undergraduate engineering program requires identification of actualcustomers of the program. Most commonly these customers maybe - students, companies which might hirethem, and graduate schools where they may go for further education. Any revision however, must follow thevery specific guidelines outlined by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). ABEThas specific structured programming requirements for different engineering disciplines. This study will reflecthow several engineering schools that used to have a common programming language requirement for allengineering freshrnen are gradually moving towards change. Some are offering different languages to studentsin different programs, while others are dropping structured
assessthe overall operation of a college or university from a broad perspective, and specialized ac-creditation, which focuses in detail on specific programs that educate students for professions(law, medicine, engineering, etc.).Engineering programs in the U.S. are accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission(EAC) of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET). ABET is theonly organization recognized by the U.S. Office of Education to accredit Engineering and Engi-neering Technology programs in the United States. ABET was established in 1932 as the Engi-neers’ Council for Professional Development (ECPD), a federation of seven professional socie-ties: AIChE, AIEE (now IEEE), AIME, ASCE, ASME, NCEE (now NCEES), and
transformation initiatives and enhancing theoverall understanding of systems engineering in diverse industrial contexts.Keywords: Digital Transformation, Systems Engineering, INCOSE Vee Model, PBL1.0 Introduction1.1 Background Digital transformation represents the integration of digital technology into all areas of abusiness, fundamentally altering how businesses operate and deliver value to customers. Thistransformation is not limited to the digitization of paper records but extends to comprehensiveshifts in business models and processes. Examples of digital transformation include the adoptionof cloud computing, implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning, utilization ofbig data and analytics, and the integration of
: technology, investment, and publicpolicy. A secondary objective for offering the course was to stimulate interest in energy-relatedcareers, a field that today lacks adequate personnel with expertise and will have vastly increasedneeds for such talent in the future3, 7.Throughout the course, frequent references are made to the engineering elements involved in agiven conversion technology, as well as the engineering issues latent in existing and proposedenergy policies. It is stressed that the discipline of engineering is often viewed as the applicationof science and technology to the needs of society, which reinforces to the students thatengineering energy solutions go beyond technology to include such aspects as economics,finance, and policy
Paper ID #16973A Principlist Approach for Thinking About the Social Impacts of Engineer-ingDr. Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida Jonathan Beever is Assistant Professor of Philosophy and faculty with the Texts & Technology Program at The University of Central Florida. He has held postdoctoral positions with Penn State’s Rock Ethics Institute and with Purdue University’s Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering before joining UCF. He has held fellowships with the Kaufmann Foundation, the Aldo Leopold Foundation, and the Global Sustainable Soundscape Network. Jonathan works and publishes at the intersection of
Session 1526 Digital and Control Labs for a New Manufacturing Engineering Curriculum Karl D. Stephan and Vedaraman Sriraman Department of Technology Southwest Texas State University San Marcos, TX 78666 Abstract: We present work in progress which describes the development or redesign oftwo courses in the manufacturing engineering curriculum which was founded at Southwest TexasState University in the fall of 2000. Digital electronics
Paper ID #38004Advancing Student Perspectives through Bi-Institutional HemisphericCollaboration in Humanitarian EngineeringProf. Aaron Brown, Metropolitan State University of Denver 1st author: Aaron Brown is a professor and program director at Metropolitan State University of Denver in the Department of Engineering and Engineering Technology. He has directed much of his work towards a focus in the areas of Appropriate Design, Humanitarian Engineering and Humanitarian Technology. Dr. Brown has worked on projects that help marginalized or vulnerable people all over the globe in such locations as Costa Rica, the Dominican
the case with universities offering predominantly undergraduate programsin engineering with a limited number of faculty. Robotics and mechatronics are amongthe frontier areas of electrical, mechanical, and computer engineering. Project-basedlearning experiences for undergraduate students in these disciplines can provide valuablereal-world problem solving experience, expose them to new or established courses thatstudents are not formally being taught, serve community outreach, and potentiallyproduce innovative technologies and products for entrepreneurship by graduates. Thispaper discusses the project-based learning experiences of the author's undergraduateengineering students at the University of Michigan-Flint, in the fields of robotics
citations, and has received funding for 21 grants and contracts totaling over $2,700,000. Her email is petrie@fau.edu.Dhushy Sathianathan, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Dhushy Sathianathan received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Penn State University, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Oklahoma State University. Since 2002, he is the Head of the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs (SEDTAPP) in the College of Engineering at Penn State University. As the head of SEDTAPP, Dr. Sathianathan provides leadership for several engineering programs both at University Park and at 19 Penn State campuses. At University Park the programs include Engineering Design
exercises place an emphasis on visualization of complex processes insolid state device engineering. Apart from the conspicuous objective of learning thedevice behavior from “tweaking” design parameters. One might ask, Where is the designaspect? The design aspect is hidden in the production of the materials by the students.According to the premonitions and observations before and during the assignments thefollowing specifics were accomplished: • Incorporating small programs for data manipulation. • Designing an easy to understand data graph. • Choosing the best technology and approach to implement the illustration. • Comparison of various approaches and selection of the most viable approach in a group setting. • Using a time line with
