teacher and developed in conjunction with members of the EngTEAMS. The design projects in each unit vary in context and in terms of the mathematics and science concepts needed to create an adequate solution. Yet, within all the variation, each unit is an authentic engineering design challenge. The common design elements that cut across curriculum were specified in three overarching design competencies (Douglas, Moore, & Adams, 2016), each with specific objectives concerning the knowledge and practices that comprise the competency. Design Competencies Competencies Objective Students… 1:Studentsdefinethe A Gatherinformationtoexaminetheproblem(askquestionstoclient) problemfromthe
abroad experience was added. Interventions were appliedaddressing four known variables that increase retention: financial support, math and academicpreparation, the learning community/cohort building, and international education. Threeobjectives or expected outcomes of this project were: 1. Increased retention and graduation rates of participating students in STEM fields. 2. Improved programs and strategies for sustaining diversity in STEM fields. 3. Improved access to engineering educational opportunities.The quantitative measure of success for the NSF Pathways project is determined by the retentionand graduation rate of the students in STEM fields at the end of five years. The current four-yearretention rate for these students in 2017
learn.Winne provides an approach to measuring self-regulated learning. Self-regulated learning isdependent on context, and it is also expected that context changes as learners redefine it uponapproaching problems.1 Self-regulated learning is composed of “metacognition, motivation, andstrategic action.” 1MLH hackathons promote small teams to coordinate with each other in order to develop and/orinnovate a project by the end of the hackathon. In focusing on teams and how they learn witheach other, a process theory helps to solidify a framework developed from Winne’s approach.Applying “how knowledge emerges from the individual to the team-level” is important for thespread of information, and in seeing how one’s actions of self-regulated learning can
Massachusetts at Amherst, an MBA from Babson College, and MS and PhD degrees from Purdue University. She currently serves on the board of the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship in the role of Vice President for Research. She is also a Senior Research Advisor to the Stanford University Epicenter.Connor Rene Couetil, Purdue University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Engineering Students' Misuse of Business Concepts: Understanding Problematic Precursors to EntrepreneurshipIntroduction and BackgroundThe increased focus on entrepreneurship in engineering education 1 has led to more attentionbeing paid to what should be taught 2 during these
, in 1962, added someadditional stages and proposed a rigorous curriculum development process that answers thefollowing questions: 1. What are the Needs 2. What are the Objectives 3. What are the Contents 4. How should the contents be organized 5. What should be the learning experience 6. How should the learning experience be organized 7. How should evaluation be carried outDr. Hilda Taba was a strong proponent of the backward curriculum development method. Thisinductive process lends itself to the use of mathematical modeling tools and the application ofsystems concepts to structure information at various stages of curriculum design.The sequence of steps proposed by Dr. Taba leads to Content Development
degrees.To shed light on these and related issues, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), withfunding from the National Science Foundation, assembled a 14-member study committee. Thecommittee, which met four times over a two-year period, was charged with examining the status,role, and needs of ET education in the United States. This paper is adapted from the committee’sfinal report (NAE, 2017).Data GatheringData gathering by the committee consisted of (1) collection and analysis of the relevantpublished literature; (2) review of relevant federal education and employment datasets; (3) asurvey of engineering technology education programs and a survey of a sample of companiesthat hire graduates from these programs; and (4) a stakeholder workshop in
, descriptive statistics isused. The reporting institutions supplied information for the data in MIDFIELD. The data wasexamined and summarized to determine how much of the data represented continuing students,transfer students, and those that matriculated. Based on the amount of data and verification, thedata represents what is found in all of MIDFIELD for the various majors and STEM groupsindicated in the database.ResultsWhen comparing engineering technology student data to traditional engineering, Figure 1 showsthe total number of engineering technology students as compared to all traditional engineeringstudents in MIDFIELD. Engineering Technology 10
Engineering Undergraduates Concurrently Seeking K-12 STEM Teacher Licensure: Fuels the Soul or Too Many Barriers?IntroductionThe benefits of infusing K-12 education with engineering—specifically engineering design anddesign habits of mind—is well established; engineering design is a powerful vehicle for scienceand math education [1]. Engineering education research suggests that students who are exposedto engineering topics during their elementary and secondary years are more motivated to enrolland succeed in advanced science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) courses inmiddle and high school, as well as eventually pursue engineering and other STEM careers [1, 2].Moreover, students who enter undergraduate engineering programs
