Paper ID #6584Assessment and repair of critical misconceptions in engineering heat transferand thermodynamicsDr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell UniversityDr. Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University Dr. Margot Vigeant is an associate professor of chemical engineering and associate dean of engineering. She is interested in chemical engineering pedagogy, first-year programs, and international education.Dr. Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University Dr. Nottis is an educational psychologist and professor of education at Bucknell University. Her research has focused on meaningful learning in science and engineering education
Paper ID #41608Board 278: Faculty and Staff Ideas and Expectations for a Culture of Wellnessin EngineeringMs. Eileen Johnson, University of Michigan Eileen Johnson received her BS and MS in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She previously worked in tissue engineering and genetic engineering throughout her education. She is currently pursuing her PhD in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan. After teaching an online laboratory class, she became interested in engineering education research. Her current research interests are in engineering student mental health & wellness
Paper ID #47203BOARD # 227: Building Engineering Leaders: Pairing Leadership Courseworkwith Service Learning - NSF DUE #2012339Dr. Marianna Savoca, Stony Brook University Marianna Savoca is both an administrator and faculty member. She teaches career development, leadership, and external relations, collaborates with faculty on research and programmatic initiatives, as well as oversees internships and practicum experiences.Dr. Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University Monica Bugallo is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Vice Provost for Faculty and Academic Staff Development at Stony Brook University. She
in my mind. And I think a lot of the material kind of relies on previous experience, which I didn't have a whole lot of.Of interest when integrating study findings, although there was noted change in awareness andintegration, qualitative data analysis revealed difficulty in extrapolating learning theory examplesfrom different fields of study. Some faculty evidenced a lack recall of the learning theoriescovered in the summer program, as well as a desire to develop a better understanding of the data,evidence, and practical applications, which would support and encourage their use of learningtheories in engineering courses. Min stated, I wish there’s more examples like solutions like Q&A, lots of Q&A, so I can ask
genre-specific features among other genres, too.Focus group responses noted both similarities and differences among writing assignments inFYC and engineering laboratory courses. Students agreed that writing assignments in bothcourses included writing for an audience with a purpose in mind, employing rhetorical appeals(logos, pathos, and ethos), and using evidence as support. Many of the distinctions that studentsnoted emphasized differences in how these elements were employed. For example, studentsnoted the difference between using thesis statements in research papers and using hypotheses inlab reports to define the genre’s purpose. They also observed that there is little pathos in labreports, and that lab reports tend to emphasize logos and
belonging inengineering. The study found that classroom inclusion was the only significant predictor ofbelonging and could predict it positively to a moderate degree. Further, it was found that studentsin revised inclusive courses reported significantly stronger feelings of inclusion and belongingthan their peers in traditional courses. These findings suggest that systematic efforts toimplement neuroinclusive learning practices in engineering education may contribute to a senseof belonging for all students.IntroductionThe concept of neurodiversity, a term coined by sociologist Judy Singer [1], emerged asmembers of the autistic community challenged the predominant disability framing of autism andembraced the notion that diversity of minds is both
Alicia Beth Consulting2 , Island Pond, VT 05846 Burd’s Eye View Research & Evaluation3, Austin, TX 78704AbstractNorwich University, a private military college that serves both civilian and Corps of Cadetsstudents, secured an NSF S-STEM award to develop a program to attract and retain highlytalented, low-income students. Norwich recognizes that students who enter college with lessexperience in mathematics are less likely to graduate with a degree in a STEM discipline. Withthat in mind, the project aims to measure the benefits of a corequisite implementation ofprecalculus and calculus to help students complete the required calculus sequence by the end oftheir first year. In the first year of the study, 34 engineering students
