were two questionnaires administered in fall 2012, spring2013, fall 2013, and spring 2014: one for the Current pathway scholars and one for the potentialtransfer students who attended Shadow Day (the Anticipating students). Both questionnairesassessed demographic information and information regarding their choice and feelings forchoosing engineering as a career. The questionnaires also assessed any hurdles they expect toface by transferring to LSU or continuing in the program. The responses to these questions werecompared between the two groups to determine potential effects of actually transferring to LSU.The results from the self-efficacy questions suggests that anticipating students rated this more Table 4. The cumulative GPA’s for
and Exposition,Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.246415 Riley, Donna. Engineering and social justice. Chapter 2 “Mindsets in Engineering” Synthesis Lectures onEngineers, Technology, and Society 3.1 (2008): 33-45.6 Bandura, Albert. (1977). “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.” Psychological Review,Vol 84(2), Mar 1977, 191-215.Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported, in part, by the National ScienceFoundation, under grant 1256529. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.For more on content of the course, see Riley, D., Grunert, J., Jalali, Y., Adams, S.G
energy demandburden as they are available through more defined communications, rather than have to operateat pre-determined values. The complexity of these levels was meant to match the expertise of the high school studentsattending the lessons. Smart Grid and Micro-Grid were both highly collaborative lessons withinteraction amongst all parties to promote self-discovery of the system in discussion.Assessment The Young Scholar’s group knowledge and experience gains were observed in several areasincluding science self-efficacy, science understanding, sense of inclusion, and energy beliefs,knowledge, and behavior. (Assessing Women and Men in Engineering (AWE). (n.d.),DeWaters,J. Quaqish, B.,Graham, M., & Powers, S. (2013). Riggs, I.M
Association Anonymous New York: Macmillan., 1992, pp. 465-485.[3] M. Borrego et al, "Team Effectiveness Theory from Industrial and Organizational Psychology Applied to Engineering Student Project Teams: A Research Review," J Eng Educ, vol. 102, (4), pp. 472-512, 2013.[4] (). Accreditation.[5] G. L. Stewart, I. S. Fulmer and M. R. Barrick, "An Exploration of Member Roles as a Multilevel Linking Mechanism for Individual Traits and Outcomes," Person. Psychol., vol. 58, (2), pp. 343-365, 2005.[6] S. Sonnentag and J. Volmer, "Individual-Level Predictors of Task-Related Teamwork Processes: The Role of Expertise and Self-Efficacy in Team Meetings," Group & Organization Management, vol. 34, (1), pp. 37-66, 2009.[7] A. Zhang, "Peer
andthrough programming during the laboratory sessions, students were able to learn about thesefundamentals without requiring a prerequisite of AP Calculus.Through in class activities and lectures by the instructional team and those in the field, studentsgained knowledge that they were able to apply to a real-world application of BCIs in thelaboratory modules. This structured learning approach allowed the students to use lowercognitive processes of the revised Bloom’s taxonomy to generate, plan, and produce novelsolutions from an existing ones by optimizing the BCI maze [16]. Furthermore, the studentsurvey results highlight the importance of having an instructional team with positive teacherattitudes and high self-efficacy about the fields of BME and
engineering students, increasing it from near87% in recent years to 90% after the block scheduling year [5].Diversity in retention effortsWhat has also been reported in literature is that unfortunate disparities and barriers related torace must also be overcome [4, 7, 8]. Studies have focused on barriers to the success of Blackand Latino STEM students [7, 8], including academic, social [7], and institutional barriers [8].Strategies have been described for helping with student retention and success, includingencouragement and maintenance of attributes like academic self-efficacy, confidence andresilience [9]. Traditional theories on retention such as that of Tinto [10], focus on the impact ofadjustment, and adaptation to the dominant culture of an
research to this conversation is Borrego’s [24], [25] quantitative workexploring the reasons why undergraduates choose to go to graduate school. They found fivethemes emerged through their Exploratory Factor Analysis: Self-efficacy, Outcomeexpectations, Supports, Barriers, and Choice Actions, while also adding value to engineeringeducation literature by exploring the differences between the goals of those pursuing Mastersdegrees and those intending to pursue a PhD.In the present work, we aim to add to the conversation on the transition from undergraduateto graduate stages of education by examining personal statements written by engineeringawardees of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program(GRFP) in one funding
