author then posesthe question to students, why doesn’t the door move (reaction forces in the former case and zero 𝑟𝑟 × ����⃗���⃗ 𝐹𝐹 in the latter case)?References[1] S. Brail, “Quantifying the Value of Service-Learning: A Comparison of Grade Achievement,” in International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, pp. 148-157, 2016.[2] Y. El-Glaly,W. Shi, S. Malachowsky, Q. Yu, and D. E. Krutz, “Presenting and Evaluating the Impact of Experiential Learning in Computing Accessibility Education,” in 2020 IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), Seoul South Korea: Association for Computing Machinery
] M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer, and J. Coleman, “Hands-on summer camp to attract K-12 students to engineering fields,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 144–151, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1109/TE.2009.2026366.[4] L. Nilson, Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors, vol. 3. 2010.[5] J. C. Carroll et al., “Lessons learned in K-12 engineering outreach and their impact on program planning (evaluation),” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28622.[6] R. Feldhausen, J. L. Weese, and N. H. Bean, “Increasing student self-efficacy in computational thinking via STEM outreach programs,” SIGCSE 2018 - Proc. 49th ACM Tech. Symp. Comput
% of positive feedback. The study's findings contribute to theconstruction technology body of knowledge by encouraging increase awareness of innovativeand promising technologies so future workforces are equip and ready to tackle the challenges ofthe industry.References[1] P. Gaire, D. Vital, M. R. Khan, C. Chibane, and S. Bhardwaj, “Adhoc mobile power connectivity using a wireless power transmission grid,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97528-5.[2] F. Carbonero, E. Ernst, and E. Weber, “Robots Worldwide: The Impact of Automation on Employment and Trade,” 2020.[3] E. Paus, Confronting dystopia: The new technological revolution and the future of work. 2018.[4] P. Pradhananga, M
) Daytime 13 Fall 2020 Adjunct Faculty (S) Evening 4 Full-Time Faculty (M) Daytime 15 Spring 2021 Adjunct Faculty (B) Evening 5 Full-Time Staff (K) Daytime 15 Fall 2021 Adjunct Faculty (B) Evening 13 Full-Time Faculty (M) Daytime 13 Spring 2022 Adjunct Faculty (B) Evening 15Project 1 – Strain GagesThe first project is an
in the next question inorder to collect common words that students might want as part of the list in the future (“If youused [emotion not listed here] above, what word or phrase did you need?”). The final questionpresented to students is shown in Figure 1, with the emotions listed in the order shown. Figure 1: The pilot question as presented to students in the Qualtrics softwareData CollectionStudents from four classes at three universities were assigned OEMPs in their classes as part of alarger research project [1], [2], [17]. The scope and format of the OEMP(s) assigned in eachclass varied, as shown in Table 1 below.Table 1: Pilot survey question participation. Of 188 students who consented to the survey across
. Finally, they mentioned how exploring projectsin a controlled, low-risk environment allowed them to explore areas of research that otherwisethey would not have been able to explore.The Icarus Program was created with the goal of improving sense of belonging, students'engagement and providing students with an opportunity to have out of the classroom experiencesto apply some of the technical knowledge they were learning in their courses while alsodeveloping a cohort and closely interact with their peers and professors. We consider that thisgoal was fulfilled based on the faculty members' perceptions.References[1] J. S. Eccles, "Families, Schools, and Developing Achievement-Related Motivations and Engagement," in Handbook of socialization: Theory
expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Reference[1] G.-M. Chen, “A model of global communication competence,” 2005.[2] A. Jaiswal, T. Karabiyik, P. Thomas, and A. J. Magana, “Characterizing Team Orientations and Academic Performance in Cooperative Project-Based Learning Environments,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 9, Art. no. 9, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11090520.[3] S. Asonitou, “Improving teamwork and communication skills through an action research project,” in Proceedings of WSEAS Conference, Special Session: New Trends and Technologies for Marketing, Management, Economics and Information Processing II, 2013, pp. 14–16.[4] A. J. Magana