Paper ID #33620Olympics on the Moon: A Challenge for Engineering Design o˜Mr. Cristi´ n Eduardo Vargas Ord´ nez P.E., Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) a o˜ Cristi´ n Vargas-Ord´ nez is a Colombian graduate student and research assistant in Engineering Educa- a tion at Purdue University. He is a Master in Education from the University of Los Andes in Colombia, a Master in Science, Technology, and Society from the National University of Quilmes in Argentina, and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of America in Colombia. As
the United States (US) K-12 setting is an idea that has been gainingattention as professional and educational groups push for its inclusion into the pre-college STEMclassrooms 1-4. Other countries such as the United Kingdom (UK), Australia, New Zealand, andCanada include design and technology in their pre-college curriculum 5-8.The International Technology Education Association (ITEA) places engineering design withintechnology education classrooms and describes engineering design as demanding “criticalthinking, the application of technical knowledge, creativity, and an appreciation of the effects ofa design on society and the environment” 1. The National Research Council (NRC)3 recognizesthe importance of the relationship between the
), a joint degree offered between Lehigh’s College of Businessand Economics and our Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Science. The IBEcurriculum, supported in part by Lehigh’s Integrated Product Development (IPD) Program,features a multidisciplinary freshman projects workshop course, described in this paper, acapstone technology entrepreneurship experience, as well as special seminars or workshops eachsemester. IBE students can major in any of Lehigh’s business fields or in electrical engineering,civil engineering, computer technology, environmental engineering, industrial engineering,materials science and engineering, mechanical engineering, or structural engineering, whiletaking a variety of courses in business, engineering and arts
Chair in Engineering Education and Innovative Learning at San Jos´e State University (SJSU). Previous roles include: Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs at California State University, Chico; a decade of service as the Don Beall Dean of Engineering in the Charles W. Davidson College of Engineering at SJSU; faculty member of SJSU since 1987; and visiting Associate Professor at Stanford University in 1993. She is founder and Board Chair of the Center for Advanc- ing Women in Technology, which established the Technology Pathways Initiative (TPI) in 2015. The TPI provides computing education to more diverse students by developing new interdisciplinary com- puting programs through an alliance of universities
. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya Johri is Professor of Information Sciences and Technology at George Mason University where he also directs the Engineering Education and Cyberlearning Laboratory (EECL). Dr. Johri studies the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for learning and knowledge sharing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in
2017 ASEE International Forum:Columbus , Ohio Jun 28 Paper ID #20820A Review of Engineering Education in China: History, Present and FutureDr. Xisong Dong, 1.The State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institutionof Automation ,Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2. Institute of Smart Education Systems, Qingdao Academy ofIntelligent Industries Xisong Dong received the B. Sc. degree in applied mathematics in 2001 and Ph. D. degree in control theory and control engineering in 2007 from the University of Science and Technology Beijing, China. He worked as a post
project to conform to educational best practices the focused learningobjective is on “design thinking,” which relates to: handling uncertainty, making decisions aspart of a team, technical communication, and viewing design as an iterative process [7].Offering engineering students access to rapid prototyping is a novel approach to understandingthe iterative nature of the design process [17]. Design experiences can be facilitated by the useof 3D printing technologies [17-19], in fact the use of 3D printers within the educational settinghas increased significantly over the past several years. With Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)printers becoming more affordable [19-20], the expansive growth and accessibility of such 3Dprinters is an opportunity to
2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Facilitating Innovation through Regulatory Engineering Education: An Academic Program Overview Diana M. Easton, PhD and Stephen A. Szygenda, PhD University of Texas at Dallas/Southern Methodist UniversityAbstractIn the past 50 years, the medical device industry has been profoundly impacted by significanttechnological advancements. These new technologies, coupled with the expansion of globalregulations, and changes to global regulatory requirements for biomedical products, havedramatically changed the regulatory landscape; creating new complexities affecting theinnovation - to
Developing an Introductory Software Programming Course for Engineering Students Scott J. Schneider Department of Engineering Technology University of Dayton Dayton, OH 45469 sschneider@udayton.eduAbstractThe ability to effectively develop software programs, from complex software systems to simplemacros, is becoming increasingly important in all engineering disciplines. Educators haverealized this need, and likewise have included software programming in many engineeringcurriculums. The initial course in software programming has
Session 3551 WebQuests as an Integrative Experience in Introductory Environmental Engineering Mary Cardenas Harvey Mudd College Claremont, CaliforniaAbstractAn Integrative Experience was developed as part of an introductory environmental engineeringcourse at Harvey Mudd College. The Integrative Experience was developed to help the collegestudents consider the relationship of science and technology with contemporary society. Juniorand senior students enrolled in the course designed WebQuests
