and potential collaborationbetween engineering librarians and mechanical engineering faculty. For the course in this study,the plan for next year will be to use these instructional activities again. It also has started thediscussion of where additional library collaboration earlier in the mechanical engineeringprogram would be appropriate and beneficial. This additional exposure and training will buildfamiliarity with information fluency skills, which may be perceived as difficult, but are essentialin the professional environment.Works Cited[1] G. Kerins, “Information seeking and students studying for professional careers: The cases of engineering and law students in Ireland,” Inf. Res. Int. Electron. J., vol. 10, no. 1, Oct. 2004.[2] S
Research, 16, 235-239.Atman, C., Adams, R., Cardella, M., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners, Journal of Engineering Education 96(4), 359-379.Atman, C. J., & Bursic, K. M. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design process. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 121-132.Ball, L. J., Ormerod, T. C., & Morley, N. J. (2004). Spontaneous analogizing in engineering design: A comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies, 25(5), 495-508.Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148
are different the lights will flash the same color at least one-third of thetime–it will be more than one-third if the instruction sets RRR or GGG ever occur. Note thatMermin subsequently “revisits” and “refines” this discussion with thought experiments that donot require perfect correlations between the particles.7,8 In our modern language we would saythat the “things” that traverse the path from transmitter to receiver have undergone “quantumentanglement.” Schroeder points out that the word entanglement was first introduced bySchrödinger in 1935 but has been virtually absent from publication until the 1980’s.9Dirac Notation – Vectors and Operators/MatricesPaul Dirac introduced a new mathematical notation to describe quantum mechanics that
generalpopulation.The revised instrument and methodologies were employed with a larger sample of approximately120 of American University’s undergraduate students in late fall 2017. The data collected fromthe larger study are presently being analyzed and will be presented in a future full paper. Wehope that the revised survey instrument will be adapted for use by other physics and STEMeducators so that additional comparisons across an even wider range of student populations canbe made.References[1] S. B. Cook, M. Druger, and L. L. Ploutz-Snyder, “Scientific literacy and attitudes towards American space exploration among college undergraduates,” Space Policy
commonalities in their individual ways of experiencing innovation(see Table 1). These categories formed a hierarchical progression from less comprehensive tomore comprehensive ways of experiencing innovation along two dimensions: Focus ofInnovation Activities and Extent of Innovation Process (see Figure 1). It should be noted that thefinal four categories (5–8) were each at the highest level of comprehensiveness in the outcomespace. They differed primarily on the Focus of Innovation Activities dimension.The Focus of Innovation Activities dimension addressed the area(s) that individuals prioritizedduring innovation activities (e.g., technical, human, or enterprise). In less comprehensivecategories (1–4), this dimension represented participants
contribute ideas for activities based upon their more recentexperiences learning the material.How can I start flipping a large class with no graduate or undergraduate TA support?Julie – Since I don’t really know the institutional constraints involved, I’m just going to throwout some ideas. Maybe one will work; hopefully, one will get you thinking about what couldwork for you specifically. Could you conscript your graduate student(s) to TA for you pro bono(as part of their broader impact fulfillment on a research stipend)? Could you have anindependent study class for undergraduates that would focus on teaching, mentoring and
year engineering technologydegree programs in the mid-1950’s in response to a need for more practically trained graduateswho would be able to enter the workforce without the need for specialized on the job training.ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.), the accreditation body forboth engineering and engineering technology programs, describes engineering and engineeringtechnology as “closely related professional fields that differ in curricular focus and careerpaths”[3]. Graduates from engineering programs are called engineers, graduates of four yeartechnology programs are known as technologists, and graduates from two year technologyprograms are called technicians. In general, engineering curricula are mainly focused
/newfaculty/nfw.cfm. [3] D. R. Sokoloff and R. K. Thornton, Interactive Lecture Demonstrations. John Wiley & Sons, 2001. [4] K. Perkins, W. Adams, M. Dubson, N. Finkelstein, S. Reid, C. Wieman, and R. LeMaster, PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2012, pp. 702–709. [5] “PhysPort: Supporting physics teaching with research-based resources,” https://www.physport.org. [6] M. Dancy and C. Henderson, “Pedagogical Practices and Instructional Change of Physics Faculty ,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 78, pp. 1056–1063, 2010. [7] “Interdisciplinary Research Institute in STEM Education,” https://www.facebook.com/interdisciplinaryresearchinstituteinstemeducation/. [8] A. D. Robertson, L. J
