first module coversMEMS / NEMS devices / sensors with applications. Module I course outcomes, lecturetopics and sample course project titles are outlined in Tables 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Table 2: Module I Course Outcomes Module I - Upon successful completion of the course, students should be able to: 1. Learn the features of the smart materials from nanoscale microscales [a] 2. Apply both types of materials into MEMS/NEMS [c, e] 3. Design for integrated sensor systems [c] Table 3: Module I Lecture Topics Module I - Lecture Topics No. of Lectures 1. An overview on semiconductors and nanomaterials 1 lecture 2
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics and the Learning Sciences and Technologies at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work In Progress: Toward an understanding of strategies used in open-ended programming tasksIntroductionProgramming education is an increasingly common part of first year engineering curriculum.1However, the success of these efforts are fraught with challenges, both because teachingprogramming is hard in general,2 and goals and motivations for learning
of the social high-speeddevelopment. In the same sense, the curriculum arrangement of engineering majors inundergraduate level practical teaching mainly consists of cognition practice, productivepractice, graduation practice, curriculum design and graduation project, among others.1 Beingthe significant component of practical teaching process carried out by engineeringuniversities, productive practice is recognized as the effective measure for consolidating anddeepening the professional basic theory, boosting engineering students’ abilities to linktheory with practice and to deal with practical problems, as well as optimizing the students’engineering practical abilities.Productive practice is a course which closely integrates classroom
perceived group roles in the context of first-year engineering courses, weexplored female students’ learning experience in a group project setting in this work-in-progress using Benne and Sheats’ functional roles model. Based on our qualitativedata, we found that female students performed a range of roles in the group project. Inthe dimension of task roles, female students usually took the roles of assistants, opiniongiver, coordinators and initiator-managers. In the dimension of social roles, femalesserved as harmonizers, followers or gatekeepers. As to the dimension of individual roles,some female students self-reported the feeling of being an outsider in working with aproject group. Suggestions were proposed to promote engineering curriculum
collaboration will have a breakthrough due in part because compactand easy-to-use CoBots will drive the market (Executive Summary World Robotics, 2016). WithCoBots expected impact on productivity and workers’ safety (Ding et al., 2013; Akella et al.,1999), it is imperative that higher education institutions incorporate this technology into learningprograms for a career-ready workforce.This paper describes an advanced, industry-driven, hands-on learning environment andeducational curriculum focused on collaborative robotics and the integration of the technologyinto advanced manufacturing systems. A hand-on CoBot learning environment has been and iscurrently being created, which will be incorporated into three different courses at Wayne StateUniversity
) activities for institutions of higher education in Delaware, the District ofColumbia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. VirginIslands [10], is also requiring universities to publish the results of licensure exams on theiruniversity websites, starting in 2017 [11]. The revision is part of MSCHE Standard II on Ethicsand Integrity [12]. These two developments in 2017 will assist researchers in engineering education as datawill become readily available to track the progress of first time exam takers and repeat examtakers.Conclusions This paper described and discussed the results of an experiment that was conducted bythe author in a course that trains mechanical engineering students to pass the
. Karla Hamlen is an Associate Professor of Educational Research in the Department of Curriculum and Foundations. She specializes in educational research relating to both formal and informal entertainment technology use among students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Integrating Computer Engineering Lab Using Spiral Model1. Introduction 1.1 Motivation Recent engineering education studies call for change to enhance student learning and tobetter prepare graduates to meet the new challenge 1,2,3. A good engineer should have a deepunderstanding of a domain and can apply the knowledge to solve problems 4. This requires twotypes of practices – the “component skill,” which is the
University of Rhode Island (URI) participated inspring 2016 along with eleven other engineering schools. Since the cross-institutional evaluationis still on-going, we can only provide a small segment of the cross-institutional results. Part IIattempts to explain why those results may have come out the way they did for URI – what kind ofinternational programming inherent in the engineering curriculum at URI may differentiate it fromothers in the sample? The main set-up and design of international engineering programming at theuniversity will be described as background in front of which the NSF results ought to be examined.Within the context of part II we will furthermore present the outcome of an IDI assessment usedfor a short-term travel course in
Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineer- ing and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a National Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty devel- opment, curricular change processes, curriculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and the general chair for the 2009 conference. Prof
in different context and at different levels. As aresult some of the acquired knowledge may be forgotten by the time student graduates or it maynot be placed in the context of the overall program outcomes, thus material presented may notseem to have relevance to student’s career. An effective method to address this issue is arequired capstone course that combines a number of different disciplines into a singlecomprehensive experience. In addition to required capstone experience, authors havecollaborated in development of an elective course on modeling and simulation of mechatronicsystems. The course introduces modern computer tools and techniques which integrates numberof different areas including statics, strength of materials, dynamics