. Fig. 3 Steel structure simulationSurveying ModuleThe Surveying Module was designed for the Engineering Surveying course and was usedin the fall of 1999. The motivation for this module was to provide an Internet-based dataprocessing tool for the engineering surveying course. Previously, to process surveying Page 5.397.7data, students used a specific software program to generate 2D contour plots. However,by integrating a number of Internet-based technologies, a surveying simulation wasdeveloped to generate 2D contour and visually present 3D surfaces on the Internet. Theidea of generating 2D contour and demonstrating real 3D surface at the same time
Session 3206 Distance Learning in Architectural Engineering: An Inter-Institutional Case Study Craig A. Bernecker, Ph.D., FIES, Walter Vincent, and Nipha P. Kumar Penn State University/Tennessee State UniversityHigher education is undergoing profound changes nationally and globally due to currentdemographic, social, economic, and technological changes. These include declining enrollments1,increasing costs, rapidly changing technical tools and information, and new types of studentswith new needs and varied learning styles2, 3. Simultaneously, digital telecommunications andcomputing
the term 2001-2002 Chaired Technical Sessions at different conventions/conferences Member of Advisory Committee for number of conventions/conferences Prin- cipal Investigator for Rs. 107 lakh project received under FIST by Electrical Engg. Deptt., VNIT from Department of Science and Technology., GoI., for the period 2009-11. Co-opted as Member on ”Board of Studies’ in Electrical Engg. of Nagpur university, Nagpur, for the period 2006-2010 Govt. College of Engineering, Aurangabad for the period 2006-2009 Shivaji University Kolhapur for the period 2000- 2005, Amravati University Amravati for the period 2002-2005, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technology University-Lonere-Raigad 2000-2004 Expert Panel Member for selection of
printers is highly desirable, especially since3D printers can speed up the process considerably. Justification for adoption of 3D printers inengineering education is well documented in engineering education literature1-8.In the past few years, inexpensive 3D printers that can produce plastic parts became ubiquitousdevices in education due to the expiration of many 3D printing technology-related patents. ManyK-16 educational institutions have at least one 3D printer, predominantly of the fused depositionmodeling (FDM) design. While acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), ornylon can create functional objects, for some applications plastic parts are just not strong enough.Until now, 3D printing in metal was for a privileged few
programs with partnerinstitutions. It is common for engineering and pre-engineering programs at HBCUs to beembedded in an integrated department or school of science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM). Having an administrative unit focused on STEM can further facilitateinterdisciplinary research experiences for its undergraduate students.The goal of this paper is to assess the impacts of a summer research experience oninterdisciplinary student teams at Benedict College, which is a recognized HBCU and classifiedas Baccalaureate Colleges – Diverse Fields. Like other interdisciplinary student experiences, thissummer program combines two signature high-impact practices, undergraduate research andcollaborative assignments and projects. High
Session 3660 Evolution of Electrical and Computer Engineering Education in Poland Andrzej Krasniewski*, Brian Manhire**, Roman Z. Morawski* *Warsaw University of Technology, **Ohio UniversityAbstractOver the last decade, there have been many changes in engineering programs offered byinstitutions of higher education in Poland. Many institutions have departed from the traditionalmodel of five-year integrated BS-MS studies and moved to two-stage studies. The changes havealso affected the organization of the educational process and the curricula. We illustrate theevolution of engineering education in Poland by
Paper ID #8586Advanced Student-Centric Learning Practices in Applied Engineering Pro-gramsProf. Ben D Radhakrishnan, National University Prof. Ben Radhakrishnan is currently a full time Faculty in the School of Engineering, Technology and Media (SETM), National University, San Diego, California, USA. He is the Lead Faculty for MS Sus- tainability Management Program. He develops and teaches Engineering Management and Sustainability Management graduate level courses. Ben has taught Sustainability workshops in Los Angeles (Army) and San Diego (SDGE). His special interests and research include teaching methods (specifically
. Certification requirements and standardized tests generated in this“accountability era” continue to perpetuate the interest in the “pure” sciences in the curriculum.Even if teachers are knowledgeable about engineering and wish to add engineering material totheir math and science classes, they do not know where they fit in with state and nationalstandards. Even though these standards address engineering and technology concepts, teachersemphasize the pure sciences. At the high school level, lack of understanding of engineering bycurriculum designers and teachers make it difficult to get engineering concepts into courses. Forsimilar reasons, having an Introduction to Engineering class accepted as a science class at thehigh school level is difficult
highereducation settings, particularly for disabled students, who are often forgotten or less emphasizedin DEI efforts. In some disciplinary areas, such as in science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) fields, disabled students are more likely to experience discrimination due to a reportedlymore competitive and less flexible and supportive environment. Academic librarians and othereducators can make a difference for these students by contributing to a more inclusive campusenvironment for disabled people in STEM by implementing universally accessible and inclusivepedagogy, resources, services, and spaces. Such efforts are more effective when they incorporatea disability justice perspective, which provides an intersectional framework to understand
Paper ID #37545Exploring Perceptions of Ethics and Social ResponsibilityAmong Engineering Students and Professionals: ResearchHighlights and Implications for the FieldBrent Jesiek Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is a Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical