2007, the field site was proposed but notselected. At that time, E. Bravo, who was a REU fellow, assisted in developing a prototype for awireless data collection system16. He selected two simple water quality sensors, and establishedserial connection with a microcontroller between each sensor and windows laptop used to viewthe data from the sensors. In 2008, LabVIEW, a programming environment developed byNational Instruments, was selected to be used for data acquisition. During that summer, theinitial detailed design, layout and implementation plan for the LEWAS field site was established.J. Kenny, the REU fellow in 2008, contributed in the integration of a LabVIEW program on awindows laptop for reading water quality data from a multi-probe
2In the next sections of this paper we step through each of the five characteristics of effectiveteamwork, and present tips, strategies, insights, and elaborations on how to bring eachcomponent of the model to life in your teaching teams.2.1 Promotive InteractionPromotive interaction is about committing to face-to-face team work time and embracing theopportunities to move your teaching and planning work forward during these meetings.Meet your graduate teaching assistants for an orientation meeting during the month beforeyour course begins. Just as the first day of class is an important moment for setting the tone andpolicies for your course, this instructors’ orientation meeting is a crucial time to get yourinstructional team working well
, Malaysia and studied abroad throughout different countries in Europe. Since January 2015, she has been with the Edward E. Whitacre Jr. College of Engineering where she continues to grow programs and provide guidance for the International Experience Initiative. She is also an active member in the international field, presenting, attending workshops and focusing on best practices. Abstract In the fall of 2013, Texas Tech University (TTU) and the Edward E. Whitacre Jr. College of Engineering (WCOE) implemented a requirement for all undergraduate engineering students to participate in an international experience as part of their degree plan. The intent behind this initiative is to facilitate the preparation of future engineers at
, through having students work on tasks that are enjoyable, andsocial persuasion, through instructors’ constant verbal comments that acknowledge students’progress and improvement.The Development of Design ConceptsIn alignment with the societal emphasis on nurturing next generation makers and tinkerers, it isimperative to teach students design concepts from an early age. One of the major design conceptcomponents is design thinking, which is the thinking process generally adopted by engineeringdesigners in approaching design problems11. Effective design thinking has been commonlyqualified as going through the process of planning, building, and testing, or in more details,going through the cycle of identifying problems, building prototypes
76ETAC 581 204 59 12 7Update• Advisory Councils: Academic & Industrial• Accreditation Processes • ISO 9001:2008 Certified• Rebranding & Strategic Planning • Identify constituent needs; increase outreach• ASEE Sponsorship• Federal issues facing accreditation• Natural sciences• Expanding international engagement 8ABET Accreditation:ProcessABET Accreditation ProcessObjectives• Assure that graduates of an accredited program are adequately prepared to enter and continue the practice of applied science, computing, engineering, and engineering technology• Stimulate
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Coordinated USV ControlAbstractMany universities have lab exercises in the controls classes which consist of modeling andsimulations for vehicles and robotics due to the costs associated with real vehicles, robotics or thetest environments. Unmanned surface vehicles such as a Sea Fox can be modeled and simulated inMatlab or a similar software. Multiple vehicle paths can be coordinated to facilitate search patternsor to setup adhoc wireless sensor networks (WSNs) with the vehicles each possessing a node. AtTexas A&M University-Kingsville an assignment for coordinated unmanned surface vehicle (USV)control and path planning has been developed. The work
in the state including a question on intended transfer major.Students are asked if they intend to transfer, but when asked about their desired major, the onlyoptions available are for the associate degrees granted by that specific community college. If thecommunity college does not offer an engineering associate degree, engineering would not showup on the list of majors at all. Second, students are required to declare a major and create aneducational plan outlining the courses taken each term in order to get priority registration.Unfortunately, the list of majors that students may choose from is limited to the degrees andcertificates that the specific college offers. While the educational plan that the student createswill have the degree