-Learning at Benedictine College in Atchison, Kansas. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Integration of Critical Reflection Methodologies into Engineering Service- Learning Projects: A Case-StudyAbstractThis paper focuses on a case study utilizing critical reflection methodologies in an engineering,service-learning course at a small, liberal arts college. The college started the engineeringdepartment in 2009. As a new program, the department has been working to accredit programsin four disciplines: chemical, civil, electrical, and mechanical engineering. The department isdesigning the degree programs to take advantage of the Catholic, liberal arts mission of thecollege. The
Paper ID #18404Developing Integrated Standards for Systematic Civil Engineering CourseDesignProf. Jim Morgan, Charles Sturt University Jim Morgan is the father of two daughters and the spouse of an engineer. Before joining Charles Sturt University as Professor of Engineering and Inaugural Course Director in 2015, he was on the faculty in civil engineering at Texas A&M for over 30 years. Jim was active in the freshman engineering program at A&M for nearly 20 years; was an active participant in the NSF Foundation Coalition from 1993 to 2003; also has received funding for his engineering education research from the
Paper ID #20575Work in Progress: Curriculum Revision and Classroom Environment Re-structuring to Support Blended Project-Based Learning in First-Year Gen-eral Engineering Laboratory CoursesProf. Brandon B. Terranova, Drexel University Dr. Terranova is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the College of Engineering at Drexel University. In his current role, he is the lead instructor for the freshman engineering program, and oversees activities in the Innovation Studio, a large-area academic makerspace. He has taught and developed courses in general engineering and mechanical engineering at Drexel. Prior to Drexel, he has taught
Paper ID #17774Employing Applied Creativity and the Engineering Design Process in the De-velopment of K-12 STE(A)M Curriculum (Work in Progress)Mr. Brett Doudican, University of Dayton Brett Doudican is the curriculum coach of the Ohio Miami Valley NSF RET program. He also is a full time math teacher and department chair at the Dayton Early College Academy, an urban school sponsored by the University of Dayton. Brett is involved in multiple levels of education from the Ohio Department of Education to teaching course to new teachers in alternative certification programs to managing a small curriculum and professional
. The theory of the circuits was discussed along with theanticipated results. The learning objectives for the project were presented, as were the ABEToutcomes that would be satisfied. Post lesson student comments and ideas for additional studentactivities, and alternate assignments were also provided.REFERENCES[1] Kuh, G. D., “High Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who has Access to Them, and Why they matter, AAC&U, 2008.[2] Zhan, W., Wang, J., Vanajakumari,, M., “High impact activities to improve student learning”, 120th ASEE Annual conference, June 2013.[3] Parker, R., Buchanan, W. Circuit Simulators and Computer Algebra- An integrated Curriculum for Electronics Students, Proceedings of 1996, ASEE Annual Conference
presented by safety experts, librarians, architects,and students. Faculty members from high schools, community colleges and universitiesparticipated in the symposium. Multiple papers addressed making and its role in collegeadmissions, highlighting another key aspect of academic makerspaces.The symposium included the following papers and presentations from institutions outside theUnited States: Best Practices for a Newly Established Academic Makerspace in a Nascent Maker Ecosystem (Pakistan) Using Makerspaces to Develop Didactic Models for Mechanical Engineering (Guatemala) Development of an Educational Program Using Capabilities of an Academic Makerspace (Austria) SNU Idea Factory with Integrative
authorities and someschools have realized that the traditional teaching models cannot meet the needs of industrialupgrading and development. Novel teaching model emphasizes demand decision, valueorientation, comprehensive engineering training, and overall reform of curriculum system.At the national level, the “National Medium and Long Term Education Reform andDevelopment Plan (2010-2020)” presented a major education and teaching reform program -program to educate and train excellent engineers (Excellence Plan), which was officiallylaunched in June 2010. "Excellence Plan" is an important measure for China's engineeringeducation to serve the national development strategy in the new period. The task is to focuson "industry guidance, school-enterprise
, National Institute of Fashion Technology Working as Assistant Professor in National Institute of Fashion Technology, Chennai. Having 11 years of experience in Teaching.Published International paper on the topic ’ Improving the Quality of Teaching- Learning Process in Design Education’. Ph.D scholar in National Institute of Technical Teachers Training & Research,Chennai,India. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Quality of Education and its Challenges in Developing CountriesAbstract In today’s competitive environment with globalization and GATS (Global Agreement onTrade in Service) drive for quality becomes an important
study. Of the 70 students, 7 identified as female (10%) and 3 wereinternational students (~4.3%). Twenty-five students (~35.7%) noted having completed a designcourse at another point in their undergraduate curriculum, while 44 students (~63%) describedhaving industry experience, either through a co-op or internship.The objective of the year-long design course sequence, as defined in the syllabus, is to providestudents experience in conceptual design, including integrating methods for vehicle sizing,configuration selection and layout determination, propulsion system design, vehicle performanceanalysis and cost analysis. The focus of this study is data collected in the first semester of thedesign sequence. During the first semester, the course
EngineeringPrograms, 2016 – 2017,” accessed February 2, 2017, http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/.3. Rachel Callison, Dan Budny, and Kate Thomes, “Library Research Project for First-Year EngineeringStudents: Results from Collaboration by Teaching and Library Faculty,” The Reference Librarian 43, no.89–90 (2005): 93–106; H. Nerz and Lisa Bullard, “The Literate Engineer: Infusing Information LiteracySkills throughout an Engineering Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2006 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006; Honora F. Nerz and Suzanne T. Weiner,“Information Competencies: A Strategic Approach,” in Proceedings of the 2001 American Society
