that she received. Furtherfunding will come from asking the students, faculty, and staff alliances at the University.Funding can also come from other internal organizations, however these provide minimal funds.Additional funding comes from percentage nights from local food establishments.Best PracticesDespite the difficulties with membership at meetings, the DAC has been successful in helping tobring in speakers and holding events. Further, the DAC has been included in diversity measuresand organizations within the university. Finally, the DAC has spearheaded both physical anddigital accessibility change projects within Virginia Tech and the surrounding community.Purdue University: ASEE Student ChapterBackground and DevelopmentPurdue
Paper ID #18315Longitudinal Study of Changes in Student Motivation and Attitudes in Engi-neeringDr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated
Paper ID #19731Promoting Computational Thinking in children Using AppsMs. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking in differently abled students in informal and formal
, students will acquire an ability to apply the knowledge of control theoriesthey have learned from class to an actual system.For the robot programming course, this system will be used as a good project to carry out. As it isshown in this paper, students will learn not only ROS, but also programming to run various sensorsand actuators along with a vision system. With adequate instructions, we believe students will beable to complete this project in one semester through four separate modules: vision, actuation(servo motors), control, and system integration. Additionally, other relevant topics such as robotdynamics and digital control can also be taught with the system presented in this paper.7. ConclusionThis paper presents a ROS-based solid multi
Paper ID #19345Development of Enhanced Value, Feature, and Stakeholder Views for a Model-Based Design ApproachDr. William A Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Professor of Engineering Management and Associate Dean of Innovation at Rose-Hulman. His teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, quality, manufacturing systems, in- novation, and entrepreneurship. As Associate Dean, he directs the Branam Innovation Center which houses campus competition teams, maker club, and projects. He is currently an associate with IOI Partners, a consulting venture focused on innovation tools and
. While this course uses active learning approaches and team projects, the scope of theircontents distinguish them from similar courses that seek to achieve improved graduation andretention rates. For instance, in this course, soft skills such as technical writing, use of Excel,developing an individual academic plan of study, cooperative education, internships, culturaldiversity, quality, safety, and ethics are covered. Basic technical skills covered include math,mechanical, electrical, and computer engineering technology. The rationale for this course is toexpose students to these subjects and topics before they enroll in core engineering technologycourses such as applied statics.Assessment of learning:While the author plans to conduct this
significantdifferences in visualization skills improvement for the two course offering modalities. Table 1. Topics covered on each one of the offered courses. Institution A ‐ WI B ‐ MI Orthographic Projections S.M. Concepts Auxiliary Views Constructive Solid Geometry Section Views Constraints Dimensioning Orthographic Projections S.M. Concepts Auxiliary Views Constructive Solid Geometry Section
represented by the heights. All four “buildings” are placed on a two-by-four,which is mounted on a set of wheels. Figure 2. Predict: Students are asked to predict the outcome.Students are asked to predict which buildings will sway the most in an “earthquake”, where theearthquake is simulated by the instructor by oscillating the two-by-four base on wheels. Theprediction is done by online polling, where students can observe the class results. In the twoyears (2015 and 2016) that this interactive demonstration was done, the results were similar tothat shown in Figure3. Figure 3. Predict: Students’ online prediction of the demonstration. (2015 poll shown).With Figure 3 projecting on the screen, the instructor then shakes the base with
hands-oninstruction to students on a variety of topics. Each week the program followed a similar pattern,involving a warm-up discussion about a professional from a STEM field, a thematic mainactivity, and a closing portion that encouraged review and reflection. At select points in theprogram, a field trip was incorporated that allowed students to visit university labs, sciencemuseums, or engineering open houses.SEBA Project OutcomesOver the course of the project multiple measures were used to assess student attitudes,engagement, and the overall impact that teaching assistants, parents, and mentors had onstudents’ perspective of STEM. Feedback about the program design, implementation, content,and outcomes was obtained from school staff, parents
that a large percentage of students in engineering programs switch theirmajors in the first two years. A study has reported that retention rates can be improved throughmultiple strategies that include making curriculum changes, moving practical engineeringlaboratories earlier in the curriculum, integrating projects into classes, and other classenhancements1. Another reason given by students who switch to other majors is that teachingapproaches are not suitable for current populations of students who learn and acquire newknowledge quite differently from those of earlier generations2, 3.Several new pedagogical approaches have been proposed to improve engineering education, suchas the use of hands-on tools to change the learning style in the
experience with a traditional lecture, preventing studentsfrom receiving guided practice and providing little motivation to learn. This contradictseducational theory that shows students learn best when shown the usefulness of the material andhow it can impact their lives (3). Numerous inductive or experiential learning techniques exist toaddress these issues, including case-based learning, project-based learning, discovery learning,and more. PBL and JiTT were chosen since these best matched the curriculum goal for studentsto program more in a collaborative setting. Also, correctly incorporating PBL helps studentsdevelop the following skills: 1) flexible knowledge, 2) effective problem solving, and 3) self-directed learning which help promote
Paper ID #18536Enhancing Student Success by Combining Pre-enrollment Risk Predictionwith Academic Analytics DataDr. D. Raj Raman, Iowa State University Raj Raman is Professor in the Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ABE) Department at Iowa State University, where he is also University Education Program Director and Testbed Champion for the NSF Engineering Research Center for Biorenewable Chemicals (CBiRC), Director of Graduate Education for the Interdepartmental Graduate Minor in Biorenewable Chemicals, and Education Programs Co-Leader for the USDA-AFRI project CenUSA Sustainable Production and Distribution of
, George Mason University Colin Reagle joined the Volgenau School of Engineering at George Mason University in 2014, specializ- ing in the area of thermal fluid flows and sustainable energy systems. He brings his extensive background in the subjects to Mason as a boon to the growing mechanical engineering program. He has also taught and conducted postdoctoral research at Virginia Tech including research projects for Solar Turbines, Siemens, Pratt and Whitney, Rolls-Royce, and Honeywell. Reagle has R&D experience as a researcher for Techs- burg, a small engineering services company in Christiansburg, Virginia. His primary focus at Mason has growing the Mechanical Engineering undergraduate program through teaching
projects Problem Solving Recognizes problems and potential challenges in their work Identifies solutions or courses of action and evaluates the costs and benefits of each Makes timely decisions, plans course of action, and carries out action accordingly Communication Oral Communication Clearly conveys information with appropriate purpose & detail Matches communication style with audience Uses listening to effectively respond to others’ input Written Communication Expresses thoughts clearly and
difficult. Unfortunately this resulted in the lowest pass rate ourdepartment had observed in several years at 40%.We found that students, when given multiple test date options, instead of taking the exam earlier,students postponed taking the test until late into the spring quarter. In some instances, ourstudents, feeling the pressure of encroaching graduation and senior design project deadlines,simply went into the test centers and put in little effort. Their motivation was mainly getting thetick mark to ensure they graduated.For our part, because of the continuous dates, we did not offer an organized review session to ourstudents as we had in the past. The timing of these review sessions in the past aimed at preparingstudents for the April exam
a host of instructional strategies andeducators have been significantly lagging in using them[1]. In fact, Henderson and Dancy [7] arguethat the improvement in engineering education lies not in finding more effective instructionalstrategies but in using the proven strategies.This paper describes our attempt to introduce a few RBIS in a rural Indian engineering college.We introduced simple strategies such as using audio-visuals, think-pair-share, formative feedback,problem-based learning in lab sessions, and project-based learning in design courses in a one-dayworkshop. Eighty faculty members, in two batches, attended the workshop, which itself used manyof the above RBIS. The participating faculty members reflected on the strategies in
Paper ID #18531Investigating the Effect of Temperature in RFID TechnologyDr. Tae-Hoon Kim, Purdue University NorthwestDr. Lash B. Mapa, Purdue University Northwest Lash Mapa is a Professor in Industrial/Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue University Calumet (PUC). His undergraduate and graduate degrees are in Chemical Engineering. He has several years’ experience as a Chemical Engineer, Process and Project manager with European and U.S. manufacturing organizations. Currently, he is involved in the MS Technology program at PUC and has managed over thirty lean six sigma projects with manufacturing, service industry
. She works with ASCE’s Committee on Education on issues of importance to the undergraduate and grad- uate level education of civil engineers.Dr. Brock E. Barry PE, U.S. Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is an Associate Professor and Mechanics Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United
. The lectures which introduce and then developthese concepts are usually very detailed and technically dense by necessity. Students often audiorecord these lectures for repeated playback outside of class, but the associated derivations anddiagrams cannot easily be captured unless taken cell phone video during lecture. This solution isnot ideal since picture quality of written or projected imagery can be insufficient, and manyprofessors do not wish to be videotaped during a lecture. This situation has led students toformally request high quality videos (technical content and production values) which can berepeatedly viewed outside of lecture as needed to assist with mastering the material.The objective of the work described in this paper is to
place at the University of Texas,Austin. Also collected from the conference programs were other sections in the ELD programssuch as unconferences, workshops, open forums, tours, and panel sessions.Once the ELD conference programs were located, every entry corresponding to Papers Sessionsand Poster Sessions was searched in the Ei Compendex database, one of the major engineeringbibliographic databases. Ei Compendex was selected for this project because it has a goodcoverage of engineering education field and because it is one of the few databases that indexesarticles of the proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Wedecided to use the descriptive metadata assigned to the documents found in this index. Thefollowing
students in the engineering enrollments. Also, as inprevious studies, most migration out of discipline occurs in the first two years ofenrollment. We also found that among enrolled students, a large number of engineeringstudents (almost 20%) have not declared a major some until later in their studies.1. IntroductionScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) professionals are needed morethan ever; based on economic projections the nation may suffer from a workforce deficit inthese majors if college graduation rates remain the same (Olson & Riordan, 2012). Highereducation, at the same time, and STEM fields, in particular, are aware of this issue andcontinue to identify ways to increase the number of STEM degrees graduates
motivation, affects and learning associated with K-16 science concepts and various instructional contexts (e.g., small groups, project-based learning) utilizing mixed-methods approaches.Dr. Elizabeth McEneaney, University of Massachusetts Dr. McEneaney is Associate Professor in the Department of Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies at the University of Massachusetts - Amherst. She is a former high school mathematics and science teacher, and earned a Ph.D. in Sociology from Stanford University. An associate editor for the Journal of Curriculum Studies, she has research interests in equity and access to STEM Education, and the influence of globalization on STEM curricula. c American Society
daily Homework-12% assignments (short Free response Attendance- 3%(2003-2005) quizzes, assigned Final Exam- 25%Calculus 5th Edition problems, short(Stewart 2002) writing assignments, No additional problem passing conditions presentations, or projects)SCALE-UP (2006-2013)The SCALE-UP (student centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs)instructional model was implemented in Fall 2006. This method encourages active learning andminimizes lecture time in the classroom. Beichner et al. (2007
that students often feel as they try tomake a final decision about which graduate program is the best option.In the end, the best choice is often the graduate program that “feels right” to the student: theplace where they found multiple connections and diverse opportunities, with strong support foryour academic, personal and financial goals. When faced with a choice between the “perfect”research project and the “perfect” faculty advisor, it is wise to remember that the mentoringrelationship is critical to success in graduate school – while projects come and go, the support ofa good mentor can have a much longer impact on your academic and professional success.References[1] “How to Make the Final Grad School Enrollment Decision | Applying to
develop a comprehensive program to extrapolate the cost effectiveanalyses of using these materials in construction and developing an environmental friendlyalternative. This research will also document any existing methods available in applying the costeffectiveness of different projects involving Supplementary cementitious materials (SCM). Acomparison among different SCM including concrete projects are analyzed for economy andenvironmental impact.This research is focusing on waste SCM and concrete management for optimizing theconstruction costs. The ways for reducing the greenhouse gases (GHG) are one of the assumedbenefits of this research. The future research can be in developing an ecofriendly concrete withgreater strength and durability with
miss important points in a traditionallecture setting, which is an instructor-centered, relatively passive method of learning. Whilelecturing still remains an effective and important way of conveying knowledge, it is critical toget students engaged in active learning through activities such as solving problems, working witheach other, asking questions and getting feedback.To enhance student learning in Statics, researchers at various institutions have explored othermethods for teaching Statics, such as developing concept map and quantifying students’conceptual understanding[1, 2], developing on-line homework or learning modules[3, 4], peer-led-team-learning[5], project-based learning[6], emporium-based course delivery[7]. Among them
to recover the precious metals from e-wastes and use in the same ordifferent industries as raw secondary materials. In order to address some of the e-waste concerns,our research team collected the gold plated connectors, components, pins and transistors in themotherboard, peripheral component interconnect board, random access memory, and processor.After the collection process, dissolution, precipitation and melting processes were applied torecover the gold from the e-waste. This will certainly allow a sustainable growth in electronicindustries. One BS student was involved in this project and used these research activities for hisEngineer of 2020 requirements. We believe that these studies can greatly benefit undergraduateengineering students
about the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Dr. Bell also conducts research and develops resources for integrating technology into science teaching. Dr. Bell has maintained strong ties to public schools through a variety of collaborative projects. Most recently, he completed a 28 million-dollar US DOE-funded I3 project designed to provide research-based professional development to Virginia’s elementary and secondary science teachers. The author of more than 170 articles, chapters and books, Randy currently serves as Associate Dean of Academics and Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Oregon State University. c American Society for Engineering Education
engineers. Peers slept in the residence halls,ate, and participated in activities with the girls in four teams of about ten each. In all, generallyabout 25 staff and volunteers (75% of them women) have helped in some way, each year. Acrosseleven years, the total volunteer base has grown to more than 200 individuals who havesupported the program in some way, including students, community members, and members ofthe regional workforce. The camp is offered over a two-day period, with an overnightexperience. Activities span a spectrum of topics, designed to engage participants in projects thatrequire them to “think like an engineer” such as: • The Prosthetic Hand problem – using only given materials, design a 3-finger prosthetic hand that can
suited for online delivery also include: greenscreen techniques, interactive video and software tools from the internet marketing niche tocapture and engage students6.During 2016 Summer Quarter, the set of videos provide a technical foundation made up of aseries of short mini-lectures (usually lasting between 5 to 10 minutes for each video) followed bya series of short assessments to verify and validate student understanding using Google Docs.Video recordings on the use of engineering tools such as Matlab/Simulink, Labview/Multisim,PhET and Algodoo software, can serve as examples to show key concepts. The video instructioncan also include demonstrations of real-world applications. For example, in the capstone designcourses and projects, students