visit, sponsored some projects, donated money and equipment, and hired MSWC graduates.References 1. U.S. Fire Administration (2001, December), Wildland Fires: A Historical Perspective, Topica Fire Research Series I(3), http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/tfrs/v1i3.pdf, Retrieved September 1, 2010. 2. Absolute Astronomy (2007, October), October 2007 California wildfires, http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/October_2007_California_wildfires, Retrieved September 5, 2010. 3. V. Dharanalakota, S. Reddy, F. Maradona, and V. Gona (2010, January), Wildfire Detection and Monitoring System, Master’s Project Report in the area of Wireless Communications, National University, San Diego, CA, (www.nu.edu
] Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board. (2008, Accreditation criteria and procedures. Canadian Council of ProfessionalEngineers.[2] V. R. Neufeld and H. S. Barrows. (1974, 11). The "McMaster philosophy": An approach to medical education. J. Med. Educ.49(11), pp. 1040-1050.[3] M. Harris and R. Cullen. (2009, 06). A model for curricular revision: The case of engineering. Innovative Higher Education34(1), pp. 51-63.[4] M. Savin-Baden. (2008, 04). Problem-based learning in electronic engineering: Locating legends or promising problems? IntJ Electr Eng Educ 45(2), pp. 96-204.[5] W. E. Eder and V. Hubka. (2005, 02). Curriculum, pedagogics and didactics for design education. J. Eng. Des. 16(1), pp. 45-61.[6] D.A. Kotys-Schwartz, D. Knight, G. Pawlas
q. ITEC 3290 Technical Writing r. ITEC 3292 Industrial Safety s. ITEC 3300 Technology Project Management t. ITEC 3800 Cost and Capital Project Analysis u. ITEC 4293 Industrial Supervision v. ITEC 4300 Quality Assurance Concepts w. CHEM 1020 General Descriptive Chemistry Page 22.392.8 x. ITEC 3200 Introduction to Statistical Process Control y. MATH 1074 Applied TrigonometryIssues with a Bearing on the Creation of the New BS-PSET Program:Two additional issues that were identified as extremely important in the structuring of theprogram were the selection of the accreditation agency
, and identify effective strategies. Attempt a truly open ended design experience for teachers; and observe subsequent results with students. Seek to establish collaborative teaching efforts with existing teachers and programs that already teach creativity; e.g., bring Art and STEM teachers together to lead students in an open ended design experience. Continue to promote international exchange of educators who have experience with the use of design at all levels of education (K-20).Bibliography 1. Macho, S. (2010). American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE): K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division, AC 2010-2063, and
. (1995). The problem-based learning approach as an enhancement factor of personal meaningfulness of learning. Higher Education, 29(1), 93-101. 7. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco: Jossey-‐Bass 8. Ford, M. E., & Nichols, C. W. (1991). Using goal assessments to identify motivational patterns and facilitate behavioral regulation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 7: Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 57–84). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 9. Ford, M., & Smith, P. (2007). Thriving with
. “Employers are looking for[AEE’s] CEM…and did not know what the LTU CEEM was all about….” The graduate alsoimplied that adding a co-op or internship would help.On the same scale, graduates were asked to rate the statement, “The amount of work required toearn a CEEM was appropriate.” The average rating was 3.68 with 73.7% agreeing or stronglyagreeing. One of the graduates who disagreed commented that he wanted more hands-on work!Another graduate who agreed to the statement loved the practical experience and wanted more tosupplement the coursework. The authors are encouraged to add more.Next, the graduates were asked to complete the statement, “The level of material that we coveredin the course(s) was….” On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being too easy and
Page 22.1629.10 The curriculum requires a proficient if not advanced knowledge of certain buildingsimulation strategies to execute the analysis approaches central to the proposed course’sconcepts. There are many software packages and pathways and each have certain strengths andweaknesses when it comes to building performance modeling. This section focuses on thecriteria upon which to select the appropriate tools for the curriculum. The students will need some previous knowledge of a few different performancemodeling software applications. Primarily, they will need proficiency with software(s) capable ofreliable yearly thermodynamic modeling for multiple zone buildings. It is critical that thesoftware be able to compute the load
