Paper ID #21392Measuring Engineering Students’ Metacognition with a Think-Aloud Proto-colDr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the recently retired Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for 30 years, and she continues to work on externally funded projects relating to engineering education.Rose M. Marra, University of Missouri Rose M. Marra is a Professor of Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri. She is PI of the NSF-funded
Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Con- struction and in the Department of Civil & Environmental
curriculum.An approach to enhance spatial thinking or spatial reasoning skills is learning three-dimensional(3D) modeling [4]. 3D modeling involves several steps and design decisions to make sure that afeasible design is made. Learning 3D modeling is supposed to not only enhance students’ designdecisions but also improve their spatial thinking ability. With the proliferation of consumer-level3D printing, Virtual Reality (VR), and Augmented Reality (AR), there is a sparked interestamong educators to teach 3D modeling using tools like Tinkercad in formal and informal settings[5], [6]. An additional benefit of 3D modeling knowledge is the career path it opens. Severalcompanies and industries are in the need for 3D designers for a variety of projects
better matched their strengths and/or interests. Someof the students with the “biggest ideas” around advancing novel, environmentally-friendlydesigns were disappointed that the engineering courses seemed to be focused on teaching currentpractice rather than creative solutions. Given these findings, it might be impactful on retention tohave EnvE students take a course specific to environmental engineering and/or one that allowsthem to be innovative in envisioning solutions to problems of their interest (such as a project-based course that allows students to select a project of interest, and significant latitude increatively exploring solutions).Students who felt that their education should be more balanced between technical and societalissues
evaluation. MethodsThe present work was conducted as part of a larger study of teaching effectiveness across STEMat the research site (Bouwma-Gearhart, Perry, & Presley, 2014; Koretsky, 2015; Koretsky et al.,2016). The research project is a broad institutional effort to cultivate interdisciplinarycommunities of practice focused on improving teaching practices in STEM. Faculty evaluationthus plays a critical role in enhancing teaching practices because the data collected and feedbackprovided are designed to help faculty improve as instructors. As a result, this research focuses onfaculty perceptions of teaching evaluation data, in particular the kinds of data they would like tocollect or stakeholders
manufacturing-focused courses. Sarah’s research interests include aspects of project-based learning and enhancing 21st century skills in undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Adam Lenz, Oregon State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring students’ and instructors’ perceptions of engineering: case studies of professionally-focused and career exploration courses Work in ProgressAbstractPrevious work developed a working definition of engineering professional identity (EPI), definedas the degree of internalization of the norms, behaviors, language, values, and practices ofengineering. This EPI
protons and electrons with varyingnumber of neutrons. By focusing on calculus there are some books that include visualexplanations (see for example references [2-10]). Of a special interest is the work by Apostol andMamikon from Caltech [11,12]. They were able to explain integration of some functions withoutthe need for mathematical formulas. The author of this paper published papers on this topic [13-20] in addition to books [21,22], one for understanding concepts in “Control Systems” and theother for understanding the basics of “Newton’s Laws of Motion.”The bigger pictureThis work is part of a multi-modal integrated project aimed at understanding concepts in STEM.The approach is meant to help both teachers and students, thereby allowing for
of Colorado (CU) Boulder [6] concluded that a hands-on approachto engineering education greatly benefited overall retention, particularly in underrepresentedpopulations. The researchers implemented a course called First-Year Engineering Projects,which required hands-on design experience which emphasized teamwork and successfulimplementation of a student-researched plan [6]. Traditionally, such an experience would notoccur for engineering students until the final year of their program, in the form of a SeniorDesign or Capstone project. Alternatively, low retention rates in engineering curriculum have been attributed todifficulties insufficient support in non-engineering core math and science courses required to betaken by engineering
the professor for this course. In theinitial contact, the goal was to begin building a collaborative relationship as they discussed somebackground information on the course and the way it had been run in the past. After thatconversation, an official ‘kick-off’ meeting was held. The discussion centered on the overallredesign process as well as a projected timeline. Roles were defined and a general plan of attackwas created. Regular weekly meetings (Thursday mornings) were scheduled with thestakeholders involved (instructor and instructional designer) in order to help keep the project ontrack.The first thing done was to begin a document that came to be called the ‘Course Map’. It wascreated as a Google Doc so all parties involved could add
Paper ID #21703#EngineersWeek: Broadening our Understanding of Community Engage-ment Through Analysis of Twitter Use During the National Engineers WeekDr. Aqdas Malik, George Mason University Aqdas Malik is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology, George Mason University. His multidisciplinary academic and industry experience spans two key disciplines: Human-Computer Interaction and Social Media Communication and Analytics. He is currently engaged in a number of research projects funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). In some of his recent projects he has applied