wide spread knowledge in problem solving,management of resources, and process planning. Project Management is a key skill required byEngineering Technologists, who work in project-driven manufacturing companies. An IndustryAdvisory Council for a university in Louisiana expressed the need for project managementtrained graduates, and worked with Engineering Technology faculty to develop a post-baccalaureate certificate program focused on technical project management. In addition, theIndustry Advisory Council worked closely with Engineering Technology faculty to develop anew course on “Technical Project Management” that can combine with other courses offered bythe department and college to prepare project management certificate graduates.This
Preheating Effect on the Friction Stir Welding Jinmyun Jo Department of Engineering Virginia State University, Petersburg, VirginiaOne of the primary emphases of the engineering senior projects is to provide researchexperiences to senior students who plan to go to engineering graduate schools. This presentationdiscusses the process used and the results obtained during proposing and executing a researchproject. Preheating effect on the friction stir welding (FSW) process was proposed as the topicof the senior researches in which preheating effects were investigated using a sand insulator anddonor material. Thermal
is also used in group advising sessions. The goal of group advising is to communicate the basic information students need to start prepare their study plans. Social Constructivism is an advising approach that is based on the concept that learners build (or construct) knowledge based on what they already know or believe. In a Social Constructivist approach to advising, the adviser takes time to understand what a student already knows, or believes, about their educational experience, and helps the student build on that knowledge. In this approach, the student can seek out knowledge from multiple sources, and verify what he thinks he knows with his adviser. Each of these advising approaches is used within Northwestern
Adapting a Freshman Manufacturing Course to Different Learning StylesIntroductionOur mechanical engineering curriculum includes a freshman course in Design ForManufacturing (DFM). This course introduces project management skills via a curriculumemploying project-based learning. These skills include product design, resource planning,process planning and cost analysis, but the primary focus is in producing a design that ismanufacturable. The most recent offering of this course gives the student an option of lab seriesin which to develop the concepts of DFM. One series uses manual machining processes and theother uses Computer Numerical Control (CNC) manufacturing. Ideally each student can learnusing the method they are
implementationactivities.Dialogues was grounded in an institutional strategic planning process and occurred as part of arange of gender equity activities implemented during an NSF funded ADVANCE project. TheADVANCE program provides significant funding to institutional change efforts that recruit,retain and promote women faculty in science, technology, engineering and math fields. TheDialogues process consisted of a series of sessions (ranging from three to eight) that engageddepartmental faculty in a total of eight hours of facilitated reflection activities and discussionsabout implementing the university’s strategic plan to meet the vision of the respectivedepartment. At each meeting, facilitators guided faculty through a series of activities aimed atdefining the
. Early respondents were offered a $5 Starbucks gift card for participating. Table 2. Outline of survey questions. Part Description # of Questions 1 Demographics (gender, race/ethnic background, age, etc.), family 13 background, and basic information about current educational activities 2a Undergraduate students only: Experiences during their civil, architectural, 45 or structural engineering education; memberships in student organizations, and future plans 2b Graduate students
sophomores and one first-year student.Administered via Qualtrics® Research Suite online survey software, the full survey consisted of14 items, including multiple choice (e.g., yes/no) and text entry (see all 14 questions inAppendix A). Three survey questions queried strengths of the CU Teach Engineering programand career plans, while five questions probed perceived differences between engineering andeducation programs and barriers to simultaneously navigating both disciplines. Other questionsasked students to briefly describe the use of engineering skills in education courses, as well asthe use of teaching skills from education courses in undergraduate engineering courses.To supplement the quantitative findings with a qualitative perspective
World Council on System Engineering and Information Technology (WCSEIT), Vice President of Safety Health and Environment Research Organization (SHERO) and Vice President of World Council on Communi- cation and Arts (WCCA). He is Chairman of Working Group ”Ingenieurp¨adagogik im Internationalen Kontext” since 2002, Member of International Monitoring Committee in IGIP since 2004, Member of Strategic Planning Committee of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engi- neers, Inc (IEEE-EdSoc) since 2009, Board Member of ”Global Council on Manufacturing and Manage- ment” (GCMM) since 2004 and Director of Brazilian Network of Engineering (RBE) since 1998. He is also Member of Board of Governors