. Student teams generate as many concepts aspossible through methods such as brainstorming, mind mapping [27], or C-Sketch [28]. In theexample EDT, students are given a handout that presents relevant background about heat,temperature, and heat transfer. In groups of four, they use brainstorming methods to generatesketches of at least three possible storage devices that fit the parameters of the design challenge. Once several concepts are generated, the best one is selected based on evaluation criteria.During stage three, teams use engineering techniques to select the best concept from the previousstage and construct an argument for their best design. The methods used during this stageencourage students to move from “tinkering” to authentic
ASSISTment System. In Ikeda, Ashley & Chan (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 635-644.29. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher order mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.30. Redish,E.F & Smith, K.A.(2008). Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3).31. Gage, M., A. K. Pizer, V. Roth. 2003. WeBWorK: generating, delivering, and checking math homework via the internet. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics. New York:Wiley. http://www.math.uoc.gr/~ictm2/Proceedings/pap189.pdf.32. Roth, V., Ivanchenko, V., Record, N. 2008. Evaluating student responses to
Paper ID #39450Board 261: Effectiveness of Vertically-Integrated Project Teams inTackling an Engineering Grand ChallengeAvinash DandaProf. Bruce L Tai Dr. Tai is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He received his Ph.D. at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor in 2011 and spent 4 years as research faculty on multidisciplinary manufacturing topics from healthcare to automotDr. Vinayak KrishnamurthyProf. Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University Dr. Mathew Kuttolamadom is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M
and promotes the integration of engineering and computational thinking [24],[25]. However, the field lacks specific tools to translate these aspirations to educational practices.A decade since the publication of the NGSS, exemplary engineering activities have yet to beidentified and published [26].Here, we propose a framework for explicitly connecting computational thinking practices withengineering design. We consider the three main phases of CT - problem decomposition,abstraction, and algorithmic thinking - and how these map to problem definition, needs finding,and solution generation in engineering design. With these analogs in mind we have developed acrosscutting framework that links NGSS goals with scientific inquiry, CT, and
Paper ID #33410The Laboratory Practice of K-5 Teachers in an Engineering RET:Triangulating Perceptions and ExperienceDr. Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida Kent Crippen is a Professor of STEM education in the School of Teaching and Learning at the University of Florida and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. His research in- volves the design, development, and evaluation of STEM cyberlearning environments as well as scientist- teacher forms of professional development. Operating from a design-based research perspective, this work focuses on using innovative, iterative and theoretically
interests in Engineering Education include engineering epistemology, equity and inclusion, and engineering culture.Mrs. Bailey Braaten, Ohio State University Bailey Braaten is currently a doctoral candidate at the Ohio State University, where she is in her fifth year of the STEM education PhD program. She is a graduate research assistant on the EHR Core NSF funded project, examining first year engineering students’ beliefs around smartness and engineering. She is also a graduate research assistant on the KEEN project, funded by the Kern Family Foundation, focusing on the assessment of entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML) in first-year engineering courses. Bailey received her B.S. in mechanical engineering from Ohio
global preparedness, which also varies by academicdiscipline; e.g., intercultural competence (international education researchers) versusmulticultural competence or intercultural maturity (diversity scholars). Engineering educationresearchers have focused on global competence. Defining and measuring global preparedness hasproven to be even more difficult.12Hunter13 working with an international panel of experts, developed a working definition ofglobal competence: “having an open mind while actively seeking to understand cultural normsand expectations of others, leveraging this gained knowledge to interact, communicate and workeffectively outside one’s environment.” Deardorff14 summarized intercultural competency as“the skills to listen, observe
met Laura, my mentor, and she helped me get involved in Xipiter. Xipiter has helped me fall in love with Aerospace Engineering and I have no doubt in my mind now that this is my major to be in. Thank you for all that you do!Another student praised the ASPIRE student co-registration and peer-mentoring components ofthe program for helping them achieve success: To me being able to talk to other students that were in my classes and then talk to the mentors contained the most value. I was able to see how my fellow students were doing in class and get much needed help when I was having trouble in a hard class. The mentors also gave pointers as in which teachers to take/avoid which I think is an important aspect to
