the accreditation of AmericanAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.2. The Fundamental Connotation of the Internal Quality Assurance Mechanism of HigherEngineering Education2.1 DefinitionAt present, there is no clear definition of “internal quality assurance mechanism ofengineering education”. The academic circles have conducted discussion around the “qualityassurance mechanism of higher education”, either on the external quality assurancemechanism of higher education, or on the internal quality mechanism of higher education, oron a certain quality assurance mechanism. For example, Louise Morley explored therelationship between quality and power, and investigated the power relationship in organizingand promoting quality assurance
more prevalent in engineering practice starting in the 1990swith improvement in technology such as the internet and video conferencing [6]. As such, it isimportant that undergraduate engineering programs prepare students to work with others in anonline setting since the prevalence of virtual teams within the workforce continues to grow.Additionally, it has been found that online teamwork can help students work out of their comfortzone, develop group cohesiveness, and better students’ negotiation skills [7]. However, there arealso various obstacles and challenges students face when working on projects virtually. Wyrickand Cisse found that trust may be more difficult to establish through virtual teams asrelationships are not as easily built via
in both the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment and the Division of Educational Leadership and Innovation at Arizona State University. She has a Ph.D. in Educational Technology, postgraduate training in Computer Systems Engineering, and many years of experience teaching and developing curriculum in various learning environments. She has taught technology integration and teacher training to undergrad- uate and graduate students at Arizona State University, students at the K-12 level locally and abroad, and various workshops and modules in business and industry. Dr. Larson is experienced in the application of instructional design, delivery, evaluation, and specializes in eLearning
San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals.Dr. Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Christopher Papadopoulos is Professor in the Department of Engineering Sciences and
education, STEM mentoring, STEM motivation and diversity, and quan- titative methods (multilevel models, structural equation modeling, decision trees, etc.).Dr. Guan Kung Saw, Claremont Graduate University Guan Saw is an associate professor in the School of Educational Studies at Claremont Graduate University. He received a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from University of Technology, Malaysia, a Master’s degree in sociology of education from National Taiwan Normal University, and a doctoral degree in measurement and quantitative methods from Michigan State University. Saw’s major research interests include educational inequality; diversity and inclusion; STEM education and workforce; college access and success
Excellence in Scholarly and Creative Activities. He was awarded numerous summer faculty fellowships with the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and the Air Force Institute of Technology - Wright Patterson Air Force Base. He is currently on sabbatical working at the US Environmental Protection Agency. He is a Princi- pal Investigator of the National Science Foundation-funded $1.5 Million grant to enhance freshman and sophomore engineering students’ learning experiences. His research is in the areas of fate and transport of organic and inorganic pollutants in the environment.Dr. Paulina Reina, California State University, Fullerton Dr. Paulina Reina is an Assistant Professor in the
Paper ID #32178Qualitative Analysis of Undergraduate and Graduate Female EngineeringStudents’ Strategies in Response to Gender Stereotype or BiasDr. Mayari Illarij Serrano Anazco, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) MAYARI SERRANO is post-doctoral research assistant at Purdue University. She earned her B.S. degree in Biotechnology Engineering from the Army Polytechnic School, Quito, Ecuador. She completed her M.S. in Computer and Information Technology at Purdue University. Her interests include foster STEM enthusiasm, and technology innovation.Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr
adapt to the restrictedlearning environment3,4. This include creating a remote Mechanical Engineering Summer UndergraduateResearch Program to engage students in active research and to provide a mentored experience forindependent research work. Students were matched with faculty based on their fields of interest and wererequired to participate in a workshop series on research methods, scientific writing, career planning, andprofessional development5. Another attempt at asynchronous online delivery of remote introductoryphysics lectures used the Playposit technology which is an interactive audio (MP3 listening assignment)and video (MP4 viewing assignment) components6.Some of the challenges that have been reported include financial strains placed
her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring ways to to promote collaborative problem solving in engineering education and provide students with team design experiences that mimic authentic work in industry.Dr. Emma Mercier Emma Mercier is an associate professor in Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her work focuses on collaborative learning in classrooms, and in particular, the use of technology for teachers and students during collaborative learning. Most recently Mercier’s projects have focused on collaborative learning in required undergraduate engineering courses.Dr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign A Postdoc Research
, perhaps not even a Weakness, but it certainly was at least astrong Concern.Several references describe the history5,6 and process7 through which ASEE has becomeinvolved with multidisciplinary engineering program accreditation for ABET. In a Prism article8while she was ASEE President, Sherra E. Kerns noted that “ASEE is a founding member societyof ABET.” Finally, in 2005, after several years of groundwork, from the initiative of ASEEmembers, the support of many other multidisciplinary engineering educators, and thecooperation of both ASEE and ABET leadership, ASEE had become the lead society for theaccreditation of multidisciplinary engineering (and engineering technology) programs.As a result of this new accreditation role and with leadership
