frameworksuggests that school counselors can play a pivotal role in promoting equity within STEM. Thereare three stages of capacity building against which counselor skill development efforts andpractices could be examined: 1) counselors’ awareness and knowledge of the professionalSTEM landscape and career pathways, 2) counselors’ communication about STEM fields withstudents, and 3) counselors’ skill development toward cultivating more diverse STEM talentconsidering individual factors and sociocultural contexts. Together the three stages suggest thatschool counselors must consider factors which might lead to inequities in STEM by gaining anawareness of STEM specific equity issues. Such awareness will allow school counselors toengage in communication and
engineering students. In 2022, Tamara received the Key Contributor Award from NSBE Region 1 for her continued efforts in supporting students in engineering. Tamara received her bachelor’s degree in Afro-American Studies and a master’s degree in Education Leadership and Policy Studies with a specialization in Higher Education, both from the University of Maryland, College Park. Tamara is a doctoral candidate in Higher Education at SU where she serves as an adjunct instructor teaching classes on identity development and the intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, disability, spirituality, and social class. Her research interests include broadening participation in STEM, identity, diversity, equity, inclusion
UpdateAbstractThis paper provides an update on our research exploring the college experience of science,technology, engineering, and math (STEM) college students with attention-deficit/ hyperactivitydisorder (ADHD). Individuals with ADHD make up a growing fraction of college students.Despite their increasing college presence, little is known about their college experiences andacademic success. This project involves three sequential studies guided by the social model ofdisability. Study 1 is a quantitative analysis investigating the relationship between pre-collegefactors, college experiences, and academic success of college students with ADHD. Study 2 is ascoping literature review of the college experiences of these students, and Study 3 is aqualitative
driven by entrepreneurship. For example, only 1 in 6 employees in SiliconValley startup companies are women (Financial Times 2017). In this study, we develop a fieldexperiment designed to increase entrepreneurial proclivity in undergraduate women studyingSTEM fields. Entrepreneurial proclivity is defined as the extent of an individual’s (1) intentionsto engage in entrepreneurship, (2) efforts to acquire knowledge about entrepreneurship, and (3)entrepreneurial actions. There is a general agreement in the literature that women are less likely than men to beinvolved in entrepreneurship [1], [2]. In 2016, women were majority owners for 38% of firms,and this ownership was concentrated primarily in non-STEM retail and service industries [3],[4
tailored support. Through C2WEST, Black students could also further realizeand conceptualize the access they have to their own aspirations regarding future career and lifegoals.IntroductionIn this theory paper, the aspirational capital of Black students will be examined through theC2WEST framework. A variety of research has examined the aspirations of Black students inSTEM in addition to other types of capital that Black students bring to the fields [1]–[4]. Yossodefines aspirational capital as the “ability to maintain hopes and dreams for the future, even inthe face of real and perceived barriers” [5, p. 77]. In a systematic review, Denton et al. [2]examined twenty-eight different studies that mentioned aspirational capital among
for others interested in designing and refining hands-on mechanics activitiestoward specific learning goals.IntroductionIn engineering statics courses students work with contexts and concepts from a broad range ofreal-world applications. While there are a variety of formulae and procedural ideas to be learnedand understood, it is also important to develop conceptual understanding of key course ideas.Active learning supports students’ performance in the STEM disciplines as compared totraditional lecture [1], particularly for students from historically marginalized groups [2], and cansupport the development of conceptual understanding. One way to do this is to use 3D models ofcommon statics concepts, such as vectors, forces, and moments to
assessment,demonstrating that the module was effective for middle school outreach. Pre/post-surveyassessments showed no significant differences in attitudes towards STEM, which was likely dueto the fact that students in YES had a strong predisposition for STEM. Overall, results motivatethe use of this module, or similar hands-on IBL modules, for outreach with K-12 students who areunderrepresented in STEM.IntroductionBiomaterials is an interdisciplinary field that employs knowledge from biology, chemistry,materials science, and engineering to create materials that improve human health [1]. To date,biomaterials have been used as medical implants, methods to promote tissue healing, molecularprobes and biosensors, drug delivery systems, and scaffolds to
participate in SL/CE: paidinternships or through taking credit hours that counts towards their degree.Literature Review:Although there are not a lot of journal papers on the topics of SL/CE, there are many conferencepapers, especially published in ASEE conference, that address these topics. For example, Koh(2020) [1], developed a “Community Engaged Design” course as a senior design capstone in asmall liberal arts college. Students were able to address pedestrian safety in their community bycoming up with a prototype for a system which detected and warned drivers of the presence ofbicyclists. Jordan (2014) [2] took their service learning all the way to Haiti by working with thelocals there to establish a solar project that can offer sustainability for
MakerspaceAbstractAcademic makerspaces are physical locations that help support engineering classroominstruction and provide exposure to workplace skills like prototyping and design. Makerspaceproponents have championed equitable makerspaces as sites for increased access to tools andknowledge in science and engineering [1]. However, this promise is yet to be realized, with anemerging body of work critiquing the notion they are delivering equitable benefits to all students[2]–[4]. This literature finds that access is not sufficient for true democratization, which cannotbe reached without the full participation of a diverse student population. Hagerty et al. [5], definefull participation as characterized by individuals’ sense of belonging in these spaces.To further
of the COVID-19 pandemic, to the current year’s team concentrating onimplementing sensors in the hand and refining the ergonomics of the existing design. The paperwill also include student & faculty reflection and discussion of the faculty facilitation needed forsuch a service-based project and how engineering educators can consider implementing suchprojects into their programs.IntroductionInterdisciplinary team-based projects in engineering education are an approach to experientiallearning which can provide students with a diverse learning opportunity to work closely withindividuals from different disciplines [1, 2, 3]. Some of the benefits of participating on aninterdisciplinary team include unique solutions to solving complex problems
affairs administrator at Barnard College and as a Researcher and Administrative Coordinator for the Center for Understanding Race Education, under the direction of Professor Amy Stuart Wells. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 An NSF-Funded Professional Development Series for Advancing Inclusion at a Hispanic-Serving Institution INTRODUCTION Higher education scholars have extensively detailed the factors that contribute to thewithdrawal of racially minoritized Black and Hispanic college students from the STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) field (see [1]-[3] for examples). These factorsinclude unwelcoming and
living in rural America. Public schools in rural settings serve one-thirdof all students in the United States [1], [2]. Often little attention is given toprepare these youth for careers in STEM education and a lack in programs toimprove rural science education remains [3]. Furthermore, multiple barriers existfor rural students who aspire to pursue a STEM career. The TRAILS 2.0 programis designed to help rural students overcome these challenges based on the situatedlearning theory to blend both physical and social elements of real-world learningwithin a community of practice to foster authentic learning [4], [5], [6], [7].TRAILS 2.0 adds a focus on Place-based education (PBE) [8] that utilizes aframework for rural teachers to leverage local and
approaches that contribute to a more expansive understanding of engineering in sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical consciousness in engineering practice, and the development and imple- mentation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Engaging Students in the UN Sustainable Development Goals through Funds of Knowledge: A Middle School Bilingual Classroom Case StudyIntroduction In response to the different challenges that humanity faces, the United NationsEducational Scientific, and Cultural Organization [1] has proposed 17 goals that seek to unite usas a community for
in space and earth system sciences as well asprecision agriculture and environmental stewardship are aligned with the NASA and USDAeducational and research objectives, the land grant mission of University of Maryland EasternShore(UMES), workforce development undertakings, and the goals of the “Smart Farming” and“AIRSPACES” projects ongoing on campus for the past several years. Since their inception, theseprojects have embraced the experiential learning paradigm within a multidisciplinary verticallyintegrated project framework [1, 2]. Undergraduate engineering and computer science students, aswell as other STEM majors, have worked alongside graduate student(s) in the doctoral program inFood Science and Technology (FDST) to advance the project
Comparisons with Tukey’s HSD Adjustment course)? Pairwise Comparison M∆ SE p 95% CIPARTICIPANTS University Belongingness Table 1 Neurodivergent & No Disability -0.36 .102 .002 [-0.596, -0.116] DISCUSSION & NEXT STEPS No Disability & Other
