Page 26.1217.2 chemistry. 1 Applications of Technology: Various technologies common to engineering are introduced and participating teachers implement the design process on open-ended problems related to those technologies.Elective Courses (participants choose two): Engineering Models: participating teachers connect algebra, trigonometry, and calculus to engineering applications using math fundamental theory and MATLAB programming. Engineering Energy Systems: Participants learn about thermodynamics, mass, and energy balances to evaluate energy supply systems and their efficiencies, including renewable energy and nanotechnology
identified for improvement were in the development of new design projects with system integration requirements, applications of new technologies, and enhanced communication skills through teamwork. At the beginning of 2006, the Dean’s office established the Clark School Keystone Academy of Distinguished Professors to recognize those educators who have made significant contributions to the undergraduate education in engineering, and to provide these faculty members with the support necessary to continue to make contributions to the undergraduate curriculum. The mission was clear: to revive the infrastructure of freshman and sophomore engineering courses with a focus on engineering design. To ensure the success of this new initiative, the
research fields with the last fifteen years in higher education. Natalia is currently an Institutional Research Analyst at Cabrillo College and for the past seven years has worked on the following grants and programs: USDE Title III STEM grant, the Academy for College Excellence program, the Career Technology Education program, the NSF EA- GER Engineering Abroad grant, and the NSF S-STEM grant. Natalia is passionate about education and enjoys being part of research projects that promote student success.Brandon Faria, Cabrillo College Brandon Faria is a mechanical engineering student at Cabrillo College. He was part of Cabrillo College’s first Engineering Abroad Program during to 2014-15 academic year. He has worked on
), EngineeringProfession (ENPR), Math Skills and Applications (MATH), Design (DESN), Global Interest(GLIN), Professional Skills / Latent Curriculum (PROF), Academic Success (ACAD), andEngineering Specific Technology/Tools (ESTT). From here on, only the new terms will be used.Initial Use of the Classification SchemeThe Classification Scheme for First Year Engineering Courses has served as a catalyst fordiscussion on revision to existing curricula in the first year in a few American institutions. OneMidwest university in particular reported on a self-study exercise in which each section of thecourse was classified. The intent was to use the classification scheme as a tool to pinpointpotential gaps among sections of a common course.3 This exercise was performed for
University in Construction Engineering and Management focused on design-construction integration. With teaching responsibilities in both the civil engineering and construction management departments, Dr. Korman has instructed courses on Construc- tion Drawings & Specifications, Concrete Technology and Formwork, Heavy Civil Construction Methods, Residential Construction Methods, and Building Systems. He has work worked for several public agen- cies, consulting engineering firms, and construction companies before joining the faculty at Cal Poly in 2005. He has designed civil infrastructure projects with an emphasis on capital improvement projects for roadways, parks and recreation facilities, and water and sewer
Paper ID #12964Introducing Students to Electronic Devices and Electric Circuit Applicationsat Early Level in the Engineering Curriculum through Multiple ProjectsDr. Nesreen Alsbou , Ohio Northern University Dr. Alsbou is an Assistant Professor at the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Com- puter Science at Ohio Northern University. She has experience teaching a variety of classes, including: Electric Circuits, Networks and Data Communication, Wireless Sensor Networks, Digital Logic Design, and others. Dr. Alsbou research in the area of wireless communications is focused on designing Media Access Control
Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of technology in engineering education, the incorpo- ration of critical thinking in undergraduate engineering education, and retention of engineering students. She leads a research group whose goal is to foster active interdisciplinary research which investigates learning and motivation and whose findings will inform the development of evidence-based interventions to promote retention and student
. 7. Maintain flexibility and be open to feedback and reflection throughout the semester. Incorporate improvements to the activities and in-class sessions as the semester progresses. Allow your course to be dynamic instead of static.AcknowledgementFunded by a grant to the University of Pennsylvania as a project site for the AAU UndergraduateSTEM Education Initiative.References1. Prince, M. J. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.2. Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., & Donovan, S.S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69
Paper ID #13373Living-Learning Communities Improve First-Year Engineering Student Aca-demic Performance and Retention at a Small Private UniversityDr. William John Palm IV P.E., Roger Williams University William Palm is Assistant Professor of Engineering at Roger Williams University, where he teaches Engi- neering Graphics and Design, Computer Applications for Engineering, Machine Design, Biomechanics, and Capstone Design. Prior to joining Roger Williams, he worked as a product design engineer and con- sultant and taught at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy and Boston University. He holds a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from MIT
American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), and her research appears in the journals American Anthropologist, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Society & Natural Resources, WorkingUSA: Journal of Labor and Society, and Anthropology Today.Dr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). His books include Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Scientists and Engineers from Sputnik to the ’War Against