, technology, engineering, andmath (STEM) professionals is vital to strengthening the growing demand for engineers. Previousstudies about raising interest in STEM majors focused on (a) the number of undergraduatestudents who decide on a major prior to attending college, (b) common misconceptions regardingthe STEM field, and (c) the effectiveness of pedagogical techniques to increase curiosity.However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, pedagogical techniques to introduce K-12 students tothe STEM fields must be adjusted. This paper investigates the effectiveness of variousmethods to engage and interact with K-12 students interested in STEM during the COVID-19 learning environment and discusses key conclusions from a pilot 90-minute virtual modulefor K-12
Paper ID #34271Mentoring and Advising Students in an S-STEM Project: Strengths Trainingfrom a Social Justice Perspective in Engineering & Computer Science asContext – Initial ImplementationDr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is a Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s and Gender Studies and Director of the Office of Student Research at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is affiliated faculty in Computer Science and Software Engineering and Science, Technology and Society. She is also the Faculty Director of the California State University (CSU
Paper ID #35224Studying the Experience of Electrical and Computer Engineering Studentsin a Face-to-Face Electronics Laboratory Course during COVID-19 PandemicDr. Siddharth Vyas, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Siddharth Vyas is a full-time lecturer of Electrical Engineering at the California Polytechnic State Uni- versity, San Luis Obispo. He teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in circuits and electronics. He received a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Electronics and Instrumentation at the Medicaps Institute of Technology and Management, Indore, India, and an MS in Electrical Engineering
. Environmental Protection Agency on the Innovation Team, where I worked on climate change resilience and low-cost air pollution sensors; and then at the U.S. Department of Energy in the Water Power Technologies Office, helping design and run the Wave Energy Prize. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 STUDENT RECOGNITION, USE, AND UNDERSTANDING OF ENGINEERING FOR ONE PLANET COMPETENCIES AND OUTCOMES IN PROJECT-BASED LEARNINGABSTRACTAddressing local-to-global crises at the intersection of environmental protection, climatechange, sustainability, and social justice will require new skills and competencies
Barriers, Bridges, and the Trolls under the Bridge: Issues in Human Factors Education for Engineers and Others William S. Helton, Michele H. Miller, and Robert Pastel Michigan Technological University Houghton, MichiganAbstractHuman Factors (HF) is the scientific discipline concerned with the interactions amonghumans and built systems. HF requires the knowledge of both human experts(psychology) and machine experts (for example, computer science and mechanicalengineering). In this paper, we will present our observations of teaching HF from theperspective of a psychologist, a mechanical engineer, and a computer scientist. We willdiscuss our observations in
Education.Dr. Julia D. Thompson, University of San Francisco r. Julia Thompson is an Assistant Professor at University of San Francisco. She has a passion for integrat- ing the soul’s work into the engineering design process and technology. She is driven to help students, and people in general, look at technology as a pathway toward healing of earth and unjust social structure. Julia did her undergrad in chemical engineering at UC Berkeley and her PhD in engineering education at Purdue. Her research interests focus on how engineering design practices impact the relationships that engineering programs create with the community. American c Society for Engineering
in an online class compared to a regular classroom. Because all of theparticipation was through Zoom, students felt uncomfortable asking questions of the professor.Disappointment with the learning environment among engineering students is echoed in researchconducted on postgraduate students in the United Kingdom [14] and 140 undergraduateengineering students in Qatar [15]. Out of the eleven students interviewed in the UK study, eightwere postgraduate students in engineering or technology. Participants in the U.K. study, inagreement with the Gelles et al study [13], felt that the remote classes were merely directtransfers of the existing teaching in the class rather than reconfigurations of the teaching tomaximize the effectiveness. The
engineering instructor interviews and class observationsconclude.Student interviews consist of two question types. The first is a group of open-ended questionsabout the role of technology in their mathematics and engineering experience, perceptions ofapplicability of tools across disciplines, and perceptions of preparedness for computing inengineering. The second question type follows the posing of four differential equation problemscenarios of graduated complexity and level of engineering context. Problems were assembledwith the aid of three experienced DE instructors at two of the participant universities. (The firsttwo problems, to which initial student responses will be discussed here, are included in Table 1.)Engineering instructor interviews
. Adesope is a Professor of Educational Psychology and a Boeing Distinguished Profes- sor of STEM Education at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. His recent research focuses on the cognitive and pedagogical underpinnings of learning with computer-based multimedia re- sources; knowledge representation through interactive concept maps; meta-analysis of empirical research, and investigation of instructional principles and assessments in STEM. He is currently a Senior Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education.Mr. Ebenezer Rotimi Ewumi, Washington State University Ebenezer Ewumi is a
. Stephanie Farrell is Interim Dean and of the Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering and Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA). Prior to 2016 she was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at Rowan for eighteen years. Dr. Farrell has contributed to engineering education through her work in inductive pedagogy, spatial skills, and inclusion and diversity. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineering Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learn- ing, and she was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland). She
