topics included in the course and recognized the collaborative nature of solving real-worldproblems. The students expressed their increased motivation to learn the class topics that werespecifically framed as problems in a cross-disciplinary context. Overall, the approach used waseffective in introducing the students to the importance and relationship of science and engineeringanalyses when interfaced with contemporary government policy. Recommendations are providedfor future implementation of similar collaborative exercises.IntroductionThe engineering curriculum needs to be broadened by integrating more content from liberal arts,public policy, economics, and other technical and non-technical fields of knowledge [1], [2].Engineering students
supported by different instances of curricular advancement.This study's relevance rests on the fact that the management tradition in Chile only incorporatesthe economic dimension of problems, so this experience leads us to seek how to improve thecurrent engineering training by developing sustainable and equitable solutions to change the waycompanies currently operate.Keywords: sustainability, higher education, educational innovation, Sustainable DevelopmentGoals, future challengesINTRODUCTIONIn 2015, the United Nations (UN) world leaders committed to sustainability through 17Sustainable Development Goals, commonly known as SDGs [1]. The achievement of these goalsrequires a sustained planetary-level effort for a new development model to ensure
Taiwan. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that Taiwanese students weremore familiar with ocean ecology and plastic product reduction, whereas US students paidgreater attention to meat consumption and energy waste via private transportation. Findings inthis study revealed strong pro-environment perceptions among the youth differentiated bynationality. Educational recommendations were provided based on the study findings.1. Introduction1.1 Research Background Environmental problems, such as pollution, climate change, depletion of natural resources,and biodiversity loss, are urgent global issues. The ongoing environmental problems can beattributed to increasing population, economic development and industrialization, pollution,urbanization, and
isusually jointly administered by the colleges of engineering and agriculture and integratesengineering with agricultural, biological, food, ecological, environmental, and chemical systemsto develop innovative solutions to sustainable food, fuel, and fiber. As a part of this program,students in their final year are required to complete a capstone design project that fulfills thedegree requirements. These capstone design projects, as also suggested by [1] [2], involveaddressing engineering problems by combining theoretical and practical, and critical thinkingskills acquired in the classroom, laboratories, and field visits during the preceding three years.Besides, soft skills such as team building, written and oral communications, project and
has also worked extensively with high schools to advance student learning success. Malshe’s notable honors include: Membership in the National Academy of En- gineering (NAE) for ”For innovations in nanomanufacturing with impact in multiple industry sectors”; Society of Manufacturing (SME)’s David Dornfeld Blue Sky Manufacturing Idea Award for ”Factories- In-Space”; SME-S.M. Wu Research Implementation Award; three Edison Awards for Innovation; Tibbett Award by the US Small Business Association sponsored by EPA for successful technology transfer; R&D 100 Award, (the ”Oscar” of innovation); Fellowships to the International 1. Academy of Production Engineering (CIRP), 2. the American Society of Materials (ASM), 3
suggestions made by the students of one peer with whom they are compatible.The goal of this process is to ensure that all voices within the group are heard and to minimizethe impact of a potentially dominant group member.The first semester focuses on the first steps of the design process: developing a problemstatement, researching the problem, generating design ideas, evaluating and selecting a design,and detailing a design solution with a supporting engineering analysis using foundationalknowledge learned in prior courses and independently as needed (Figure 1). The final outcomefor the first semester is a design package, which will allow for the system to be built to print inthe second semester. The second semester focuses on enhancing the design
, theLeonhard Center coordinated a number of initiatives to help faculty move forward with their teaching.Our process was: Identify what worked during the emergency transition, listen to questions from facultyabout things that did not work, then provide faculty development support in targeted areas focusing on theFall 2020 semester. The overall timeline is displayed in Figure 1. May June July Look What Our College Accomplished! Townhalls Summer Workshop Series Figure 1. Timeline of Center Pandemic InitiativesMay 2020: Look What Our College Accomplished! SeriesAs the Spring 2020 semester wrapped-up, the Leonhard
open toquestions. Our department chair is deeply integrated in our program’s teaching and led the chargeas we pivoted to emergency remote teaching (ERT) halfway through the Spring 2020 semester.In this paper, we reflect on how our department’s faculty successfully navigated the transition toERT and share lessons learned on how we continue to maintain high quality education whileonline. We have also reported elsewhere on our students' responses to the adjustments madeduring the COVID-19 pandemic using a compassionate flexibility model [1].Establishment of a Virtual Community of PracticeBefore the pandemic, our department of five faculty already had strong relationships and anetwork of support. When classes were cancelled for a week to prepare