of Georgia. Her research interests include STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math) education, narrative inquiry, and interdisciplinary studies. She is also the founding director of the Double Helix STEAM School in Athens, GA.Dr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students
-related experiences. Her work dwells into learning in informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace applications as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley Shannon Ciston is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Education in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Ciston holds degrees in chemical engineering from Northwestern University (PhD) and Illinois Institute of Technology (BS). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in technical communications and
control and signal processing.Prof. Robert M. Weikle II, University of Virginia Robert M. Weikle, II received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering and physics from Rice University, Houston, TX, in 1986 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the California In- stitute of Technology in 1987 and 1992, respectively. In 1993, he joined the faculty of the University of Virginia where he is currently a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. His research group focuses on submillimeter electronics, terahertz devices, high-frequency instrumentation and metrology, and quasi-optical techniques for millimeter-wave power combining and imaging.Prof. Maite Brandt-Pearce, University
3025 Writing Assignment 2”, Spring 2014.4. Helfers, Christing, Sarah Duerden, Jean Garland, and D.L. Evans, “An Effective Peer Revision Method for Engineering Students in First-Year English Courses”, Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999, pp 13a6-7-12.5. Rose, Andrew T., “Using the Peer Review Process to Implement Writing Assignments in an Engineering Technology Course”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2001 – session 3650, pp 1 – 8.6. Guildford, William Hl, “Teaching Peer Review and the Process of Scientific Writing”, Advance in Physiology Education, Vol 25, No 3, 2001, pp 167-175.7. Sharp, Julie and Marilyn Dyrud, “Two Perspectives on
A. Cropley. 2005. Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 9. Ishii, N., and K. Miwa. 2005. Supporting reflective practice in creativity education. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Creativity & Cognition. London, England. 10. Buelin-Biesecker, J., & Wiebe, E. N. (2013). Can Pedagogical Strategies Affect Students’ Creativity? Testing a Choice-Based Approach to Design and Problem-Solving in Technology, Design, and Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 11. Charyton, C., & Merrill, J. A. (2009
University Tamara J. Moore, INSPIRE, Purdue University | kmtank@iastate.edu | tamara@purdue.edu | PictureSTEM.org The PictureSTEM Project is developing an instructional module at each grade level, K-5, which employs engineering and literary contexts to integrate science, technology, and mathematics content instruction in meaningful and significant ways. These transformative new models for STEM learning use picture books and an engineering design challenge to provide students with authentic, contextual activities that engage learners in
ScienceFoundation, National Academy of Engineering, American Society for Engineering Education,and the United States government, among others.After a substantial review process that took several years and several committees of high rankingmembers from academia and industry, the National Academy of Engineering in its EducatingThe Engineer of 2020 report1 recommended in 2005 that engineering education establishmentsseek to achieve the following: 1. Pursue a student-centered approach to undergraduate engineering education. 2. Increase the value in engineering education research to better understand how students learn. 3. Develop new standards for faculty qualifications. 4. Help promote engineering and technological literacy among the
. Dr. Eddy received her doctorate in Applied Cognitive Psychology and has spent her career focused on ap- plying the principles of learning and cognition to evaluation of educational programs. Her work includes published articles and client technical reports as President of Cobblestone Applied Research & Evalu- ation, Inc. and a faculty member at Claremont Graduate University. Work at Cobblestone focuses on advancing the numbers of underrepresented minority students in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Dr. Eddy has conducted evaluation or applied research studies on numerous university projects including clients programs funded by the National Science Foundation; U.S. Depart- ment
understand materials (or other resources) or design limitations.26 Failure within P12 education literature is largely limited to accountability reporting, e.g.:“failing schools” or schools who do not as a whole achieve proficiency on mandated tests, or“student failure” or a student’s inability to demonstrate cognitive knowledge.27 In bothengineering and education, the ramifications of failure can be seen as catastrophic with respect tothe damage being done (e.g., to technologies, people, students). Engineers will use the data toplan to avoid such a situation in the future, whereas in education the reaction typically involvessome sort of remediation (e.g., employed to impact individual students to be able to demonstrateproficiency in a subject
Paper ID #12857Teachers’ Use of Argumentation in the Development of Integrated STEMCurricula (Fundamental)Corey A Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Mathis is a Ph.D student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in biology and her M.E.D. in secondary education from Northern Arizona University and is a former high school science and technology teacher. Her research interest includes improving students learning of science and engineering through integrated STEM curricula.Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emilie A. Siverling is a Ph.D. Student in Engineering