industry career. Currently he is using his technical business experiences to develop and run innovation and entrepreneurial programs for the Engineering Innovation Center, a 20,000 sq ft rapid prototyping facility. These in- clude Aggies Invent, TAMU iSITE, Inventeer, and Pop Up Classes. In addition, he mentors multiple entrepreneurial teams. Formerly he was a Senior Vice President of Fujitsu Network Communications, headquartered in Richard- son, Texas. With over 30 years of experience in telecommunications, Rodney was responsible for de- veloping partnerships with leading network technology providers and driving marketing efforts for op- tical, access and data products developed by Fujitsu. Rodney was Chairman of
be a “good” engineer.IntroductionIn 2004, the National Academies of Engineering released the “The Engineer of 2020: Visions ofEngineering in the New Century” report in an effort to highlight the role engineers would hold inour future society [1]. A topic of discussion was the impact of the engineer on societal changes,focusing mainly on the importance of incorporating social contexts into engineering. TheNational Academy of Engineering envisioned an era of engineering education that resulted inengineers that are “leaders, able to balance the gains afforded by new technologies with thevulnerabilities created by their byproducts without compromising the well-being of society andhumanity” [1, p. 19]. However, as we move past 2020, it is
Paper ID #34960Towards Designing an Interactive System for Accelerated Learning andAssessment in Engineering Mechanics: A First Look at the DeformsProblem-solving SystemMr. Arinjoy Basak, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Arinjoy Basak is a PhD student in the Department of Computer Science at the Virginia Polytechnic Insti- tute and State University, advised by Prof. Clifford A. Shaffer. He obtained his Bachelors in Computer Science from the Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur in 2016, and his Mas- ters in Computer Science from Virginia Tech in 2019.Mr. Todd Patrick Shuba
Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021A Characterization of Engineering and Computer Science Undergraduate Participation in High Impact Educational Practices at Two Western Land Grant Institutions IntroductionTo maintain its technological competitiveness and innovation leadership into the 21st century,the United States requires a robust engineering and computer science (E/CS) workforce withsubstantial diversity across gender and underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups [1][2]. However, there are growing concerns about the ability of U.S. educational
barriers to the success of CC students and CC transfers; changes infaculty and staff perceptions regarding CC transfers; and the effects of the program on CCstudent matriculation and completion of Lipscomb’s engineering program are presented.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) created the Scholarships in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) program to enable low-income, talented domesticstudents to pursue successful careers in STEM fields and contribute to the American innovationeconomy with their knowledge [1]. The NSF provides support to institutes of higher educationin a competitive grant process to develop S-STEM programs and encourages four yearinstitutions to collaborate and encourage students to complete 4
completion of the project were pride and joy. The useof responsive pedagogy should be further refined in the African context, mechanisms forbuilding self-efficacy in young African engineers should be elicited, and they should beconsidered equally alongside interventions focused on improving learning outcomes.IntroductionMost countries that have achieved sustainable development have done so through a concertedfocus on technology and innovation. Existence of an innovation-driven economy dependsdirectly on the quality of education available for the rising generation. Although the WestAfrican nation of Ghana recently achieved lower-middle income status [1], its potential forsustainable development continues to be limited by its educational system’s
/334. [Accessed December 17th, 2020].[4] D. J. Espiritu, and R.Todorovic, “Increasing Diversity and Student Success in Engineering and Computer Science through Contextualized Practices,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020. [Online]. Available: ASEEPublications, https://peer.asee.org/34817. [Accessed December 12th, 2020].[5] A. Abrew and M. Villatoro, “Broadening Participation of Female Students in Engineering Technology through a network of Peers,” St.Lawrence Section Meeting, Ithaca, NY, 2016. [Online]. Available: ASEE Publications, https://peer.asee.org/33841. [Accessed January 2nd, 2021].[6] E. L. Usher, N. A. Mamaril, C. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, "Sources of Self
Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering ResearchCenter (ERC), which mission is to attain U.S. shale gas potential responsibly by working inpartnership with industry to develop technological innovations and build a diverse andinnovative workforce. The CISTAR Engineering Workforce Development pillar uses theframework of Identity-based Motivation to promote skills and ways for all students, from middleschool to doctoral students, to see themselves as active participants in the hydrocarbon workforceto achieve a robust system of engineering education and pathways. Students' identities, or howthey see themselves as an individual, within particular roles, or as part of a larger group, havebeen linked to engineering career choices [1]–[3], student
system responses. In this article, performance ofthe two systems are compared and analyzed for control engineering education. IntroductionSome concepts and technologies in the area of control and optimization should be developed toimprove the control system class instruction and laboratory practice, covering most aspects ofclassical control, modern control and intelligent control theories. In most cases, the cost of acontrol system increases based on its complexity, thus the optimal performance to cost ratio isdesirable1,2,3. Proportional controller is the simplest and most intuitive structure for theimplementation of linear control systems. So a direct method has been presented4 for thedetermination of
and thought-provoking curriculums for the engineering department at UC San Diego. My master’s degree background is aimed towards the field of medical technology, where I am able to work in a design laboratory that specializes in researching and developing medical devices. I plan to continue my education to obtain a Ph.D., directing my impact on engineering education and translational research at UC San Diego.Mr. Edward I Lan, University of California, San Diego Edward Lan earned his B.S in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, San Diego in 2017. He moved on to work in the aerospace industry at Applied Composites San Diego (Formerly San Diego Composite) directly after graduating, developing new