a larger research study of faculty development,pedagogical practices, and student support. This includes three semi-structured interviews withthe manager of the makerspace (a university faculty member), 4 faculty member interviews, andartifacts including images, videos, and student projects that demonstrate the results of theinstructional and pedagogical shifts throughout the pandemic. See Figure 1 for a timeline of datacollection and important events.Figure 1: Timeline of Data CollectionLessons Learned Throughout the 2020 Spring and Fall Semester there were key moments that illustratedvarious shifts in the way the makerspace approached faculty development. After the pivot, themakerspace staff adopted a triage mentality. Student
doing engineering with engineers [1] - [7]. As part of this culture change, thedepartment implemented several major curricular changes beginning Fall 2019 [1] - [4]. Thesechanges were designed to give students hands-on engineering experiences and engage them withpracticing engineers. The department introduced a new required integrated design sequence forthe first, second, and third-year students [3], [4]. The new design sequence complements theexisting year-long, industry-sponsored senior design experience. The circuits andinstrumentation courses were replaced with a lab-focused, two-course sequence combiningcircuits and instrumentation curriculum [7]. Senior design was retooled to better reflect theexperiences of working engineers [3], [4]. In
Education for Engineers.For decades the business of ideas and creating startups was relegated to the business schools withengineers coming in to just complete the creative part of the business or to create the MinimumViable Product or MVP. But for the last decade or so, we have seen a proliferation of engineeringschools offer entrepreneurship education. In the United States, many faculty and engineeringstudents act as the entrepreneurial lead and participate in the Innovation Corps programs offeredby NSF [1]. This has been successful in promoting start-ups originating from universities and ledby students, faculty and post-doctoral fellows, who are trained using the Lean Launchpad method.[2] In order to replicate this model in India, we embarked on
College (1988) and holds a PhD in developmental psychology from Teachers College, Columbia University (1999). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Observing empathy in informal engineering activities with girls ages 7-14 (RTP, Diversity)BackgroundResearch and policy shifts in engineering education have identified socioemotional skills likeempathy as a fundamental and often neglected part of engineering practice [1]-[2]. This workargues that solving complex engineering challenges with societal and ethical implicationsrequires engineers to empathize with clients and colleagues whose perspectives and needs mightdiffer from their own [1]-[4]. Humanistic
after the COVERAGEproject was initiated. As a result, almost all the activities had to be changed to an online platform[1], over which the participating students program robots virtually. In Fall 2020 and Spring 2021,online instructions were offered every week via Microsoft Teams, intending to guide theparticipating middle school students to program virtual robots. All the Teams sessions arerecorded and shared with all the participants, such that the middle school students could visitthem anytime. In addition to online instructions, at least one hour was designated every week forthe mentors (who are female undergraduate students) to work with the participating middleschool students on the online assignments under the supervision of middle
of testingin an LMS that could be done much better to suit our individual needs. In this paper, we discusssome of the types of questions that we use in Blackboard Exams and some of the computer toolsthat we use to create them. We discuss some of the successes as well as some tricks of the tradethat we use to address our objectives. Finally, we discuss some additional tools that we use tomitigate cheating. This paper covers subjects such as: 1) Different types of Blackboard questions a. Calculated Formula b. Multiple Choice c. Fill in the Blank d. Fill in Multiple Blanks 2) Software tools to help write questions (e.g.) a. Mathematica b. Excel c. Visio 3
national technology education nonprofits including the Computer Science for All and Nation of Makers. Andrew was also the lead author on the Maryland Access Task Force report to Maryland’s Governor Larry Hogan. His work has been recognized by Baltimore Business Journal, The Daily Record, Forbes Magazine, Baltimore Sun, Education Week, and K12 Magazine.Ms. Amy L. Freeland, University of Maryland Baltimore County Ms. Freeland’s areas of interest include HCI, Assistive Technology, Inclusive Practices, Everyday Com- puting, Ethical and Legal Practices Pertaining to Computing. In the past, she has worked on projects that include (1) the study of assistive technology as it pertains to individuals with multiple disabilities
