” and shares progress in the four essential areas needed todevelop a culture of doing engineering. It also provides insights on lessons learned.IntroductionIn 2017, the Mechanical Engineering Department at Seattle University was awarded a NationalScience Foundation grant to revolutionize the department. The department’s proposal centers oncreating a program where students can develop a strong identity with their chosen profession.The project leverages the department’s small size and close ties with industry to create a cultureof “Engineering with Engineers.” The first two sections of this paper provide an overview of theproject. This overview is taken from the NSF Grantees Poster paper presented at the 2018 ASEEAnnual Conference [1]. The
a mechanism for enhancing the engagement and performance of underrepresented groups(UGs) in spatial learning [1], physics [2], computer science, general engineering [3], softwareand electrical engineering [4] – [17], mechanical engineering (ME) [18] – [25] computer aideddesign [26], and aerospace engineering [27]. Less than a handful of these studies have exploredgames’ appeal, efficacy or UG performance as a function of gender. For example, Joiner et al.,[19] who studied a population of 138 ME UGs (15/138 female) found that there was nodifference in “motivation towards engineering” (4.2 + 0.5, pre- and post-survey results) or in“perceived engineering competence” (3.4 + 0.7, pre-survey to 3.3 + 0.4, post-survey) after videogame use for
less stress throughout the course and perform better than their peersin the conceptual design phase.Keywords: Engineering Design Education; Maker Movement; Making Activities; MakerCurriculum.Introduction and Background:In the post-industrial era, market demands have required that organizations design, develop anddeliver products in ever-decreasing time frames [1]. To meet market demands, organizationshave capitalized on teamwork, as it is ideally suited to spurring innovation and creativity, as wellas generating and sharing knowledge [2]. These changes in industry have demanded thatengineering graduates be trained in more than just technical skills [3]. For these reasons,engineering programs have worked to incorporate cornerstone and capstone
behaviors and different structures for thesame design using a cell phone is show in Figure 1.The FBS coding scheme can be summarized using the design terminology embodied in Figure 1.This produces six codes for the design issues (segments) and those six codes (Table 1) and can becombined to produce eight design processes (Table 2). Figure 2 shows the relationship betweenthe FBS codes and processes. Figure 1. An example of functions (F), expected behaviors (Be) and structures (S)Table 1. FBS Codes Table 2. FBS Processes Code Design Process R Formulation R>F, F>Be F
with a Design-Based Chemistry Laboratory Curriculum In- and Out-of-SequenceChANgE Chem is a curriculum reform model which was created to address the retention ofengineering students taking general chemistry in their first two years as undergraduates [1],[2].Currently, we are using this model to develop a curriculum of laboratory activities called DesignChallenges (Figure 1), which translates the chemistry concepts into contextualized problems andmethods unique to the way engineering students are expected to learn, think and collaborate(Table 1). This new curriculum is designed to maintain student motivation for an engineeringmajor by helping them to better understand the profession and practice [3].Figure 1. Concept design for a
students develop prototypes of testinginstruments. Project 1 involved designing a pharmaceutical vial seal force tester in collaboration with a localequipment manufacturing company. Seal force is the integrity of the sealing quality of the rubber stoppers that cap thepharmaceutical drug vials. The usual process of testing it is by performing a compressive test. The entire prototypingwas accomplished in various phases. Project 2 was an independent undertaking that was conducted over a period of2 semesters during which the student-faculty team conceived and developed an idea for marketing a low-costmechanical testing equipment. The idea was to build a tensile, compressive tester using off the shelf component,keeping the selling price below $2500 per
the general instructional objectives of thefreshman course.The project was titled “Introduction to Big Data Analytics: Analyzing Tweets with Matlab”. Theinstructor provided the students with a Matlab code that was designed to facilitate applyingSentiment Analysis to tweets. For example, the code can be used to (1) identify tweets thatcontain one or more specific keywords and (2) create a histogram of words used in these tweets,in order to identify recurring themes in tweets that mention the keyword(s). The final deliverablefor the project was a report in which students detailed how they used the Matlab code to answer anumber of open-ended questions, as well as an introductory section in which students discussedthe importance and applications
are two intended byproducts of engineering research.These byproducts are, however, difficult to achieve, particularly for researchers in training,without the right foundation of knowledge and skills. Because engineering research demands aworkforce whose interdisciplinary academic training extends from a sub-atomistic understandingof fundamental science to a broad understanding of complex systems and processes, mostresearch training programs focus on knowledge and skills either specific to the field of research,or on the process of performing research in general, giving students basic competencies in theability to perform research [1]. However, as the global challenges that our engineering workforceaddress become increasingly interwoven and
financial, academic, professional, andsocial support to incoming engineering students who are low-income and high achieving. Theduration of the grant is five years. This paper summarizes the activities in the first 18 months ofthe project and the activities projected for the remainder of the project.The objectives of this project are to 1) enhance students’ learning by providing access to extra andco-curricular experiences, 2) create a positive student experience through mentorship, and 3)ensure successful student placement in the STEM workforce or graduate school. S-STEM Scholarsin this program received financial, academic, professional, and social development via variousevidence-based activities integrated throughout four years and starting with
diverged from a model process used previously to develop a con- cept inventory for thermodynamics. The peculiarities of this concept inventory development process and possible lessons for such development in general will be discussed.1 IntroductionThis is a report of work in progress on a project to develop a concept inventory for functionalreasoning in engineering design by means of a Delphi process. Functional modeling proceduresare often taught in undergraduate design classes as a part of reverse engineering or as an earlystep in creating new designs. However, there is no accepted means of assessing whether studentsunderstand the underlying concepts when applying these procedures, and indeed there is no agreed-upon articulation of
pieces that are small enough for novices to grasp.Experts, including instructors, teaching introductory level courses are often unable to explain thesubgoal-level processes that they use in problem solving because they have automated much ofthe problem solving processes after many years of practice. This intervention had been tested inprogramming for a few hours of instruction and found effective. The current project expandsupon that work.The overarching research questions for this project are as follows: 1. How do subgoal-labeled worked examples affect learning through an entire introductory programming course? 2. How can formative assessments that are subgoal labeled impact student learning?In order to answer these questions
Paper ID #26298Board 37: Student Experiences in a University Makerspace: Design as Deci-sion MakingKathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of WashingtonTimothy Sun, University of Washington c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student Experiences in a University Makerspace: Design as Decision Making1. IntroductionDesign thinking is an important skill for university students both within and outside ofengineering majors. It is difficult to teach and learn for a number of reasons.1 Senior capstonecourses are a traditional means of teaching design but have limitations as they
utility district, the competition was modeled after the USDepartment of Energy’s Solar Decathlon [1]. Participating teams were required to design andbuild fully functional tiny houses that were evaluated across multiple criteria including energyuse, innovation, and aesthetics. California State University Sacramento successfully completedthe project and placed 5th overall. The Tiny House is now used as a research platform forengineering, construction management, and computer science students at California StateUniversity Sacramento. Among its many features are a home automation system which enablesusers to monitor and control all of the homes features. In order to give an occupant a real-timefull energy profile of the house, data (including
collaborations amongdiverse learners by automating the identification and utilization of learners’ efficacies andknowledge gaps to create complementary collaborative teams that maximize avenues for peerteaching and learning. The workshop targeted the utilization and efficacy of next-generationlearning architectures through a focus on instructional technologies that facilitate digitally-mediated team-based learning. These included technical objectives of: (1) identifying newresearch in learning analytics required to automate more optimal composition, formation, andadaptation of learner design teams; (2) detecting advances in physical and virtual learningenvironments that can achieve more effective and scalable observation and assessment of learnerteams
, PacificVis 2014, and SIBGRAPI 2013 and honorable mentions at the VAST Challenge 2017 and CG&A 2011 best paper. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing Intelligent Review Forms for Peer Assessment: A Data-driven Approach AbstractThis evidence-based practice paper employs a data-driven, explainable, and scalable approach to the de-velopment and application of an online peer review system in computer science and engineering courses.Crowd-sourced grading through peer review is an effective evaluation methodology that 1) allows the use ofmeaningful assignments in large or online classes (e.g. assignments
conferences. The end goal of thisproject is to create a more welcoming and diverse community within the computer andinformation technology industry.IntroductionThe computer and information technology industry has been under the spotlight in recent yearsfor the reputation of toxic environments at many of the companies [1], [2]. According to analysesfrom the site information is beautiful, out of 23 different companies within the industry Amazonis the sole company with a workforce that meets and/or exceeds parity for Blacks (21%) in theUS population [3]. According to Connor [4], “Black people and Latinos earn nearly 18% ofcomputer science degrees but hold barely 5% of tech jobs…People of color who enter the techindustry leave the field more than 3.5
was added to the first-year programming sequence at Ohio NorthernUniversity that focused on developing educational software applications. The intent was to showhow computing and engineering professionals could make a positive difference in the lives ofothers, even if limited to working from behind a computer screen. However, the project waslargely self-directed by the students, as each team picked the subject for a provided grade leveland then wrote a software application for it. While the project allowed students to displaytechnical competency, it embraced a person-centric view towards learning as an internal process.In his seminal work, Kolb discusses the characteristics associated with the concept ofexperiential learning [1], where
University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Curriculum on Diversity and Ethics: Impact in an Introductory Bioengineering CourseEthics and diversity are critical components of engineering training and practice, but mostundergraduate engineering programs do not address these issues in-depth [1-3]. In this work-in-progress, we describe the design and implementation of a novel curriculum focused on theinterplay of diversity and ethics.We launched this curriculum through an honors section in a large introductory bioengineeringcourse at the University of Washington. The creation of an honors section builds on our previouswork, where we discussed
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He is from Louisiana where he also completed his Baccalaureate Degree in Physics with a minor in Chemistry from Grambling State University. Dr. Burks received his doctoral degree from Drexel Unviersity in Materials Science & Engineering and was also a National Science Foundation GK-12 STEM Fellow for 3 years, in the School District of Philadelphia. Primary research interests are: 1) synthesis and characterization of functional polymeric materials, 2) polymer crystallization phenomena, and 3) pedagogical assessment of conventional and nontraditional STEM spaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Leveraging undergraduate curriculum
academically talented, low-income students in Engineering and Computer Science majors. CAPS focuses on progressivelydeveloping students’ social and career competence via three integrated interventions: (1)Mentor+, relationally informed advising that encourages students to see their academic work inrelation to their families and communities; (2) peer cohorts, providing social support structure forstudents and enhancing their sense of belongings in engineering and computer scienceclassrooms and beyond; and (3) professional development with difference-education,illuminating the hidden curricula that may disadvantage first-generation and low incomestudents. This paper presents our progress and core program activities during the first year of theCAPS
on the hiring process andthe early years of engineers at the workplace (Norback & Hardin, 2005).Nicometo et al. (2010) summarized what can be considered the ideal engineering communicationskills in the industry setting in three main themes: 1) the ability to effectively speak, write, andinteract with audiences outside of engineers’ specific discipline, work group, or focus; 2) thewillingness and self-motivation to initiate communication with others, and to seek out resourceinformation through informal interactions; and 3) the ability to listen carefully to others in orderto do the best work and achieve results that are valued by different stakeholders (clients,managers, coworkers). From the perspective of executives, the communication
Research on Instructional Change in Postsecondary Education (CRICPE) at WesternMichigan University. Evaluations were conducted at the middle of all three summer programs.Virtual interviews using ZOOM, a video conferencing service, were conducted with participantsand mentors of each summer program. Each interview session was approximately 15 minuteslong. The number of interviews is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Number of Interviews High Program In-Service Graduate School Undergrads Total Teachers mentors Students
, particularly inlower-resourced schools, are designed to meet general state education standards rather thanteaching STEM as a “scientific discipline” [1]. In particular, Black and Hispanic students aremore likely to attend high schools that have fewer academic resources and advanced courseoptions [2] and graduate from high school underprepared for college-level science and math [3].Further, high-ability college students from less competitive high schools may have been unableto choose college-track courses, meaning that their courses may not have been challengingenough to engage in and develop in-depth STEM study skills [4]. When these students entercollege, they may struggle to achieve high performance in their STEM classes for the first time.More
