model of what is occurring in different classrooms or different schools for a diverse set of schools. Modeling those systems, they can then look at the attributes of the teachers, school, school district, and figure out what enhances or detracts from the successful deployment of EarSketch from a sustainability stand point, sustaining the project beyond the grant.This team member understands that modeling helps to develop theories about bothimplementation (P3) and sustainability (P4.) This is reflective of the initial goals ofthe modeling effort set forth in the proposal development, where the intent was toidentify barriers and enablers to intervention sustainability.Some of the members of the team articulated a more
addedinteractive features for class in spring 2018. In this paper, we will present our material designrationale and the results from the spring 2018 class. A list of must-have features for reviewvideos and instructor reflection on course and video production will also be shared.II. Course Set-Up and Course Material DesignA. Course set-upLike other engineering courses in the curriculum, student academic performance in ME 491 isassessed through a variety of assignments. The weight of each category of assignments are listedin Table 1. Five assignments were designed to help students review prerequisite knowledge andskills. They are distributed across different learning units with a total weight of 7% of the coursegrade. Each review assignment includes a video
patrons submitted. Figure 11. Fusion F400-S.43The summer months also gave library staff time to reflect on the first semester and a half ofoffering the 3D printing service. After careful consideration, the library believed it could domore marketing and expand the different types of workshops offered. The marketing expansionwas planned to take place in two phases. The first phase, during the fall 2016 semester, wouldinclude developing, printing and posting flyers (see Appendix B) around campus and offeringadditional workshops on new topics. The second phase, which began in the spring 2017 semesterincluded using social media to promote the service, promoting the service by telling the personalstories behind patrons
comparatively smaller classes (~15-20 students per class for the“Mechanics for Technologists” course and ~15-25 students per class for the “Metallic Materials”course). The MMET 207 lab size was held at a maximum of 16, regardless of semester offering,since this was restricted by physical lab space. It is conjectured that the different class sizes andthe resulting teacher-to-student ratio, and hence the individual attention that could be afforded toeach student could have had an impact on student perception of the topic/instructor and the classin general (and potentially performance) as well, as was reflected in the research. Further, theimpact of missing a class/day was much more significant in the case of the summer sessionoffering. Regular semester
awareness as well as major policy changes at the Government Level coupled with stricter application of RTI kind of mechanism – the future is for better. Diagram 8 below provides the comparison. Diagram- 8: Comparison of level of Ethics between Year 2015 & 2020 This optimistic view is also reflected in the CPI Ranking for the year 2016. The trend is in the direction of improvement and hence the optimism for year 2020 looks reasonable. Very Clean Highly Corrupt Countries Countries1,2,3,4 174,175,176
3-5 demonstrate exemplar student-produced schematics and photographs for (A) fast-acting valves, (B) muzzle velocity sensor circuits and hardware supports, and (C) velocity-corroborating backstops. We attribute the diversity in valve and backstop designs to ourintentional avoidance of prescribed designs, though some groups did follow through withprovided lecture material, as evidenced in the Supah-style9 valve implementation shown inFigure 3.Despite three sensor options provided for the muzzle velocity measurement circuits, groupsunanimously (14 groups of 14 total groups) chose infrared break-beam sensors as the definingelements of their myDAQ or Arduino Uno circuits, even despite prior use of the alternativelyoffered infrared reflectance
preferences for group work atthe board versus at tables on paper are illuminating. These show a strong majority of studentspreferring to work at the board, and noting the greater opportunity for collaboration that thismethod afforded.ConclusionThe value of group work at the board - for promoting collaboration, effectively reaching asolution with limited time, and learning something new – has been demonstrated here. However,it is important to take into account the diversity of student learning styles in a classroom, andpromote facilitation methods to engage, inspire, and accommodate the strengths of both activeand reflective learners (Felder and Silverman, 1988). While active group engagement is a centralgoal of the workshops, many students will gain
