Board.David S. Hurwitz, Oregon State University Dr. Hurwitz serves as an Assistant Professor in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Ore- gon State University (OSU). He teaches graduate and undergraduate classes in traffic operations, highway design, traffic signal design, and transportation safety. His areas of research interest include traffic en- gineering, driver behavior, driving simulation, and human factors. Dr. Hurwitz founded a traffic data collection company in Massachusetts that successfully completed numerous projects with private compa- nies and public agencies during his 5 year tenure with the firm. He is an active member of TRB, ASCE, and ITE.Shashi S. Nambisan, Iowa State University
content they were learning. Ultimately, all students entered the lab with some degreeof curiosity and engaging in a research experience provided an opportunity to explore newquestions and deepen prior knowledge.Response to uncertainty Every student interviewed in the study reported that they sought the help of a graduatestudent when they encountered uncertainty, and most also mentioned the lab’s PI as a source ofhelp. In many cases, students worked directly with a graduate student in the lab and assistedthem with their projects, therefore, it is likely that grad students were often physically present inthe lab when uncertainty arose or were available to call or email. It is also possible thatundergraduate students felt more comfortable
affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Science and Technology Policy Fellowship in 2013-2014, with a placement at the National Science Foundation.Dr. George T. MacDonald, University of South Florida Dr. George MacDonald is the interim Director for the Center for Research, Evaluation, Assessment, and Measurement (CREAM) in the College of Education at the University of South Florida(USF). He is the Co-Principal
thefollowing topics: estimation, expected value and expected error in decision making, sampledistributions and sizes (e.g., significance, hypothesis testing, non-normal distributions), andgoodness of fit, including correlation coefficient, standard errors, and R2 [12]. The purpose ofthis exam is to test engineers’ overall competency across core areas of an undergraduatedegree in a given engineering discipline. IDE students are required to take the FE exam priorto graduation, and they are encouraged to take the “Other Disciplines” version of the exam.The IDE Program recently discussed ideas for how we could further help our students preparefor the FE exam, and each instructor was asked to evaluate the overlap of their course contentwith the applicable
SelectionWhile 122 students filled out the pre-survey, and 107 students filled out the post-survey, only 99students completed both the pre- and post-survey with no missing data. The top three factorsimpacting major decisions at the beginning of the semester for all students were job opportunitiesafter graduation, personal interest, and salary levels (Table 2). All three of these factors had anaverage importance level greater than 4 on the provided scale from 1 (not at all important) to 5(extremely important). While the influential impacting factors found in the literature vary, jobprospects and personal interest are most identified as top factors by other studies [4], [8], whichagrees with our results. The salary level, however, has not been
decisions in the form of curriculumchoices9,10,11,12,13,14,15. Many of these middle school and high school students passively eliminatetechnical career options by not choosing courses that are not needed for these STEM fields9. Inmany cases, students who pursue STEM courses have made these career decisions before theyfinish high school so that STEM career exploration summer programs before their senior year, orbefore they start college may be too late. With this consideration, the SEI team is planning todevelop a curriculum that will be implemented in an engineering institute for middle schoolstudents.AcknowledgementsThis project was supported by a grant from the US Department of Education through theMinority Science and Engineering Improvement
and selection techniques employed by engineers. Verification – Engineers must verify that their selected concept satisfies the design constraints, requirements, and customer needs. Communication – Students learn good communication skills and unique aspects of how engineers document and present design ideas and analytical results. Emphasis is placed on creating communication artifacts to ensure accurate interpretation by others (with an eye toward clarity, detail, precision of process, and completeness). Collaboration – Students learn the importance of working on multidisciplinary teams and understand what type of team member they are. Emphasis is placed on engineering personality
for queer folks, women, and people of color, through empowerment, collaboration, and co-development for a more equitable world. Shannon is also a Senior Graduate Facilitator and Lab Manager with the Center for Socially Engaged Design.Dr. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is the Research and Faculty Engagement Manager in the Center for Socially Engaged Design within University of Michigan College of Engineering. She earned a PhD and MA in Higher Education from Michigan and a Bachelor’s in Psychology and Sociology from Case Western Reserve University.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She