Paper ID #39654Addressing Engineers and Stakeholders Social and Institutional Power inan Human-Centered Design Capstone CourseDr. Corey T Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Corey Schimpf is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo, SUNY. His lab focuses on engineering design, advancing research methods, and technology innovations to support learning in complex domains. Major research strands include: (1) analyzing how expertise develops in engineering design across the continuum from novice pre-college students to prac- ticing engineers, (2
skills intoaccreditation criteria. Over two decades ago, ABET Engineering Criteria (i.e., EC2000) for thefirst time included professional skills, intended to address the demands for interpersonal skillsand global awareness among 21st Century engineers (Shuman, Besterfield‐Sacre, & McGourty,2005). In fact, a greater number of EC2000 a-k Student Outcomes pertain to professional skillsthan technical skills. This is even more the case in the current (1-7) Student Outcomes Criteria(ABET, n.d.). ABET’s reasoning behind including professional skills in Student Criteria inEC2000 is equally applicable to ABET’s current proposed inclusion of DEI elements into theGeneral Criteria: [To promote undergraduate engineering students’] ability to
Universityrecently received a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant for a Research Experiences forUndergraduates (REU) site. The site recruits only community college students from the greaterBoston area with the goal of preparing students to either join the workforce or transfer to highereducation in engineering.The REU site, called REU Pathways, focuses on smart engineering with four research themes:artificial intelligence and machine learning, smart infrastructure, smart materials, and smarthealth. Each year, the REU site offers 10 local students the opportunity to engage in a 10-weekresearch experience, for a total of 30 students in 3 years. The external evaluator of the programconducted the first formative evaluation after Year 1 of the program
, such as the ASEE Annual Conference andthe Frontiers in Education Conference. Future work will share the extent to which the reviewedliterature discussed interventions to recruit or retain women in the engineering professoriate, andwhether these interventions vary by the type of institution.IntroductionThere have been considerable efforts towards increasing the representation of women in scienceand engineering, which have resulted in an increase in the number of women earning advanceddegrees in these fields, including PhDs. However, these gains have not translated into asignificant increase in the representation of women in the engineering professoriate [1]. Thereare funding opportunities available to institutions who seek to address concerns
enrollment increases in U.S. undergraduate computing departments, representation ofhistorically excluded groups remains low [1]. This lack of diversity is evident in academic andworkplace cultures and manifests in biased and/or harmful technologies that negatively impactand exclude non-dominant identities [2], [3][4]–[6]. The Alliance for Identity-InclusiveComputing Education (AiiCE, pronounced “ace”) aims to increase the entry, retention, andcourse/degree completion rates of high-school and undergraduate students from groups that arehistorically marginalized in computing [7], [8].Our collective impact approach to broaden participation aims to transform high-school andpostsecondary computer science (CS) education by convening national leaders in K
the community throughmultiple forms of peer review as well as their individual scholarship. More detailed descriptionof the processes as well as related research questions and synthesis can be found in [1] - [6].The proposal reviewing process incorporates the practice of forming small groups, collaborativecreation of reviews, and joint training. A key difference between the proposal review andmanuscript review experiences is the culminating experience of a mock panel review session forproposal reviewing, wherein participants take on typical panel roles of lead discussant, scribe fornote taking, and prepared reviewer. To facilitate forming full panels, quads were used rather thantriads, consisting of a mentor and three mentees. Quad mentors
. Furthermore, this training collaboration andpartnership provided the foundation and training model for the newly funded NSF EngineeringResearch Center for Precision Microbiome Engineering (PreMiEr) for work in the critical area ofengineering the microbiome in built environments.IntroductionIn the last decade, rapid advances in DNA sequencing technology have transformed thebiological sciences [1]. It has become essential for students training in biological disciplinesrequiring metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses to have a working knowledge ofbioinformatics and biostatistics. Conversely, it is critical for students training in bioinformatics,biostatistics, and engineering to understand fundamentals behind the biological systems theymodel and
same issues in the 3D manufacturing simulation while solving the same problemsand proposing qualitative solutions to improve the overall system. Data was collected for theoutside-the-classroom and inside-the-classroom groups in Fall 2021 and Fall 2022, respectively.The results of this study indicated no statistically significant difference in motivation, moduleusability score, engineering identity, self-assessment, or performance between the two groups.1 IntroductionWith the growing prevalence of online learning in today’s society, it has become increasinglyimportant for professors to ensure that lessons and class activities remain engaging andinteractive for their students. Thus, the goal of this study is to compare the results of
