Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 12

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Krista Schumacher, University of St. Thomas; Deborah Besser P.E., University of St. Thomas; Annmarie Thomas, University of St. Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

may feel if they have low self-efficacy in this area of engineering and design.Lesson PlanPrep: Structured Practice:• Gather supplies 10 minutes• Fill bucket with water • Collaboration with partner(s). Must present finalGrouping: design before using materials. Have to spend 10• Instruction will be given as an entire group. minutes planning without touching materials. Must build exactly what is on

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Caleb James O'Malley, University of Florida; Ashish Aggarwal, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

researchershave studied various factors for their ability to influence the performance of a student in anintroductory programming course discussed below.1.1 Factors of SuccessA wide range of factors spanning from a student’s gender to their experience with video gameshave been studied in the context of student success in programming courses. Some of the mostcommonly analyzed factors include gender [3], [4], [5], [6], prior programming experience [3],[5] – [9], and previous math or science courses [3], [8]. Other factors include self efficacy [6],[8], comfort level [3], [6], [10], motivation [10], and attributions [6], [8].There is currently little evidence that gender plays a major role in student success. Quille et al.[4] conducted a multi-institutional

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: The Art of Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, Rice University; Samuel Garcia Jr., Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

towards securing my future.”Question 7. How do you feel when you have low grades in class?Low performance as measured by grades can have highly damaging and negative consequenceson students perceived self-efficacy, confidence, and motivation. As indicated by the participants’statements, students begin to question their capability to comprehend class material which impactstheir sense of self confidence to achieve academic success. “I feel terrible.” “Nervous and slightly concerned/stressed for my grade.” “Anxious because it will affect my GPA and I’m not sure that I’m learning well.” “Stressed out, hyper.” “I feel terrible and dumb. Like I know nothing in the class which is usually not true.” “I feel a little depressed since grades

Conference Session

Empathy and Human-Centered Design 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Abbas Ghassemi, University of California, Merced; Christopher A. Butler, University of California, Merced; Marina Shapiro

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

], [28].Flipped classroom pedagogies, including POGIL, effectiveness on student outcomes has beendemonstrated thoroughly in the literature through longitudinal studies [18], STEM classes [15],[19], and quantitative studies of exam performance [20]-[25]. The literature shows increases instudent outcomes, student perceptions [12], even in self-efficacy with regards to complicatedsubject matter [25]. The flipped classroom pedagogy equalizes opportunities for students,especially for students of lower socioeconomic status and first-generation students. Incomparison to advantaged students who may have support systems in place to help completehomework and projects with tutors or advice from previous generations of how to navigatehigher education

Conference Session

Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Qiushi Li, Shanghai Jiaotong University; Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

in developingengineering students’ multiple skills and abilities, such as independent thinking, criticalthinking, creative thinking and hands-on skills [8]-[10]. For instance, using self-reported questionnaires among senior students ， Marques (2017) pointed out thatengagements in SDPs can strengthen students' soft skills like communication andpublic speaking [9]. Also, Xiong and Liu (2012) suggested that students whoparticipated in SDPs got their critical thinking and engineering design thinkingimproved [13]. In addition, applying self-efficacy scales, Dunlap (2005) measuredstudents' self-efficacy in a capstone environment. Pre- and post- data showed astatistically significant change in student perceptions of personal ability andpreparedness

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Maker Spaces in the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville; James E. Lewis, University of Louisville; Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville; Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

students [27]. The principles ofthe competency-belief component of this theory are similar to Shavelson’s self-concept of ability[28] and Bandura’s self-efficacy construct [29]. While by definition, these three concepts aredifferent, they have proven difficult to isolate empirically [30-34] and are usually measured in thesame manner [27]. Competency beliefs are frequently grounded in self-efficacy theory [22], whichfacilitates the connection between positive feedback and better academic achievement [35]. Valuebeliefs, on the other hand, have been studied less often but are by no means less vital. Whilecompetency beliefs focus on a person’s ability to do a task or engage in an activity, value beliefsfocus on an individual’s desire to engage in an

Conference Session

Capstone, Undergraduate Research, and Projects in ECE

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ying Lin, Western Washington University; Steve Sandelin