] M. Demir, S. Burton and N. Dunbar, "Professor–Student Rapport and Perceived Autonomy Support as Predictors of Course and Student Outcomes," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 22-33, 2018.[17] M. Komarraju, "Ideal Teacher Behaviors: Student Motivation and Self-Efficacy Predict Preferences," Society for the Teaching of Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 104-110, 2013.[18] M. M. Handelsman, W. L. Briggs, N. Sullivan and A. Towler, "A Measure of College Student Course Engagement," Journal of Educational Research, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 184-191, 2005.[19] C. M. Estepp and G. T. Roberts, "Exploring the Relationship between Professor/Student Rapport and Students' Expectancy for Success and Values/Goals in College of
to theSTEMcx Environmental Justice internship have implications for persistence in STEM (Grahamet al., 2013), pathways into engineering (Godwin & Kirn, 2020; Kirn & Benson, 2018), and self-efficacy (Newton et al., 2020). Rather, to motivate this research I rely on three anecdotalobservations I made during the 2022 pilot of the STEMcx Environmental Justice Internship.These anecdotes will make clear the critical need for phenomenological exploration of theexperiences of Black and underrepresented students in out-of-classroom engineering and scienceinternships and other pre-college work experiences.During the summer 2022 pilot environmental justice internship cohort, I had many opportunitiesto engage with the interns in informal
learning activities, benefitingboth K-12 students and Ambassadors. K-12 students are provided with tutoring, STEMcompetition coaching, and other support while Ambassadors learn essential professionalism,communication, and leadership skills. A pilot-scale study with ten schools within the ShelbyCounty Schools district during the 2015-16 academic year showed that students working withAmbassadors achieved math performance goals at rates of 12% (middle school) and 30%(elementary) higher than that of their peers [27]. It also revealed increased confidence incommunication and leadership abilities and STEM self-efficacy ratings from the Ambassadors.Urban STEM scholars were offered the opportunity to join the STEM Ambassador program butwere not required
, C., Menold, J., and McComb, C. (November 17, 2020). "Assessing Engineering Design: A Comparison of the Effect of Exams and Design Practica on First-Year Students’ Design Self-Efficacy." ASME. J. Mech. Des. May 2021; 143(5): 052301.
Education, vol. 146, no. 3, 2020.[11] S. Zha, S. Wu, and J. Estis, “Using team-based learning to promote engineering students’ performance and self-efficacy in a technical writing class,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 456-467, 2021.[12] M. A. Hannah and A. Arreguin, “Cultivating conditions for access: a case for case-makin in graduate student preparation for interdisciplinary research,” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 172–193, 2017.[13] S. Wu, and L. Montalvo, “Repurposing waste plastics into cleaner asphalt pavement materials: a critical literature review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 280, 2021.[14] S. Wu, A. Haji, and I. Adkins, “State of art
development. In our sample, participants often reported on how crucial the influence and support of members of the community and family was in shaping their career interests and self-efficacy in achieving a career in STEM.2. Redefining success was an important aspect of the counter narrative about motivations for academic and professional pursuits. While participants did report recognition, personal fulfillment, and a desire for success as motives toward their academic and professional pursuits, they also reported the need to have an impact on emerging FWoC and other minority populations entering STEM fields, a need to create value specifically around having a social impact either within or outside their current institution. Often the
comparison of the mean scores across genders for each construct. A more in-depth exploration of these differences is discussed in the subsequent paragraphs. Figure 1: Gender-wise Mean Scores Comparison4.1 Needs FulfillmentFemale students (M= 58.16, SD = 28.04) showed higher gains in Needs Fulfillment than malestudents (M= 41.42, SD = 28.22, t=-8.92, df=998, p=0.00), indicating a statistically significantdifference between the two groups. This result suggests that female students are better at seekingand achieving personal and professional satisfaction compared to male students. The higherNeeds Fulfillment scores among female students imply that they have higher self-efficacy andmight experience a greater sense of fulfillment
attitudes and higher self-efficacy for innovation. Theydefined a mindful attitude as the willingness to engage in situations that may seem uncertain andnovel in one’s daily life. Respondents to the survey with mindful attitudes were more likely tohave been involved with leadership and entrepreneurial clubs, courses, and initiatives. Theresults suggest that students who exercise mindfulness in their routine are set up for successfulentrepreneurial and design-related endeavors.Through a meta-analysis of literature in psychology, Lebuda et al. (2016) demonstrated that thereis a statistically significant link between mindfulness and creativity. They found certain abilitiesthat promote creativity to be fostered through mindfulness training or trait