formulate, solve, and properly tacklemultidisciplinary problems.Particularly, this paper addresses the effectiveness of combined virtual and physical hands-onactivities in students’ learning which was infused in the capstone senior design project. Seniordesign projects are open-ended and are similar to the research that scientists perform toward amore comprehensive understanding of nature or new scientific knowledge. As a reinforcedlearning methodology to greatly assist students’ reasoning and problem-solving skills, virtuallearning was first integrated at the planning stage of their projects. This approach is in contrastwith the typical senior design courses where only limited resources are available for planningexperiments. Using virtual learning
campus and propose action plans, and estimate the economic impact of theirsolution. As a result of this project, students learn how to create value and communicate anengineering solution in terms of economic benefits. Students provide a report for each modulewhich is graded based on designed rubrics. All these modules are performed in teams which inturn improves students’ team work and collaboration skills. This paper elaborates the details ofeach module and learning outcomes, and presents the student evaluation results, and at the enddiscusses the lessons learned.1. IntroductionIn the past few years the attitude that considers engineers as sole reactive specialists has evolvedto team player entrepreneurs. This fact is critical while designing
we have to plan classroomand laboratory sessions by considering all approaches, we can customize one-on-onediscussions and self-study sessions to learning approaches and styles of individuals. Studentshave to be aware that they need to occasionally step out of their preference and work usingother styles and approaches. Learning styles and approaches characterize students at study;therefore, they were included in the assessment.Teamwork (team behavior), which includes egoless behavior, is an important dimension,especially in case of software engineering. The IEEE software engineering body ofknowledge 2 states that a software engineer must be able to interact cooperatively andconstructively with others to first determine and then meet both
integration across courses within CCEM curriculum. The goal of introducingsustainability concepts is two-fold: to enhance undergraduate students’ interest in andunderstanding of sustainability by engaging them in real-world sustainability projects; and toprovide students with necessary knowledge for advancing a career in sustainability withinCCEM. The PBL framework is developed and implemented at "Arizona State University" between alower-division construction management course, Construction Materials, Methods andEquipment (CON252) and an upper-division/graduate cross-disciplinary course between civilengineering course, sustainability, and planning, Urban Infrastructure Anatomy and SustainableDevelopment (CEE 507). CON252 focuses on the building
generally provides wide spread knowledge inproblem solving, management of resources, and process planning. Project Management is a keyskill required by Engineering Technologists, who work in project-driven manufacturingcompanies. Thus, it is imperative to prepare graduates of engineering technology programs toinclude a course on project management. An Industry Advisory Council for a university inLouisiana expressed the need for project management trained graduates, and worked with thedepartment faculty to develop a course on technical project management. The developed courseis offered as part of a new post-baccalaureate certificate program at the university.This paper discusses the development of a project management course tailored to
down. A serial interface was also implemented for the arm controller so the arm could becontrolled from a PC. The students had a mentor from industry to guide them in the design of theirrobot arm and controller. The mentor also evaluated the robot arm and similar designs for use with theRobotic Operating System (ROS) and Moveit software, for possible use of Moveit on future studentprojects.ROS and Moveit bring interesting functions for control of robot arms. The Open Motion PlanningLibrary (OMPL) is used by the Moveit, providing a variety of motion planning algorithms to controlthe students arm. A 3D Camera can be directly used by Moveit to provide obstacle avoidance functionsfor the robot arm. The results of the evaluation of Moveit were
service learning projects can be terrific learningexperiences for students, the level of planning is much greater than for a traditional study abroad program.In addition, numerous other challenges are encountered when working in developing regions, as will bedescribed. 1 Cultural challengesObviously the potential for a language barrier is perhaps the biggest challenge, but other cultural normssuch as style of dress, local cuisine, religious preferences, alcohol use and gestures vary greatly from placeto place. It is important not to inadvertently upset or offend residents of the host country. Often socialnorms, particularly with regard to
obtained through focus groups and surveys. These findings are noteworthybecause scholarship students in this program are graduated at a 95% rate and 50% of themcontinue right on to graduate school. These rates are much higher than the usual 70% graduaterate for upper division transfer students and the less than 15% who go right on to graduateschool.Sustainability is also addressed, including how the academic and professional developmentcourse is now offered to all transfer students through the Dean’s Office. Future plans for theprogram as the grant monies come to a close are addressed.IntroductionIn 2002, Arizona State University (ASU) was awarded a National Science Foundation (NSF) S-STEM scholarship award (# 0123146) for upper division