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

and fun circuits and providing a big picture view, andpromoting students’ motivation to continue pursuing the EE major. We have adopted this courseproject for two consecutive course offerings in fall 2018 and fall 2019, respectively. Studentfeedback in the form of survey questionnaires has confirmed that this pilot project has beensuccessful. Per the survey results, most students feel their abilities of developing design solutions,constructing prototypes, and communicating the design process have improved, which indicatesincreased students’ self-efficacy. Moreover, majority of students feel more motivated to continuewith the EE major of study.I IntroductionFor most Electrical Engineering (EE) and Engineering curricula, analog circuitry and

Conference Session

The Best of First-year Programs Division

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laurel Whisler, Clemson University; Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University; Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

”responses related to strategies students realize they were not using effectively.A single researcher scored the responses; thus our study did not have the benefit of a more robustreview of the data or the benefit of inter-rater reliability.Conclusion and Implications for Future ResearchWe propose that a course environment that focuses on increasing metacognitive awarenessthrough self-directed learning in individual and collaborative settings may positively impactstudents’ self-efficacy. As students focus on attaining goals that are important to them, in settingswhere the challenge is not beyond their capability, in a social setting that supports persistence,students’ self-efficacy should be enhanced [16]. This is an area ripe for future

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Design

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nan Kong, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Senay Purzer, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Lindsey B. Payne, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Eunhye Kim, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Carolina Vivas-Valencia, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Duncan-Wiles, “Design creativity in K-12 student designs: Exploring an egg packaging and drop activity,” in iSTEM – Integration of Engineering into other STEM Education: Proceedings of 2nd P-12 Engineering and Design Education Research Summit, Washington, D.C, April 26 - 28, 2012. 9[4] N. D., Fila and Ş, Purzer, “The relationship between team gender diversity, idea variety, and potential for design innovation,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1405–1418, December 2013.[5] M. Schar, S. Gilmartin, A. Harris, B. Rieken, and S. Sheppard, “Innovation self-efficacy: A very brief measure for engineering students,” in Proceedings of the

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Competitions, Challenges, and Teams

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yaxin Huang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Zhinan Zhang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

exception is that Huang (2017) conducted quantitative surveyon students who participated in “Creation Youth” National University StudentEntrepreneurship Competition, and found that entrepreneurship practice education includingentrepreneurship competitions had significant positive impacts on mediating variable ofentrepreneurial self-efficacy and therefore can improve college students’ entrepreneurialintention [23]. Although the prior study has proven the promoting effect of entrepreneurialcompetition on entrepreneurial intention, it remains to explore which specific learningexperiences in entrepreneurship competitions function. This current study shall continue toexplore the specific impact of engaging in TIECs on engineering students

Conference Session

Programmatic Integration of Liberal Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rebecca Balakrishnan, University of Manitoba; Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba; Priya Subra Mani

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

first-time student retention at a public Midwest community college (Published doctoral dissertation)., Saint Louis University, USA., 2013.[14] P. K. Roberts, Perceived changes in career decidedness following completion of a for- credit career class (Published doctoral dissertation), University of Northern Colorado, USA, 2004.[15] R. Reese and C. Miller, "Effects of a university career development course on career decision-making self-efficacy," Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 252-266, 2006.[16] A. Scott and K. CIani, "Effects of an undergraduate career class on men’s and women’s career decision-making self-efficacy and vocational identity," Journal of Career Development, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 263

Conference Session

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Erin Ingram, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Jennifer Keshwani, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Tammera J. Mittelstet, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Julie Thomas, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biological and Agricultural Engineering

involved in research that focuses on STEM integration, Elementary Teacher STEM identity and self-efficacy development, and the interactions between Formal and Informal learning entities.Dr. Julie Thomas, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Julie Thomas is a Research Professor of science education in the College of Education and Human Sci- ences at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Thomas’ research has focused on children’s science learning and teacher professional development. Proud accomplishments include collaborative efforts – such as No Duck Left Behind, a partnership with waterfowl biologists to promote wetland education efforts, and En- gineering is Everywhere (E2), a partnership with a materials engineer to

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: First Year Programming (1)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Donald P. Visco Jr., University of Akron; Nidaa Makki, University of Akron; Linda M. Subich, University of Akron; David Steer, University of Akron; Erin R. Stevic, University of Akron