students?" 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013, June. ASEE Conferences, 2013. https://strategy.asee.org/19695 [3] B. Maheswaran, "Teaching an Accelerated Course via Team Activities: Assessment and Peer Rating of the Team Impact". 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June. ASEE Conferences, 2016. https://peer.asee.org/26015 [4] B. Maheswaran, C. S. Stransky, and H. Kumarakuru, "Innovative Energy Elevator: a Physics and Engineering Wonder!". 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June. ASEE Conferences, 2018. https://peer.asee.org/30667 [5] B. Maheswaran, N. B. Tedori, E. J. Whitmore, B. L
studentexpectations without compromising the instructors’ standards. Overall, ungrading offers anopportunity to engage students in the learning and assessment process while instillingaccountability and agency.References:Blum, S. D. 2020. Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to DoInstead). Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 1st Edition. 10Butler, R. Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task‐involving and ego‐involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology58(1):1 – 14. May 2011.Dosmar, E. A Case Against Grades. The Teaching Professor. June
). https://peer.asee.org/36045[6] Fiegel, G. L., and Derbidge, N. (2015). “Introducing Soil Property Evaluation inGeotechnical Engineering – Some Food for Thought.” Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24364[7] Allen, E., Seaman, J., Lederman, D., and Jaschik, S. (2012). "Conflicted: Faculty and OnlineEducation, 2012." Inside Higher Ed.[8] Kinney, L., Liu, M., and Thornton, M. (2012). “Faculty and Student Perceptions of OnlineLearning in Engineering Education.” Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21387[9] Jolley, D.F., Wilson, S.R., Kelso, C., O’Brien, G. and Mason, C.E. (2016). “AnalyticalThinking, Analytical Action
other video chat options for virtual instruction.References[1] National Center for Education Statistics, '"Number and percentage of undergraduate studentsenrolled in distance education or online classes and degree programs, by selected characteristics:Selected years, 2003-04 through 2015-16," 2018. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov[Accessed Jan. 25, 2022].[2] M. Cameron, et al., "2019–20 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:20): FirstLook at the Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic on Undergraduate StudentEnrollment, Housing, and Finances (Preliminary Data)," 2021. [Online]. Available:https://nces.ed.gov [Accessed Jan. 25, 2022].[3] A. G. Cavinato, R. A. Hunter, L. S. Ott, and J. K. Robinson, “Promoting student
Rates in Engineering Fields,” American Society for Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX,2012.4 B. L . Yoder, “ Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation Benchmarks forUndergraduate Engineering Schools, Departments, and Programs,” American Society for EngineeringEducation, Washington D.C., 2016.5 S. S. Steinberg, “The relations of secondary mathematics to engineering education,” Mathematicsteacher, Vol. 42, No. 8, 1949.6 C. Adelman, “Women and men of the engineering path: A model for the analysis of undergraduatecareers,” U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 1998.7 M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of freshman engineering students:Models for determining student attrition in
the learning management system forinstruction, and grading policies and procedures (Table 1). Rubrics are used to grade all courseelements, and prior work by our group has demonstrated high inter-rater consistency using thisapproach [14]. During the semester, there are weekly group meetings where peer leaders haveopportunities to troubleshoot and clarify any questions with the faculty instructor(s). Table 1: Structure of one-day peer leader training. Section No. Training Focus Components Covered Course learning 1 Course Overview Objectives & elements Peer leader roles
curricula,” Transactions of the ASABE, 55(6), 2371-2378, 2012.[2] VanDeGrift, T. and Liao, S., “Helping First-Year Engineering Students Select a Major,” Paper presentedat the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 24 -28, 2017.[3] Brozina, C., and Meyers, K., “Engineering Major Discernment: A Model for Informing Students andOffering Choice,” Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June16-19 2019.[4] Lent, R., Brown, S. D., and Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual Supports and Barriers to Career Choice: ASocial Cognitive Analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47 (1), 36 – 49.[5] Lent, R.W., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, J., and Pertmer, G., “Exploration of Collective Efficacy Beliefs inStudent
review by Texas A&MUniversity-Corpus Christi Institutional Review Board (IRB Number: TAMU-CC-IRB-2021-0227).References [1] Overview of the Internet of Things. Series Y: Global Information Infrastructure, Internet Protocol Aspects and Next-Generation Networks, Recommendation ITU-T Y.2060, (2012, June), ITU-T, Telecommunication Standardization sector of ITU, International Telecommunication Union. [2] Gayle, M., & Mangra, D. (2021, November), Engineering by Remote Online Learning During COVID-19, 2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting, Virtually Hosted by the section. https://peer.asee.org/38430[3] Hsieh, S. (2020, June), Remotely Accessible 3-D Printer for Teaching CNC Programming: Lessons
