capacity and opportunity to maintain and improve its quality of life indefinitelywithout degrading the quantity, quality or availability of natural, economic and socialresources”1. This description is consistent with the 1987 UN World Commission on Environmentand Development report that defined sustainable development as “meeting the needs of thepresent generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their ownneeds”2. These definitions and many others offered in the literature, center around three pillarsof sustainability namely, economy, environment, and society and suggest a need to consider aglobal approach when referring to sustainability that considers economic impacts, the ecologicalview, and a socio-cultural
, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering reportpublished by the NSF, with significant variance by subfield.1 The proportion of womengraduating with a bachelor’s degree in computing disciplines has decreased. 1 In 2012, the U.S.Congress Joint Economic Committee affirmed that, “Women’s increased participation in theSTEM workforce is essential to alleviating the shortage of STEM workers” in the United States.2The ASEE Diversity Task Force has identified increasing the percentage of undergraduatefemale students to 25% by 2020 as a strategic goal.3 Explanations for the continuedunderrepresentation of women include the impacts of the social structures of society, educationand the professions on women’s participation, as well as the
sustainable thinking is a challenge for education in engineering, but it is essential tothe personal and professional development of an engineer since the demand for labor requires Page 26.1125.2engineers with professional practice, knowledge, and ability to make decisions to meet every daychallenges in their work field. These decisions involve aspects of Sustainable Development (SD)1 like: “the development that satisfies the needs of the people today without compromising thefuture generations”2. The resulting situation at the universities today is that SD integration isoften limited to some specific courses (depending on the lecturers) and that
with measuring how cultural programs andexperiences contribute to positive changes in students’ abilities to work and thrive in diverseenvironments. Global competency can be defined broadly as “having an open mind whileactively seeking to understand cultural norms and expectations of others, leveraging this gainedknowledge to interact, communicate and work effectively outside one’s environment”1.Measuring global competency levels before and after participation in cultural programs maytherefore be a potentially effective method for measuring changes in students’ ability to work ina global environment. Currently, studies on engineering students’ baseline global competencylevels are few at the undergraduate level. This research fills this gap
societalbenefits must be paired with financial benefits in order to truly succeed. Furthermore, the processof rethinking a product’s design so that it is more durable or more easily recycled; or so that itcontains fewer parts, less packaging or more recycled content – also drives innovation andquality improvement.This paper describes a new model that identifies sustainability related performance measures forproducts in terms of 1. Sustainable product design by robust design 2. Sustainable design byquality of service. The paper describes items 1 and 2 in detail. To support the theory ofsustainable product design by robust design techniques (item 1), a case study on a laser basedmeasuring instrument is considered. To support the theory of sustainable design
virtualenvironments for cognitive processes. In particular, the depth of the resulting “spatialpresence” and the phenomenon of “flow” are discussed. The paper closes with a discussion ofthe question, to what extend such innovative technologies establish new possibilities foreducational sciences and pedagogics, especially focusing on engineering education and thefield of virtual experiments.1. Introduction – New Perspectives for Engineering Education through Mixed Reality Page 26.1188.2A main goal of engineering education is the development of professional skills, to supportgraduates with the application of their knowledge within their subsequent
programminglanguage such as C and some familiarity with AI, HCI, or other relevant fields. The course metonce per week for 2 ½ hours for 15 weeks. The class format was approximately an hour forlecture and the remaining time to work on the lab projects. There was no single textbook butweekly readings on the state of the art as well as written discussion and quizzes on the readings.The literature review quizzes and discussion were due each week before the related lecture. Thecourse grade was based upon the criteria shown in Table 1. Table 1: HRI Course Grading Criteria Participation 10% Discussion 15% Quizzes
