UniversityMr. Matthew R. Marsteller, Carnegie Mellon University Mr.Marsteller is Principal Librarian, Engineering & Science at Carnegie Mellon University. Prior to this position, he was Head of the Science Libraries at Carnegie Mellon University from 2006 through 2014. He has also served as the Physics and Math Librarian at Carnegie Mellon from 1999 through 2006. Earlier in his career, he served as the Library Team Leader for the National Energy Technology Laboratory Library in Morgantown, West Virginia and as an Assistant Science Librarian at the University of South Carolina. He also served in the United States Navy as a surface ship nuclear propulsion plant operator aboard the USS Mississippi. He is currently a United
Paper ID #24291The Effectiveness of Webinars in Professional Skills and Engineering EthicsEducation in Large Online ClassesMr. Brendon Lumgair P.Eng., University of Calgary Brendon is an ”out-of-the-box” engineer with degrees in engineering and philosophy. He is passionate about using webinars and online learning tools to engage learners on their own terms. When students feel comfortable they ask more questions and participate in activities and discussions about the material, thus increasing retention and student satisfaction. After 10 years of industry experience Brendon became an engineering technology instructor at
licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado - Boulder Marissa H. Forbes is a research associate at the University of Colorado Boulder and lead editor of the TeachEngineering digital library. She previously taught middle school science and engineering and wrote K-12 STEM curricula while an NSF GK-12 graduate engineering fellow at CU. With a master’s degree in civil engineering she went on to teach physics for the Denver School of Science and Technology (DSST), where she also created and taught a year-long, design-based DSST engineering course for
Paper ID #25311Beer Brewing and the Environmental Engineer: ”Tapping” into ExperientialLearningMajor Kyle R. Murray, United States Military Academy Kyle Murray is a Major and an Aviation Officer in the United States Army and an Instructor in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He is a 2007 graduate of the United States Military Academy with a B.S. in Civil Engineering and graduated from the University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA) with an M.S. in Environmental Engineering in 2017. His research interests include wastewater treatment technologies and
Lifelong Learning in engineering programs.Dr. Lianne M. Lefsrud P.Eng., University of Alberta Dr. Lianne Lefsrud is an Assistant Professor, Engineering Safety and Risk Management, Department of Chemical Engineering, at the University of Alberta. Her research examines hazard identification and risk management, risk evaluation and social license to operate, and drivers of technology adoption in oil and gas, mining, pipelining, construction, agriculture, and railroading, among other industries. In the past four years she has received $2.4 million in funding (as PI or co-PI) from federal agencies (NSERC, SSHRC, CFREF, Genome Canada, Transport Canada), industry associations (Railway Safety Associa- tion, Alberta Chamber of
for expanding the role of the librarian.Literature ReviewMany librarians have incorporated standards into library resource instruction lectures and/orassignments, and more specific to this study, as a means to teach information literacy toengineering students [6-8]. While each case or study varied slightly in how standards wereincorporated into engineering curricula or library resource instruction for engineering students,all involved librarians familiar with technical literature who understood the importance ofstandards in future engineers careers. As Phillips and McPherson note, there are examples offaculty in engineering and engineering technology incorporating standards into undergraduatedesign courses, but not often in terms of
Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Columbs, Ohio, 2017, vol. 2017-June, doi: 10.18260/1-2–28022.[2] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, C. Swan, D. Knight, and N. E. Canney, “Effective ethics education: Examining differing faculty perspectives,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[3] V. Weil, “Ethics across the curriculum: Preparing engineering and science faculty to introduce ethics into their teaching,” in Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering: Papers from a Workshop, I. W. Wulf, Ed. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2003, pp. 79–93.[4] National Academy of Engineering (NAE), “The engineer of 2020: visions of engineering in the new century,” The
processthat would enable them to realize their creative potential and learn to innovate within a self-directed learning environment. Another aim was building a global creativity community,connecting learners around the world with a passion for change. These topics and skills are ofparticular importance to engineering students as they learn to create our technological future, butthey are equally important to students in other disciplines as they solve the most pressingproblems in their respective domains. The integration of engineering and non-engineeringexpertise may, in fact, lie at the heart of solving some of our greatest challenges today.In the following sections, we describe the essence of our MOOC and explore several keyquestions related to our
comprisedof a three year curriculum that fosters a learning environment in which electrical, computer and systemsengineering students collaborate to engage in the designing, prototyping and testing of engineeringprojects. At the end of the curriculum, students of both majors will have developed a unique skillsetwhich allows for them to effectively solve the real world engineering challenges faced in industry.Specifically, fourth year systems engineering graduates will have the ability to work on technology-oriented projects while electrical and computer engineering graduates with have the ability to integratedomain-specific technical designs into larger systems.During the spring semester of 2012, a pilot study was conducted at the Sunapee State
of Chemical Technology in China. Her current research focuses on biomedical engineering applications in biosensors which is called Dual Ionophore Ion-Selective Electrode (di-ISE) biosensor.Mr. Kevin Lee, University of Idaho In cooperation with Bernie Van Wie at Washington State University, my project research focuses on cell sensor and biological sample reading principles. This biomedical engineering cartridge is designed for detecting and determining concentration of biological cells in suspension at a specific wavelength.Mr. Mert Colpan, Washington State University Mert Colpan is a graduate student at Washington State University and he is seeking a PhD Degree in Bioengineering. He got a dual Bachelor’s Degree in