protocolapproved by the Institutional Review Board at LPI. SurveyA survey was designed to measure students’ feelings of belonging, engineering identity, and selfperceptions of math skills competence, as summarized in Table 2. These survey items had a 7-point response scale, with the exception of the math confidence (or self-efficacy) items that had a5-point scale. The survey also included additional items, but these are beyond the scope of theresearch questions explored in this paper. The pre and post surveys in 2017 and 2018 included afairly large number of items (73), with additional questions added to the post survey in fall 2018.Concerns with the length of the survey and quality of student responses led to an effort tooptimize the survey
matters. (p. 123)A separate but related phenomena to creativity is innovation. Specifically, based on extensiveinterviews with serial innovators, Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen (the authors of theInnovator’s) DNA postulate that innovators tend to be avid questioners, observers,experimenters, and idea networkers. They framed these four phenomena as the “behavioraltendencies” of serial innovators. In alignment with the Innovator’s DNA, we identify innovationas much more than a function of the brain but also a function of behaviors [7]. In the context ofengineering design, to be an innovative engineer requires the act of doing or creating.We recognize that behavior is fundamentally contingent upon one’s inner drives, motivations,values, self
also enrollstudents who are different from those beginning their studies at four-year institutions in manyways [40]. This does not entirely discount the value of single-institution studies, however. Astudy [41] conducted at Louisiana Tech University explored the impact of backgroundknowledge on the success of freshman engineering students, as measured by grades andgraduation rates. The author acknowledges the limitation of analyzing data from a singleuniversity, and also notes that the focused examination of a specific context provided a nuancedunderstanding that might be obscured by institutional variation.Collectively, these studies underscore the potential benefit of a nuanced approach that considersinstitutional differences in the context
processof materials discovery, which involves the identification of new materials with specificfeatures, served as the foundation for instructing the participants on the fundamental conceptsof ML [29].Therefore, this paper serves to report the module design and a hands-on technique that wassuccessfully implemented by ACENPEE to help students of various engineering backgroundsdevelop self-efficacy in ML. The next sections describe the approach used for the workshop,the discussion of students’ perceptions of the learning experience assessed through the learner’ssatisfaction survey, as well as the concluding section. The designed modules and snippets ofthe scripts used during the workshop are described in the appendix section. 2. Platforms, tools
, participants seem to have strikingly different ideas of what it means to persist in ML/AI, and future work should continue to capture this. In quantitative studies, ML/AI should be clearly defined, with examples of roles.2. Questions about social belonging should assess the ability for students to develop meaningful close social connection, such as mentorship, rather than general social connection.3. Persistence research in tech-heavy engineering fields should assess programming self-efficacy, which women report lower levels of [52]. The increasing demand for these skills in engineering may exacerbate the technical confidence gap, further perpetuating the gender gap in these fields.We report on some initial ways persistence in ML/AI
an after-school program, engage parents, and provide gender and ethnic-matchedmentors and role models in hopes to positively impact participant self-efficacy (Mitcham et al., 2012).With buy-in from the principal, solicitation emails were provided to principals about the Algebra by 7thGrade. The university-based team developed recruitment activities that ranged from attending introductionof teacher nights, attending school-wide math nights already planned, and pizza dinners for targetedfamilies. The top three schools were invited to participate in the inaugural Ab7G. They were given firstpriority for enrollment and each school was given 10 seats until the priority deadline. After the priority
, modeling,number line, functions, rover, statistics, tug of war, and algebraic expressions. For further detailsof the PD program, see [15,21].At the end of the PD, the research team verified that the teachers had become self-sufficient toteach robotics-based science and math lessons in their classes. To assess the confidence and self-efficacy of teachers, the research team conducted a post-program survey. In the survey, teacherswere inquired about their confidence, motivation, teaching effectiveness, and interest in classroomteaching of robotics-activity based lessons. A total of 20 teachers responded to the survey of whom17 teachers strongly or somewhat agreed that the PD participation increased their confidence as ateacher. Moreover, 18 teachers