present study, the students in universities of technology hold somealternative conceptions in Electricity. Therefore, the physics teacher should think how to teachthe topics of electricity in an effective way. Furthermore, more research is need on developingmore effective teaching strategy to enhance UT students’ conception about electricity. Finally, itis found that the UT students did lack of the ability/intention in reasoning and explanation. It issuggested that physics teacher should encourage students and provide them more opportunities toengage in reasoning activities in physics course.AcknowledgementThe funding of this research work is provided by the National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC,under grant NSC 97-2511-S-259-008-MY3
constructive, effective study groups to maximizeeach person’s learning within the study group environment.References Cited:1 Brower, A. M. & Inkelas, K. K. (2010). Living Learning Programs: One High-Impact Educational PracticeWe Now Know a Lot About. Liberal Education, 96 (2).2 Inkelas, K. K., Zeller, W. J., Murphy, R. K., Hummel M. L. (2006) Learning Moves Home. About Campus,10 (6), 10-16.3 Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1994). The impact of residential life on students. InC. L. Schroeder & P. Mable (Eds.), Realizing the Educational Potential of Residence Halls (pp. 22-52). SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.4 Pike, G. R. (1990). The Effects of Residential Learning Communities and Traditional
Education, 94(1), pp. 41-56, 2005.8. Besterfield-Sacre, M. and LJ Shuman, “The Future of Assessment” (Chapter 12) in Spurlin, J., Rajala, S., & Lavelle, J. (2008) (eds.) Designing Better Engineering Education Through Assessment: A Practical Resource Page 22.836.12 for Faculty and Department Chairs on Using Assessment and ABET Criteria to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing; pp. 307-327.9. Diefes-Dux, H.A., Moore, T., Zawojewski, J., Imbrie, P.K., & Follman, D. (2004). A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: Model-eliciting activities. Proceedings of the 30th ASEE
. ―Learning to Navigate.‖ In Chaiklin, S. and J. Lave (Eds.) Understanding Practice: perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 35-63, 1996.15. Kusterer, Ken. Know-how on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of “Unskilled” Workers. Westview Press, 1978.16. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.17. National Academy of Engineering. (NAE) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academies Press, 2004.18. Orr, Julian. Thinking about machines. Cornell University Press, 1996.19. Robbins, Philip and Murat Aydede. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge
, TR-83-3048, Oct. 1960 (Revised 1978).13. Husman, J., Lynch, C., Hilpert, J., and Duggan, M. A., "Validating measures of future time perspective for engineering students: Steps toward improving engineering education", presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.14. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. , “Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1993, 53(3), 80115. Yasar, S., “Discourse in freshman engineering teams: The relationship between verbal persuasions, self-efficacy, and achievement”, 200816. Bandura, A., “Guide for
Work (SOW) a. Period of performance; minimum 8-14 weeks b. Research & development requirements c. Statement of Work agreed to by Corporate Partner, University Engineering Page 22.882.4 Department, and the Student d. Cost and Schedule requirements3 e. 2-3 presentations at corporate partner facility f. 1-2 presentations to university representative(s) g. Sr. Project Work log to indicate effort during paid time and personal time associated with Senior Project effort. h. A final presentation of work done and/or product demonstration i
languages. Limits in conceptual knowledge means that they are limited to solving well-defined tasks with specified tools. When faced with a more open-ended or complex problems, limits in conceptual knowledge will mean they will probably not be able to solve the problem. Proficiency The individual has some conceptual knowledge of both computing systems and their application domain. When presented with a problem, they are able select the appropriate tools(s), seek the necessary information, and present a solution. The regularly used technical skills are committed to memory and external information resources are