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

“Zip to Industry: A First-YearCorporate-STEM Connection program”. This program connects first-year STEM students withco-op/intern students within their major (or in a similar major) for several four-hour jobshadowing experiences during their initial year on campus.The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact a first-year STEM job-shadowing programon first-year students’ retention in STEM, and their knowledge of careers in STEM fields. Thestudy reported in this paper is part of a larger study that is also investigating the relationshipbetween self-efficacy, interest in STEM, and retention.Theory of ActionThe use of shadowing experiences for first-year STEM students as a means to make progress onthe research questions of this project

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Margaret Carroll; James A. Coller, University of Michigan; Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan; Roxanne Pinsky, University of Michigan; Charles William Schertzing, University of Michigan; Julia T. Toye, University of Michigan; Magel P. Su, California Institute of Technology; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Sangam Munsiff, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

. Mccormack, Thompson P. Beyerlein, S., S. Howe, P. Leiffer, and P. Brackin. Assessing team member citizenship in capstone engineering design courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4):771–783, 2010.[13] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue. Women engineering students and self efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, pages 27–38, Jan. 2009.[14] M. A. Hutchison, D. K. Follman, M. Sumpter, and G. M. Bodner. Factors influencing the self-efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, pages 39–47, Jan. 2006.[15] G. E. Okudan, D. Horner, B. Bogue, and R. Devon. An investigation of gender

Conference Session

2-Year College Division: Students and the Pipeline

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington; Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers; Alexandra Schaefer, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

qualitative approachprovides a deeper look into dimensions of this experience for women on the transfer pathway andtheir perception of factors contributing to success.Quantitative methodsSurvey data were collected from 414 students aged 18 or older at three community colleges inTexas between April and September 2019. Select demographics of the sample are shown in Table1, more detailed demographic information can be found in Appendix B. The survey capturedinformation on students’ self-efficacy, inclusion, motivation, and confidence in ECS usingpreviously-validated measures from the Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy(LAESE) [12] and the Academic Table 1: Demographic characteristics of survey

Collection

2020 ASEE North Midwest Section Annual Conference

Authors

Arielle True-Funk, Iowa State University; Cristina Poleacovschi, Iowa State University; Gloria Jones-Johnson; Scott Grant Feinstein; Meghan Berger M.A., LCMHCA, NCC, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

studentsof color (Samuelson & Litzler, 2016; Yosso et al., 2009). At the individual level, engineeringundergraduates who experience microaggressions may face decreased academic self-efficacy andself-esteem (True-Funk et al., 2020). Additionally, Camacho and Lord (2011) found thatmicroaggressions contributed to a hostile environment within engineering education. Womenwithin male dominate majors like engineering face environments widespread incidents of sexistmicroaggressions (McCabe, 2009). Among Latinx college students, microaggressions have beenassociated with negative persistence attitudes (Hernández & Villodas, 2019). Women in engineering may experience microaggressions due to their gender and racial orethnic identities (Camacho

Conference Session

Insights for Teaching ECE Courses

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan; Amir Kamil, University of Michigan; Andrew Deorio, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

CS1 through CS2 to CS3.The survey data was analyzed using a mixed-effects linear model for repeated measures ofquestions on the student’s sense of community in their undergraduate studies up to the point ofwhen they took the survey.The data show that students in all groups report generally positive feelings for every surveyquestions, and that mean values are fairly consistent across groups. However, we did observeseveral statistically significant effects, indicating a change in sense of community andself-efficacy. Overall, students report a small but significant decrease over time in response toquestions related to self-efficacy as they progress through the program. Women in particular showa stronger negative effect compared to men. URM

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Madhurima Das, NuVu Studio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

accomplish much on their own,stating that it is because the girls aren’t present to lead the group or assign tasks.Student Assessments and Self-Efficacy ScoresAt the end of each session, students spend a whole day on reflection. This reflection includesproviding feedback to their peers and analyzing their own experiences during the session. Thestudents discuss personal reflections and complete a self-assessment of their learning during thesession. The students fill out a survey which asks them to score their skill levels on specific skillsthat were used during the session such as “Brainstorming,” “Sketching,” “Prototyping,” and“2D-Design: Illustrator.” For each skill, they rate their level on a 3-point Likert scale withanswer choices “Lacking