Teaching Blockchain at the Undergraduate Level Dr. Emil H. Salib, Zachary Lee Shaver and Ryan Derek Rambilas salibeh@jmu.edu, shaverzl@dukes.jmu.edu and rambilrd@dukes.jmu.edu College of Science and Engineering (CISE), James Madison University (JMU), Harrisonburg, VA 228071 IntroductionBlockchain technology [1] is positioned to change the way we execute and manage contracts (andassociated transactions and records) between individuals and/or organizations from being highlycentralized (through agencies) to being decentralized (directly between the concerned parties andcommunities). In the implementation of this technology for public use, by design, once a
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Transforming A Large Lecture FYE Course Structure into Virtual Collaborative LearningIntroductionFirst Year Experience (FYE) engineering courses at large, research-focused universities present aunique challenge from a curricular and administrative perspective. Prior research indicates thatFYE engineering courses should be interdisciplinary and highly interactive, whilesimultaneously presenting enough technical and career-specific content within each engineeringdiscipline to facilitate students’ choices of majors [1]–[5]. These course characteristics are mosteffectively supported by student-centered pedagogical approaches, such as project-based learning(PBL) [6
Experience in a First-year Engineering Design Class to a Remote Learning Environment 1. Introduction and BackgroundThis evidence-based practice paper describes the transformation of the hands-on learningexperience for MAE 3 Introduction to Engineering Graphics and Design at University ofCalifornia San Diego (UCSD) for remote instruction. As a first year engineering design course,it plays an important role in establishing the foundation for students’ principal area of study,teaching basic design methods, and helping the students gain a better understanding of theirchosen major, which is essential for their intellectual development and engineering identityformation. As the first design course in the curriculum, the course aims to
Program at the University of Oklahoma [1] is a four-week residentialcamp for pre-freshmen engineering students that introduces students to the University, theGallogly College of Engineering, and many of the resources available for students as they completetheir education. The students typically enroll in a mathematics course and a pre-chemistry courseand participate in a variety of team-building activities to further prepare the students as theyprepare to begin their first semester. One of the central activities of the program is aninterdisciplinary engineering design project that introduces students to the engineering designprocess as well as facilities to which all engineering students have access for their careers. In thesummer of 2020, the
introductory class designedspecifically for the BS in Data Science program. In this pilot study, we taught data analysisutilizing data sets collected by the New York City agencies 1. Our findings demonstrate that usingreal-life data sets encourages students to compare the results learned from data about theircommunities and their everyday experiences. We believe that using such a teaching approach canbe a great start for igniting the interest in the field as well as in society-aware aspects of dataanalysis.1. IntroductionGraduates with knowledge in the field of Data Science are currently in great demand in industryand research. This demand is much higher than the number of graduates with adequate training.A data scientist is expected to have training
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Virtual Hands-On: Taking a Design Lab OnlineImpetus: COVID as a design constraintAs with the rest of industrialized society, the reliance of design education on digital tools andvirtual platforms is on the rise. There are ample examples in the literature dealing withtransitioning specific learning outcomes from hands-on to online.[1] However, what if thetransition to the virtual space was total, immediate, and involuntary? Of course, this scenario isexactly what the COVID-19 pandemic engendered for a number of professions. For many of usinvolved in teaching engineering design, this manifested an interesting and urgent challenge.How do we run normally hands-on, data-driven labs online
growth.IntroductionBeyond the catastrophic effects on public health and the economy, the onset of the COVID-19pandemic in the US during late winter and early spring 2020 essentially shut down access toexperiential learning and internships for university students [1], [2], [3]. By mid-May 2020, alarge percentage of previously confirmed internships for summer 2020 were rescinded. ANational Association of Colleges and Employers survey in April 2020 found that employerswere revoking two-thirds of their summer internships, and many of those that remained movedinterns into virtual programs (46.2%) and reduced the length of internships (41%) [4].Companies could not have interns working on-site due to in-person activities being significantlyreduced or prohibited by public
. Such experiential transfer is likely differentthan knowledge transfer across disciplinary domains and may be enhanced by supporting thedevelopment of goal-based concepts. Furthermore, although this characteristic is oftendecomposed into discrete educational outcomes such as teamwork or communication, definingand assessing outcomes necessarily emphasizes skill within a domain rather than synthesis acrossdomains. Thus outcomes-based assessment may be counter-productive to developing soughtafter characteristics of graduates.Introduction and BackgroundThis paper examines one of the foundations of modern engineering education, defining andmeasuring educational outcomes, through the lens of philosophy, or “truth estimation” [1]. Thegoal of this