, Dittrich Y, Gorschek T, Grahn H. “The success factors powering industry-academiacollaboration.” IEEE Software. 2011 Jul 22(2):67-73[6] Pertuze, J. A., Calder, E. S., Greitzer, E. M. & Lucas, W. A. “Best practices for industry-university collaboration.” MIT Sloan Management Review. (2010) Vol. 51 No. 4[7] ELI Report, “7 things you should know about cross-institutional collaboration.” EduCause,ELI Report, July 2015[8] Beckman, et al. “Closing the Industry-Academic Gap.” IEEE Software. 1997 Nov/Dec: 49-57[9] Jones S, Clulow S. “How to foster a culture of collaboration between universities andindustry.” Higher Education Network, The Guardian, 2012(https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2012/aug/02/the-value-of-research
answers.Students who viewed video content were asked to answer multiple choice survey questions,including: “How much time did you spend watching the videos,” “How many different videosdid you watch,” “Which video topics were the most valuable to you,” and we asked for the gradereceived in the prerequisite course. Only students who did watch videos were asked furthersurvey questions which were Likert-scale questions asking about their level of agreement withthe following statements: “The videos helped me to better understand the topic(s) in the videos,”and “The videos created were relevant to me.” They were also asked to rate video quality asExcellent, Satisfactory, or Poor. Figure 1. Feedback on effectiveness of short video projects from students who
Towards Community Integration and Academic AtmosphereStudents were asked to reflect on several statements related to their attitudes towards communityintegration and academic atmosphere. Overwhelmingly, 74.1% of students strongly agreed that“[their] interaction[s] with [their] professors were positive and beneficial, thus helping [them]succeed during [their] first semester” (Figure 7A). In contrast 37.0% of students strongly agreedand 51.9% agreed that “…[they knew] other students in [their] classes and [felt] part of anacademic learning community” (Figure 7B). While students certainly cited satisfaction withtheir professor and peer relationships, they were most satisfied with their professorialrelationships.Student responses were generally
). Construction of the vector space concept from the viewpoint of APOS theory, Linear Algebra Appl. 432 (8), 2112-2124.15. Piaget, J, & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science (H. Feider, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1983).16. Piaget, J., J.-B.Grize, A., Szeminska, & V.Bang (1977). Epistemology and psychology of functions (J. Castellano`s and V.Anderson:Trans.)17. Slavit, D. (1995). A growth-oriented route to the reification of function. In D. T. Owens, M. K. Reed, and G. M. Millsaps (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, 1, 284-290
is possible that further analysis will indicate arelationship between the measured constructs and the probability of changing to a non-engineering major.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1712089. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] Stephen R. Porter and Paul D. Umbach. “College Major Choice: An Analysis of Person–environment Fit”. In: Research in Higher Education 47.4 (2006), pp. 429–449. [2] Kerry Meyers et al. “Perspectives on First-Year Engineering Education”. In: age 13 (2008), p. 1. [3
perceptions offemale and male K-12 students: effects of a multimedia overview on elementary, middle-, andhigh-school students,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 519–531,2013. 15[7.] N. Abaid, V. Kopman and M. Porfiri, "An Attraction Toward Engineering Careers: TheStory of a Brooklyn Outreach Program for KuFFFD12 Students," IEEE Robotics & AutomationMagazine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 31-39, June 2013.doi: 10.1109/MRA.2012.2184672[8.] A. Paulino, P. Babb, C. Saar, S. Friesen, and J. Brandon, “Engaging high school students inan engineering thermodynamics project,” IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference(EDUCON), 2014.[9.] J
. Policysciences, 4(2), 155-169.[15] Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers (Vol. 465). Harvard UniversityPress.[16] Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share thevision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.[17] R. Lingard & S. Barkataki (2011). Teaching teamwork in engineering and computerscience. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011 (pp. F1C-1). IEEE.[18] Kuh, G. D. (2008). Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: What they are, who hasaccess to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.[19] Warnick, G. M., Schmidt, J., & Bowden, A. (2014). An experiential learning approach todevelop leadership competencies in engineering and
investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection between the two.Dr. David A. Delaine, Ohio State University Dr. David A. Delaine is an Assistant Professor at The Ohio State University Department of Engineer- ing Education. Within this newly formed department he strives to creatively impact society through investigating the intersections of engineering, education, and social need through research on community engagement and collaborative processes within informal learning. He has obtained a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Drexel University, in Philadelphia, USA and served as a Postdoctoral Fulbright Scholar at the Escola Polit´ecnica da Universidade de S˜ao Paulo. Dr
norms, from internal compassion for to community time, talent authority, or motivations community (i.e., no engagement or resources expectations (i.e., personal expectation of to ways that of others (e.g., experience, reward or make a parents, values and recognition; not difference in instructor, beliefs, about personal the advisor, clubs, and/or self- accomplishment[s]) community. religious identified