.7. Acknowledgements The author thanks the reviewers for several important comments that led to severalspecific improvements, and to Mr. Martinson who carefully reviewed the paper and providedvery useful suggestions. Special thanks to Dr. Brittanney Adelmann, the Calculus class instructorwho allowed to remotely present the material to students, and to assess the presentation using ananonymous questionnaire. Special thanks to Mr. Juan Yepes for his help in visualizing theassessment results.8. References[1] T. Goldfinch, A. L. Carew, and T.J. McCarthy, “Improving Learning in EngineeringMechanics: The Significance of Understanding Causes of Poor Performance,” in Proceedings ofthe 2008 AAEE Conference, 2008.[2] S. Baker and L. Talley
Director of Qeexo Week 8 - 15 Term Project (& ML Contest) Providing technical seminar and remote Q&A ▪ Topic selection - presentation sessions by engineering staff of Qeexo in ▪ Hands-on project development technical areas such as SW Installation and ▪ Final presentation Issue Resolutions.Term Project Description(s)Class term projects requested students to search for and choose project topics which could applyembedded ML to solve the relevant engineering problem(s). Term projects included three mainparts: Part I – ML Project Planning/Framing, Part II – ML Project Implementation, and Part III –Report and Presentation. Along with the course schedule, the major project
Activities Druing the COVID-19 Pandemic. Advances in Engineering Education, 2020. 8(4).[7] Benabdallah, G., et al. Remote learners, home makers: How digital fabrication was taught online during a pandemic. in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2021.[8] Boll, S., et al., Making, together, alone: Experiences from teaching a hardware-oriented course remotely. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2020. 19(04): p. 35-41.[9] Galaleldin, M., et al., The impact of makerspaces on engineering education. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2016.[10] Vossoughi, S., P.K. Hooper, and M. Escude, Making Through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward
-x.[9] S. Yu and C. Levesque-Bristol, “A cross-classified path analysis of the self-determination theory model on the situational, individual and classroom levels in college education,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, no. March, p. 101857, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101857.[10] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 54–67, 2000, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.[11] H. J. Cho, C. Levesque-Bristol, and M. Yough, “How autonomy-supportive learning environments promote Asian international students’ academic adjustment: a self- determination theory perspective,” Learn. Environ. Res
College of Technology)Diana Samaroo Diana Samaroo is a Professor in the Chemistry Department at NYC College of Technology in Brooklyn, New York. She has experience in curricular and program development, as well as administration as the Chairperson of the Chemistry Department for numerous years. She has mentored undergraduates under the support of Emerging and Honors Scholars program, CUNY Service Corps, Louis-Stokes for Alliance Minority Participation (LS-AMP) and the Black Male Initiative programs. She serves as co-PI on several federal grants, which include NSF S-STEM and NSF HSI-IUSE grants. With a doctoral degree in Biochemistry, Dr. Samaroo’s research interests include drug discovery, therapeutics and
The Vertical Axis is Normalized to Gravity.cycle studied in VBL II. Next, they are introduced Accleration of Whole Body CG (from GRF)to the electromygraphic (EMG) 4signal, its electrical origin, and Acceleration (m/s^2) 3its frequency characteristics. A 2spreadsheet is supplied with the 1raw EMG signals gathered in agait lab for five leg muscles
, Capstone 2. Among other assignments, a midterm presentation and report serve aspractice and a chance to iterate towards the final products, which include an executive summary,an on-line juried presentation, an in-person poster-and-pitch day, and a final report.Feedback. It is well established that constructive feedback is enormously valuable, particularlyif certain conditions are met: It should come from a respected source, it needs to be relativelyimmediate, and it should be delivered with thoughtful clarity from a “more knowledgeable other”(Salalahi, 2019). Further, the recipient(s) ought to be in a receptive and ideally solution-orientedframe of mind (Stone & Heen, 2014). Throughout the capstone experience, teams benefit fromfeedback