Challenge at RWTH Aachen University was marked as “good”. Asides from that, the analyses also indicate that the students most benefit from a great amount of gained knowledge and their improved ability to adapt technologies depending on the situational context and the underlying social and cultural structures. Yet, the results show that there are also aspects of the challenge-concept that need some improvement. One of these aspects is to enhance the students’ awareness of the social responsibilities of engineers.1. Introduction The twenty-first century is highly influenced by globalization and an increasing dependence on technologies. Likewise, the global awareness about climate change and the importance of reducing greenhouse gas
address societal problems through technical solutions is foundationalto official articulations about the engineering profession. 1 Questions, however, have been raisedabout how this vision translates into practice. They point to limitations in engineers’ training and,by extension, competency in determining and promoting the “social good,” 2 as well as to anincreasing number of contemporary cases involving engineers’ failure to protect the public’shealth, safety, and welfare. 3 Integral to the engineering profession’s service ideal is a relationaldimension that portrays engineers as inextricably connected to society. However, in their day-to-day work, engineers tend to make complex and critical decisions – often with significant
impact the performance of East Asian students in the context of a mandatoryintroductory class in engineering.INTRODUCTION Year after year, it is more common for instructors to encounter non-U.S. students in theirengineering classrooms. The last report from the Institute of International Education shows thatfor the academic year 2015/2016, there were over a million non-U.S. students enrolled in highereducation programs in the U.S 1. This is almost double of what they reported in 2005. Studentsfrom East Asia account for 41.9% of the population of foreign students, with China being themost popular country of origin 1. In 2015, U.S. undergraduate engineering programs enrolledover thirty thousand students from China, South Korea, Japan, Hong
development so it has not been widely implemented incollege. On the other hand, project-based learning has been broadly executed. Project-basedlearning enhances knowledge retention in students since they acquire the fundamental principlesby solving a problem, which provides context to the theory learned while making it more relevant.Additionally, it prepares students for industries as it enhances team working and soft skills. Figure 1: Promotion video of MSEIP project.Special Topic: Green Energy Materials and Engineering (MECH 4395/5390 and IE4395/5390) Green energy materials and engineering is a special topic course that focuses on combiningrenewable energy design and manufacturing while incorporating cyber
users to navigate and operate the machine easily.Illustrated in figure 1 is uPrint SE plus 3D printer. Figure 1. uPrint SE Plus 3D Printer manufactured by StratasysTo replicate the exact functionality of the printer’s real time operation and its response to the givencommands in the virtual simulator, a touch interface was developed for the user to see exactly howthe printer reacts to the commands given by mimicking every function of the control panel relatedto uPrint SE plus-3D printer. To set a scenario, if there is no part being built by the printer and ifthere is no part set in the queue of the printer, the control panel display an “Idle” status. Similarly,if the printer has a part in queue to be build, the display message
300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469 Phone: (937) 229-2475AbstractThis paper will describe and discuss the learning strategies applied in an EngineeringManagement Organizational Behavior course to enhance and encourage students to go beyondrote memorization and simple understanding of concepts to application, synthesis, evaluation andcreation for an organization. The learning strategies to be considered are: 1) research anddelivery of a real-world case study application of an organization applying the organizationalbehavior concepts; 2) within-class active learning exercises applying the organizational behaviorconcepts; 3) developing a written paper applying the concepts
. Workers displaced by automation may then wish to learn newskills so that they can work on designing, maintaining, and improving industrial robotics systems.However, in order to develop these new skills, people need hands-on experience with robotics sys-tems as well as educational programs which can teach robotics, programming, and problem-solvingtechniques. One obstacle for learning these new systems is that, unlike computers which are widelyFigure 1: An screenshot of our RobotRun software illustrating primilary support for two robots, redobjects, end effectors, and the teach pendant (left).available and reasonably affordable, industrial robotics are expensive and inaccessible. In addition,universities, community colleges, and high schools may