multiple disciplines learned principles andmethods of metals analysis and worked together on a wide range of trace metal research projects.The project was supported by the National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentationgrant program. This paper both summarizes the projects conducted and describes the challengesand opportunities experienced over the course of the project with the intent of exchanging ideasand establishing successful approaches to collaborative interdisciplinary undergraduate research.In the process of conducting trace metals research, project outcomes were accomplished. 1. The project provided opportunities for faculty development and faculty development occurred; 2. The project integrated STEM and non-STEM
, beliefs, self-regulation, and achievement.Min Tang, College of Education, Learning and Cognition Program,Florida State University The research interests of mine are: 1) to understand teachers’ pedagogical practices and the potential effects of those practices on students’ critical thinking and epistemic beliefs in engineering domain, 2) to quantify epistemically-related emotions that occur during the epistemic activity, 3) to explore the best pedagogical practices to improve the efficiency integrating classroom project-based learning and students’ real-world problem-solving practice. I have MS degree from Florida State University in Curriculum and Instruction and BA degree from China Nanchang University in English
hoc analysis of the results obtained when applyingthis strategy to existing student submission data. This allows us to investigate what feedback orboosters would have been earned by individual students in a real-life situation to validate thefeedback design before live deployment.Related WorkRewards, Operant Conditioning, and Intrinsic MotivationApplying rewards to increase student motivation has been widely researched in areas includingpsychology, education, and video games 1 2 17 . In 1940’s, Skinner formed the theory of operantconditioning to explain how a behavior can be shaped by its resulting consequences 15 . Bystudying the behavior of animals in experiments, Skinner formulated the underlying ideas ofpositive and negative reinforcement
discussion of the advancement of EER. More broadly, identifying such boundaryknowledge can facilitate new understanding of how the social construction of knowledge occursin interdisciplinary fields beyond engineering education. As a first step toward these largerobjectives, we review relevant literature and outline our participants as well as our analytic plan.BackgroundDisciplinary-specific norms reflect a field’s priorities and values, as well as assumptions aboutwhat qualifies as rigorous, trustworthy, or quality scholarship [1]. The ramifications ofdisciplinary normativities include which methodologies are widely endorsed, which questionsare investigated, and what is considered knowledge. As such, these normativities set theboundaries of a
scientific inquiry. Our expectation is that (1) existing science courses offeropportunities for students to engage meaningfully with engineering practices, by solving designchallenges that emerge in the construction of scientific ideas; and (2) doing so can capitalize onexisting curricula that science education has developed, facilitating the adoption of engineeringdesign into preservice teacher education. As part of NSF’s Improving Undergraduate STEMEducation (IUSE) funding program, this proposal is part of a broader effort to transformundergraduate science education, preparing students to be innovators and leaders in STEM.BackgroundThe Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States, 2013) calls for engineering — andparticularly engineering
University Mary- land. Her primary research is in writing pedagogy and assessment, and she has taught a wide variety of writing courses including first year composition, professional writing, rhetoric, and style. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Integrating Writing into Engineering Labs: Developing Curriculum and Creating a Writing Fellows Program I. IntroductionThis paper presents a Works-in-Progress. Communication competency is critical for practicingengineers [1]. Research demonstrates that learning to write and communicate in engineering islinked to learning to think like an engineer and to developing a professional identity as an engineer[1], [2]. ABET lists
keepingpassengers comfortable with higher accelerations.Introduction:This paper focuses on introducing a unit in the introductory physics course as an example of aPhysics Innovation and Entrepreneurship (PIE) education module. This approach can beconsidered to be an activity-based learning session using a problem-based approach thathighlights the relevance of introductory physics courses that can enhance students’ engagementand interest in physics [1-3]. We have briefly introduced a Human Centered Design approach, orDesign Thinking, to show the connection between physics knowledge and societal impact whentechnical feasibility is explored using laws of physics, correlated with human desirability andfinancial viability of a technical solution. The approach