the extent to which creative ideation may be modulated by prior knowledge and training.Ms. Yushuang Liu, The Pennsylvania State University Yushuang Liu is a graduate student in Psychology and Language Science at Penn State. She is generally interested in natural speech processing using electroencephalogram. She has been actively involved in creativity projects examining how to facilitate divergent thinking abilities in engineering students.Dr. Danielle S. Dickson, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Dickson received her a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2016 with a dissertation examining the memory system’s representation of numerical information, using behavioral and electrophysiological
Paper ID #26927Board 68: Problem-Solving Rationales of Practicing Transportation and Hy-draulic Engineers When Provided Multiple Contextual RepresentationsDr. Masoud Ghodrat Abadi, California State University, Sacramento Masoud Ghodrat Abadi is an assistant professor in Civil Engineering at California State University, Sacra- mento. He received his PhD in 2018 from Oregon State University. He is a member of standing committee on Education and Training in Transportation Research Board (TRB).Mr. Sean Lyle Gestson, Oregon State University Sean Gestson is a recent graduate from the University of Portland where he studied Civil
Paper ID #16814The Maker Movement - A Pathway for K12 Students to Engineering Adap-tive ExpertiseProf. Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis Lee Martin studies people’s efforts to enhance their own learning environments, with a particular focus on mathematical, engineering, and design thinking. In everyday settings, he looks at the varied ways in which people assemble social, material, and intellectual resources for problem solving and learning. In school settings, he looks to find ways in which schools might better prepare students to be more resourceful and flexible in fostering their own learning
., 1987. “Why We Need Hands-On Engineering Education.” The Journal of Technology Review, Vol. 90, No. 7, p. 38.9. Sarasin, L., 1998, “Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom.” Madison, WI: Atwood.10. Gardner, H., 1999. “Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century.” New York: Basic Books.11. Joyce, B., and Weil, M., 2000, “Models of Teaching.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.12. Brandford, J.D., et al., Eds., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” Expanded Edition, National Academy of Sciences, 2000.13. Bourne, T., Klingbeil, N. and Ciarallo, F., 2014, “Developing the Academic Performance Commitment Matrix: How Measures of Objective Academic Performance Can Do More than Predict College
National Academies Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17226/25038.[11] A. Kirn, J.L. Huff, A. Godwin, M. Ross, & C. Cass. “Exploring tensions of using interpretative phenomenological analysis in a domain with conflicting cultural practices.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1-20, 2019.[12] A. Kirn, A. Godwin, C. Cass, M.S. Ross, & J.L. Huff. “Mindful Methodology: A transparent dialogue on adapting Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis for engineering education research.” In ASEE 2017: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[13] J. Husman & W. Lens. “The role of the future in student motivation.” Educational Psychologist, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 113-125
is also anopportunity for students to give and receive feedback in a small group setting, a learningenvironment that is less “risky” than the traditional classroom setting.Mentor Training ProgramAs previously mentioned, the engineering peer mentors perform multiple roles in the program.For example, they provide support to students in understanding the engineering content of thecalculus problems. They facilitate group discussions, aid students in being successful during theirfirst year in engineering, and to make students aware of opportunities to connect with other like-minded individuals in environments such as the student chapters of the Institute of Electrical and
solutions) whilesimultaneously learning pure science concepts. While there are grade-level specific anddiscipline-specific learning standards, there are generic practices and lessons that can be usedacross grade levels and disciplines. Introducing teachers to the general mind-set of engineers andhow engineering practices can help students to apply science concepts is a critical need inprofessional development for science teachers.A professional development workshop was conducted over a period of several months during theschool year through the Stony Brook University outreach program. Teachers were recruited froma variety of suburban school districts and included teachers at the elementary through highschool levels. Participants met at the