a sequence of courses that would be required of all of the engineering students.The ongoing development of the Servant Engineering program at GFU has taken place inroughly six distinct phases: Phase 1: The instructors attempted to mimic the basic format provided to us by the Purdue EPICS program. Phase 2: Much of the EPICS structure was shed to create a much leaner system, focusing primarily on performing the engineering service tasks. Phase 3: The EPICS structure was re-implemented in a manner that was more effective for the Servant Engineering program at GFU, re-emphasizing the importance of learning the engineering design process. Phase 4: The course was restructured from 4 semesters to 2
shows thatdifferent students require different amounts of practice to achieve proficiency in a given skill, andthat all students require repeated practice 1 . Additionally, spaced-repetition theory 2 providesevidence that it is more effective to space out repeated practices of the same or similar items 6 .To incorporate both mastery learning and spaced-repetition concepts into online homeworks, wedeveloped the PrairieLearn web-based homework system. This system simultaneously modelsboth student ability and question difficulty and guides students by adaptively awarding studentsdifferent numbers of points to each question (positive for correct answers, negative for incorrectanswers). The objectives of this system are to: (1) enable students to
successful construction andcustomer handoff relies upon (1) having a good partnership with a local non-governmentalorganization; (2) including local labor and materials in the construction; and (3) getting supportfrom local leaders on emplacement, operation, and maintenance of the system. Page 26.1268.2(1) Introduction Engineering education presents many opportunities for project-based learning, sincestudents can readily apply classroom knowledge to the creation of a tangible product. A project-based learning approach to engineering education has several advantages. For example,“inductive learning” methods such as this have been found to be
program’s home site.The research questions explored in this study are: (1) How does participation in the USRG program influence students’ intention to pursue different career and degree paths in engineering? (2) What factors influence USRG program participants’ decision to potentially apply to and matriculate in engineering at TAMU at the completion of the program? (3) How do factors that influence USRG program participants’ decision to potentially apply to and matriculate in engineering differ between those who applied and who did not apply to graduate studies at TAMU?MethodsA mixed methods survey design approach was used to collect data from the target population torespond to the research questions asked in this
produce this program, including the results of over 1,300surveys completed by students and teachers who have participated in the program activities.1. IntroductionConnecting math and science concepts to real-world applications can help to generate studentinterest in STEM disciplines and careers. There have been significant outreach efforts to engagestudents in STEM-related activities, primarily with the intent of generating interest in STEMfields, but these efforts are not necessarily intended to teach specific K-12 math and scienceconcepts. In this research, we present the design, development, and assessment of a university-led outreach program to address these needs. The presented work is focused on identifying andlinking 5th – 12th grade math
, technology and engineer abilities in order to expand their professional potential. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF 3D TECHNOLOGY IN STEM- BASED COURSES; SPECIFICALLY INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING COURSES.The impact of new technologies on teaching and learning engineering is important to study andunderstand for various reasons, including: (1) the pervasive use of technology tools by students, and(2) the rapidly increasing use of technology tools in schools and college classrooms, as new devicesthat balance cost, functionality and portability and shift the use of computing devices from personalpurposes to mainstream course applications. We present
techniques.IntroductionInterpretivist qualitative research seeks to understand individuals’ experiences and “consists of aset of interpretive, material practices that make the world visible” (p. 3).1 In doing so it placesprimary importance on the meaning made by individuals as they interact with their worlds. Inthis constructivist perspective the participants’ perceptions, values, beliefs and experiences are ofprimary importance.1 Additionally, constructivism focuses on the individual meaning makingprocess, and individuals are viewed as active agents gaining knowledge about social contextthrough their experiences with the environment.2,3 However, the thoughts that are of importanceto meaning making may actually be unconscious, and thus inaccessible to both the interviewerand
. Page 26.240.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessing Engineering Ethics Training All engineering schools accredited by ABETa are required to ensure their graduates have“an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.”1 To many ABET-accreditedengineering schools, it is not clear whether they are meeting this requirement2. Walla WallaUniversity (the University) is also struggling with this question. This describes the first efforts atassessing the engineering ethics training at the University. This information will help the facultyat the Edward F. Cross School of Engineering (School of Engineering) at the University continueto improve the ethics
