programs that involved students in the on-going activities of the institution andacquainted them with older professionals, who could potentially serve as mentors, wereincorporated into the sequense of recommended activities [11], [17]. Since today’s collegestudents are deeply motivated by large scale problems and environmental issues [18], significanteffort was expended in helping them to select broad, diverse faculty-directed projects orientedtoward the Grand Challenges for their initial research team experiences, where possible [19]. Asrising sophomores, the RS students participated in the Louis Stokes Alliance of MinorityParticipation (LSAMP) program [20], becoming team members within an experimental laboratory,directly participating in the
AC 2011-493: COLLECTING PROGRAMMATIC ASSESSMENT DATA WITHNO ”EXTRA” EFFORT: CONSOLIDATED EVALUATION RUBRICS FORCHEMICAL PLANT DESIGNKevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. from WPI in 1992 and his Ph.D. from MIT in 1998. He has published on teaching engineering design, assessment of student learning, and use of process simulation in undergraduate education. He is the recipient of the 2004 Fahien Award and the 2010 Mid-Atlantic Section Outstanding Teaching Award from ASEE. Page 22.337.1 c
Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Her educational interests include the incorporation of experiential learning throughout the ChE curriculum and the development of academe-industry-government collaboration. She is the recipient of the National Outstanding Teaching Award (2004) and the Robert G. Quinn Award (2006), and she currently serves on the ASEE Board of Directors as Zone I Chair.Mariano J. Savelski, Rowan UniversityC. Stewart Slater, Rowan University C. Stewart Slater is professor of chemical engineering and founding chair of the Chemical Engineering Department at Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey. His research and teaching background is in separation process
Page 10.1191.1be translated into educational paradigms, particularly for the engineering senior design classes. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition” Copyright © 2005, American Society of Engineering EducationIntroductionFor almost a millennium, the role of the university as a place to create and disseminateknowledge has evolved constantly, but slowly. Initially, the university examined topics ofgrammar, rhetoric, history, theology and science. In the 20th century, the combination teaching-research university developed under a model established by Wilhelm Humboldt of the Universityof Berlin. This model has worked well, but it tends to encourage individual
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography1. Cotton, Kathleen and Wikelund, Karen Reed, “Educational Time Factors”, Close-Up #8, Research You Can Use, School Improvement Research Series (SIRS), Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 2001, http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/4/cu8.html.2. Anderson, L. "Student Involvement in Learning and School Achievement." CALIFORNIA JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 26 (1975): 53-62.3. Anderson, L. "Policy Implications of Research on School Time." THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR 40 (1983): 25-28.4. Borg, W.R. "Time and School Learning." In TIME TO LEARN, edited by C. Denham and A. Lieberman
risk tolerance,” Psychological Science, 2010, 1362-1368.[43] Donovan, J., R. Avery, Speaker | Leader | Champion: Succeed at work through the power of public speaking,McGraw Hill.[44] Rosenthal, R., J. A. Hall, M. R. DiMattero, P. L. Rogers, D. Archer, “Sensitivity in nonverbal communication:The PONS Test,” John Hopkins University Press, 1979.[45] LeFebvre, L., M. Allen, “Teacher immediacy and student learning: An examination of lecture/laboratory andself-contained course sections,” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2014, 29–45.[46] McCroskey, J. C., V. P. Richmond, “Increasing teacher influence through immediacy,” in V. P. Richmond, J. C.McCroskey (eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, 1992, 101
Data Acquisition Systems for the CGA Plasma LabAbstract: This paper reports on the results of an educational collaboration between Physics andElectrical Engineering faculty at US Coast Guard Academy (CGA), to advise a senior capstoneproject. The Physics faculty is constructing a research grade plasma laboratory as a nexus forProject Based Learning (PBL), the development of magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) physicstheory applications to support organization missions, and investigations into plasma physicsexperiments that are vital to today’s scientific challenges. The collaborative project was designedto setup an electronic system for the lab’s command, control, and data collection from threeplasma experiments being developed in house.Two Electrical