evolvedaccording to government and industry demand. Agriculture, the mechanical arts, andmanufacturing dominated the 19th century needs, resulting in the development of shop courseswhere students gained hands-on experience with machine tools for farming and manufacturing.1With the rise of electrical engineering in the early 1900’s, combined with increasing promotion Page 22.913.3of a scientific approach to practice and the desire to “professionalize”1 engineering and establish it as a credible academic discipline, laboratory experience became the norm for practicalexperiences within the engineering
is a sample ofrepresentative answers, categorized by theme. Student comments are verbatim andoccasionally contain grammatical errors, etc. Content statements I learned that laser colors are that because of the number of nanometers that the laser has Page 22.1323.7 On a mirror a laser reflects opposite direction on an angle Vocal cords don’t vibrate when you say “s” Careers Now I know the difference between a scientist and an engineer. I learned that to get into speech technology you just have to have a bachelor’s degree They are looking for engineers Relevance Many people
learners: active learners have the opportunity to “do” experiments, sequentiallearners follow step by step instructions revealing the concept(s) piece by piece, and summaryquestions are provided for reflective learners. An example experiment is shown in the Appendix. For the first time, students have remarked that the labs are fun (emotionally engaging),and the demonstrations have improved understanding of concepts as measured by targetedproblems and through formative assessment. 4 5 2
Statistics.4. Goodman Research Group (2002). Final report of the women’s experiences in college engineering (WECE) project, Cambridge, MA.5. Davis, C-S. & Finelli, C.J. (2007), Diversity and Retention in Engineering, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, v2007, n111, p63-7.6. Derlin, R.L. & McShannon, J.L. (2000), Faculty and Student Interaction and Learning Styles of Engineering Undergraduates, Retrieved May 10, 2008 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/89/1d.pdf.7. Goldberg, J. & Sedlacek, W. (1996), Summer Study in Engineering for High School Women, Maryland University, College Park, Maryland.8. Pantano, J. (1994), Comprehensive Minority SEM Programs
effective for your learning. • It was perfectly fine. • They did well; I don’t see any way it could be improved. • Providing more examples that were mentioned through the non-SI sessions. Go over previous tests. Finally, maybe making the session longer. • All math classes should have SI sections. • It’s really good with this class, can’t say I would add anything to it. • I don’t know. • Nothing from my experience, it was the best way to become highly successful in the class. • I thought it was fine. Please indicate the reason(s) you did not attend SI sessions: • I didn’t feel it was
experience both the frustration and satisfactionof that experience. Such learning prepares them for professional practice in ways that a projectrequiring only a paper/computer design does not. For instance, students in the lower end designteam, while having some background due from their coursework, became much more proficientand confident in their understanding of design and machining. Students designed, programmed,setup, machined, and inspected complex CNC parts. They assembled the parts into a completemachine and successfully tested it. They were able to adapt their engineering skill sets to theproject at hand. This was a lifelong-learning experience the student will not soon forget.Bibliography 1 Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., &
Austin, TX INDUSTRY 1 Lockheed-Martin Various Locations INDUSTRY 5 Master card O'Fallon, MO INDUSTRY 1 Nissan Canton, MS INDUSTRY 1 Raytheon Tucson, AZ INDUSTRY 4 SAKS New York New York, NY INDUSTRY 1 Union Pacific Omaha, NE INDUSTRY 2 U. S. Army MIL 1 Jackson State University Jackson, MS STATE
designsituations. With the conversation as a backdrop, students were then introduced to the notion of adesign rationale and asked to draft a sample design rationale as a way to introduce them to thisconcept.Case 2: Graduate multi-week projectThe journal landscape project was a multi-week project in a graduate level course entitledEmpirical Traditions in Human Centered Design and Engineering. Per the syllabus, the task was Page 22.1116.3as follows: “Working in teams of two or three, you and your teammate(s) will characterize oneyear of articles in a major journal in our field in terms of five to seven dimensions of yourchoosing and then prepare a summary of