, similar to other studies11, success (passing) isdefined as getting at least a C grade.TABLE I. NUMBER OF GRADES THAT WERE AVAILABLE Assessment Week 2 Week 4 Week 9 Component Attendance 4 8 18 Homework 2 4 9 Quiz 4 8 18 Exam 0 0 1 Project 0 0 0* Open-ended 0 0 0* Problems Team 0 0 0* Evaluations* At week 9, number of available grades was different for Spring 2011 and Spring 2012. Thus, inthus study they were not included in the predictive model.For each week, we used the academic
contribution to the multi-disciplinary team lies in qualitative methodologies, cultural theory and the belief that outliers offer great insight into the workings of power. Her research interests include cultural theory, the cultural/historical construction of women’s identities and roles in past and present societies, and most recently, equity issues surrounding gender and underrepresented populations in engineering education. She can be contacted at cynthia.e.foor-1@ou.edu.Dr. Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is an Associate Professor of Computer Science and Womens’ and Gender Stud- ies at the University of Oklahoma. Her main research focus is diversity in engineering education and
components directly addresses the key factors for commercializationidentified per domain.Finally, there is a discussion on the importance of including the DFC model as part of an Page 26.462.3engineering program as well as the importance of improving this model.Key factors for success or failure in technology commercializationTechnology commercialization is inherently an innovation-based discipline (Balachandra, 2010)1.By understanding the factors that influence the success or failure in commercializing newtechnology, a holistic model for the commercialization of renewable energy technologies (RETs)can be developed. Such model may provide a
in turn thesechallenges often stem from the kinds of personal struggles mentioned above. As such, the UGOstaff frequently work with ODOS staff, student health, the residence halls, etc. to supportstudents and give them the information and support they need. In a given academic year, theUGO supports a huge number of students; some of the support services are provisioned quickly(issues are handled in a matter of minutes or hours), while others require more sustainedinterventions (measured in days or weeks). The national numbers speak for themselves: almost30% of college-aged students report being depressed to the point of impaired functioning[1](which means perhaps 0.3 x 2700 = 810 students in engineering at our institution), over 20%report
research summarized byBressoud, et. al.3Boise State University’s efforts have been successful because we identified and capitalized ontwo important sources of momentum: 1) efforts to reframe calculus content and 2) facultydevelopment supporting calculus instructors. In 2010 we were awarded a National ScienceFoundation Science Talent Expansion Program grant, specifically aimed at increasing STEMgraduates by improving first-time, full-time student retention. One of the elements of the projectwas the support of three, year-long, STEM-specific faculty learning communities (FLCs) (e.g.see Cox, 2001).4 Based on interest from numerous math faculty, coupled with Calculus Ileadership by one of the co-PIs on the grant, the latter two FLCs became exclusively
representations, constructed with data from individuals with varying levels of designexpertise, present salient information about how individual design processes can differ. We havedeveloped a series of tasks based on these representations whose purpose is to teach studentsabout design processes, and we implemented them with eight undergraduate engineering studentsin two separate research seminars at a large state institution.Specifically, in these tasks, students were presented with design timelines as well as theempirically-based codes that were used to construct the timelines, and were asked to developnew representations from that data (an activity called Design Brief 1, or DB1). They were thenasked to execute a design task, capture their own design
set of Design Heuristics lessons for engineering studentsthat can be incorporated directly into existing undergraduate courses at varied institutions. Theproject aims to refine these pedagogical methods through co-creation of lessons with engineeringinstructors from diverse institutions and backgrounds. Our goals include: 1) raise awareness ofthe importance of teaching students to generate creative concepts; 2) educate instructors on howto teach Design Heuristics within existing engineering classes; 3) assess learning outcomes ofDesign Heuristics lessons from diverse instructors, courses, and universities; and 4) develop aneffective, easy-to-adopt pedagogy for educating students about how to generate creative ideas. Inthis paper, we present
interpretations of what is desirable to young people (ex. rock star).They ultimately lack the authenticity, relevance, and ultimately, the social and environmentaljustice elements that many female Millennial adolescents seek.2.3. Perspectives on female adolescents from the Millennial GenerationA female-inclusive engineering identity must reflect an understanding of the unique time inwhich female adolescents have been raised and are now living. This paper focuses on the Page 26.772.5Millennial Generation – people born between the 1980s and the early 2000s, and who can becharacterized by the following traits: 1. Special – they feel that their input is
leave science, mathematics, and engineering fields ofstudy was pedagogical – the mode of assessment and the design of curriculum were notadequately supporting students in learning8. A follow-up study is underway to learn why therehas been minimal improvement in the retention of students in these fields, despite efforts forinstructional improvement9. Retention improvements are consistent with the goals of the Engageto Excel report, which strategizes how to produce 1 million additional graduates with degrees inSTEM10.It is also important to note that while instructors may try to adopt evidence-based teachinginnovations, the quality with which they implement the innovation may vary significantly andtherefore may not result in improved student
entering from outside. Disassembly of the previous design: To gain a better understanding of what the prior team was working with and what needed to be altered, the team began looking at each piece in the printer enclosure. The team quickly found out that the z-axis stepper-motor and modular frame was reusable. However, almost all the other components needed to be redone.Figure 1. The DLP 3D Printer – including its internal structure, projector, resin box, build platform, and z-axis controls Ordering a new projector: The previous team believed to have damaged their projector. Furthermore, due to the resin leak mentioned above, their projector was covered in resin, making it useless. Therefore the
, preparing short written deliverables as a group throughout the course of theproject before delivering a final oral presentation about their completed device. Students alsocompleted individual weekly quizzes and two exams (a midterm and a final) on course materialin order to grant students more individual control over their final grades. The full breakdown ofstudent grades is shown in Table 1, and course grades were made up of 60% group work (20%for each project) and 40% individual work (quizzes, exams, and peer assessments). Page 26.40.3Table 1. Assignments as contributors to student grades for the Spring 2014 semesterItem Points per
: A New Way to Explore Unearned Advantages and Unearned DisadvantagesAbstractThis paper describes the development of a unique interview method based on Peggy McIntosh’s“serial testimony” technique. Our “singular testimony” technique preserves many of thehallmarks of the serial testimony technique, specifically: 1. Giving participants the opportunity to share their personal narrative, or testimony, about unearned advantages and unearned disadvantages as they perceive them; 2. Allowing participants to speak uninterrupted; 3. Exhibiting no judgment and expressing no rebuttal to participant responses; 4. Returning to a particular advantage/disadvantage for further exploration and follow up questions in
the development of this internal grants program. Additionally, it describesthe framework for implementing this internal grants program and the outcomes of the awarded grants.1. INTRODUCTIONWhen examining technological innovations, particularly in computing organizations, the concept ofdisruptive change is often a focus. Without the innovations that are enabled by change, technicalorganizations are unable to sustain themselves, let alone thrive. Research by Christensen, et al. suggeststhat three factors affect the abilities or inabilities of an organization to change: the organization’sresources, its processes, and its values. They also suggest that these factors are critical to theorganization’s ability to innovate.[1]Resources include
-item by line-item, and placed in a containingcategory. No additional containing categories were required during this follow on phase,indicating that categorical saturation was achieved. Four top level categories were added tothe 37 containers; effectively creating an hierarchical taxonomy for REILs.1 IntroductionThis paper presents a remote laboratory information taxonomy. Development of taxonomiesis a common human intellectual activity; a taxonomy within some given domain organizesand clarifies the domain content and provides a common framework that supports andfacilitates reasoning and communication about the domain in question. In this paper, theinformation taxonomy that is presented was developed to support reasoning about
Physics Department at Kansas State University. Page 26.496.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing and Piloting a Quantitative Assessment Tool for Cybersecurity Courses Scott Bell1 , Eleanor Sayre2 , and Eugene Vasserman2 1 Northwest Missouri State University 2 Kansas State UniversityAbstractThe rapid growth of the Internet over the past two decades has led to a proliferation ofnetwork-capable computing devices