challenges that mathematics faculty and graduateteaching assistants (GTAs) faced when moving active and collaborative learning (ACL) incalculus courses from in-person to virtual instruction in Spring 2020. Understanding thesechallenges will help us create better support for GTAs and instructors moving to ACL in bothonline and face-to-face environments.The change efforts discussed in this paper are part of an NSF-supported project that aims tomake ACL the default method of instruction in highly enrolled gateway STEM courses across alarge public Research-1 university. Active learning has been shown to improve both retentionand understanding in STEM [1]. The theoretical framework for the project builds on existingwork of grassroots change in higher
writing, reflective thinking, qualitative data analysis, machine analysis“It is so Much Easier to Educate Students for Our Past than for Their Future” Aldert KampIntroductionThe quote above from Kamp’s 2020 [1] book1 implies that engineering education should lookforward, not backward, in its pedagogical principles and practices. According to Kamp, theworld is rapidly changing, increasingly complex, often chaotic, and being re-built on the realityof globalization and connectedness. He suggests that “It might even be more important to foundeducational change on the things technology cannot do, the things that are strictly human!”, andadvises that “Engineering students have to learn that people policies, environmental aspects,politics, economics or
pursuing STEM baccalaureate degrees lies in examining and addressing theculture of the engineering classroom and the engineering laboratory (Ibarra, 1999). The methods throughwhich engineering faculty choose to enrich and mentor students makes just a significant impact in whatthey are being taught. Brown Jr. offers fours components needed for strengthening the relationshipbetween underrepresented students and STEM baccalaureate degree pursual: (1) prioritizing diversity; (2)providing mentoring; (3) involving students in professional development activities; and (4) incorporatingreal cultural context within the framing of research (2011). Implementation of such elements within thestudy’s Biomechatronic Learning Laboratory for rehabilitation robotics
independentstudy but also the design process of the small-scale pendulum which can be reproducedanywhere else in the world with a low budget. Introduction Léon Foucault first started publicly conducting his famous experiment in 1851. Hisdemonstration (now dubbed the Foucault Pendulum) has since been recreated in museums anduniversities worldwide. He suspended a 28-kg iron coated lead ball from a height of 67-m fromthe dome of the Panthéon, Paris, France [1]. He demonstrated how the precession waspredictable according to the latitude of the location of the pendulum. Although impressive, thissetup is not necessarily easy to reproduce at this scale. To understand the theory behind a pendulum’s precession, the student was directed tovarious
open educational resource at the “ME Online”website (www.cpp.edu/meonline), which has accumulated over 8,600,000 views as of March2021. In 2018, a brief survey was administered to 340 mechanical engineering students at CalPoly Pomona as part of a pilot study to investigate the impact of ME Online [1]. The surveyresults were promising – the vast majority of students felt the video library made a positiveimpact on their education and helped their grades in at least one course. However, the survey didnot explore the socio-emotional impact of the video library on students nor obtain specificrecommendations of how the video library could be improved to enhance student success.The current study was designed to gain a deeper understanding of how ME
maintaining an online course environment, yet were tasked withdeveloping their summer courses in a short period of time. In addition to these suddeneducational delivery changes, research findings indicate that supportive interventions to reduceloneliness should prioritize younger individuals during the COVID 19 pandemic [1]. This paperreviews the successful online transition of an in-person engineering innovation course thatutilizes project based educational methods to an online environment during the summer of 2020and the subsequent fall semester. In total, 174 undergraduate and graduate multidisciplinaryengineering students completed this course in the new online format during the summer and 131students took the course in the fall semester of 2020
technological systems and the products of the engineering disciplines. Systems thinking isconceptual and doesn't rely on higher-level mathematics knowledge explicitly. It is one of themost accessible aspects of engineering for non-engineers. Non-engineers can learn the basics ofhow things work.Definition of Systems ThinkingThe applicability of systems thinking across many different fields has led to many variations ofdefinitions of system thinking (some representative examples include [1-5]). While sharing anessential emphasis on the foundational importance of identifying elements and relationshipsbetween those elements, varying definitions reflect the vocabulary and priorities of differentdisciplines. Recent comprehensive definitions aimed at