Prof K. Prof K. 3500gets to play [redacted].Your team plays Among Us with Prof K and TAs 3500Your team gets to pick a project first for 4000Fluid-Mechanical DissectionMembers of your team get one additional homework/quiz 6500leniencyYour team receives MAE3230-themed temporary tattoos xxxxYour team picks its recitation seats first when we next xxxxxreshuffle the seating chartProf K lectures in costume for halloween xxx points from each of 8 teamsYour team gets a private hour of office hours with a TA in xxxxpreparation for written exam or mock job interview(subject to
pilot study, description of the labs, and assessment.Development and ObjectiveThe objective of this project was to examine the feasibility of a full-scale implementation of ahome-based laboratory for selected online courses. As institutions begin to offer more onlineengineering courses one of the challenges has been how to incorporate a lab component. Possiblesolutions to consider are use of simulation software, or require students to physically attend asession where all the labs are conducted at one time.Labs designed around simulation platforms show basic principles, however lack the hands-onlearning experiences of troubleshooting issues that can arise with the physical wiring and testingof circuits. These real world issues are just as
toreplace the projected attrition. This phenomenon is colloquially known as the “manufacturingskills gap,” and is immensely complex, with near-limitless contributing social andtechnological factors. In the 2018 Skills Gap in Manufacturing Study [1], industry executiveslist a few potential reasons for the projected shortage of talent; including the lack of interestin manufacturing careers due to misperceptions of the industry and a shift in the skills thatcutting-edge manufacturing technologies and processes demand. According to [1], themanufacturing workforce is aging and in the next decade, there will be a shortage in talent tofill the nearly 2.6 million projected openings. In that same report, manufacturing executivesidentified “misperceptions of
evaluator and psychometric expert on several federally funded projects in education, natural science, and engineering. His focus is to conduct rigorous quantitative and qualitative measurement and program evaluation utiliz- ing validated assessment tools with published psychometric properties, qualitative rubrics with reliable scoring procedures, and developing and validating assessments in-line with the recommendations of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.Isaias Cerda , Rice University As the Associate Director for Science Education and English Language Learners for the Rice Office of STEM Engagement (R-STEM) and a former participant in our professional development programs, Isaias provides
and teaching in the freshman engineering program and the mechanical engineering program. She is also the Assistant Director of the NAE Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) at ASU and works closely with the Director to ensure the success of the program. Dr. Zhu is also involved in the ASU ProMod project, the Engineering Projects in Community Service program, the Engineering Futures program, the Global Freshman Academy/Earned Admission Program, and the ASU Kern Project. She was a part of the team that designed a largely team and activity based online Introduction to Engineering course. She has also co-developed two unique MOOCs, Introduction to Engineering and Perspectives on Grand Challenges for Engineering
Design Experiences for Future Engineers in Chemistry Laboratory AbstractOur approach to general chemistry laboratory for engineers in our NSF-funded IUSE project(DUE-1625378) involves the use of design challenges (DCs), an innovation that uses authenticcontext and practice to transform traditional tasks. These challenges are scaled-down engineeringproblems related to the NAE Grand Challenges that engage students in collaborative, team-basedproblem solving via the modeling process. With features aligned with professional engineeringpractice, DCs are hypothesized to support student motivation for the task as well as for theprofession. As an evaluation of our curriculum design, we use Expectancy Value
by students, and contrast it with that used bySTEM professionals.In [2] the authors showed that “professional” STEM writing is far from homogeneous anddemonstrated significant differences not only between engineering and natural science writing,but also between different disciplines within engineering: samples of physics, structural,electrical, and mechanical engineering writing were compared and found to have pronounceddifferences in voice, style, and diction. Present work will expand this comparison to includeanalysis of student work.Student work considered for this paper was in the form of an analysis report, submitted bysenior-level Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) students as part of a year-long seniordesign team project. The
its assessment. The module and graded reportassignment described in this paper provide students with an opportunity to apply usabilityheuristics to evaluate the effectiveness of everyday UIs and create a high-fidelity mockup of aredesigned UI. An overriding goal of this UI module is to deepen students’ understanding of UIdesign principles as well as heuristics for evaluating effective UIs and in the process gain anunderstanding of the impact that UI design has in people’s lives. Students take an active role intheir own learning in this project-based assignment [6]. The assignment helps students taketheory into practice and prepare them for the world of work. Educators in any discipline involvedin designing products in which users interact
Chile Javiera Meza has a Bachelor of Engineering Science in Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile. She is a research assistant of the Engineering Education Division, responsible for supporting research tasks and collaborating in data collection and analysis. Javiera developed a project about STEM education focused on primary school. Her research theme is about gender gap and motivation of students in undergraduate computer science programs. Currently she is researching about student motivation in online lessons due to the influence of COVID-19.Mr. Gonzalo Cort´es, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Gonzalo Cort´es is an undergraduate student at the engineering school in Pontificia Universidad Cat