: Association of International Educators, and funded by ExxonMobil Corporation. The100,000 Strong in the Americas program is an education initiative created “to increase the annualnumber of U.S. students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean to 100,000 and bring100,000 students to the United States by 2020.” [1]. It does this by fostering new partnershipsamong higher education institutions (HEIs) in the United States and the rest of the WesternHemisphere in student exchange and training programs with focus given to “buildinginstitutional capacity, increasing student mobility, and enhancing regional educationcooperation” [1].The objective of the initial partnership activities was to offer an innovative study abroadopportunity to American students
course, particularly students in marginalized categories in STEM (women,Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC)), and a different approach was needed.One step implemented was to incorporate a project into the course that allowed for moreexperiential learning; other changes included the change-over of instructors and the primary textto Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black WomenMathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race by Margot Lee Shetterly [1], thus groundingthe topics of the course in a historical biography. For the project, the level and depth of theexperiences needed to be manageable, since the course was focused on the introduction ofaerodynamic topics based on an understanding of fluid
for supporting S-STEM student retention and graduationA recent self-study at Stevens Institute of Technology revealed that our 2nd and 3rd year retention ratesfor low-income STEM students are lower than those for our non-low income STEM student body. Toaddress this finding, the goal of our S-STEM program is to implement evidence-based best practices toincrease retention and graduation rates of low-income academically talented STEM students to levels thatmatch our overall STEM population. To accomplish this goal, we are seeking to: 1. implement best-practices with regards to cohort development and faculty, peer, and alumni mentoring programs to support the ADAPT Scholars, 2. develop targeted enrichment and mentoring activities
. In the field of engineering, morespecifically, programs are often characterized by their narrow focus on and rigid adherence tostandardized ways of thinking and traditional modes of instruction and assessment [1, 2]. Thisone-size-fits-all model of teaching and learning limits opportunities not only for traditionallearners to engage in interactive learning and creative problem solving but also for studentswhose ways of thinking fall outside of the typical range. While accommodations such asextended time on exams and assistance with notetaking may provide some form of equity forthese students [3-5], they fail to address the underlying mismatch between the unique abilities ofneurodivergent students and the demands of the traditional educational
further research into how students learn to frame engineering designproblems and what role framing plays in their professional formation.Introduction and Research PurposeDeveloping the ability to design solutions to problems is key for engineering students learning tobe professionals [1]. Many design experiences happen in the first-year and senior year courses,though increasingly they are being incorporated into courses along the entire program [2]–[4].Instructors must make many decisions when developing design challenges, not all of which areclear. For instance, in senior capstone design, faculty commonly contend with ABETrequirements, ethics, project management, appropriate scope, appropriate technical content, andteam dynamics [5]–[7]. With
car. While there were challenges and learnings, the integrationwas successful, and the students were able to fully utilize MPADs capabilities with their own RCcar design and demonstrate a self-driving scale car. This article will discuss the implementation,testing details, experiences gained and future work.1. IntroductionRadio Controlled (RC) cars are a great way for prospective engineers to learn real-world technicalskills. The low cost and shorter turnaround time allow for rapid development and testing and caneffectively teach many of the same principles as real cars. At XYZ University, ABC is anintroductory design course where remote-controlled scale cars were designed, analyzed, built, andtested by groups of students. Each group was
from Carnegie Mellon University (1993) and ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Understanding Context: Propagation and Effectiveness of the Concept Warehouse in Mechanical Engineering at Five Diverse Institutions and Beyond – Results from Year 4It has been shown that active learning strategies have a positive effect on student retention,engagement, and performance, and can reduce the performance gap for underrepresentedstudents [1-8]. One form of active learning, concept-based learning, is used to “foster students'understanding of deeper concepts rather than just factual knowledge” [3]; the effectiveness ofthis approach has also been well established. Despite the