tests,students in MSE 440 use MATLAB to apply the analysis methods described in 6 and determinethe Johnson-Cook parameters for a Ti-Al-V alloy. Using these parameters, they then predict theyield strength of the alloy for a different set of experimental conditions.5. Impact of Curriculum ChangesSurveys administered in each course assessed students’ attitudes toward and reflections on thecomputational curriculum. Preliminary results derived from these surveys and an evaluation ofimpact on exam-based performance are discussed in 15;16 . Here, we describe new results obtainedfrom studying students’ perspectives on the computational curriculum and their owncomputational competency as they progressed through the undergraduate program.5.1. Students
support a topic using existing literature,develop a well-crafted research question, and design a clear research framework were alsoadded27.The students are encouraged to take the required three credit technology research course (TECH646) offered by the college during the same semester as Construction Research Fundamentals.TECH 646 prepares students to write and research using a standard university thesis format withan introduction to a variety of methodologies used in technology research. The group mentoringand peer reflection of the Construction Research Fundamentals course complements andsupports the mostly lecture activities of the college research course. Table 2 shows the basicoutline of the Construction Research Fundamentals schedule. Table
: Understand and interpret the organization and use of the AISC Manual of Steel Construction Identify and apply appropriate steel provisions (AISC) to elements and systems. Design steel members using the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) approach. Develop skills in completing and checking individual component and complete structural system designs. Due to the volume of possible topics that AISC incorporates within the Specification, thetopical list for AE 401 was selected to be reflected of most standard entry level undergraduate steeldesign classes. Due to our mandatory two steel classes in the undergraduate AE program, no lateralmembers or systems are discussed. Instead, AE 401 is gravity focused while the advanced
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.We also wish to acknowledge the assistance of the Institutional Research Officers at each campusin gathering the data used in this analysis.References [1] X. Chen and M. Soldner, STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields (Statistical Analysis Report), ser. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCSE) Statistical Analysis Reports. U.S. Department of Education, 2013. [2] J. Levin and J. H. Wyckof, “Predictors of persistence and success in an engineering program,” NACADA Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 1995. [3] J. Middleton, S. Krause, S. Maass, K. Beeley, J. Collofello, and R. Culbertson, “Early course and grade
. Innovation 16. Argument construction 17. Intellectual risk Domain B: Personal B1: Personal qualities 18. Enthusiasm Effectiveness 19. Perseverance 20. Integrity Definition: The personal 21. Self-confidence qualities and approach to 22. Self-reflection be an effective researcher. 23. Responsibility B2: Self-management 24. Preparation and
the deliberate effort of the committee to develop clearer and more concisecognitive domain outcome statements that better reflect the levels in Bloom’s Taxonomywith an appropriate verbs at each level. Another major consideration for the committee wasto be less prescriptive in the outcome statements.The committee first debated which educational taxonomy to use and considered the originalBloom’s Taxonomy, the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, and at least one other variation ofBloom’s Taxonomy. The committee concluded that the original Bloom’s Taxonomy wasthe most appropriate for BOK3 and discussion on this selection process will be presented.When critically reviewing the BOK2, the committee concluded that some of the outcomestatements only loosely
-learned”.Detailed description of pilot course syllabusThe monograph Science and Diplomacy: A New Dimension of International Relations [13] wasused as the primary text for the course. One benefit of a text translated from French is that theexamples and the perspective are offered based upon science diplomacy as practiced by France.This varies considerably from the approach to science diplomacy as practiced by the UnitedStates (i.e., as reflected in the material published by AAAS, [33]), and it also varies considerablyfrom the approach to science diplomacy as practiced by the United Kingdom (i.e., as reflected inthe material published by The Royal Society, [2]). One drawback of a text translated fromFrench is poor translation in various places
provides opportunities for students to talk directly with membersfrom various stakeholder groups in the VA coalfields including state regulators, industrymembers and local citizens.3. SurveyAppendix A includes the survey instrument used in the first year of the study analyzed here. Itwas designed to measure students’ knowledge, abilities, and attitudes [15] related to CSR andcollect relevant background information to explore possible connections between those and thedemographic information, students’ motivations for pursuing engineering, their career desires,and their civic activities. The survey reflects feedback from an expert panel of engineeringeducators and industry practitioners, as well as “talk alouds” with students. Going through thefirst