Conference Session

Faculty and Student Perspective on Instructional Strategies

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Roxana Maria Carbonell, University of Texas at Austin; Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin; Patricia Clayton, University of Texas at Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

questions that examine the following factors: affect towards design, technology self-efficacy, innovation orientation, design self-efficacy, and a sense of belonging to themakerspace. As these surveys continue, this research team plans on conducting further analysisto explore the student experience in these courses. In addition to these quantitative measures,future research should conduct in-depth interviews with students and TAs about theirexperiences. Finally, a comparative case study amongst faculty members would be useful inexamining different approaches to iteration and pedagogy to further establish best practices.ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education. (2016). Envisioning the future of the maker movement: Summit Report

Conference Session

Pedagogy and Teaching Preparation in Graduate Programs

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kara Danielle Fong, University of California, Berkeley; Shannon Ciston, Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

often report low levels ofconfidence in a wide range of teaching skills, from facilitating group discussions to handlingstudent cheating. 2,3 In light of these issues, it is crucial to establish effective programs to train andsupport new GSIs in developing both pedagogical knowledge and practical teaching skills.There exists substantial evidence suggesting that semester- or year-long courses aimed towardtraining GSIs are effective in increasing GSI self-efficacy. 2,3,4 The benefits of these coursesinclude improvements in GSI competency that persist years after the course is completed. 5Numerous works have been published in recent years detailing best practices andrecommendations for the development of these graduate student teaching courses

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Panagiotis Skrimponis, New York University; Nikos Makris, University of Thessaly; Karen Cheng, Columbia University; Jonatan Ostrometzky, Columbia University; Zoran Kostic, Columbia University; Gil Zussman, Columbia University; Thanasis Korakis, New York University; Sheila Borges Rajguru, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

research interests include experimentally driven research with several radio access technologies (WiFi, WiMAX, LTE, 5G-NR), conducted under real environment settings, the dis- aggregation of base station units, Multi-access Edge Computing and NFV orchestration using open source platforms.Dr. Karen Cheng, Columbia Engineering Dr. Karen Cheng is an Outreach Program Specialist at Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science. A former research scientist turned high school math teacher, she recently completed her Ph.D. in mathematics and STEM teacher education, with research interests in the development of professional motivation and self-efficacy among K-12 STEM teachers in the framework of out-of-school

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mauro Rodriguez Jr, California Institute of Technology; Karen Mariela Siles, IBM Corporation; Dora Louise Renaud, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

programming, while effective forstandardized, intervention-like programming, is limited in duration and scope in terms ofworkforce development compared to local chapter-based programming. However, localprogramming poses challenges as it is highly dependent volunteers’ self-efficacy and heterogenousin available resources and knowledge capital to obtain national uniformity. To the authors’knowledge, limited to no information about chapter-based programming or its evolution isavailable in the literature from these organizations. It is noted that there have been engineeringeducation research of students’ academic performance in their participation in national engineeringdiversity organizations [3, 4]. This experience report provides a decade-long insight

Conference Session

Preparation for Graduate Research

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bala Ram P.E., North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University; Tobin N. Walton, North Carolina A&T State University; Stephanie Teixeira-Poit

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

are unrelated to pastacademic achievement and ability, but are instead cultural, social, and psychological impediments thatresult from students’ experiences within STEM programs and society at large (see Godwin et al., 2016 &Steenbergen-Hu et al., 2018). The construct of Identity has become one of the most useful tools forunderstanding and assessing the experiences of students from underrepresented groups withinundergraduate and graduate STEM programs. Indeed, a strong STEM identity has been shown to bepowerfully related to a students’ interest in STEM fields, beliefs about their own capabilities withinSTEM (i.e., self-efficacy), and motivation to persist to graduation (Collins, 2018). However, research hasalso shown that incompatibility

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jeremi S. London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Stephanie G. Adams, University of Texas at Dallas; Julia Machele Brisbane, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Crystal M. Pee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

in theworkplace and their career outcomes. Studies have shown that BWEF experience slightly higherstress than other faculty [2,3]. Time constraints on completing activities, promotion concerns, andvariations in expectations contribute to these higher stress levels; this is particularly true for women ofcolor at four-year colleges [3]. Additionally, the findings from other studies report that BWEF tend toencounter unique challenges along the tenure track [3], and have high extended family responsibility[1]. These factors can contribute to a lower self-efficacy, which correlates to feelings of institutionalfit [3]. On the other hand, perceptions of institutional fit can also be positively influenced bymentoring. Before moving on to mentoring