inform the development of a model or framework that organizes factors thatinfluence success in educational aspirations (shown in Figure 1 below).This model highlights sociocultural Figure 1. Framework for Educational Aspirationsexperiences and validating experiences ascritical to a positive higher experience forAmerican Indian women.The themes presented in the findings of theirstudy were based on n=18 returned surveyswith multiple choice and open-ended questionsrelated to 1) Honoring Family, 2) SocialModels, 3) Encouragement and Support, 4)Values and Attributes, 5) Service, 6) Learning,7) Hard Work and 8) Self-efficacy. Theyhighlight the interconnectedness of individualwomen’s lives and conclude that theinterviewed women’s voices
explore each of these themes in the following sections: Ability to learn the material. The theme of “My ability to learn the material” was a concernfor the 90.9% of participants. This finding illustrates students’ learning styles and preferencesregarding the most effective way to engage and learn course material. It also highlights thechallenges associated of adjusting rapidly to a new learning modality. Confidence in Class. The theme of “Confidence in Class” was a concern for 75.8% ofparticipants. This finding helps to highlight students’ concern regarding their own self-efficacy tolearn course material in this new learning setting. It can be argued that a large part of student’soverall confidence in class originates from
for mentoring and to providefaculty training in optimizing mentoring relationships for mentors with their mentees at all levelsof their research careers. The Academy is based on the research mentoring curriculum, ”EnteringMentoring”, an evidence-based curriculum from the Center for the Improvement of MentoredExperiences in Research (CIMER) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Course topicsinclude aligning expectations, assessing understanding, promoting professional development,cultivating ethical behaviors, promoting mentee research self-efficacy, enhancing work-lifeintegration, and articulating a mentoring philosophy and action plan. 37Plans for Evaluation and ExpansionWe are currently designing a peer-to-peer mentoring certification
with new and innovative solutions[37]; iv) self-management and self-development, understood as the capacity to work autonomouslyin a self-motivated and self-controlled manner [36]; and v) systemic thinking, i.e. the ability torecognize how a system functions [36] to make decisions about their elements and interactions[38].However, is possible to synthesize 21st century skills and positive attitudes toward STEM asengagement, interest, and self-efficacy [39], into STEM skills such as i) critical thinking, ii)problem-solving, iii) research, iv) creativity, v) communication, and vi) collaboration [28]. TheseSTEM skills can be complemented by the competency of computational thinking, which is veryimportant for STEM learning [40] and involves some
Research Workshop has been provided by the Kern Family Foundation.Dr. Doug Melton and Dr. Meg West provided thoughtful feedback about the workshop development overmany years. Special thanks to all the participants who took time to take our survey and learn with us!References[1] L. O. Flowers, “Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences at HBCUs,” J. Educ. Soc. Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 33, 2021, doi: 10.30845/jesp.v8n1p4.[2] A. Carpi, D. M. Ronan, H. M. Falconer, and N. H. Lents, “Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 169–194, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1002/tea.21341.[3] M. Villarejo, A. E. L
. The goal is to provide insights that will help framefuture studies of students who do not value engaging with or belonging in their engineeringprograms to the detriment of their professional formation as engineers.Literature ReviewSense of Belonging and Persistence At a fundamental level, humans have the desire to belong. The desire for interpersonalrelationships has an additive effect on that desire. Previous research on students’ academicsuccess has primarily focused on the interaction between students’ sense of belonging,motivation, self-efficacy, and perception of curriculum [1], [2]. On the college campus andwithin STEM classrooms, several characteristics are known to commonly exhibit a positiveeffect on students’ sense of belonging
] K. Levecque, F. Anseel, A. De Beuckelaer, J. Van der Heyden, and L. Gisle, “Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students,” Research Policy, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 868-879, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008.[11] D. Jairam, and A. Cribbs, “The graduate writing self-efficacy scale: Validating a new component specific assessment,” in American Psychological Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, Aug 8-11, 2019.[12] E. O. McGee, D. M. Griffith, and S. L. Houston, “‘I know I have to work twice as hard and hope that makes me good enough’: Exploring the stress and strain of black doctoral students in engineering and computing,” Teachers College Record, vol. 121, no. 4, pp