division bylaws;• developed and circulated newsletters on Diversity Committee efforts;• worked with the ASEE Board of Directors to get Figure 1. Example of Footsteps from approval for and to institutionalize the ASEE Best 2017 Annual Conference Diversity Paper;• piloted the footsteps project, where large stickers were placed on the floor throughout the convention center in Indianapolis in high traffic spaces (see Figure 3);• created the call for papers and an assessment tool for the ASEE Best Diversity Paper; and• worked with ASEE information technology staff to identify potential papers within the paper review
Paper ID #22312BYOE: Activities to Map Intuition to Lumped System ModelsRaina White, Dartmouth College Raina White is an Engineering Lab Instructor at Dartmouth College. She earned a BS in Mechanical Engineering and a M.Eng in Systems engineering from Cornell University. She worked as a Systems Engineer at Hamilton Sundstrand, and then transitioned to teaching high school Physics. Currently Mrs. White works with students at Dartmouth College in systems, fluids, mechanical engineering, and auto- motive engineering courses and projects. She is very interested in improving student’s ability to translate coursework into
equity, and implicit bias in academia.Dr. Lizabeth T. Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is an Associate Dean and a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engi- neering. In her role of Associate Dean, she advocates for equity and access. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAIN SLO learning initiative, she and her colleagues have been active researching in transformation in higher education.Ms. Emily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow currently works at a tech startup accelerator in
, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Andr´e Schleife is a Blue Waters Assistant Professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineer- ing at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He obtained his Diploma and Ph.D. at Friedrich- Schiller-University in Jena, Germany for his theoretical work on transparent conducting oxides. Before he started at UIUC he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory on a project that aimed at a description of non-adiabatic electron ion dynamics. His research revolves around excited electronic states and their dynamics in various materials using accurate computational methods and making use of modern super computers in order to understand
. Facilitate opportunities for employees to work on projects or issues that are socially relevant Men working in engineering and computing to serve as role models. Emphasize ethical and social issues when teaching engineering and computing. Encourage a supportive environment in the classroom and in the program. Encourage and assist early contact between students and professionals. Emphasize the wide variety of expertise necessary to be successful as an engineer or computing professional. Highlight as early as possible the different facets that make up engineering and computing.Methodology and Educational Learning Strategies:This course came out of a passion by the instructor to enhance leadership
Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Arkansas and is currently working on a PhD in Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas.Mr. Trevor Joe Dodson, University of Arkansas c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Effectiveness of GRE Workshops to Increase AwarenessAbstractExcelling on the Graduate Records Exam (GRE) can be an important milestone for students whowish to attend graduate school. As part of an NSF-STEM project, two GRE workshops wereimplemented to inform students about the importance of starting the preparation process earlierin their undergraduate career. The second workshop, occurring the year after the first, includedminor modifications based on the
can build self-efficacy directly and encourage moremastery experiences.Contextual examples of each of Bandura’s four sources of self-efficacy in undergraduateengineering education: first, mastery experiences could consist of completing practice problemsto master theory, engaging in project work and hands-on activities to build engineering skills,and successfully working in teams and giving technical presentations. Second, role models whoshare a similar identity in populations of upper year students, alumni, outside speakers, or facultymay provide vicarious experiences. Third, classmates, teaching assistant, professors, mentors,friends and family may all provide social persuasion, and fourth, an individual's’ personal orextra-curricular
st 1 year 64% 61% 85 + 42 = 127 2nd year 23% 25% 31 + 17 = 48 rd 3 year 8% 9% 10 + 6 = 16 4th year 5% 5% 7 + 4 = 11 During the first week of the semester, students self-enrolled in teams of 6 or 7 for an out-of-class design project using the self-sign-up group feature of Canvas (Instructure, Salt Lake CityUT); these same teams were also used for all in-class learning activities. Class periods devoted toactive learning where indicated as such on the course syllabus and schedule. On these scheduled
the 2015 Best Diversity Paper.Mejia, et al., [3] presented a paper nominated by the K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Divisionexploring Latinx adolescents’ perceptions of engineering and their engineering abilities afterparticipation in community-based design projects. Students were from working class familiesand most had parents with limited education who worked in farming or other manual laboractivities. The adolescents, ages 14-17, worked in teams to identify a problem in theircommunity and to use engineering design to solve the problem. Most of the participants changedboth their perceptions of engineering as well as their self-efficacy as they worked on theseprojects. The design experience influenced participants’ perceptions of
collaborative learning is not directly relevant to our approach since thekinds of activities considered in much of that work, e.g., team projects in capstone design coursesas well as in several of the systems listed above do not, for the most part, involve students in ateam trying to resolve cognitive conflicts. Indeed, students in such teams often go out of their wayto not criticize the ideas offered by other members of the team for fear of offending them. Morerelevant for us is the work on the role of argumentation in learning. But, as Driver et al. [8] putit, “[although] argument is a central feature of the resolution of scientific controversies, scienceteaching has paid . . . little attention to [this] practice . . . It is our contention that