). Online Delivery Management for Teaching and Learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(2):237-246.51. Enriquez, A. (2010). Assessing the Effectiveness of Synchronous Content Delivery in an Online Introductory Circuits Analysis Course. Proceedings: 2009 American Society of Engineering Education Zone IV Meeting, Reno, NV, March 25-27, 2010..52. CCC Confer (n.d.). CCC Confer Products. Retrieved December 21, 2009 from http://www.cccconfer.org/products/products.aspx53. Kowalski, F., Kowalski, S., & Hoover. E. (2007). Using InkSurvey: A Free Web-Based Tool for Open-Ended Questioning to Promote Active Learning and Real-Time Formative Assessment of Tablet-PC-Equipped Engineering Students. Proceedings; 2007 American
. vol. 2011: The Gale Group, 2009.[3] Gibbs R. Rural Education at a Glance. In: Service ER, editor. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2003.[4] Bard J, Clark Gardener, Regi Wieland. Rural School Consolidation: History, Research Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations. The Rural Educator, vol. Winter: National Rural Education Association, 2006.[5] Provasnik S, Angelina KewalRamani, Mary McLaughlin Coleman, Lauren Gilbertson, Will Herring, Qingshu Xie. Status of Education in Rural America. In: Education USDo, editor. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, 2007.[6] United States Libraries: Our Approach. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, vol. 2011
for their support. Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering Education 184 References 1. Davis, R. E. (2005). Community-Based Learning Develops Diverse Engineering Workforce. In W. Aung, R. Altenkirch, T Cermak, R. W. King & L.M. S. Ruiz (Eds), Innovations 2005: World Innovations in Engineering Education and Research. pp. 7-16, Arlington VA, iNEER/Begell House Publishing. 2. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002). Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time
; !"% !"$ !"# ! #"' $"! $"' %"! %"' &"! &"' '"! '"' !"#$%$#&'()24056) *2/".7$8&.$/"*)89):1173 Figure 5. Individual impact on group consensus compared to peer perceptions of contribution.Developing and delivering the course required the collaboration of a group of individualcontributors (including students) and has been a positive experience for all. Generally theobjectives of the course have been achieved but analysis of the assessments indicates that thereare deeper issues that should be addressed as engineering students move to professional practice.References1. Crawford, Andrew S. (1998). “Leadership education at the University of Michigan
Modeling to Simulate and Visualize Urban Areas and byan Adobe Inc. grants Constrained Procedural Modeling.References:1. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1997). Understanding by Design: Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision andCurriculum Development.2. NVIDIA. (2010). Developer Zone. Retrieved December 20, 2010, fromhttp://developer.nvidia.com/page/cg_main.html3. Kirk, D., & Wen-mei, W. (2010). Programming massively parallel processors: A Hands-on approach: MorganKaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA.4. Sanders, J., & Kandrot, E. (2010). CUDA by Example: An Introduction to General-Purpose GPU Programming:Addison-Wesley Professional.5. Tsuchiyama, R., Nakamura, T., Iizuka, T., Asahara, A., & Miki, S. (2010). The OpenCL
results, and maintain a record of teacher participation forContinuing Education credit. PLTW teachers signing up for a class first register via a dynamicweb-based interface and database to collect background information on their PLTW training,including the location of the STI attended, when they were trained, and the number of times theytaught a related PLTW course (if at all). The information is downloaded to an excel spreadsheetand required “student” information is manually entered into CCBC’s system. Following a set ofdetailed instructions, teachers are then able to obtain their student ID and password in order toaccess the course(s) for which they registered. The MTT instructs their counterparts from the Affiliate Universities in the
). Preface. In F. Voss, D. N. Perkins & Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 13. Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students' writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59-92. 14. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 285-296. 15. Ross, B.H., & Spalding, T.L. (1994). Concepts and categories. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 119-148). New York: Academic Press. 16. Wittrock, M. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational