Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Wade Goodridge, Utah State University; Assad Iqbal, Utah State University

delivered in the REU were useful (0%) (9%) (36%) (55%) The workshops conducted during Phase 1 were well-designed 0 1 3 7 9 and delivered (0%) (9%) (27%) (64%) 0 0 1 10 10 I would recommend this REU experience to a friend (0%) (0%) (9%) (91%) The faculty research mentor(s) were helpful in facilitating my 0 0 1 10 11 research experience (0

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sharon Miller, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Steven Higbee, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis

impact design solutions and to provideevidence of these perceptions for the larger biomedical engineering educator community.AcknowledgmentsResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of BiomedicalImaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health under Award NumberR25EB031389. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarilyrepresent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.References[1] M. Kotche, A. E. Felder, K. Wilkens, and S. Stirling, “Perspectives on Bioengineering Clinical Immersion: History, Innovation, and Impact,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02508-x.[2] J. Kadlowec, T. Merrill, S. Sood, J. G. Ryan, A

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy Ernst, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide; Brenda Brand, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Xiao Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

-Efficacy in ResearchMeasure (SERM-S), research autonomy was measured through the Attitudes Toward ResearchScale (ATRS), and social support networks were measured through the Multidimensional Scaleof Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). The SERM-S was administered pre- and post-cohort year,the ATRS was administered pre- and post-cohort year, and the MSPSS was administered pre-and post-cohort year. The SERM-S contains 32 items centered on confidence with a scaleranging from 0 (no confidence) to 9 (total confidence), the ATRS contains 32 level of agreementitems with a scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), and the MSPSSconsists of 12 level of agreement items with a scale ranging from 1 (very strongly disagree) to 7(very strongly

Conference Session

ERM: Persistence and Attrition in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyeonghun Jwa, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University

longitudinal research.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1844878. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the National Science Foundation.Reference[1] National Academies, Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press, 2018.[2] Council of Graduate Schools, “Ph . D . Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Data,” 2008.[3] R. Sowell, J. Allum, and H. Okahana, “Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion,” 2015.[4] T. M. Bluestein, C. T. Amelink, and M. S. Artiles, “Campus climate for

Collection

2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Paul J Marchese, City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; Deborah Hecht, Center for Advanced Studyin Education

disabilitiesapproximately 40,000 students with disabilities at CUNY. 4 in science and engineering: 2017 digest. Special Report NSF, 17-310. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311 Okoro CA, Hollis ND, Cyrus AC, Griffin-Blake S. Prevalence of Disabilities and Health Care Access by Disability Status and Type Among

Collection

2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University

previously served on the executive leadership team to establish theASEE Faculty Development Division and served as the division’s Program Chair for the 2018,2019, and 2020 annual ASEE Conferences. Her primary research interests include facultydevelopment, the peer review process, the doctoral experience, and the adoption of evidence-basedteaching strategies. In her free time, Stephanie enjoys reading sci. fi. and fantasy books, kayaking,walking her dog, snuggling her dog, and playing video games.References:Velegol, S. B., Zappe, S. E., & Mahone, E. (2015). The Evolution of a Flipped Classroom:Evidence-Based Recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(3), 1-37.Zappe, S. E., Leicht, R., Messner, J., & Litzinger, T. (2009). “Flipping

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 11 Empathy and Human-Centered Design 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelley Dugan, University of Michigan; Shanna Daly, University of Michigan; Charlie Michaels, University of Michigan; Steve Skerlos, University of Michigan; Ann Verhey-Henke, University of Michigan

SpecificationDevelopment, Conceptual Design, Detailed Design, Delivery, Service/Maintenance,Redesign/Retirement with iteration arrows within each phase [24]. From the visualrepresentation alone, we see consideration of people explicit with the inclusion of the word“Stakeholders” boxed-in within the center of the circle. Furthermore, consideration of users isexplicit with the inclusion of “User Analysis”, “User Training”, and “Usability Testing.” Adeeper dive into the text description of this EPICS Design Process [25] reveals thatunderstanding and describing the social context of community partner(s) is embedded with the“Project Identification” and “Specification Development” phases. Again, we aim to makeconsideration of context more explicit in this SED Process

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University; Jeffrey Radloff; Cristina Diordieva, Nanyang Technological University

and 4.1 billion SGD towards investments in fixed assets withinthe engineering clusters, including electronics and chemicals, respectively. Furthermore, thecountry’s commitment to the United Nation (UN)’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Developmentinvolves, amongst other benchmarks, developing a city in nature, increasing sustainable living,and building a green economy. Solar energy, an expansion of existing rail networks, and thedesign of low carbon alternatives, green buildings, and sustainable infrastructure are all keygrowth sectors that Singapore will increasingly attend to in the near future, demonstrating theneed for engineering expertise. Singapore: The Nation’s School System and Engineering Education Contrary to its central

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session: New and Innovative Technologies in Aerospace

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chadia A. Aji, Tuskegee University; M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University

=10.3389/frvir.2021.645153 [Accessed on Jan. 2022].[2] F. D. Rose, E. A. Attree, B. M. Brooks, D. M. Parslow, P. R. Penn, and N. Ambihaipahan,“Transfer of training from virtual to real environments,” Ergonomics, Vol 43(4), May 2000. pp494-511.[3] S. Grassini, K. Laumann, and S. M. Rasmussen. “The Use of Virtual Reality Alone Does NotPromote Training Performance (but Sense of Presence Does),” Frontiers in Psychology, Vol 11,2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01743[4] T.W. Hsu et al., "Design and Initial Evaluation of a VR based Immersive and InteractiveArchitectural Design Discussion System," IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D UserInterfaces (VR), 2020. pp. 363-371. doi: 10.1109/VR46266.2020.00056.[5] R. Schroeter, and M. A. Gerber. “A

Conference Session

PCEE Session 4: Resource / Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Latanya Robinson, Florida International University; Emily Dare, Florida International University

Suggested Lesson Planning Prompts How does the inclusion of selected content area(s) assist students with understanding the connections between the disciplines? What real-world problem or design challenge explicitly connects to what students are learning? Example: Architectural Engineers use the exposed surface area (mathematics) of a building compared to its volume (mathematics) to help design energy-efficient buildings (context through a design challenge). A building's shape is important because heat is lost through the building's outer faces. Heat is transferred by conduction (science) through solids like walls, floors, and the roof. The larger the area of outer faces the more thermal energy (science) is lost. Engineering

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 10: Empathy and Human-centered Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Imane Aboutajedyne, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University; Ahmed Aboutajeddine, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University; Yassine Salih Alj, Al Akhawayn University; Shawn Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

Akhawayn University in Ifrane (AUI), Morocco. He has published over 50 publications and has been actively involved in IEEE events for the past five years, where he chaired and served as Technical Program Member or as distinguished reviewer for over 100 conferences. His research interests are in the areas of Wireless Communications, Indoor Positioning, UWB (Ultra-Wideband), Digital System Implementation, GPS (Global Positioning System) and Engineering Education.Shawn S. Jordan (Associate Professor) Shawn Jordan is an associate professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use

Conference Session

LEES Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie Wint

. The use of accreditation panels thus provides another example of the way in whichknowledge is preserved by those in power and there is a need to involve people with a varietyof perspectives and experiences within accreditation panels [56].LOs are typically enforced by the structures and systems present within HE, for example byorganization of knowledges into distinct modules timetabled in isolation from one another.This can be considered to result in compartmentalized of knowledge. The formation of ‘silos’tends to restrict the use of knowledge to within specific domains and “limit(s) opportunitiesfor them (students) to learn about the strengths and limitations [of disciplines] in real-worldcontexts and multidisciplinary arenas” [62]. This, of

Conference Session

Technical Session 8 - Paper 3: Academic Success of College Students with ADHD: The First Year of College

Collection

2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)

Authors

Laura Carroll, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Stephen L DesJardins

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

in an academic support program(ACADSUPP; 0=no, 1=yes). We operationalize belongingness in out-of-class experiences withthe sense of belonging construct (SENSE_BELONG; continuous) and a variable measuring thefrequency of students’ interactions with close friends at their college (FRIENDS; 0=twice a termor less, 1=one to two times a month, 2=at least weekly).Table 2Model components (and related construct [28]) and survey items [26], [27] Model components Item/s (construct or survey) Precollege characteristics & experiences Gender Sex of respondent; Survey choices: Female, Male Financial resources Parents’ income

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Siqing Wei, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Matthew Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

toproviding team experiences with a consistent peer evaluation process does have a significantimpact. Thus our findings provide support for a more comprehensive teamwork education forengineering students involving multiple experiences that are consistently managed, arecommendation supported by others [28]–[30].References[1] S. B. Parumasur, “The Importance of Teamwork, Continuous Top Management Support and Training in Bringing About TQM,” J. Econ. Behav. Stud., 2013.[2] A. A. Ghaferi and J. B. Dimick, “Importance of teamwork, communication and culture on failure-to-rescue in the elderly,” British Journal of Surgery. 2016.[3] B. Gummer, “Go team go!: The growing importance of teamwork in organizational life,” Adm. Soc. Work

Conference Session

ERM: Let's Continue the Conversation about Tests! Part 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gibin Raju, University of Cincinnati; Sheryl Sorby, University of Cincinnati; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Clodagh Reid, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest; Luke Fisher, University of Cincinnati

real time feedback to alleviate cognitiveload, increasing flexibility and personalization of the learning and teaching process.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation in the U. S. undergrants number DRL-1535307 (PI: Perez) and DRL-1818758 (PI: Sorby). Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References[1] L. L. Thurstone, Primary mental abilities, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.[2] J. Schneider and K. S. McGrew, "The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities.," in Contemporary Intellectual

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Perkins, Wichita State University; Adam Carberry, Arizona State University; Samantha Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1997. doi: 10.17226/5789.[4] E. C. Carey and D. E. Weissman, “Understanding and Finding Mentorship: A Review for Junior Faculty,” J. Palliat. Med., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1373–1379, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0091.[5] A. H. Farkas, E. Bonifacino, R. Turner, S. A. Tilstra, and J. A. Corbelli, “Mentorship of Women in Academic Medicine: a Systematic Review,” J. Gen. Intern. Med., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1322–1329, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04955-2.[6] K. E. Foote and M. N. Solem, “Toward better mentoring for early career faculty: results of a study of US geographers

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rustin Webster, Purdue University, New Albany; Joseph Ottway

, MT, NV, OR, UT, WA, WYResultsThe descriptive research study surveyed 780 individuals (643 CSWPs and 137 CSWEs) locatedwithin the United States, of which 193 (24.74%) provided some feedback (answering allquestions was not mandatory) and met all inclusion criteria. The respondents were primarilyeducated (unlicensed) white males between the age of 26 to 54, who worked for corporations ingeneral engineering fields (see Table 2). Figure 1 shows the diversity and number ofcertifications held by the respondents and Figure 2 shows approximately when respondentsattempted a SOLIDWORKS certification exam(s).Results show that 88.89% of respondents perceive that, in general, a SOLIDWORKScertification is valuable (i.e., has relative worth, utility, or

Conference Session

ERM: Persistence and Attrition in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Gabriella Sallai, Pennsylvania State University

are first-generation low-income students [18],[29], [30]. Participant selection will also be based on open-ended responses from the survey, particularlythose we are likely to glean the most information about our study [31].The design of the interview protocol will be influenced by Liddell et al.'s Survey of Early CareerSocialization in Student Affairs used in their study of professional identity [32]. The semi-structuredinterviews will be conducted online via Zoom and recorded before the audio files are professionallytranscribed and analyzed in NVIVO. We will employ a constructivist phenomenological approach whenexamining the data to explore how participants interpreted their experiences and characterize theirpreparation and persistence in

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Allan Estuardo Rodas, Raytheon Company; Kai Ren, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

/S) transition, software-defined radio, through-the-wall radarimaging (TWRI)I.INTRODUCTION Materials common in construction are reinforced concrete or cement-based materials.Occasionally, these materials naturally develop cracks due to deterioration throughout their lifecycle. The detection of cracks, erosion, voids, and gaps in walls and structural supports is criticalin preventing structural failures. Microwave-based, non-invasive techniques such as Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) are preferred to detect structural anomalies since there is no impacton the integrity of the structure or material due to the penetration ability of microwaves intodielectric materials. Current NDT equipment have several limitations and drawbacks, such asbeing

Conference Session

Technical Session M4C

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Clodagh Reid, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest; Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati; Gibin Raju, University of Cincinnati; Niall Seery, Technological University of the Shannon

Tagged Topics

Workshops

. Policy Pract., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 281–300, 2012, doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2012.665354.[3] D. Canty, N. Seery, E. Hartell, and A. Doyle, “Integrating Peer Assessment in Technology Education through Adaptive Comparative Judgment,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320299812[4] S. R. Bartholomew, G. J. Strimel, and E. Yoshikawa, “Using adaptive comparative judgment for student formative feedback and learning during a middle school design project,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 363–385, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10798-018-9442-7.[5] G. J. Strimel, S. R. Bartholomew, S. Purzer, L. Zhang, and E. Yoshikawa Ruesch, “Informing engineering design through adaptive

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen Dietz, University of Florida; Elliot Douglas, University of Florida; Erica McCray, University of Florida

their intelligence andSTEM identity. Maya described that being the only one created heightened awareness and lesscomfort than her white coworkers. Like Walton et al.’s study, lack of diversity in a professionalsetting detracted from a sense of belonging in the workplace [54].Authenticity was also experienced when the interns had a strong commitment to their racialidentity, or internalization of their identity. Similar to Helms and Piper, as people of Colordevelop and grow in their careers, racial identity is internalized and there is “positive racial-group commitment, humanistic orientation, and internally defined racial attributes” [57, p. 127].Stanley and Evie showed strong commitments to their identities and were agents within theirworkplace

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 1: Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity (DEI)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Young, The Ohio State University; David Delaine

risk factors for persistence of American Indian students and retention of non-American Indian teachers in reservation schools,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 2017.[16] C. H. Foster and S. S. Jordan, “A philosophy of learning engineering and a Native American philosophy of learning; An analysis for congruency,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014.[17] I. Anderson and S. S. Jordan, “Engineering connections in a Native American community and culture,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018.[18] D. Luecke et al., “Efforts to improve mathematical preparation for a pre-engineering

Conference Session

Understanding Inclusivity and Equity in STEM Contexts: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria Bill, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Julie Martin, The Ohio State University

: “In general, the studies did not take a critical stance on how engineering knowledge is constructed, who participates in engineering, and who decides who becomes an engineer. In terms of critical pedagogy, few studies questioned how to empower students of color (e.g., concientização) or considered taking action and working alongside the students (e.g., praxis) to de-colonize and re-inhabit their spaces, including all of these different domains that students of color inhabit” (pp. 157-158).In a similar vein, Patrick et al.’s state-of-the-art review of papers claiming to use critical methodsin STEM education found that many articles mentioned using a critical theory at the beginningbut did not follow through by

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Stwalley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Grace Baldwin; Virginia Booth-Womack, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Sarah Larose; Carol Stwalley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Students and Developing Professional Support NetworksIntroduction The Purdue University Rising Scholars program was initially funded in 2016 by NSF S-STEM#1644143 Rising Scholars: Web of Support Used as an Indicator of Success in Engineering. Theterm ‘Rising Scholars’ has come to represent the strata of the population that are of low socio-economic status (SES) striving to complete a collegiate education (Kent State University, 2021;Stanford University, 2020). The current collegiate entrance metrics favored by many well-regarded state institutions for their STEM programs have certain gateway values, and in general,do not select equitably across many notable factors, including gender; race; ethnicity; first-time,full-time status; and low-SES

Conference Session

PCEE Session 11: Engineering Outreach / Summer Programs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Tang, Western Carolina University; Nelson Granda Marulanda, Western Carolina University; JennieV. Sorrells, Western Carolina University; Robert Pierce, Western Carolina University

work on any n- 3D cars - projects10:00: S ON SET- S ON SET- Brainstorm Printing, Build a Scott00 AM UP AND UP AND ing Robot simple- 11:00 TEACH TEACH Solutions Programm THEM TO THEM TO circuitAM ing DO THE DO THE ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES LUNCH LUNCH11:00: . . - Former - Faculty

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Darby Riley, Rowan University; Jacob Troutman, University of Texas at Austin

majordifferences between coping networks of students who are able to successfully manage stress versusthose who are not able to? To answer these questions, we surveyed graduate engineering studentsat a mid-sized Mid-Atlantic institution. The survey consists of three major sections: (1) thePerceived Stress Questionnaire (S. Levenstein, et al. J. Psychosom. Res., vol 37, no. 1, pp. 19-32,1993.), which is a validated instrument that assesses an individual's perceived stress level, (2) asection for respondents to identify and rank major sources of stress, and (3) a section forrespondents to identify and rank major coping strategies. The survey identified research, grades,and issues relating to mental health as major stressors for all groups, and people

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Genovesi, Drexel University; Ian Marcus, Drexel University; Kimberly Sterin, Drexel University; Dominique Thomas, Drexel University

applying a holistic-content narrative analysis [70] to each interview,focus group, or journal. Next, we employ open coding which gleans from elemental methods:descriptive, in vivo, and process coding and affective methods: emotion, values, and evaluationto identify emerging patterns in the data [73]. Then, we apply axial coding to identify subthemes[74] and thereafter, group themes and sub-themes across all interviews and focus groups,formulate meaning through the clustering of themes [69], which will ultimately lead to theemergence of key findings.Research FindingsPreliminary Findings with EngWINS ParticipantsQuantitative Findings:Descriptive statistics from the S-STEM Pre (n=15) and Post (n=11) Surveys were calculated, asdisplayed in Table 3 and

Conference Session

Unassigned (6 available)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill Heemstra, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Luis Rodriguez; Anna-Maria Marshall, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Erin Cortus, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; John Classen, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Jacek Koziel, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Alison Deviney

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 14: Introductory Programming Assessment, Plagiarism, Motivation, Engagement, and Textbooks

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

P.K. Imbrie, University of Cincinnati; Jeff Kastner, University of Cincinnati; Dylan Ryman, University of Cincinnati

test a substantiallygreater number of mutations and samples when compared to this work. However, the results inCheers et al. are unable to answer this paper’s research question because the purpose of Cheers etal.’s work is to measure similarity robustness in isolation, and does not attempt to evaluatedetection correctness [15, Sec. 4.1]. The gap between the work of Cheers et al. and this paper’sresearch question is filled by the development of the sensitivity preservation metric that considersonly the similarity robustness that is a result of correctly detected plagiarism. Additionally,Cheers et al. note that “...the interpretation of the second comparative metric poses a threat to thevalidity of results in this work. As discussed, it is not a

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - Innovative Teaching Strategies II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Moorehouse, United States Military Academy

and rds. AY AY ta, d th th ions. tud c nda to s ent nati . Deve tion EV310 Aquatic Science