Paper ID #41602Characterizing Teamwork Dynamics and Computational Model-Based Reasoningin Biomedical Engineering ProjectsAbasiafak Ndifreke Udosen, Purdue University Abasiafak Udosen is a professional Mechanical Engineer in Nigeria and a doctoral research scholar at ROCkETEd laboratory, Purdue University, United States. He earned a B.Eng in Mechanical Engineering and an M.Eng in Energy and Power Engineering both in Nigeria. Over the years he has had the privilege of teaching courses such as Thermodynamics, Measurement and Instrumentation, Engineering Metallurgy, System Design, and Quantitative research methods at the
Learning. Previously, Stephanie received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Neuroscience from the University of Miami, in addition to B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science from FIU.Dr. Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology Cristi L. Bell-Huff, PhD is a Lecturer and Director of Faculty and Student Training in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. She is involved in teaching, engineering education innovation, and research. In addition to her PhD in Chemical Engineer- ing, she also has an MA in Educational Studies. She has industrial experience in pharmaceutical product and process development as well as teaching experience at the secondary and post
York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and
was composed of lecture periods (twice a week; one hour each) and a weekly labsession (once a week; two hours per week). The staffing included a graduate teaching assistantto assist students. Lecture periods were sprinkled with collaborative active exercises. Studentswere encouraged to work in teams on the lecture active exercises and on laboratory tasks. Theinstructor often had to expressly direct the collaborative effort as most students would choose towork alone if given the choice. The complexity of VHDL and the overhead of tool chain processeslargely prohibited the use of the synthesis tools in-class for the active exercises.In-class active exercises were mostly focused on the design approach for a particular problem, withstudents
in that study can be used inconjunction with a virtual laboratory environment to facilitate learning.The problems faced in the SafetyNET study illustrate a broader problem that faces machinesafety training throughout both academia and industry. It is evident that engineering studentsand industry professionals are not receiving adequate training with regard to the requirements ofmachine guarding and safety. For engineering education to be improved in this area, facultymust recognize the importance of this material as an explicit component of the curriculum.Additionally, for the subject to be taught effectively, schools must be equipped with appropriateresources to safely teach students about machine safety.Until recently, the latter problem
-efficacy.Dr. Michael Frye, University of the Incarnate Word Michael T. Frye, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering in the Department of Engineering at the University of the Incarnate Word, in San Antonio, TX. He is an Electrical Engineer who specialized in the field of nonlinear control theory with applications to autonomous air vehicles. Dr. Frye’s research interest is in discovering new and efficient techniques that mitigates the effects of uncertainty in complex nonlinear dynamics; such as seen in autonomous vehicle systems. Dr. Frye is the PI and Laboratory Director for the Autonomous Vehicle Systems Lab sponsored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. c American Society for
cause harm that goes undetected until well after the fact. Third, software oftenrequires maintenance. Unlike a commercial entity, students are transitory, thereby leaving theend user adrift if a problem occurs or if a modification is needed. Amongst those efforts reportedon regarding applying service learning in computer science [10, 11, 12, 13, 14], some haveinvolved experiences being conducted in the first year of study. Examples include creatinganimations for a community music outreach program [15], teaching basic computer skills toprison inmates [16], performing usability and accessibility audits of non-profit websites [9],conducting computing lessons in an after-school program at a local middle school [17], andapplying the entrepreneurial
maintenance. Unlike a commercial entity, students are transitory, thereby leaving theend user adrift if a problem occurs or if a modification is needed. Amongst those efforts reportedon regarding applying service learning in computer science [10, 11, 12, 13, 14], some haveinvolved experiences being conducted in the first year of study. Examples include creatinganimations for a community music outreach program [15], teaching basic computer skills toprison inmates [16], performing usability and accessibility audits of non-profit websites [9],conducting computing lessons in an after-school program at a local middle school [17], andapplying the entrepreneurial mindset to the service learning experience [18].Project DesignTo formalize the design of the
– Should Students Do Them or Design Them?”, Chemical EngineeringEducation, vol 29, no. w, 1995, p. 34.vi Macias-Machin, A., Guotai Zhang, and Octave Levenspiel, “The Unstructured Student-Designed Research Typeof Laboratory Experiment”, Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 24, no. 2, 1990, pp. 78-79.vii Dym, C.L., A.M. Agogino, O. Eris, D.D. Frey, and L.J. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching andlearning”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, 2005, 103-120viii ABET, 2009-2010 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2008ix Northeastern University, ABET Self Study Report for Mechanical Engineering, 2007
capacity of transmission lines, six- sigma, Design for Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, QFD, Statistics, project management, consulting, and holding workshops on team building, leadership, and creativity and innovation. Presently teaching en- gineering design methods, and coordinating/ co supervising, and instructing senor design classes and projects.Dr. Okenwa I Okoli, Florida A&M University/Florida State UniversitySungmoon Jung Ph.D., FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Dr. Jung joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering in August 2008, after working at Caterpillar Champaign Simulation Center as a staff engineer for two and half years. Dr. Jung’s research interests
(owner: faculty) GUIDING PRINCIPLES VALIDATION ¥ student learning sur vey To improve: ¥ course evaluation forms ¥ only a few verified weak areas ¥ senior exit survey ¥ teaching and instruction ¥ industrial advisory board ¥ instruments and rubrics ¥ alumni survey OUTPUT AND ¥ College & University ACTION ITEMS assessment
and then equipping them with the ability to engage that workwith competence and insight. Learning taxonomies are tools that can be used to categorize thecognitive levels at which learners are engaging with material as a means of providing structureand metrics to the educational process, with achievement at higher levels of a taxonomygenerally corresponding to the desired intellectual abilities for practicing engineers [1, 2, 3].The general consensus among engineering educators has long been that creative, practical, andactive educational methods are needed in order to produce engineers who are well-prepared forthe workplace. Presenting students with problems and projects, laboratory experiences, designchallenges, group work, and other
whole experience are summarized. Hopefully, thisdocumentation will help others in planning similar experiences for engineering undergraduates. Enhanced analytical and computational capabilities and higher strength materials have led tolighter, larger and more complex and unconventional civil structures. To design such structures,one must be able to evaluate their overall behavior under both static and dynamic (seismic)heavy overloads, both in laboratory and field environments. The inherent non-linearities indescribing the material behavior and the interaction between the components of a structure,makes simply using analytical tools for studying the response inadequate. This can only be doneby experimental testing. Research projects for the
. Through the arrangement between IEEE and Rutgers, he is also Adjunct Professor of History of Technology and of Science, Technology and Society at Rutgers. Geselowitz holds S.B. degrees in electrical engineering and in anthropology from the Massachusetts In- stitute of Technology, and M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in anthropology from Harvard University. His focus has been on the role of history and social relations of engineering and technology at all levels. He has worked as an electronics engineer for the Department of Defense, and he has held teaching and research positions relating to the social study of technology at M.I.T., Harvard, and Yale University, including a stint as Assistant Collections Manager/Curator at
in that position title during the analysis.In the third step, we revisited and quantified the data (frequency) to make sure we couldeffectively use the data. To do so, we refined positioning categories and assigned them toposition options based on previous analysis of positioning within coding experiences. Positionoptions in technical work experience include: self-positioning as an engineering intern, anengineer, a student engineer, a teaching assistant, or an agentic position. We also found somestudents took on two positions, such as self-positioning as an engineering intern and an agenticposition, in their reflections. Thus, we defined and included different combinations of positions.In students’ research experiences, position options
Paper ID #37891Views about the Nature of Engineering Knowledge AmongSecondary (6-12) Technology and Engineering Teachers(FUNDAMENTAL)Ryan Brown (Dr.) Ryan is a Professor of Secondary Education and Associate Director/Coordinator of Graduate Programs in the School of Teaching and Learning at Illinois State University.Allison Antink-meyer (Associate Professor Science and STEM Education) Allison Antink-Meyer is a Professor in science and engineering education at Illinois State University with an emphasis in the nature of engineering knowledge and K-8 classrooms. © American Society for
-solving, with special focus on systems thinking and creative thinking. His doctoral research received several awards, including the Zeff Fellowship for Excelling First-year Ph.D. Students and the Miriam and Aaron Gutwirth Fellowship for Excelling Ph.D. Students. Dr. Lavi has recently received an award from the d’Arebeloff Fund for Excellence in Education to develop and teach a new undergraduate course, ‘22.s092 - Tackling Challenges in Climate and Sustainability with Ways of Thinking’. He is the inventor of the SNAP Method® for structured creative problem-solving (US & UK trademarks).Justin A. Lavallee (Lead Technical Instructor)Nathan Melenbrink (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Amitava Mitra Amitava ‘Babi’ Mitra
Statistics, from Georgia State University.Dr. Hoda Ehsan, Georgia Institute of Technology Hoda is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center for Education Integrating Science, Math and Computing (CEISMC) Georgia Institute of Technology. She earned her PhD in Engineering Education from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue. She received her B.S. in mechanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking of children with special needs in informal
Page 13.570.5engineering that integrate a variety of ethical considerations that mean to address critiquesencountered throughout the course. Forms of resistance including dissent of individualexperts41,42, collective dissent of professional societies43, and citizen action44. New visions ofdoing and teaching science in response to macroethical concerns are presented45-49, along withdiscussions of teaching and doing engineering in ways that promote peace and social justice 50-52.Challenges posed by the content. It may be apparent that at least some of the readings presentedhere, particularly those that draw either on philosophy or critical theory (or both), may be quitechallenging for engineering students. If this material is important to their
Bell Laboratories, Siemens Corporate Research, and AVL, including microcode for a graphics processor, real-time medical image processing, and data acquisition and communications protocols for semiconductor process control. Since 1997, he has been a faculty member in Rochester Institute of Technology’s Department of Software En- gineering including the position of Department Chair. His professional interests are in the engineering of software for real-time and embedded systems. He was a recipient of RIT’s 2010 Eisenhart Award for Outstanding Teaching.Mr. Bryan Basham, Software Alchemy (with RIT) I am a Software Consultant, Developer, Application Architect and Educator with over 40 years of software development
(2015-2016) I have the privilege of being a Course Assistant for three classes at Stanford: (1) E14: Introduction to Solid Mechanics; (2) BIOE51: Anatomy for Bioengineers; (3) BIOE80: Introduction to Bioengineering and Engineering Living Matter. I also have pleasure of serving as the Safety and Operations Manager at the Volkswagen Automotive Innovation Laboratory, which includes managing the machine shop and teaching students how to use the machinery. In this role I am able to advise and educate students on design choices for their personal and research projects from ideation phases to functional products, with an emphasis on design and manufacturing techniques. c American Society for
Paper ID #13579Finite Element Method as a Useful Modern Engineering Tool to EnhanceLearning of Deformation ConceptsDr. Qin Ma, walla walla university Dr. Qin Ma is a tenured professor at Edward F. Cross School of Engineering, Walla Walla University, WA, USA. He has been active in using finite element methods in his research and teaching for more than fifteen years.Prof. Louie L Yaw, Walla Walla University Currently Professor of Civil Engineering at Walla Walla University. Undergraduate degree in Civil engi- neering Walla Walla College in 1992. Masters in structural engineering from UC Davis 1996 and PhD from UC Davis in
Paper ID #11398Design, Implementation and Evaluation of an Online Team and Activity-Based Introduction to Engineering CourseDr. Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University Dr. Benjamin Mertz received his Ph. D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2010 and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2005. He is currently a part of a lecturer team at Arizona State University that focuses on the first-year engineering experience, including developing and teaching the Introduction to Engineering course. He also teaches Thermo-Fluids and High Speed Aerodynamics for the