], and the Lumina Foundation 's National Tech Challenge selectedEduGuide's intervention as a model for making college access and success more efficient. Theyhave supported EduGuide with a planning grant to further test and refine the platform, as has theW.K. Kellogg Foundation to help scale-up EduGuide’s platform and program.Assessment of Grit Levels of Participating StudentsOverall, 108 freshman-year STEM students participated in the baseline assessment of students’grit levels in early fall 2017. Of the 108 students, 81 were STEMGrow students, while 27 werenon-STEMGrow students (Control Group). The first post-assessment involved 64 students, 43of whom were STEMGrow students, and 21 were non-STEMGrow students. A total of 38students, 26 STEMGrow
NY State Engineering Activities Performance Outcomes Focus Students Objectives/Goals Design Standard(s) What defines a Introduce students to Oceanic plastic example Students are able to Asking Questions and problem? the concept of a problem: students read one-page construct a complete Developing Problems - What questions do problem definition article about oceanic plastic problem definition Ask questions to clarify we
Platform Wind Speed 15 m/s Hub Height 110 m Tower Type Tubular Tower Mass 275,000 Kg Frequency 60 Hz Tip Height 167 m Blade length 57 m Number of Blades 3 Blade Mass 8,550 Kg Rotor Mass (including the blades) 98,000 Kg Rotor
requirements’ list for the project. The instructortypically shows a case study project example explaining Step 1 tasks, generally in an in-classworkshop, so that each team can take the following actions:1. Break down the project description, recognize and highlight key words and form a list of high-level requirements.2. Share the list with other teams for peer review to refine the list.3. Prepare a list of questions to obtain the instructor/s’ and sponsor’s assistance.The high-level requirement list after this step generally captures key system behavioral featuresand main system functions. Table 2 (page 8) shows the input and output of Step 1 for a casestudy exercise conducted in class.Objectives achieved during this step: 1. Team gets an easy
Ed.D., West Virginia University Robin A. M. Hensel, Ed.D., is the Assistant Dean for Freshman Experience in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. While her doctorate is in Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on higher education teaching in STEM fields, she also holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Dr. Hensel has over seven years of experience working in engineer- ing teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years teaching mathematics, statis- tics, computer science, and freshman engineering courses in higher education institutions
answers.Students who viewed video content were asked to answer multiple choice survey questions,including: “How much time did you spend watching the videos,” “How many different videosdid you watch,” “Which video topics were the most valuable to you,” and we asked for the gradereceived in the prerequisite course. Only students who did watch videos were asked furthersurvey questions which were Likert-scale questions asking about their level of agreement withthe following statements: “The videos helped me to better understand the topic(s) in the videos,”and “The videos created were relevant to me.” They were also asked to rate video quality asExcellent, Satisfactory, or Poor. Figure 1. Feedback on effectiveness of short video projects from students who
Research Council (NRC), in its report “Learning toThink Spatially”, refers to spatial thinking as a “universal mode of thinking”, and has recognizedit as an important skill in the 21st century, and further supports its integration in the K-12curriculum. 5GIS has long been recognized as having a critical role in enhancing students’ spatial literacy andas an important tool not only in the study of Geography, but increasingly across multipledisciplines and learning contexts. In her dissertation, Kim references the ongoing debate overhow to define the “S” in GIS (as either Systems, Studies, Science, or Service). 6 Several articlesdiscuss the importance of integrating spatial literacy in post-graduate/doctoral programs, andLuna and Miles report on the
students found to support first-year successCharacteristic Comments (brief)High school academic achievement Indicator of academic preparedness; incoming grades/composite assessmentsQuantitative skills Analytical skills necessary for engineering student successStudy habits Whether student is an independent learner; has experience maintaining regular study habitsCommitment to career and educational goals Early identification of career goal(s
lecture the instructorintroduces the parameters of thermal resistance, thermal capacitance, time constant, and stepinput size; and links the cooling methods proposed by students to the correspondingparameter(s). The open-ended rich solution set of this challenge offers to open discussion inmany directions, including the limitations of lumped system modeling.Fluid in a Tube: This experiment illustrates the step response of a second order fluid system as afunction of its damping ratio. Students are asked to observe fluid oscillations in a tube andexplore how the size and duration of oscillations varies with restrictions to air flow at the end ofthe tube. During a follow-on lecture the instructor shows plots of the oscillations observed inthis