conceptualized from a longitudinal study of a scholar’s program atthree different universities in the state of Nebraska. A department faculty member was part of amulti-year institutional professional learning community (PLC) that explored the scale-up andscale-out of this model. Based on their experience from the PLC, this model was used in thedevelopment of the department’s overall student services ethos and in the specificimplementation of two initiatives: 1) hybrid advising/mentoring model, and 2) peer-mentoringprogram. This practice paper provides an overview of the ecological validation model andpresents our approach to implementing these initiatives. We also reflect on challenges and futureopportunities including long-term sustainability and
peerinteractions as well as interactions with faculty members, and these interactions could encouragemore effective understanding of materials and exploration of topics. Second, liberal artseducation focuses on cultivating adaptive problem-solving skills based on critical thinking,collaboration, and effective communication. These skills make students valuable collaborators inengineering projects and afford them a smooth transition into professional life [3]. That means aliberal arts education can potentially lead to a successful engineering career.In the meantime, the integration of engineering education into liberal arts universities posesseveral challenges to the engineering faculty members. For instance, faculty members may lackthe knowledge needed to
and provided topicsuggestions in alignment with what the faculty previously considered.The faculty also utilized the advisory board’s expertise to review the proposed content of a newcourse that would integrate the use of simulation with traditional lecture to provide students withan enhanced technical understanding of how the NAS and ATC works. The intention was thesame as the pilot foundation course, which is to help students make informed decisions in theirfuture jobs. The faculty also proposed to the board the idea of requiring flight students to takethis course. The majority of flight students graduating from the program would be dealing withATC their entire professional flying career. The justification of this requirement was that
little training, students are allowed to use tools andmaterials to create objects and complete projects, both personal and for class. Theinformal learning space is the perfect place for students to explore, push themselves anddevelop their ability to struggle through ambiguity, persevere in the face of challenges,and drive towards an end result. Through active participation in the space, studentsbecome part of the SIL community and culture, allowing them to learn fromexperienced members of the space and share their work with others, as they engage in avariety of making projects.The Mobile Makerspace Redesign ChallengeThe IDC on which this study focused was to redesign and improve the university’s newlyacquired mobile makerspace, to better meet
Page 13.1318.12 • provide advice concerning resources (people, potential partnerships, and funds) for Educational Opportunity programs • provide direction in the development and improvement of the Department’s precollege career explorations • recommend improvements in advertising and marketing strategies for Department programs • provide advice for fine tuning Educational Opportunity business processes The greatest impact the Board has had is in its very presence on campus. It aggressivelyquestions staff, faculty, students and the upper administration about our commitment to diversity.The Board is an advocate that consistently reminds our fairly isolated campus that we must be adiverse university and that we
Paper ID #39784Motivations and Barriers to Participation in Community Outreach andEngagement among Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Stu-dentsSydney Donohue, University of New Mexico Sydney Donohue is a graduate student in the Water Resources Program at the University of New Mexico. She works as the Outreach Coordinator for the Center for Water and the Environment and the Intermoun- tain West Transformation Network. She holds a B.A. in Ecology from the University of Georgia.Dr. Anjali Mulchandani, University of New Mexico Dr. Anjali Mulchandani is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction and
-curricularor both. Entrepreneurial Site and Data Collection Data was collected from an entrepreneurship program anchored in a large, Midwest,public research university college of engineering center for entrepreneurship (CFE). The CFEwas developed in response to student, alumni, faculty and administrative demands to address theneeds of educating engineering students for the changing economy. Both curricular and co-curricular experiences were supported by the CFE (Table 2) at different levels (i.e., staff,training, funding, mentorship, etc.). Curricular experiences included individual entrepreneurshipclasses and a formal 9-credit certificate program, designated the Program in Entrepreneurship.The formal Program in Entrepreneurship required