Paper ID #14160Transportation System Based Summer Academy for Teachers (RTP, Strand4)Dr. Shashi S. Nambisan P.E., University of Tennessee, Knoxville Shashi Nambisan is a Professor of Civil Engineering at University of Tennessee, Knoxville (UT). Since 1989, he has led efforts on more than 165 research, education, and outreach projects that have addressed local, statewide, regional and national issues in transportation and infrastructure systems management related to policy, planning, operations, safety, and risk analysis. He has authored or co-authored more than 125 peer reviewed journal and conference publications. Along
development, program evaluation, multidis- ciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and college math, science, computer science, and engineering teaching to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Mrs. Anne Seifert, Idaho National Laboratory Anne Seifert EdS INL K-12 STEM Coordinator Idaho i-STEM Coordinator Anne Seifert is the Idaho National Laboratory STEM Coordinator and founder and executive director of the i-STEM network. She holds a BS degree in elementary education, an MA in Education Administration
-Champaign Dr. Wade Fagen is a Lecturer in the Department of Computer Science in the College of Engineering at The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). He teaches one of UIUC’s largest courses, Introduction to Computer Science, known as CS 105. His research aims to improve learning by using technologies that students already bring to the classroom.Dr. Cinda Heeren, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Cinda Heeren is an award-winning Senior Lecturer at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She teaches CS225, Data Structures and Programming Principles, to hundreds of enthusiastic and talented undergraduates every year. She is always game to try new pedagogical innovations, and she loves
educationprofessionals to improve delivery and assessment is ongoing, and processes to promotetransferability of research findings are under development.References: 1. American Society for Mechanical Engineering web site, accessed May 6, 2014: “Washington Policy Report May 2013.” 2. FEDERAL SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) EDUCATION 5-YEAR STR ATEGIC PLAN, A Report from the Committee on STEM Education National Science and Technology Council, May 2013 3. National Academy of Engineering (2014), Making a World of Difference, National Academies Press. 4. National Academy of Engineering, Grand Challenges for Engineering, www.engineeringchallenges.org, updated 9/2013. 5. Johnson, Steven (2012). Future Perfect
’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts.Dr. Charles E. Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 10 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). While he teaches freshman to graduate- level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He im- plements classroom demonstrations at every opportunity as part of a complete instructional strategy that seeks to overcome issues of student conceptual understanding.Dr. Luciana R Barroso, Texas A&M University Luciana R. Barroso
JamMath Jam is a one-week intensive math treatment that offers Cañada College students theopportunity to improve their Placement Test results in Mathematics and/or prepare for mathcourses that they will be taking. There are three Math Jam opportunities each year, all heldduring the intersession period between semesters. Math Jam aims to help students complete theirAssociates Degrees and/or transfer requirements in less time than previously possible, especiallythose intending to major in Science, Technology, Engineering, or Mathematics (STEM) fieldswho placed into a college math course below pre-calculus and want to advance to the next mathlevel by scoring higher on the Math Placement Test at the end of Math Jam
study to characterize practicing engineers’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific
Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World, June 12, 2005 - June 15, 2005. 2005. Portland, OR, United states: American Society for Engineering Education.36. van der Hulst, M. and E. Jansen, Effects of curriculum organisation on study progress in engineering studies. Higher Education, 2002. 43(4): p. 489-506.37. Mandel, P. and B. Süssmuth, Size matters. The relevance and Hicksian surplus of preferred college class size. Economics of Education Review, 2011. 30(5): p. 1073-1084.38. Kennedy, P.E. and J.J. Siegfried, Class size and achievement in introductory economics: Evidence from the TUCE III data. Economics of Education Review, 1997. 16(4): p. 385-394.39. De Clemencia Cosentino, C. and N. Deterding
Community and Service Learning Sponsored by South Carolina Coalition of Mathematics and Science – Dr. Tom Peters Ron Welch, The Citadel, Dean of Engineering Jennifer Ogle, Clemson University, Civil Engineering Faculty Director of Engineers for Developing Countries Moshe Kam, New Jersey Institution of Technology, Dean of Engineering; IEEE / EPICS-in-IEEE Bill Oakes, Purdue, Engineering Education, Director of EPICSApril 14, 2015Engineering Education Practice - 2011Survey responses from 110 eng’g depts at 72 universities (46% rate)ASEE report Innovation with Impact, 2012 Not Somewhat Highly Important
grown about 50 percent, but the number of engineering graduates has stagnated at around 130,000 (White House, 2011b). One Decade, One Million more STEM Graduates. Engineering graduates are 4.4% of total college graduates.• National Priorities: In June, 2011, President Obama called for the training of 10,000 new American engineers a year (White House, 2011a).• K‐12 Standards. The January 2013 draft of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) fully integrates engineering and technology into the structure of science education by raising engineering design to the same level as scientific inquiry at all levels of K‐12 education. U.S. bachelor’s degrees in selected S&E fields per 1,000 20–24