increase apprehension for students with math anxiety (e.g., arithmetic and vector operators, Cartesian and cylindrical polar coordinate systems, and sine and cosine trigonometric functions).The graphic representations in the section that follows demonstrate the manner in whichchunking breaks the above problem down into more manageable pieces that reflect the logic ofthe mathematical substructures. Initially, the chunks are labeled with appropriate mathvocabulary, temporarily hiding the numbers, variables, and symbols to deliver only the broadlandscape of the problem. This first step functions as an instructional pause button that givesstudents additional time to formulate a strategy before working memory is taxed with the detailsof the
when solving the engineering problem. Studies withpublished pre-posttest results generally show positive learning gains in science content (e.g.,[11], [14]) and practices (e.g., [15], [16]) as a result of implementing these types of curricula.However, studies that provide an in-depth look at students’ engineering design decisions havemixed results with regards to the amount and quality of students’ application of science andmathematics to the engineering challenge (e.g., [17]–[20]). Some research has shown thatstudents have difficultly justifying their design solutions with science and/or mathematics [18],though guided reflection and evaluation about benefits and trade-offs helped them thinkscientifically [17]. Other research demonstrated that
based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF)under Grant Number 1148666. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF nor the educational institutions with which the authors are affiliated.References[1] F. Arpan, "Opportunities, Mentoring, Education, Growth, and Academics (OMEGA) Scholarship Program evaluation." Report for the Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 2015.[2] F. Arpan, "Opportunities, Mentoring, Education, Growth, and Academics (OMEGA) Scholarship Program evaluation." Report for the Jerome J. Lohr College of
remote sensing were initiated by funds from Connectiv Power [7] andNASA [8] at UMES and sustained through support from the University System of Maryland(USM) by way of proposals developed by the primary author. Subsequently, the efforts have beenexpanded and integrated with agricultural automation and remote sensing with support fromNational Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA/USDA) and MDSGC/NASA. The currentframework of AIRSPACES project as outlined by the expanded form Autonomous InstrumentedRobotic Sensory Platforms to Advance Creativity and Engage Students not only reflects the earlieriteration of the project title -- with the acronym AIRSPACES2 that combined experiential learningand research efforts titled Aerial Imaging and Remote
semester a course is offered. In addition tolearning outcomes, assessments and teaching strategies in the backward design sequence, thecourse development cycle comprises of two more decision steps involving reflection and revisionas shown in Figure 3. For the flight dynamics class, a thorough review of all the formative andsummative assessments, questions asked by students from time to time during a semester andofficial student feedback at the end of the semester were utilized to better the design of the coursefor the subsequent semester. Develop learning outcomes
: 1) breakingmisconceptions of creativity, 2) understanding the link between research and creativity, and 3) theimpact on research activities. These are discussed below.Students were specifically asked how learning about the creative process impacted theirunderstanding of research. For this question, the theme of breaking misconceptions of creativityemerged in some student responses. As one student noted, he or she previously did not see researchas being related to creativity. The student’s statement reflects the frequent misconception ofcreativity as being related to art, rather than to engineering or the sciences. This student alsorecognizes that being creative in research involves a systematic process, rather than a freewheelingactivity
had been exposed to functional modeling through the engineeringprogram. To ensure inter-rater agreement, small samples of student responses for both the hairdryer and the car radiator were scored, and those scores were evaluated by a third seniorundergraduate researcher, who identified items where the two raters disagreed consistently.Group discussion was used to facilitate communication about points of disagreement and updatethe scoring rubric accordingly.For the composite scores, Cohen’s Kappa was used to evaluate inter-rater agreement. The hairdryer composite scores had a κ = 0.685 (95% CI, 0.584 to 0.786) and the car radiator had a κ =0.670 (95% CI, 0.582 to 0.773). Both of these reflect substantial agreement according to thedescriptors
the academic and socialengagement provided by peer mentoring aspects of the program may be positive predictors ofretention for first year female students in science and engineering.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.7686640. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] A. E. Bell, S. J. Spencer, E. Iserman, and C. E. R. Logel, "Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, pp. 307-312, 2003.[2] N. M. Else-Quest, C. C. Mineo, and A. Higgins, "Math