. They are publicly availabledata at the iGEM website [23], where the participants documented their projects using differentrepresentations (texts, diagrams, models, videos, etc.). These wikis were published with acreative commons copyright. For this project, we focused on the following sections of the wikis: • Team members (Names, majors, and specific contributions to the project). • Problem framing • Design of their biological system • Laboratory notebook with daily or weekly reports of experiments and results • Mathematical models and simulations • Demonstration of the design's functionality and general conclusions • Description of the outreach activities • Team's social media (Facebook, Instagram
Paper ID #34916An Instructional Approach to Engage Children with Autism to EngineeringDesignDr. Hoda Ehsan, Georgia Institute of Technology Hoda is a research faculty at the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing at Georgia Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in mechanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing
theStudio Habits of Mind as defined through studies in arts classrooms through Bers’ [8] [9] notionof Positive Technological Development. During the Creepy Carrots project, we witnessed manyof the aforementioned dispositions and the following discussion will describe a few instanceswhere the Studio Habits of Mind and the six C’s of Positive Technological Developmentintersected. In the interest of time, we have chosen to explore those intersections that were mostprevalent in our analysis. This is by no means an exhaustive analysis of the intersection of thesebehaviors in this study or possible in subsequent studies. The authors suggest that further studymay reveal additional connections and deepen complexity and understanding of theseintersections
Research and Outreach Center in the School of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. In 2019, Dr. Kerzmann joined the Me- chanical Engineering and Material Science (MEMS) department at the University of Pittsburgh. He is the advising coordinator and associate professor in the MEMS department, where he positively engages with numerous mechanical engineering advisees, teaches courses in mechanical engineering and sustainability, and conducts research in energy systems. Throughout his career, Dr. Kerzmann has advised over eighty student projects, some of which have won regional and international awards. A recent project team won the Utility of Tomorrow competition, outperforming fifty-five international teams to bring
expertise; manage and lead projects; understand basic businessprinciples needed in small and large companies; and ideate when there are not alreadyestablished explicit design specifications.As a curriculum, most Mechanical Engineering programs by necessity are discipline focused,without much flexibility. Curricular changes typically involve a long process and significantjustification. There are also a number of required foundational courses such as math, physics,and mechanics that are followed by the obligatory ME-focused courses such as thermodynamics,fluids, dynamics, labs, and design courses. The sheer breadth of required courses significantlyconstrains the time available to explore other critical skills. These curricula are additionallyshaped
of proactive trainings andeducational resources to benefit all students. Understanding what institutional and programmaticexperiences engineers indicate as critical to their mental health will allow us to develop targetedinterventions, more inclusive teaching practices, and thoughtful advising guidelines.Furthermore, the study allows us to develop conceptual models about how academic culturedevelops in undergraduate programs. Here we describe the first phase of the project to developnew measures of students’ perceptions of a high stress culture in engineering and to understandfaculty and staff perspectives of undergraduate mental health.Project OverviewThe project CAREER: Supporting Undergraduate Mental Health by Building a Culture
will be encouraged to go into the interdisciplinary fields without feelingdisadvantaged compared to computer science majors. For instance, a student majoring in biologywill be more confident pursuing a degree/career in fields like biotechnology, bioengineeringwhich spans technology and biology after being introduced to computational thinking in abiology class [6]. Moreover, there has been a lot of effort by government and research agencies toencourage young people into STEM and technology careers. With this work of ours, we believeUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington (UNCW) will be doing its due diligence in supportingthese efforts. With this project, we want to take the initiative to start the CT pedagogicalmovement in our institution to
Engineering (Major: Industrial and Systems Engineering) from Anna University [Tamilnadu, India], her MS in Industrial Engineering from Auburn University, her MA in Management Science and MS in Applied Statistics from The University of Alabama. She has experi- ence working with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her
online. Specifically, the campus itself was closed to students and faculty alike, resulting in a hands-on laboratory component that shifted to an ad-hoc “kitchen table” video demonstration format. For senior capstone industrial sponsored projects, the team meetings, sponsor interactions, and project presentations were all converted to a “virtual” format. However, the biggest thing I missed was the interaction with the students in the classroom. I felt the environment was not as interactive and the students tended not to be as engaged. Course content was delivered virtually with lab videos recorded showing how the labs were performed (by the instructor) and the data were collected and sent to the students
libraries.Linda M. N. Struble, Pennsylvania State University Linda Struble is the manager of the Engineering Library on the University Park campus of the Penn- sylvania State University. She graduated from the College of Arts and Architecture and the Schreyer Honors College of the Pennsylvania State University in 2010. Her interests include onboarding, student engagement, sustainability, project management, and operations. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Engineering Libraries and Student Organizations: Working Together to Enhance Outreach to Underrepresented GroupsABSTRACTRecruiting and retaining a diverse student population is extremely