role of corporate responsibility in employee recruitment and retention. Before coming to IUPUI, Brandon ran the day-to-day operations of the Indiana STEM Resource Network where he co-founded the Indiana Science Initiative which provides research based science materials and professional development to approximately 2200 teachers impacting over 50,000 students each year. .Dr. Mary F. Price, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis ASEE Presentation Mary F. Price (price6@iupui.edu ) is an anthropologist and Director of Faculty Devel- opment at the IUPUI Center for Service and Learning. Mary works with scholar-practitioners, students and community members to strengthen practice, deepen learning and facilitate
disciplines to participate in the community during the second year of the project.Participants will commit to attending two 2-hour sessions per month and to integrate computinginto one of their courses by developing an assignment, lecture, in-class exercise, or etc. Anindustry panel, comprised of a new set of 4-6 representatives, will be formed each semester andwill be asked to attend at least one session per month. The graduate student assistant trainedduring the planning phase will be available to provide personal attention to faculty participants toaid in executing the ideas generated and for assistance in developing relevant assessmentmeasures. The semester will culminate with a poster session and/or some form of disseminationof information to
-of-the-art technologies in theirrespective research areas. This includes appropriate literature reviews, advanced analysistechniques, numerical simulations, and experimental investigations, where appropriate.Ideally, the graduate students working on Imation-supported projects will also conductresearch and development at the Imation facility for a minimum of three months per calendaryear. This is an excellent workforce development model to produce the next generation ofhighly-qualified scientists and engineers, in which graduate education and the ability to workboth independently and as a member of multidisciplinary teams are required. Ultimately, oneof the long-term goals of this partnership is to further promote graduate-level education
project designed toincrease the participation of people with disabilities in education and careers in engineering andimprove engineering fields with their perspectives and expertise. We are working withengineering faculty nationwide to (1) better serve a diverse student body that includes studentswith disabilities in engineering courses and programs, and (2) integrate relevant disability-relatedand universal design content into engineering courses.Starting in 2015, we will host a workshop each year with engineering faculty from across thecountry to discuss their approaches to achieving these goals. We will be drafting resources basedon these conversations and disseminating them widely through our networks of engineeringfaculty members, the
Paper ID #41767Preparing Students for Successful Industrial Collaborations in Engineering(Work in progress)Mr. Chun Kit Chan, The University of Hong Kong Mr. Ryan Chun Kit Chan is a Senior Technical Assistant in the Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wing, Faculty of Engineering at the University of Hong Kong after graduation. Before graduation, Ryan served as an undergraduate research assistant in Innovation Wing and has involved in the design and implementation of a world-record-holding robotic fish. Ryan received his Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Hong Kong. Ryan’s research focuses on robotic
President of the Student Government Association, and a member of the MSU chapter of the National Society of Black Engineers. Active in community outreach, he is also President of SMOOTH, an innovative student organization fostering Black male achievement and collaboration across disciplines, backgrounds and cultures.Dr. Keyanoush Sadeghipour, Temple University Keya Sadeghipour is currently a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering and serves as the Dean of the College of Engineering since 2003. He is a graduate of Mechanical Engineering from the University of Manchester Institute of Technology, UK which is now the University of Manchester. He has been involved in receiving over $7 M funding from various
mentoring relationships are effective inpromoting protégé advancement and compensation. 3,4Mentoring is traditionally a developmental relationship in which an experienced person providessupport to a less experienced person. In return, the mentor gains personal satisfaction, respectfrom colleagues for successfully developing the younger talent, and in the best case growsintellectually as well. Mentoring has multiple aspects and functions, and has variously beendescribed as fulfilling either or both the technical and psychosocial needs of the less experiencedperson. Examples of the technical knowledge-based or career development issues include how tosolve a particular technical problem, continue intellectual growth, approach a new internship, jobor
higher rates of mental health conditions in engineeringand understand factors that influence students’ decisions to seek help. Wider scale studies andcross-institutional engineering-specific studies can provide additional evidence for understandingthe mental health issues faced by our students and how engineering education plays a role inthem and their ability to address such issues timely. Aligned with that objective, this studypresents an initial exploration of the relationship between the stigma typically associated withmental health conditions and help-seeking behavior of students. It is a first step toward a morethorough examination of the engineering culture and its effect on students’ mental health.Engineering culture and mental