courseoutcomes was then also linked to the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET)14 student outcomes and Bloom’s taxonomy’s cognitive level15. Since this is anintroductory course taught to engineering freshmen, the highest cognition level expected is“application”.Course Goals I. Develop a foundational understanding of computer programming and how it is applied in the field of engineering. II. Develop an understanding of mathematics, numerical methods, and statistics especially relevant to the field of engineering. III. Encourage methodical, orderly, and disciplined study of engineering.Course Outcomes Page
Paper ID #34669Impact of Entrepreneurial Mindset Module Connecting SocietalConsideration, Medical Interventions and Engineering PhysiologyAllison Lukas, Western New England University Allison Lukas graduated in 2021 from Western New England University where she earned a bachelor’s degree in Biomedical Engineering. She has plans to attend graduate school and eventually become a professor. In the meantime she will be working in the medical device industry to gain experience before pursuing further education. During her time at Western New England University she served as a supple- mental instructor for two physiology
Paper ID #32575Modifying the Syllabus on Construction Materials and Methods to BetterPrepare Construction Students for Upper-level Courses, Co-ops, orInternshipsDr. George Okere, University of Cincinnati George is currently an associate professor educator, and heavy highway chair (endowed position) in the Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management Department in the College of Engi- neering and Applied Science at the University of Cincinnati (UC). George has over 23 years of construc- tion industry work experience, and 11.5 years of which was with Kiewit, where he worked on various heavy civil
." International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 713-729,2019.R. Clark, A. Kaw, Y. Lou, A. Scott, and M. Besterfield-Sacre, "Evaluating Blended and Flipped Instruction inNumerical Methods at Multiple Engineering Schools." International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching &Learning, vol. 12, no. 1, 2018.J. O'Flaherty and C. Phillips, "The Use of Flipped Classrooms in Higher Education: A Scoping Review." TheInternet and Higher Education, vol. 25, pp. 85-95, 2015."Flip Learning: A Community Resource Brought to You by the Flipped Learning Network."https://flippedlearning.org/ (last accessed May 19, 2021).L. Foderaro, "Psst! Need the Answer to No. 7? Click Here."https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18
Paper ID #32415The Use of Parametric Modeling to Enhance the Understanding of ConcreteFormwork StructuresDr. Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He has completed Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with a total of 18 years academic experience at five different universities. He has always been
simulated laboratories are as effective as hands-on labs in teachingcourse concepts. Another study by Viegas et al. [10] showed that remote laboratories were usefulfor basic courses, but not as effective on more advanced courses. While there is growingpopularity to offer courses based on virtual instruction, significant challenges remain forengineering education using this format. These challenges include the fundamental need forexperimentation and for students to learn through interactions with hardware [11].Significant scrutiny of virtual instruction is expected to occur during the accreditation process ofengineering programs that have incorporated virtual methods into their curriculum. TheAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET
., what are the exact explications in student responses thatdemonstrate higher-level understanding, are not as explicit or reproducible across evaluators given therubric and example applications.We employed the systems thinking activity and evaluation of the student responses before specific ordedicated instruction and background to teaching a systems thinking approach to solve ill-structuredproblems in the given context to assess baseline systems thinking. We wanted to explore if the tool,developed for engineering or technology, can be used for students in a different context like businessdisciplines. After this pilot study, we believe the tool can be employed in courses in various disciplines,focusing on content that addresses social, technical
mechatronics. His research also includes control optimization and system identification. He is also a graduate teaching assistant of design for manufacturability.Dr. Leon Liebenberg, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Leon is a Teaching Associate Professor in mechanical science and engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He is also a Fellow of the UIUC’s Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning. Before coming to UIUC, he was a professor of mechanical engineering at two South African universities (University of Pretoria; North West University) and a higher education consultant in Switzerland where he worked with colleges of engineering and technology management. Leon is passionate about
Shiloh James Howland is a doctoral candidate at Brigham Young University in Educational Inquiry, Mea- surement, and Evaluation. She received a master’s degree in instructional psychology and technology as well as a bachelor’s degree and master’s degree in geology. Her current research interests are in educa- tional assessment and measurement.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and
Clemson University. She has over ten years of construction and civil engineering experience working for energy companies and as a project management consultant. Dr. Simmons has extensive experience leading and conducting multi-institutional, workforce-related re- search and outreach. She is a leader in research investigating the competencies professionals need to compete in and sustain the construction workforce. Dr. Simmons oversees the Simmons Research Lab (www.denisersimmons.com), which is home to a dynamic, interdisciplinary mix of graduate researchers and postdoctoral researchers who work together to explore human, technology and society interactions to transform civil engineering education and practice with an
Swanson School of Engineering, he was with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the Department of Transportation in Washington, DC, performing technical policy analysis for vehicle fuel economy regulations.Dr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the faculty of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology for over 5 years before joining Carnegie Mellon as a Teaching Faculty in 2016. Dr. Be- dillion’s research interests include
Engineering, LATICE 2014, 2014, pp. 74–77.[6] G. W. Hislop and H. J. C. Ellis, “Using scaffolding to improve written communication of software engineering students,” in ITNG 2009 - 6th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 2009, pp. 707–712.[7] T. A. Eppes, I. Milanovic, and H. F. Sweitzer, “Strengthening capstone skills in STEM programs,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 3–10, Feb. 2012.[8] L. Bosman, “From Doing to Thinking: Developing the Entrepreneurial Mindset through Scaffold Assignments and Self-Regulated Learning Reflection,” Open Educ. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 106–121, Oct. 2019.[9] T. Morgan, “Enabling Meaningful Reflection Within Project-Based-Learning in Engineering
Paper ID #33671Work-in-Progress: The Design and Implementation of EFRI-ResearchExperience in Mentoring Catalyst InitiativeDr. Olgha Bassam Qaqish, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Olgha B. Qaqish, Ph.D. is a engineering educator and researcher, who has experience working with stu- dents at all levels in science, math, engineering, and technology (STEM). Dr. Qaqish is an author of a mathematics textbook: Algebra Essentials. She is currently a postdoctoral researcher at NC State. Courses that she’s taught in the last couple of years include BME 210: Biomedical Electronics and BME 490: Research in Engineering. In
Paper ID #18566Assessing Individual Temperament and Group Performance in a Project-Based Learning ExperienceCapt. Jeremiah Matthew Stache P.E., U.S. Military Academy Captain Jeremiah Stache is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from the U.S. Military Academy, West Point; M.S. from both the University of Tennessee, Knoxville and Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla; and is currently a Ph.D student at Mississippi State University, Starkville. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the states of
benefits of active learning, the nextquestion may be, “How do engineering faculty incorporate active learning in the classroom giventhe constraints of time and the amount of material that needs to be covered?” One potentialanswer to this question is the flipped or inverted classroom. The flipped or inverted classroomcan be defined as one where students obtain content from technology and apply that content withhelp from the instructor in class (Margulieux et al. 2014). The flipped classroom provides ameans of enabling the same amount of material to be covered by having students first interactwith the content outside of the classroom and then spend class time actively engaging with thematerial they were introduced to prior to attending class.With
ofbreadth versus depth in the introductory transportation engineering course as universitiescontinue to struggle with which topics and additional issues (such as policy, energy,environment, and technology) to include [19]. The following section furthers the discussion onthis introductory course and its contents.Introductory Transportation Engineering CoursesAn introductory course is often the first exposure to transportation engineering that civilengineering students receive in their undergraduate career. This course has the ability toinspire students to pursue more advanced transportation engineering courses andultimately a career within the field. In order to gain students’ attention, introductorycourses require effective strategies [23] of
exists to determinequantitatively if these changes have been a success, the lessons that have been learned will allowthe faculty to improve two experiences that __________ University is proud to offer.8. References1. C. J. Nixon, “Key Business Competencies for New Aerospace Engineers,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).2. B. R. Dickson, “The Engineer Ought To Be A Man Of Business,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).3. George Suckarieh, Jason Krupar, “Leadership and Teamwork Education for Engineering and Technology Students: An Experiential Learning and Community Service Approach
perspectives. • Communicate technical and other trade-offs, and negotiate satisfactory resolution. • Generate creative, integrated and effective solutions collaboratively.We agreed that our ultimate goal would be to include students from outside engineeringin our junior-level, multi-disciplinary design course, but that we would begin by defining“multi-disciplinary” as inclusive of all college of engineering programs, includingMechanical Engineering Technology and Computer Science.Assessing the Ability to “Function on a Multi-disciplinary Team”Parallel to the process of choosing an alternative for providing our students with a multi-disciplinary educational experience, we have been ruminating about how to determine abaseline
AC 2008-1617: CENTRIFUGAL PUMP TEST BED: A SENIOR CAPSTONEPROJECTRobert Choate, Western Kentucky University Robert Choate teaches thermo-fluid and professional component courses in Mechanical Engineering, including the Sophomore Design, Junior Design, the Senior ME Lab I and the ME Senior Project Design course sequence. Prior to teaching at WKU, he was a principal engineer for CMAC Design Corporation, designing telecommunication, data communication and information technology equipment.Kevin Schmaltz, Western Kentucky University Kevin Schmaltz teaches thermo-fluid and professional component courses in Mechanical Engineering, including the Freshman Experience course, Sophomore Design, Junior
institutions use the Islamic calendar as the basis for their school year. Thecourses highlighted in yellow represent the 16-course civil engineering major. All remainingcourses constitute a common core curriculum taken by all NMAA cadets. CE301 (Introductionto Engineering Mechanics and Design) and CE302 (Construction Management) serve as a two-course core engineering sequence taken by all cadets, as well as being part of the civilengineering major. The core curriculum includes nine courses that also serve as prerequisites forthe civil engineering major—Pre-Calculus, Calculus I and II, Statistics, Chemistry, Physics I andII, Information Technology, and Information Systems