scholarship of teaching. His efforts in leading the Sustainable Buildings program were recognized with the 2019 Award for Excellence in Education Abroad Curriculum Design. He has also worked as a construction project engineer, consultant, and safety inspector. He believes educating the next generation of professionals will be pivotal in sustainability standard practices. Regarding engagement, Dr. Valdes-Vasquez has served as the USGBC student club’s adviser and the ASC Sustainability Team’s faculty coach since 2013. He is a CSU President’s Sustainability Commission member, among multiple other committees. In addition, he is involved with various professional organizations at the national level, including the
of second in the pre REU data tonot being in the top four rankings in the post REU data. It is possible that pre-conceivednotions of what engineering education focuses on as a research community is no longer asprevalent in the student’s minds after having been exposed to some of the work within it.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1950330. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect theviews of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesCraney, C., McKay, T., Mazzeo, A., Morris, J., Prigodich, C., and Groot, R. (2011). "Cross-disciplineperceptions of the undergraduate
. Gardner, H., 1999. “Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century.” New York: Basic Books.11. Joyce, B., and Weil, M., 2000, “Models of Teaching.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.12. Brandford, J.D., et al., Eds., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” Expanded Edition, National Academy of Sciences, 2000.13. Klingbeil, N. and Bourne, T. 2013, “A National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: Longitudinal Impact at Wright State University,” Proceedings 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 2013.14. Klingbeil, N. and Bourne, T., 2012, "The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: A Longitudinal Study of Program Impacts," Proceedings 4th First Year
each student population.ReferencesAdelman, C. (1998), Females and Men of the Engineering Path. A Model for Analysts of Undergraduate Careers, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, D.C.; U.S. Government Printing Office.Bransford, J., A. Brown, and R. Cocking (Eds) (2000), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded EditionBrown, S., L Flick, and T. Fiez (2009), “An Investigation of the Presence and Development of Social Capital in an Electrical Engineering Laboratory”, Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1). 93-102.Bordonaro, M., A. Borg, G. Campbell, B. Clewell, M. Duncan, J. Johnson, K. Johnson, R. Matthews, G. May, E. Mendoza, J. Sideman, S. Winters, and C
diverse backgrounds, further disrupting efforts to form capableteams in those STEM enterprises.Historically, many diversity-focused interventions have centered on “fixing” the marginalizedminority to cope with the unwelcoming cultures in which they are situated. Instead, theinterventions in this project attempt to change the culture such that it respects and valuesdiversity in all of its forms.Leveraging diversity as a tool for confronting complex and persistent societal problems willtherefore require engineering and computer science educators to be attentive to priming allstudents to work on diverse teams and be committed to addressing matters of equity within theirrespective fields. With this in mind, the ultimate purpose of our 5-year
received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Information Science & Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri. His research/teaching focuses on engineering as an innovation in pK-12 education, policy of STEM education, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering, engineering ’habits of mind’ and empathy and care in engi- neering. He has published more than 140 journal articles and proceedings papers in engineering education and educational technology and is the inaugural editor for the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion Research. Page 26.1210.1
Paper ID #15317Faculty Characteristics that Influence Student Performance in the First TwoYears of EngineeringMs. Bethany B Smith, Arizona State University Bethany Smith is currently a master’s student in materials science and engineering at Arizona State Uni- versity. She has been involved in STEM education research since 2012 under the direction of Professor Stephen Krause. Her research interests in STEM education include faculty development, best classroom practices, and improving undergraduate engineering student retention through understanding what makes students leave engineering. She will be pursuing her PhD in
Paper ID #7524Engaging US Engineering Students in Fuel Cell Research at a Foreign SiteDr. Xia Wang, Oakland University Dr. Xia Wang is an associate professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Oakland Uni- versity. Her research and teaching interests lie in the areas of fluid mechanics and heat transfer, with an emphasis on fuel cell and battery technology. She was the program director for the NSF-funded project entitled International Research Experience for Students: Collaborative Research Activities with China on Fuel Cells at Oakland University.Dr. Qian Zou, Oakland University Dr. Qian Zou is an