Success Programs which include an array of services geared towardhelping students achieve academic success. These include general advising, career advancement,education abroad, disability resources, first-year programs, testing, tutoring and military services. Figure 1. Advising structure at this universityThe College of Engineering supports a dual advising system comprised of professional advisingand faculty mentoring. It has the office of the Assistant Director of Academics which serves asthe professional advising arm. It is aided by the undergraduate coordinator which is usually anindividual engineering faculty member. Both combined, advise the first-year and second yearstudents with their transitional needs
, particularly in the design thread of the ECE curriculum. Initial results are positive, andthe project is currently experimenting with different e-portfolio formats that can elicit howstudents are developing both functionings and capabilities. One major issue that is still beingworked out is how to have a single portfolio that covers all four years of the program. The initialexperiments are thus focused on having students address different prompts each year. In the firstyear students explore various functionings in the major and identify personally relevantfunctionings. In the second year the focus is on potential careers, extending the functioningsview beyond the undergraduate program. In the third year students focus on processes ofpersonal
degrees and suggests strategies to encourage and attract morewomen to study and work in the industry. The results of the study highlight that personal interestin construction and career opportunities are the most significant factors influencing femalestudents' decisions to major in CEM. Furthermore, the majority of students reported positivelearning experiences during their studies. The findings inform recommendations for CEMprogram recruitment efforts. The recommendations include collaborating with a ProfessionalWomen in Construction chapter to provide prospective students with increased opportunities forengagement within the construction industry. Additionally, enhancing advertising efforts throughsocial media platforms and the internet
the introductory engineering course, which had a total of 23 students enrolled duringthe first implementation, was provided by a faculty member from the UTEP Engineering Leadership andEducation Department. Students were allowed to complete the financial literacy learning modulesprogressively at their own time throughout the spring 2022 semester. A pre-semester survey was sent tothe students to have a baseline of students’ knowledge of personal and college related financial management.The students’ participation in the learning modules and final project was analyzed to determine thepreliminary impact of the first implementation of the financial literacy course. From this study, studentsshowed interest in learning more about personal finance
1st year students cognitive and non-cognitive profiles,testing an applied engineering math course, and incrementally shifting faculty andadministrative culture from transactional relationships to higher quality studentengagement for 1st year students. Between Fall 2014 and Fall 2015 qualitative data wascollected measuring new students’ initial “grit”, motivations and career expectations.The total sample (N=509) consisted of 84% freshmen, 16% transfers, 21% women and14% minority students. Quantitative data included an analysis of the high school SATsand initial university math placement scores for Fall 2014-Fall 2015, a comparativeanalysis of the same data for the Fall 2011-Fall 2013 cohorts, and an analysis of studentoutcomes from an adapted
, Electrical Engineering, Industrial Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering); providing FEP students with academic, career, and personal advising in a proactive manner; fostering a sense of community among FEP students, other CoE students, the CoE faculty, and the balance of the UofA community.The FEP is executed via two sub-programs – the Freshman Engineering Academic Program(FEAP) and the Freshman Engineering Student Services Program (FESSP). These sub-programsare executed by a faculty Director, two full-time professional staff members, two instructors, andfive graduate teaching assistants.The Freshman Engineering Academic ProgramThe FEAP is a two-semester, thirty-credit-hour program designed on the basis of the
retention and engagement in the university community?This 1-unit introductory course has been developed around three themes: • Entering the Engineering/Computer Science Profession • Engaging in the University Community • Building Skills for SuccessTo develop students’ professional skills and knowledge of career paths available, the first-yearstudents in this course meet with student leaders, engage in breakout group discussions with theChairperson or a faculty member from their intended major, watch and reflect on brief videosabout each of the majors offered in the School of Engineering and Computer Science, andparticipate in classroom activities focused on professional communication and ethics.Active engagement in the university community is