semester-long data collectionand analysis project which included a fun laboratory experiment to motivate students. Mini-companies of two students each were asked to treat the project as if they had been hired toperform a consulting job for a customer – their professor. The project provided context for theproduction of a series of typical engineering consulting documents: a formal introductory email,a follow-up cover letter, a meeting summary memo, a project specification document includingan estimate/quote, project planning documentation, an interim technical progress report andfinancial summary, and a final technical report were woven through the fabric of the course.Three iterations later, with minor continuous improvement modification based on
-term. You can set goals for your personal andprofessional life. Your goals can have varying complexity and time frames as well. Take sometime to think about your professional and personal goals; they will serve as a guide throughoutyour time in graduate school. Tracy 1 provides seven steps that are helpful for setting andachieving goals: 1. “Decide exactly what you want” 2. “Write it down” 3. “Set a deadline on your goal; set subdeadlines if necessary” 4. “Make a list of everything that you can think of that you are going to have to do to achieve your goal” 5. “Organize the list into a plan” 6. “Take action on your plan immediately” 7. “Resolve to do something every single day that moves you toward your major goal”As an
course credit recognition, resolvinginstitutional and federal travel risk issues, recruitment and selection of students, travel andhousing logistics, local contacts involved in community projects, and follow up of the projectsafter program completion.1. IntroductionBackgroundThe objective of this paper is to provide useful recommendations for planning and executingfaculty-led study abroad programs based on the authors’ experience. In the summer of 2015,UTEP and CETYS conducted a study abroad program funded by the 100,000 Strong in theAmericas Innovation Fund. The program was a real success, but the planning and executionpresented continuous challenges that required quick thinking and adaptability from theorganizers. These lessons are captured in
teaching strategies of engineering project course. Students participated inlearning activities following the instructor's planning and guidance and their learningbehaviors to use a learning system were recorded in the database. Those attributes, such asfrequency, sequence, and association of learning behavior were identified through astructured arrangement and statistical analysis. In addition, those key learning activities thatinspire the students' creativity along with the creativity assessment results were discovered.According to our findings, high creativity students proceeded with active exploration duringlearning more frequently compared to low creativity students. The data analysis also showedmore instances of independent thinking created
course, deadlines and time expectations); in the future, requirements was essential. debriefings with partners would be useful to share suggestions. We needed to Our department has a strong Directly connecting students back connecting students advising team that works with to university issues, university in a streamlined firstyear students on course deadlines, and resources in a way to university registration, academic plans for purposeful manner improves advising, calendar, study, major choices, etc. To students’ connections to the course
what types ofknowledge, skills or attitudinal sets are needed to become an effective ‘life-long learner.’” (p.105)12 Thus, despite McGourty et al.’s call for operational clarification, 1 outcome (i) still appearsto confound many engineering programs.Our research was guided by the question, “How do engineering programs address ABET studentoutcomes as reported within their program self-study documents?” Our research goal was to helpeducators interpret the breadth and specificity of ABET student outcomes by offering a structuraltechnique to interpret outcomes and to plan, implement, and evaluate curricula. This paperpresents our research process—a curriculum design framework to map the components ofstudent outcomes. To illustrate its
an appendix that described thegenesis of the novel, including Flaubert’s development of detailed scenarios for the events of hisnovel in which Flaubert described the setting, characters involved, and outcomes of these events.The level of detail and planning seems remarkable to an engineer; Flaubert even drew a simplemap of the fictional village of Yonville-l’Abbaye in which much of the story takes place. Manypages include cross-outs and marginal notes related to the plot. Faculty in the arts, however, areused to seeing such careful mapping of setting, plot, and characters in imaginative texts,especially in longer works such as novels. Similar plans were made by Charles Dickens andJane Austen for their novels, and by William Wordsworth and