something like that... [my] BS [major] was more one sided – professor taught, we took it and we applied in a test but it was basically just saying it back and that’s it. That was the idea, that was the concept of teaching which not my favorite but its undergrad so I accepted it as that and wanted to get good grades that’s all.Many evidence-based teaching approaches exist from active learning techniques to project-basedlearning to peer instruction. With the emergence of Engineering Education as an establishedresearch field and the existence of Centers for Teaching and Learning at many institutions ofhigher education, access to effective instructional practices should be plentiful. Still, manyengineering and related STEM
3 4 Business risk assessment is the business manager’s responsibility 4 5 I like to learn about entrepreneurship comparison 6 Every time I fail a task, I reflect on why I failed so that I can learn how to do better in the future 6 7 I understand why a monopolistic market is usually not favorable to consumers 7 8 I consider how multiple changes affect each other 8 9 I am confident in leading a team to work on a project
analysis was conducted through critical narrative analysis tounderstand the meaning behind the engineers’ life experiences. The engineers discussed severalissues in their narratives including lack of diversity and support for minorities in the workplace.Through this project we would like to help others gain a better understanding of the experiencesof Black engineers in the technology industry. The results gained from this project will be usedto make diversity issues in the workplace more apparent to senior officials in companies so thatthey can reconsider the way they approach diversity.IntroductionIn recent years there has been increasing scrutiny on diversity within the computer andinformation technology industry. Popular press articles about
. Of the 15% who had attendedengineering focused PD, only 40% reported that their district paid for them to attend the PD.Examples of engineering focused PD that participants attended included Project Lead the Way,STEM workshops developed by the Oklahoma Energy Resource Board, and robotics trainingssuch as Botball and FIRST Lego League. Many participants could not remember the name ofthe PD they attended and simply called it a STEM training. Figure 2 displays participant responses to the modified Texas Poll question “Do youbelieve engineering is a high priority…” Overall, participants did not believe that engineeringwas a priority in their schools, in their school districts, to the parents in their schools, or to thecommunities where
, Feb. 2000.[10] D. M. Buede and W. D. Miller, The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.[11] C. Dym, P. Little, E. Orwin, and E. Spjut, “Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction,” HMC Fac. Books, Jan. 2009.[12] A. F. (Alex F. Osborn, Applied imagination; principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York, Scribner, 1953.[13] F. Zwicky, Morphological Astronomy. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.[14] G. Altshuller, The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity. Technical Innovation Center, Inc., 1999.[15] D. Silverstein, N. DeCarlo, and M. Slocum, Insourcing Innovation: How to Achieve Competitive Excellence Using TRIZ. CRC Press
in teaching, research and service. She enjoys teaching electrical engineering and power engineering topics to students. In research and graduate studies, she has been very active having graduated 40 MS and 13 PhD students; published 160 papers and 2 book chapters; and brought in over $40 M in external research through individual and collaborative projects including an U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER award. She is an ASEE and an IEEE Fellow. She has been active in the IEEE Power & Energy Society serving on the PES Governing Board for 12 years and President for 2012-2013. Dr. Schulz is a member of Eta Kappa Nu (Electrical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education
courses that teach the basics are free while other courses are premium and paid. The CodeCademy style is more like a guided tutorial where the student have to complete a set of particular tasks as well as other problems where the student needs to complete the missing code. Good tool for beginners and for those wanting to refresh the knowledge. Programmr 6 – provides coding simulators for several languages. Their courses are free and in the platform students can solve problems in Java, C, C++, Objective C, Angular JS. At Programmr the student can code, compile, and run projects in the browser in many of the most popular programming languages available. They have several courses as well as
Paper ID #240602018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Exploring the Experiences of First-Generation Student Veterans in Engineer-ingDr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army
,andprovideacompetitiveinternsummerwage.Sponsor funding for professional development of EMIX interns is calculated by theuniversityteamtobeaflatfeeperstudentintern.Corporatesponsorshipsupportsweeklyprofessional development, intern and chaperone travel to the sponsor site, funding forstudent internship academic credit, and project administration. Notably, each corporatesponsoridentifiesthenumberofEMIXinternstobesponsored,minimallystipulatedtobethree engineering undergraduates to one location; several corporate sponsors elect tosponsorfiveinternseachsummer.Former Penn State EMIX interns serve as mentors to incoming students, and showcaseprofessional experiences at College of Engineering networking events and diversityretention initiatives. Ultimately, the EMIX initiative provides
are over 100 full-time and part-time faculty and more than 1,100undergraduate and graduate students. In addition to rigorous technical educations where theory isbalanced with hands-on, laboratory-based work, our students experience emphasis on leadership,teamwork, and oral and written communication.All engineering and computer science students participate in a year-long senior design project which issponsored by local industry. Teams of students mentored by a faculty member and a liaison engineersolve real-world engineering problems. Students design, build and test their own solution, writeproposals and reports, and present the result to their sponsors. By bridging the gap between academiaand industry, the senior design project prepares