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 10: STEM Outreach

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Afrin Naz, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Mingyu Lu, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Tommi Brooke Kenneda, West Virginia University Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

students’ intention to pursue STEM career will be assessed using Social Cognitive Career Theory. Students will take surveys about their intentions to pursue career in STEM disciplines prior to and after participating in the ambassadress program. The model of Social Cognitive Career Theory accounts for the development and influence of students’ self-efficacy, expected outcomes, and interests in STEM professions.Indicator 2 Parents will respond to a survey regarding their conceptions toward STEM before the ambassadress program, after they attend the “Family STEM Night,” and after the ambassadress program. Success will be indicated by positive changes in parents

Conference Session

International Research Experiences Intl Div Tech Session 8

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Gloria J. Kim, University of Florida; Yong Kyu Yoon, University of Florida ; Jin-woo Choi, Louisiana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

while they were in Korea.Specifically, evaluation methods include: 1. Registration form: When the selected five students register, they will complete a form that includes questions (open-ended and Likert scales) about their expectations for the program and research & cultural preparation. 2. Pre-program survey: This survey will include questions about expectations (open-ended and Likert scales) as well as questions that gather baseline data regarding knowledge, perceptions, and self-efficacy. The latter questions will be matched to post-program survey questions. 3. Mid-program survey: This survey will collect formative feedback regarding the program experience and structure. 4. Post-program survey

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Workforce Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Danielle Wood, University of Notre Dame; Alisa Zornig Gura, University of Notre Dame; Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

instrument. Aggregation provides increased power for inferential statistics to examinethe outcomes of the intervention on construct(s) of interest – including ones related to self-efficacy and place attachment. It also allows for more robust descriptive statistics to examinedifferences between characteristics of interest.Interviews Exploring Attachment to PlaceGiven our interest in the emergence of attachment to place within the C-EEEM efforts as anoutcome, the research team retained an independent external evaluator [24] specializing inenvironmental sociology to validate and expand on our findings. As noted, qualitative datacollection by internal researchers through the duration of the grant indicated a positive shift bymost interns in place

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Emel Cevik, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Jennifer Whitfield, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Jay R. Porter, Texas A&M University; Joseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

boost students’ interest inSTEM fields is to increase teachers’ perceptions and self-efficacy with engineering and STEMconcepts [6]. While most teachers have the necessary educational background in math andscience, their knowledge and experience related to engineers, engineering and technology arevery limited [7]. This causes a lack of widespread engineering education at the K-12 level.Previous research reveals that teacher professional development programs have a positive impacton the students’ achievement [8, 9] as well as providing benefits to the teachers. With this inmind, STEM focused teacher professional development programs that provide opportunities tothe teachers to engage in authentic STEM and specifically engineering and technology

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Core Skills

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wujie Zhang, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Gina Elizabeth Mazzone, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Anne Alexander, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Jill Meyer, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

an understanding of students' chemistry education backgroundas well as their intent of study to be able to analyze the results based on their majors (majors willbe clustered and included in the drop-down list). The questions related to motivation assessmentare selected from the attached reference to mainly focus on the three factors of motivation: self-efficacy (Q4 and 5), active learning strategies (Q6-8), and science learning value (Q9-11). Q11looks particularly at whether the response is major-dependent. The questions with the highestloading of these three factors have been chosen. Moreover, to ensure the survey quality, a reversequestion has also been included (Q5).Voluntary Qualtrics surveys containing an informed consent statement were

Conference Session

Understanding Student Behavior and Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Arif Mohaimin Sadri, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

through formation of student learning communities," in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2010, pp. 85-88. 5[20] J. Bruun and E. Brewe, "Talking and learning physics: Predicting future grades from network measures and Force Concept Inventory pretest scores," Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, vol. 9, p. 020109, 2013.[21] R. Dou, E. Brewe, G. Potvin, J. P. Zwolak, and Z. Hazari, "Understanding the development of interest and self-efficacy in active-learning undergraduate physics courses," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 40, pp. 1587-1605, 2018.[22] J. P. Zwolak, R. Dou, E. A. Williams, and E. Brewe, "Students’ network integration as