assessment,student satisfaction survey responses and creative designs, the next section will comment onthese results, draw some conclusions and address opportunities for future work.IV. Discussion and ConclusionsThis section discusses some questions this work raises, reflects upon and draws conclusionsabout the outcomes and suggests ideas for future work, as related to the IMD project employedin an EMAG course at Messiah College during the Fall 2018 semester, and for the broaderengineering education community. Project outcomes discussed here include key experimentalresults, graded assessment, responses of the student satisfaction survey and creative designs.Questions raised by this work include best learning strategies and concept clarity in EMAG
the accreditation cycle under which the program wasreviewed, whether the university is public or private, and the Carnegie Classification. Respondentswere also asked to either provide “Table 5.1” (Curriculum details) from their most recent ABETself-study report, a revised version edited to reflect the current curriculum, or to respond to a seriesof questions designed to elicit the information contained in Table 5.1 of the Self-Study Report.Seventy nine complete survey responses were received including nine from programs undergoingreview in the 2018-19 accreditation cycle. In the case of duplicate records, data obtained from bothsources were compared to confirm that the methods used to identify curricular elements in thisstudy were consistent
effective latent variable model and instrument that reflects the factors of college students’ retention. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Creating a Successful Pathway to Graduate Studies: The Student Integrated Intern Research Experience (SIIRE)AbstractFor the health of the engineering profession and the nation, increasing the number and diversityof engineering students going on to graduate studies is imperative. The Student Integrated InternResearch Experience (SIIRE) is successfully addressing this situation, supporting students fromundergraduate through graduate school. SIIRE recruits a diverse group of first-year students tobegin in SIIRE in their sophomore year and
developing conception generation skills (Daly et al.,2012), the benefits of model building for dealing with ambiguity (Lemons et al., 2010), and thebenefits of reflection practices in learning engineering design (Adams, 2003). Additionally, someresearchers have found that design courses should move from an“instructor-transfers-knowledge” model towards a “developing-a-professional-knowledge” model,where students are asked to take charge of their learning and needs (Mann et al, 2007).Crismond and Adams (2012) developed the informed design teaching and learning matrix whichoutlines specific learning practices between novice and expert designers and also providessuggested teaching approaches. Specifically, Crismond and Adams (2012) define design as
contexts [1], [2]. This study is part of a broadcurricular reform project in 11 core studio courses using assignments that support students’learning of engineering practice [3], [4]. The reform is motivated by research that relates thedevelopment of higher-level capabilities such as systems thinking, communication skills, ethicalstandards, and critical thinking to students’ success in the workforce [5]. It also addresses callsfor greater emphasis on complex, open-ended design problems reflecting work done byprofessional engineers [6].Such tasks contrast with more typical school worksheets that require an algorithmic applicationof course concepts, with an emphasis on reaching a single correct solution through an instructor-determined solution path
numerical answers, and g)reflect on the answer. Parts a, b, and c together were worth 2/10 points. Part d was worth 4/10 points, parte was worth 3.5/10 points, and part g was worth 0.5/10 points. To create the problems, GTAs browsedseveral dynamics books to understand the typical types of problems used, and then created problemssimilar in scope and content and that addressed the learning objectives within each chapter. Thehomework solution template was designed to force students to utilize the problem-solving approach theinstructor was working to develop. For instance, students had to draw a diagram of the system, whichsometimes seems unnecessary to students early in the course because the problems are straightforward.However, forcing the student
ActivitiesWhile the program activities of Bridge to Boise State and STEM Summer Adventure (now merged intoone program under the title, RAISE) have evolved over the years, common elements have remainedimportant components of the program over time. These include peer mentoring, opportunities to connectwith STEM faculty, team and community building activities, and sessions that focus on buildingmindsets and habits linked to academic success, such as a growth mindset. The following is a summaryof the program activities from the most recent year of the RAISE program, which are reflective of, if notidentical to, the program activities from previous years of the Bridge to Boise State and STEM SummerAdventure programs.Peer MentoringFeedback from previous years