italics in lists are used to indicate direct quotations from theidentified source.References[1] P.-D. Shen, T.-H. Lee, and C.-W. Tsai, “Applying Web-Enabled Problem-Based Learning and Self-Regulated Learning to Enhance Computing Skills of Taiwan’s Vocational Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study of a Short-Term Module,” Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2007.[2] C.-W. Tsai, T.-H. Lee, and P.-D. Shen, “Developing long-term computing skills among low-achieving students via web-enabled problem-based learning and self-regulated learning,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 121–132, May 2013, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2012.760873.[3] E. M. Al-Madi, S. L. Celur, and M. Nasim, “Effectiveness
course I and course II engineering courses at theinstitution. Although the proposed lab experiment(s) can be used as a smooth transition between any circuit analysiscourses that are offered as sequences in engineering curricula, they are also helpful in making a bridge between thetopics of DC and AC Analysis in a single circuit analysis course. This paper proposes that for a course sequence case,the assignment of RL and RC passive filters as the final experiment of the course I would serve as a smooth transitionbetween the course sequences.To explain the concept of passive filter, oscilloscope, function generator, and network analyzer equipment must beintroduced. If the mentioned equipment is presented at the end of course I, course II
across the IP network. This TS stream is then loaded into IP packets (TransportStream over IP (TSoIP)). Assuming that IP packets have a 1500 byte MTU, and since TS packets are fixedat 188 bytes, only 7 TS packets can be encapsulated into an IP packet. The resulting IP packet is 1316 bytes,not including headers.Note that encapsulating TS packets into the IP packet increases the rate of the TS stream as a result ofthe addition of headers (RTP/UDP/IP/MAC headers). We assume that half of the video surveillance cameras(26 cameras) are 1MP (1280*720) IP cameras that consume about 1 Mb/s per camera (assuming H.265encoder) at full resolution (for the mainstream). Each of the remaining 26 surveillance cameras is assumedto be using a second sub-stream
student selectsappropriate courses for their degree program and optimizing their roadmap towards graduation.References[1] Hasenwinkel, J. and Mack, S. (2021) “Holistic, Wrap-Around, Advising Model to Support Student Success and Professional Development” AIChE Annual Meeting, November, 2021.[2] Assadollahi, A. “Using Proactive Advising in a First-Year Introductory Engineering Course“ ASEE First Year Engineering Experience Conference, East Lansing, MI 2020.
; Zurhellen, H. S. (1978). Student attitudes toward the grade contract. Improving College and University Teaching, 26(4), 239-242.[7] Frank, T., & Scharff, L. L. (2013). Learning contracts in undergraduate courses: Impacts on student behaviors and academic performance. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 36-53.[8] Hiller, T. B., & Hietapelto, A. B. (2001). Contract grading: Encouraging commitment to the learning process through voice in the evaluation process. Journal of Management Education, 25(6), 660-684.[9] Inoue, A. B. (2019). Labor-based grading contracts: Building equity and inclusion in the compassionate writing classroom. WAC Clearinghouse.[10] Carillo, E. C. (2021). The
mediator and serves as an ignitertowards behaviors and actions to counter the HC [2]. SA is considered an outcome of theframework where an action (negative, positive, or none) is taken [2]. Out of these, HCA isconsidered the most important factor, in that without its initiating role, no messages orinformation transmitted by a system, structure, or individual(s) can be intercepted or uncovered.We argue that the “task of enabling people to understand what motivates such interference isperhaps even more important” [17, p. 177] than identifying the interference itself. An early study was conducted by Villanueva et al., [6] to explore the perspectives of over200 undergraduate students, graduate students, and faculty when asked about their
identified as a tool of high potential in improving the learning process, as can be used from students to review topics, answer questions on parts that might missed in real time and deepen their understanding through repetition.References[1] S. Asgari, J. Trajkovic, M. Rahmani, W. Zhang, R. C. Lo, and A. Sciortino, "An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 4, p. e0250041, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250041.[2] C. Wang, Z. Cheng, X.-G. Yue, and M. McAleer, "Risk Management of COVID-19 by Universities in China," Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 13, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.3390/jrfm13020036.[3] Z. H. Khan and M. I. Abid