andproblem solution, we designed an exam to assess the ability of engineering students to thinkcomprehensively and broadly about a novel scenario with both technical and non-technicaldimensions. In addition to providing comprehensive data about what the STS program adds tothe engineering education of all students who pass through our program, we wanted to moreprecisely articulate what constitutes excellence in sociotechnical analysis of the type we prepareour students to do. Having extensively assessed all of the non-technical ABET outcomes at alllevels of our curriculum, we were eager to know whether the sum was more than the whole of itsparts, in other words, what students could do when they applied their knowledge to the kind ofsituation they
designed as an integrated module, sufficient information and guidance is provided to enable instructors to incorporate individual units, activities, and components of activities into courses. And this was demonstrated by pilot testing individual and sets of lessons. Based on student feedback from the pilot tests, the team project was identified as the most important element of the module for helping students to understand the interconnections among geosciences and engineering in water sustainability. After additional reflection on the process, the professor team noted the following lessons learned about collaborative curriculum development: Collaborative development
mixed reality. This course will considerably improve CM students’understanding of BIM as a process instead of a modeling tools or software program andsignificantly broaden their insights into BIM beyond the existing 3D, 4D, and 5D applications.This paper will serve as a case study of an advanced level BIM course in CM programs.IntroductionThe rapid adoption of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the architecture, construction,and engineering (AEC) industry has led to an increasing integration of BIM into constructionmanagement (CM) programs in the U.S. Offering new BIM courses is one popular approach thatmany CM programs have employed to incorporate BIM contents into their curriculum. Whileintroducing BIM in new courses is an effective
State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr
constraint is to introduce sustainablematerial concepts into an existing core course while maintaining the original course objectives.Therefore, the aim of the proposed study is to integrate sustainability concepts in the ConstructionMaterials course through an innovative term project (called as Green Concrete) dealing with thecreative use of recycled materials in concrete. Green Concrete project covers one of the majortopics of sustainable construction which is building infrastructure using materials which canreduce the impact on the environment.Background of Sustainable ConstructionSustainable construction indicates that buildings are well designed, constructed, operated and thendemolished in an environmentally friendly and energy efficient manner
Paper ID #17833Integral Concept and Decision Making: Do the STEM Majors Know Whento Use Numerical Methods for Integral Approximation?Dr. Emre Tokgoz, Quinnipiac University Emre Tokgoz is currently an Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering at Quinnipiac University. He completed a Ph.D. in Mathematics and another Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at the Univer- sity of Oklahoma. His pedagogical research interest includes technology and calculus education of STEM majors. He worked on several IRB approved pedagogical studies to observe undergraduate and graduate mathematics and engineering students’ calculus
. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech (VT). Benitez seeks to understand how to best instruct and assess ethical reasoning of engineering practices and engineering responsibilities, including wildlife and humanity, in our definitions of public good. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Self-Authorship and Reflective Practice in an Innovation MinorAbstract This project describes a minor in Innovation that is being introduced in an engineeringdepartment as a part of a new general education curriculum initiative. The minor connects threeexisting courses from different colleges to form the core course sequence. The theories of self-authorship1 and reflective practice 2
Paper ID #19053Implementing Hands-on Experiments in an Engineering Technology Intro-ductory CourseDr. Carmen Cioc, The University of ToledoDr. Sorin Cioc, The University of ToledoZachary Linkous, University of Toledo c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Implementing Hands-On Experiments to an Engineering Technology Introductory CourseAbstractThe mechanical engineering technology (MET) students at the University of Toledo start theircurriculum with a three-credit hour course entitled “Computers for Engineering Technology”.Over the years, this class was subject to many changes with
other informal co-curricular programs. Although it is imperative to evaluate these programs to better informentrepreneurship education practices, minimal attention has been devoted to assessment ofentrepreneurship education programs. Furthermore, of the few existing studies, most haveexamined students’ perceptions of learning gains and affective responses such as entrepreneurialself-efficacy, mindset and attitude. In this study, we present an examination of students’ actuallearning in an entrepreneurship practicum course at large research university. The courseleverages widely used Lean Launch Curriculum and Business Model Canvas (BMC) to engagestudents in entrepreneurship in a project-based learning environment. In contrast with prior workthat
aleadership identity within the formation of an engineering identity. Together, these developmentprocesses constitute the formation of engineering leaders.This paper presents the methods underway to validate and refine a proposed theoretical model ofengineering leadership identity development. This model can be used to reshape existingengineering leadership education programs and integrate leadership into the engineeringcurriculum in an innovative manner. The model starts with a fundamental assumption that theengineering leadership formation process is, at its core, an identity development process. Thisassumption is also central to two established theoretical perspectives that informed theconstruction of this model. Lave and Wenger’s (1991