participation, help sustain student attention,and allow instructors to better gauge levels of understanding [1], [2]. Previous systems requiredstudents to purchase dedicated equipment, but access and affordability has dramaticallyincreased now that students can submit answers through their own laptops or mobile devices [3].Recently, a new generation of SRSs has focused on boosting their appeal and effectivenessthrough gamification [4], defined as the incorporation of game design elements such as avatars,points, competition, teams, and time limits into a non-game context [5]. Gamification has beenshown to enhance student engagement across a wide variety of educational activities [6]. Previous studies have reported favorable student responses to using
speech using a laptop. Theperson using the captioning services watches this transcription on their own computer in order to followalong with a lab discussion or lab presentation. In contrast to hearing audiences who listen to speakerswhile watching for body language cues and reading presentation slides, deaf audiences must multitaskduring lectures and panels, regardless of which accommodation is provided. To follow a presentation,deaf participants shift their attention from the interpreter to the lab demonstration, resulting in eye fatigue,distraction, and decreased engagement.Deaf Student ChallengesFor captions, deaf participants juggle their attention from(1) the text to understand the content of the conversation,(2) the speaker to pick-up
of the project description, listed below. 1. Describe the problem that is being solved, and provide a justification for using Mohr’s Circle as an appropriate approach to solve this problem. 2. Determine the necessary equations to convert the strain rate rosette to stress (in any system of coordinates). Identify key assumptions and limitations. 3. Determine the principal stress and principal planes with respect to the global system of coordinates xy, and plot the Mohr’s Circle by providing to the special MATLAB function the center and radius of the circle. 4. Implement the equations in MATLAB and comment the code accordingly. 5. Complete the provided table (see Appendix A) by following the considerations detailed
thetheorized utility of the experience for promoting student engineering self-efficacy andmotivation. Following an overview of theory behind the curriculum, we describe how theseprinciples align with the student experience while fabricating soft robots. Finally, we offerpreliminary reports on initial states and changes in student perceptions as they participated in thecurriculum.Girls in STEMAmong areas of concern for technology and engineering education, is the participation of adiverse body of students 1. For our field this includes female students, and a number of effortshave been made to understand factors related to this disparity 2, 3. In middle-school and high-school, as students are often first exposed to these elective courses, interest
– whichallowed grouping students into multiple risk categories based upon a small set of pre-enrollmentdata – with our insights into key success predictor courses. Specifically: What grades, onaverage, do different risk category students earn, in each of our key success prediction courses?A related question was as follows: To what degree are students in each risk category achievingthe success threshold grade in the key courses? We believed that answering these questionsmight help us better support at-risk students in multiple ways, including (1) providing data-basedadvice on which courses to focus on; (2) providing insight into how course scheduling mightimpact performance (by comparing first vs. second semester performance in key courses); (3)helping
the realms of thought needed for AM and SM [1].This paper presents methodologies to increase student understanding of SM processes usingcomputer-based simulations; a voxel-based computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) softwareknown as SculptPrint [20] was used to provide these simulations. SculptPrint enables interactive,video game-like visualizations of a manufacturing process for various part and toolinggeometries. A case study was performed in a required, high-enrollment, sophomore-levelmechanical engineering course to evaluate the improvement in student understanding of theturning process. Experimental groups of students from the course were selected to receive bothexperience with the CAM software and training on computer numerical control
teams of 2 students per lab. Lab partnersare randomly assigned for each lab. Labs must be completed and submitted by the end of class.Lab reports are submitted via Blackboard (Bb). Students use a generic template to completeeach written lab report. A list of materials and equipment and a set of objectives (which includeat least one hypothesis) is provided. Students are instructed on how to use the equipment prior tothe lab. The objective is for the students to design their own experiments within the givenconstraints based on a problem-solving approach2. These constraints are as follows: (1) Studentsmust utilize the supplied lab equipment and materials issued by the instructor. (2) Labexperiments must be designed and completed within the class
, Technology Review, andvarious web based venues. They are assigned and due the next lecture. Students must read ashort article, and write a ½ - 1 page summary. All students turning in a reasonable paper receivefull credit. The focus is on content and exposure, rather than on composition and in-depthanalysis.Some of the readings I have used include:Woman Who Couldn’t Be Intimidated by Citigroup Wins $31 Million11, A manager inCitigroup’s Mortgage division becomes a whistleblower exposing improper mortgage practicesat Citigroup. This reading reinforces the importance of integrity, and addresses a principal causeof the recession of 2008.Professor on quest for India’s hidden Inventors12. Management professor Anil Gupta travelsthrough rural India to find
" thatmany engineering students may identify with business and/or entrepreneurship. Thus, it wasdeemed an appropriate place to ask students about their views on entrepreneurship and to presentinformation on entrepreneurship.Student projects in the class culminated in team-developed project proposals. Prior to thisresearch endeavor, students were instructed to write proposals to solve the Grand Challenges forEngineering (NAE, 2017), but those challenges proved to be daunting, and student motivationwas seen as lacking. Entrepreneurship was seen to be a possible replacement for the GrandChallenges. By introducing entrepreneurial instruction, we hope to increase motivation in twoways: 1) We hope that allowing students to develop proposals for "Main
courses. In their taxonomy of higher education outcomes,the Association of American Colleges and Universities identifies a set of outcomes as belongingparticularly to integrative learning.2 For the introductory studio course that we piloted in oursummer 2016 version the learning outcomes were defined by the three constituent courses:Introduction to Design (a course in the engineering curriculum), Rhetoric and Composition, andGraphical Communication (which teaches solid modeling techniques). The learning outcomesfor each of these individual courses—tracked with some care to ensure that all were achieved inthe new studio experience—are shown in Table 1.Table 1. Learning outcomes from the three individual source courses, maintained as statedlearning
students in this major is critical. The Computingfield offers a unique opportunity for exciting industry-sponsored mini-projects that involvehands-on experience and link the applicability of computing skills to the industry world.Technical understanding is essential to engineering. But engineers find success and personalfulfillment when they couple these skills with a mindset to create extraordinary value for others.Our mini-project aims at providing an immersive experiential learning experience that introducesstudents to engineering entrepreneurial-minded principles[1] (EML). In this paper, we discuss the design of a seven week long lab offered in the beginning ofthe freshman year, where students get real world experience on cyber
innovation.1. REVIEW OF LITERATUREAccording to McKinsey & Company (2011), the global economy of the 21st century will evolveand grow according to five (5) ‘mega-trends’:‘1. The ‘great rebalancing’ resulting from globalization;2. the ‘productivity imperative’ – i.e. the need to create more wealth for all;3. the ‘pricing of the planet’ resulting from increasing constraints on key resources;4. the development of the ‘global grid’ and its implications and,5. the ‘market state’ where national governments play a major role in setting the conditions for equitable and sustainable growth.’These authors postulate that these ‘mega-trends’ will result in a disruptive environment and in aworld of massive ‘creative disruption’ that will made the 21st
collaborated with the professionalsociety IEEE to organize a workshop highlighting the role of campus information resources inempowering entrepreneurs. The workshop was organized in a panel discussion format, featuringtechnology transfer professionals, librarians from both institutions, and examples of successful innovatorsand entrepreneurs. This allowed for active interaction and networking with the panelists. We review thestate-of-the-art in entrepreneurship education, report student feedback, and offer lessons learned from thisexperience.Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Academic Libraries, Collaboration, Information LiteracyIntroductionInnovation and entrepreneurship are driving forces of growth and global competitiveness [1, 2].University-based
creating these plans seems germane. Therefore, the purpose of thisproject was to first compile elements of lesson plans that are valued by the profession (based onthe quality assessments found in the literature) and to compare lessons that were created bycontributors of various backgrounds.As a start, consider how teachers are taught to generate lesson plans when they are in a Collegeof Education program. University preservice programs generally have a systematic approach tolesson planning that is often based on educational research and practice. For example, theelementary education program at North Carolina State University uses the template in figure 1.This template has elements that are unique to the program, but are not tied to any
the emerging doctoral degree programs.IntroductionViewed as being essential to American technological research, manufacturing, and overalleconomic strength, the limited number of scientists and engineers with advanced degrees haslong been a concern for the country’s wellbeing. Science and engineering jobs have continued toincrease at a faster rate (18.7%) than all other occupations (14.3%), with 59% in computer andmathematical scientist occupations.1 The driving growth among science, technology, engineeringand math (STEM) occupations, has caused more than 1.1 million computer and mathematicaloccupations to be added between 2005-2015.2Although over 22,000 doctoral degrees are conferred yearly in the science and engineeringfields,3 questions