[3] Carrico, C.A., “Voices in the
(Alice’ss major), theere is a signifficant compoonent (subsyystem S) thaatrequires skills from discipline d S (Sarah’s ( majjor). And as is the case iin most enginneering projjects,a multi-ddisciplinary approach a to developing the t artifact wwould be benneficial.Alice and d Sarah present an intereesting perspeective becau se they weree both excelllent candidattes toparticipatte in SELEC CT but had vastly v differeent team exp eriences. Allice was ultim matelysuccessfu ul in
enhance theseintrinsic motivators.2.2 Resiliency5Globalization, competition and existing dynamic market conditions require engineers toconstantly innovate, to work and adapt under uncertain conditions and to quickly learn andrecover from mistakes and fails. This requires a high level of “resiliency” defined as theability to overcome and rise above adversity and difficult situations. Page 26.89.3Resiliency describes one´s ability to move forward with optimism and self-confidence evenwhen we are immersed in adversity. It is a mental state motivated by our thoughts, which arein part formulated by our success and our interpretations of past and current
., & Von Bergen, C. (2000). The One to One Survey: Traditional Versus Nontraditional Student Satisfaction With Professors during One to One Contacts. Caring, 37(30.10), 1-46.3 Rendon, L. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative higher education, 19(1), 33-51.4 Stewart, S. S., & Rue, P. (1983). Commuter students: Definition and distribution. New Directions for Student Services, 1983(24), 3-8.5 Kasworm, C. E., & Pike, G. R. (1994). Adult undergraduate students: Evaluating the appropriateness of a traditional model of academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 35(6), 689-710.6 Donaldson, J. F., &
. Ray, (1992), Robotics and Manufacturing Automation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY.[3] Hsieh, S. and Hsieh, P.Y., “Web-based Modules for Programmable Logic Controller Education,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 13(4), Dec 2005, pp. 266- 279.[4] Hsieh, S. and Hsieh, P.Y., “An Integrated Virtual Learning System for Programmable Logic Controller,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93(2), April, 2004.[5] Hsieh, S. and Hsieh, P.Y., “Animations and Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Programmable Logic Controller Education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 2003.[6] Hsieh, S., “Reconfigurable and Scalable Automated Systems Projects for Manufacturing Automation and Control Education
1+|𝑇 | 1+0.88356VSWR = 1−|𝑇𝐿| = 1−0.88356 = 16.176 𝐿Example: 2.2Design a broadband amplifier making use of negative feedback and calculate the S-Parameters for the equivalent circuit of the amplifier given below:Using again the Kirchhoff’s current and voltage laws, the Admittance matrix 𝑦11 𝑦12[𝑦 ] can be derived as, 21 𝑦22 1 1 𝑖 𝑅2 −𝑅2 𝑣1[ 1] = [ 1 ] [𝑣2 ] 𝑖2 𝑔𝑚 −𝑅 1 1+𝑔𝑚 2 𝑅2From the y matrix, the S-matrix can be derived as 1 𝑔𝑚 𝑍0S11= S22 = 𝐷[1- 𝑅 ] 2 (1+𝑔𝑚 𝑅1 ) 1 −2𝑔 𝑍
managers in new engineers’ socializationprocesses as well as Brunhaver et al.’s [15] analysis of the supports and barriers in newengineers’ experiences in the workplace. The latter study highlighted ways in which experiencessuch as employee education, help from managers and coworkers, and camaraderie served as bothsupports (when present) and barriers (when absent) to participants’ transitions to the workplace.EPS researchers have also explored engineering career pathways [16, 17] and perceptions of keyoutcome measures [18].To extend our knowledge of new engineers’ experiences of the transition from school to work,we draw on data from a large multi-institution study to explore 1) what types of tasks andactivities new engineers engage in during