cover student-selected topics outside my expertise, anunreasonable evaluation plan, and a student resistance to the concept of setting their own plan ofstudy. The potential benefits were seen to outweigh the potential pitfalls. The resultingexperiment was to manage the course as an engineering manager should manage an engineeringdepartment with the team setting the goals and project plan subject to managerial approval.The first night of class I arrived with a syllabus which contained the basics – course description,details of when the course met, my grading philosophy, my contact, and my office hours. Theonly class topic on the syllabus was that night’s – “Introduction and Course Development”. Afterintroducing myself to the class, I offered
economic and technological competitiveness. Often pre-college students Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section Conferencehave not been introduced to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) ina way to attract them to the fields as a career. This has been particularly challengingfor the engineering field, since specific instruction in engineering is quite limited in K-12 settings, with most engineering offerings not appearing until the high schoolyears. In an effort to increase awareness, programs such as Engineering is Elementar and Project Lead the Wa have developed curricula that can be used in school settings, andprograms such as FIRST have been developed to pique interest in engineering and sciencethough
Education at The Ohio State University. She holds degrees in Electrical Engineering (BS, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, and in Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include learning experiences in fundamental engineering courses and data-informed reflective practice. Michelle’s professional experience includes roles in industry and academia, having worked as a software engineer, project lead and manager before becoming Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Elec- trical Engineering at the Ateneo de Davao University.Dr. Tamoghna Roy, DeepSig Inc. Tamoghna Roy works as a Principal Engineer at DeepSig where he is responsible for creating
co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey has served as the Principal Investigator (PI) on several externally funded efforts, most recently for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institu- tional Transformation grant (2012-2019). The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. The project has resulted in impactful new programs, practices, and policies as well as a new dedicated unit within the Office of the Provost.Dr. Naveen Sharma, Rochester Institute of TechnologyLana Verschage, Rochester Institute of
and a PhD.In my experience in STEM, I have constantly been underestimated and mis labeled in theareas of which I found interest. This constant mis categorization and lack of representationcreated a strong sense of not belonging which drove me to me the representation in myfield and create the support structures that I did not have that would have made adifference for me walking my path. On this project I worked in conjunction with two stellarcolleagues Kathy Chen, situated to my left in the picture, the Executive Director of theSTEM Education Center at WPI, who is the daughter of immigrant parents from Taiwan, cis-female, middle-class, able-bodied, PhD. Kathy is someone who always felt as an outsider ornot belonging in STEM, she used her
Paper ID #33883Work in Progress: Evaluation of a Remote Undergraduate ResearchExperience in Chemical EngineeringDr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Professor and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to
duration of the CISTAR grant. The process will rununtil the end of the CISTAR NSF project, estimated for 2027. The survey will be sent yearly toan estimated maximum of 1155 participants of CISTAR programs (which includes students fromsecondary education through graduate education in a variety of ongoing and summerprogramming). Each participant will be contacted via a provided email to update theirprofessional progression. The maximum amount of time that a participant might be in the studyis starting in Summer 2021 through Fall 2027. As new cohorts of participants in CISTAR engagewith the center each year, they will be added to the study.Survey developmentThe first round of surveys comprises four topics: task difficulty questions, identity
/instrumentation related to fluency, speechproduction, language, cognition, voice, resonance, feeding/swallowing, and auditoryhabilitation/rehabilitation [3]. In clinical practice, Speech Language Pathologists (SLPs) andAudiologists (AuDs) utilize a range of technologies including audio recording/acoustic analysis,electromyography, and video imaging/analysis. Research projects for our REU includeassessment of noise levels in mobile audiology clinics, image analysis to identify features ofpediatric dysphagia from videofluoroscopy swallow studies, and assessment of surfaceelectromyography data of oropharyngeal musculature collected during swallowing events.Beyond the research, students participated in professional development sessions and
, “Value added or misattributed? A multi-institution study on the educational benefit of labs for reinforcing physics content,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2017. eprint: 1705.03580.[3] S. Willner-Giwerc, K. B. Wendell, C. B. Rogers, E. E. Danahy, and I. Stuopis, “Solution diversity in engineering computing final projects,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2020-June, 2020.
Paper ID #35287Who are the instructional assistant interns?: Examining the synergy ofteaching assistants in first-year engineering course during the pandemicDr. Gerald Tembrevilla, McMaster University Gerald Tembrevilla completed his PhD in science (physics) education in the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Faculty of Education at the University of British Columbia (UBC) in Vancouver, Canada in July 2020. Currently, he serves as a postdoctoral fellow for the PIVOT project, a cutting-edge revamp of the engineering curriculum in the Faculty of Engineering at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. During his
(not including 2020 due to COVID restrictions) up to 24 secondary students come toparticipate in hands on/minds on engineering projects, coupled with lectures and lab timelearning skills of electrical and computer engineering, aspects of professional engineering andcollaboration and critical thinking skills, among others. The experience is designed to makeengineering as a profession a possibility and choice for future university students. In addition tothe informal engineering day camp the faculty hosts, there is also a federally funded teacherresearch experience (RET) engineering faculty provide in collaboration with a local communitySTEM outreach organization. This year, the day camp and RET experiences were combined toaddress problems of