There are a wide range of student perceptions about the panels, and this is unlikely to change Creating competitiveness between students is difficult and that these panels seem to have failed in that endeavor6.0 AcknowledgementsThanks are due to the individuals who served as panel members alongside the authors of thispaper. Dr. Dennis D. Truax is also owed thanks for helping to facilitate several items associatedwith the 2014 CE 3311 offering, and for working toward a solution allowing SPM’s. Page 26.832.137.0 Bibliography1. Larson, D., McKean, R., Cramer, S. (2014). “Learning Outcomes: Less is More-ABET’s Criterion 3 Needs
help rectify this situation. In the process,it is believed that enthusiasm for engineering and science will increase among both adults andyoung people. Survey data indicates that demonstrating the underlying ingenuity behind nature,as exemplified above, has been moderately successful in accomplishing this goal.Thus far, as a part of this grant-funded project, 79 presentations have been made to communitygroups, churches and Christian schools with a total audience of 2,500 people. A diverse selectionof 23 of these groups was anonymously surveyed in an attempt to assess the impact of thepresentations and drive improvements for the future. The presentations typically close with livelyquestion and answer sessions between speaker(s) and audience. A
Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY. 13. ASCE. 2011. Program Criteria for Civil and Similarly Named Engineering Programs. (https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Education_and_Careers/University_Curriculum_Development/Conte nt_Pieces/criteria-for-accrediting-civil-engineering-programs.pdf). 14. Estes, A.C. and Lenox, T.A. 2014. “New Civil Engineering Program Criteria: How the Sausage is Being Made.” Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN. 15. Ressler, S. J. 2008. “Influence of the New Civil Engineering Body
Vision." International Journal of Engineering Education (1999): 376-382.12. Roemer, Robert, et al. "A SPIRAL Learning Curriculum in Mechanical Engineering." The 117th Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. Louisville, KY, 2010. AC 2010-1903.13. Besterfield-Sacre, Mary, Larry Shuman, Cynthia Altman. “Pittsburgh Freshman Attitudes Survey” http://civeng1.civ.pitt.edu/~outcomes/14. Kolb, David A., “ Learning Style Inventory Manual” , McBer, Boston, 1976.15. Prenzel, M. “ The selective persistence of interest”, In K.A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.), Interest in learning and development. 1992. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers (71-98).16. Urban-Lurain, Mark, et al
://www.griffith.edu.au/centre/gihe/griffith_graduate/home.html.7. Krajcik, J. S. (2010, April 23). Supporting Students in Developing Literacy in Science. Science, pp. 456-459.8. Chan, V. (2011). Teaching Oral Communication in Undergraduate Science: Are We Doing Enough and Doing it Right? Journal of Learning Design, 71-79.9. Noblitt, L. V. (2010). A comparison of case study and tradition teaching methods for improvement of oral communication and critical thinking skills. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26-32.10. Garber, R. I. (2011, August 14). 20 fears for a new millennium - replacing the 1977 Book of Lists . Retrieved from Joyful Public Speaking: http://joyfulpublicspeaking.blogspot.com/2011/08/20-fears-for-new-millennium
; Teasley, S. D.) 63–82 (American Psychological Assossiation, 1991).7. Adams, R. et al. A community of practice approach to becoming an engineering education re- search professional. in 121st ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. (2014).8. Sattler, B., Carberry, A. R. & Thomas, L. D. Graduate student peer mentoring: A means for creating an engineering education reseracg community. in Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. (2012).9. Jesiek, B. K., Newswander, L. K. & Borrego, M. Engineering Education Research: Discipline, Community, Page 26.1783.14 or Field? J. Eng. Educ. (2009).10. Katehi, L. et al. Development of Graduate Programs
to be employed. That andother additions will soon to be realized.References[1] Sirinterlikci, A., Sirinterlikci, S., Utilizing Rep-Rap Machines in the Engineering Curriculum, 2014 ASEE Annual Conference.[2] Jaksic, N., New Inexpensive 3-D Printers Open Doors to Novel Experiential Learning Practices in Engineering Education, 2014 ASEE Annual Conference.[3] Ertekin, Y., Husanu, C., N.,I., Chiou, R., Konstantinos, J., Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project to Develop a Teaching Tool: Dragon Conductive 3-D Printer, 2014 ASEE Annual Conference.[4]Technology Overview DLP Process.EnvisionTec. http://envisiontec.com/technology-overview/. Accessed on December 31, 2013.[5] DIY DLP Printer. Dimensionext. http://www.dimensionext.co.uk
Engineering Education Conference& Exposition,Annual Conference, 2005.11. Seymour, E., Hewitt, N.(1997) Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. WestviewPress, Boulder, CO12. Ohland, M., Sheppard, S., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., Layton, R., “Persistance, Engagement, andMigration in Engineering Programs” Mechanical Engineering (2008)13. Eris, Ozgur; Chachra, Debbie; Chen, Helen; Sheppard, Sheri D.; Ludlow, Larry; Rosca, Camelia; Bailey, Tori;and Toye, George, "Outcomes of a Longitudinal Administration of the Persistence in Engineering Survey"(2010). 2010. Paper 3.14. Shuman, L., Delaney, C., Wolfe, H., Scalise, A., and Besterfield-Sacre, M., “Engineering Attrition: StudentCharacteristics and Educational Initiatives
. Page 26.40.15References1. Sheppard, S., and R. Jenison. (1997). Examples of Freshman Design Education. International Journal ofEngineering Education 13(4). 248-61.2. Dally, J.W., and G. Zhang. (1991). Experienced in Offering a Freshman Design Course in Engineering.Proceedings of the Conference on New Approaches to Undergraduate Education. July, 1991. Banff, Canada.3. Frank, M., I. Lavy, and D. Elata. (2003). Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an AcademicEngineering Course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13. 273-88.4. Marra, R.M., B. Palmer, and T.A. Litzinger. (2000). The Effects of a First-Year Engineering Design Course onStudent Intellectual Development as Measured by the Perry Scheme. Journal of
Society of Engineering Education, 20124. Anderson, L.W. et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Illinois, 2001.5. Bland, L. “Applying Flip/Inverted Classroom Model in Electrical Engineering to Establish Life-Long Learning,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2006.6. Redekopp, M.W. and Ragusa, G. “Evaluating Flipped Classroom Strategies and Tools for Computer Engineering,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2013.7. Stickel, M., Hari, S., and Liu, Q. “The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students’ Self
. American Society for Engineering Education.3. Jecker, J., N. Maccoby, and H. Breitrose, Improving accuracy in interpreting non verbal cues of comprehension. Psychology in the Schools, 1965. 2(3): p. 239-244.4. Neill, S., Classroom Nonverbal Communication. 1991, London: Routledge. 191.5. Gregersen, T.S., Nonverbal cues: Clues to the detection of foreign language anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 2005. 38(3): p. 388-400.6. Hartley, G. and M. Karinch, I can read you like a book: how to spot the messages and emotions people are really sending with their body language. 2007: Career Press.7. Fisher, D. and N. Frey, Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. 2007: ASCD.8
. pp. 00740-12. 2012. 2012: p. 00740-00712.25. Reidsema, C., S. Wilson, and C. Netherton. Impromptu design as a vehicle for developing team work and problem solving skills in design engineering. in International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 2004.26. Davis, M.L. and S.J. Masten. Design competitions: does “multidisciplinary” contribute to the team building experience? in Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996. FIE'96. 26th Annual Conference., Page 26.100.11 Proceedings of. 1996. IEEE.27. Richards, L.G., et al., Promoting active learning with cases and instructional modules
not come directlyout of the course textbook and/or the lecturer’s notes. Critics of this method say that mostlecturers are incapable of being engaging or even holding their students attention. Some havedescribed this as though the lecturer were reciting a monologue to a room full of inattentive ears. Student’s course grades are mostly determined by homework and exams. Many worrythat students are more likely to focus on rote memorization of formulas and examples, and neverdevelop independent thinking or the foundational understanding. Redish (1994) uses an analogycalled “the dead leaves model”: …it is as if physics were a collection of equations on fallen leaves. One might hold s=1/2g*t^2, another F = m*a, and a third F
,” open source ebook for undergraduate engineering economics, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, August 20162. ABET web site of accredited programs from http://main.abet.org/aps/Accreditedprogramsearch.aspx3. American Society of Engineering Education, 2013 ASEE Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology College, accessed 10 December 2014 at http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/14_443- 474.pdf4. Connor, H., Dench, S. & Bates, P. (2002). Skills dialogue: An assessment of skill needs in engineering, Department for Education and Employment, UK. Retrieved October 15, 2005 from http://www.employment- studies.co.uk/summary/summary.php?id=dfeesd25. Goel, Sanjay
Differential Stirling Engines”, James R, Senft (1996), Moriya Press Page 26.184.11AppendixDocument 1: Syllabus for ME 449 for Spring 2015 # Date Topic Assignment(s) Due Jan. 19 M MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DAY (NO LECTURE) 1 21 W Introduction to the class Lab 22 Th Metrology & Red Permit Seminar 2 26 M Introduction to the Stirling engine 3 28 W Dimensioning and tolerancing Lab 29 Th Green Part Seminar (every student must attend) Red
of the Undergraduate Educational Experience.”Assessing the Value of Research in the Chemical Sciences. National Research Council Report, National Page 26.441.12Academy Press: 73-81. (1998)6. E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni,. “Establishing the Benefits of ResearchExperiences for Undergraduates: First Findings from a Three-Year Study.” Sci. Educ., 88, 493-594.(2004)7. D.W. Mogk, “Undergraduate Research Experiences as Preparation for Graduate Study in Geology,” J.Geological Education, 41:126-128. (1993)8. D. Willis, P. Krueger, and A. Kendrick, “Perceptions, Expectations, and Outcomes of the Third Year ofa Research
performed multiple research projects for several Federal agencies since 1990’s dealing with; power system analysis, physics based modeling, electromagnetic signature, sensorless control, elec- tric machinery, high frequency switching, electromagnetic Interference and ship power systems modeling and analysis. Professor Mohammed has currently active research programs in a number of these areas funded by DoD, the US Department of Energy and several industries. Professor Mohammed is a world renowned leader in electrical energy systems and computational electromagnetics. He has published more than 400 articles in refereed journals and other IEEE refereed International conference records. He also authored a book and several
Page 26.460.9Subsumption Architecture in the 1980’s at MIT. This paradigm for controlling robots wasrevolutionary in its treatment of the three robot primitives - sense, plan, and act, which up untilthat time involved a heavy planning and world modeling component. Behavior based controlprograms did not rely on planning, but they separated the robot’s brain into modular behaviorsthat were triggered by sensor inputs. The output of the behaviors sent commands to the actuators,and these commands could be suppressed by other behaviors. The simplest manner in which tochoose which behavior the robot executes at any time is to list behaviors in an order of priority.The behaviors cooperate in that any behavior can be executed at any time, if the right
Foundation under GrantNos. 1223868 and 1223460.VIII. References1. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Publication. 3rd ed. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association, 2007.2. L. Katehi, G. Pearson and M. Feder, (Eds.), National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2009.3. S. Ellis, Talk to Me, FastPencil Wavecrest, Campbell, CA, 2014.4. K. Egan, An Imaginative Approach to Teaching, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2004.5. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown and
of leadership o Concepts: Motivation, Management Style and Control, Work Organization, Rewards and Appraisals, Appropriate application of both styles• Culture and Climatexxv. Explores the impact that the natural forces of culture and climate have on an organization, particularly those attempting to go through transformational change. o Components of culture: Values, beliefs, myths, traditions, norms o Components of climate: Leadership, organizational structure, history, standards of accountability and behavior, communication, rewards, organizational connectedness, vision and strategy, trust and commitment• Followershipxxvi,xxvii. Mellinger’ s “The Ten Rules of Good Followership
Assessment of Tools, Methods, and Approaches for the 21st Century Security Environment, ISBN: 978-0-309-29871-1, The National Academies Press, 2014.11. DARPA, Open Manufacturing, http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/DSO/Programs/Open_Manufacturing_%28OM%29.aspx, (Accessed, 2015).12. Watson, J., Schomaker, M.G., “Introduction to Cooperative Education-The Course,” Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.13. Rangan, S., Natarajarathinam, M., “How to structure an internship that is great for the intern and the manager?,” 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.14. Ermer, G.E., “The Four Pillars of
). Collaborative Leaning and the “Conversation of Mankind.” CollegeEnglish. Vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 635-6525. Alley, M. (2013). The Craft of Scientific Presentations, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.6. Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., Amos, D.M. (July, 2008). Becoming an Engineer:Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 355-368.7. Adams, S. (November 7, 2004). Retrieved fromhttp://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/00000/0000/600/677/677.strip.sunday.gif Page 26.571.168. The Creative Engineer. (2014). A few common myths about engineers. Retrieved fromhttp
that both Olin and UTEP seek to model, and that partnerships like the UTEP-Olin collaboration are necessary for educating a new kind of engineer. Yet, challenges remain ineducating the broader industry and academic community about E-Lead and its benefits. It is easyfor E-Lead to be misunderstood by potential employers, parents and prospective students. As a Page 26.635.12result, learning from the introduction of Systems Engineering in the 1970’s could benefit how wehelp form our message.Bibliography[1] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2007). Rising Above the Gathering Storm.Retrieved from http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Reports/25575
Page 26.644.18end of camp. This leads to the ability to do paired sample analysis. Here are findings forengineering camps in the summer of 2014. Constructs are formed from multiple questions infour areas of interest, math, science, engineering and technology and 21st Century Skills. Allattitudes tests are paired sample t-tests from pre and post measures of individuals.ElementaryThe S-STEM assessment created by the MISO project3 has four sections, math, science,Engineering/Tech, 21st century skills. Students are asked questions designed to elicit theirattitudes in these areas. A construct composite is made by averaging responses to questions ineach of the four sections. Here answers are averaged for each participant and then pre scoresand
. Guo, J. Kim, and R. Rubin, “How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos,” in Proceedings of the first ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, Atlanta, GA, March 2014.6. Maryland Online, Inc., “Quality Matters Rubric Standards, Fifth Edition, 2014,” Maryland Online, Inc, Annapolis, MD, 2014.7. R.E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001.8. S. Veronikas, and M.F. Shaughnessy, “An interview with Richard Mayer,” Educational Psychology Review. vol. 17, no. 2, Jun 2005.9. J.A. Day, “Investigating Learning with Web Lectures,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, May 2008
of Fuel Cell Science & Technology b) Popular Mechanics c) Wall St. Journal d) Smithsonian Magazine 2. Why is it important to provide proper citations in your papers? a) To avoid plagiarism b) To give the author(s) proper credit for their work c) To prove that your work has a solid, scholarly basis d) All of the above 3. If looking for research on solar energy panels, which search statement would give the most focused results? a) solar energy AND panels b) solar energy panels c) "solar energy panels" d) All options would work equally well 4. When is it appropriate to use Google Scholar to search for research papers or books