with Sandia National Laboratories and was President of HKN. She moved to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for graduate school. She completed an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineer- ing in 2008 and a Ph.D in 2011. Her graduate research has resulted in two patent filings. The first patent, the culmination of her masters research, was for a pattern reconfigurable microstrip antenna. The second patent resulted from her doctoral research and was for a placement insensitive RFID antenna. Her tech- nical research interests lie in the development and characterization of new electromagnetic devices and platforms such as antennas and packaging to improve the performance of wireless systems in challenging
have had laboratory experiences which enable them to measure manufacturing process variables and make technical inferences about the process.However, this will soon need to be changed and other major specific outcomes includingBiomedical, Mechanical, Industrial, and Software will need to be added based on the projectobjectives and content. In the past, most this course enrollment was coming from BS inManufacturing Engineering Program. Even though some of the Manufacturing Engineeringoutcomes are still relevant, some other major outcomes need to be added to assessment of thiscourse.Conclusions and Future WorkWithin the last few semesters, the course enrollment had grown into thirties, including 33students enrolled in upcoming Spring 2014
communication problems. The coursewas structured as a lecture-lab combination where the fundamental concepts and implementationissues were discussed in the lecture portion. The laboratory portion of the course uses twodifferent approaches to ensure the fundamental software skills as well as a clear understanding ofthe implementation challenges. The students were asked to complete individual projects in thefirst half of the course. The project consists of a small residential building which enables studentsto create a model from the beginning to the end in a limited amount of time. Different methods toaddress possible conflicts in design and construction are discussed and simulated in this process.The purpose of this paper is to provide a sample
Manufacturing Process Laboratory (1 cr.) ART 145RA Web Design (3 cr.) ETME 310 Machining and Industrial Safety (3 cr.) EMEC 403 CAE IV‐Design Integration (3 cr.) ETME 410 CNC & CAM Technology (3 cr.) EMEC 465 Bio‐inspired Engineering (3 cr.) ETME 415 Design for Mfg and Tooling (3 cr.) Take ARCH 121IA to satisfy university core requirement. Human Factors Healthcare PSYX 360 Social Psychology (3 cr.) CHTH 210 Foundations of Community Health (3 cr.) PSYX 380 Memory & Cognition (3 cr.) HADM 445 Managing Healthcare Orgs (3 cr.) PSYX 481
through its practical applications The critical evaluation of co-op positions by the university and the inclusion of positions with the greatest possible amount of education content Condition of actual employment (not artificial conditions imposed upon employers which could reduce the experience to a laboratory experience in a campus environment Co-op position as a paid positions because payment is the primary component of work Ongoing evaluation of curricular design both on and off campus Understanding by the university of the students’ aptitudes, academic preparation and the relationship between classroom theory and practical applications Development of methods in which the student is led to observe
rendered with V-Ray and Twilight and for thestand-alone programs, Kerkythea and 3DS Max a view of the entire front and side of the buildingwas rendered. The stand-alone rendering programs were installed in the computer laboratories ofthe department and so the student decided to use them for the purpose of the study. V-Ray is avery popular rendering engine and used by professional firms while renderings completed usingTwilight can be easily exported into Kerkythea for further enhancement if needed hence theywere selected for the study. The student had previously experimented with Kerkythea but had notworked with the other three programs. Following the rendering, post-production work was doneon one of the rendered images in Photoshop to add
engineering. New York: Teachers College Press. 8. Markus, G. B., Howard, J. P. F., & King, D. C. (1993). Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 410-419. 9. Batchelder, T. H. & Root, S. (1994). Effects of an undergraduate program to integrate academic learning and service: Cognitive, prosocial cognitive, and identity outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17, 341-355. 10. Giles, D. E. & Eyler, J. (1994). The impact of a college community service laboratory on students’ personal, social, and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17, 327-339. 11. Astin, A. W. & Sax, L. J. (1998). How
a Senior Research Associate at the Evaluation Center (Western Michigan University) and served for six years as Coordinator for the Social Science Research Center’s Evaluation & Decision Support Laboratory (Mississippi State University). Dr. Ritchie has extensive experience in all aspects of evaluation and research design and implementation. She has served as PI or co-PI on more than 70 projects and authored or coauthored more than 70 technical reports, as well as published in peer reviewed journals.Dr. Sandra Janette Mikolaski Page 24.844.1 c American Society for
- 4), 25-36.6. Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. J. (1994). Teaching and the case method: Text, cases, and readings, Harvard Business Press.7. Hoag, K., Lillie, J., & Hoppe, R. (2005). Piloting case-based instruction in a didactic clinical immunology course, Clinical Laboratory Science 18(4), 2005, 213-220.8. Richard, L. G., Gorman, M. E., Scherer, W. T., & Landel, R. D. (1995). Promoting active learning with cases and instructional modules, Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 375-381.9. Raju, P. K., & Sankar, C. S. (1999). Teaching Real‐World Issues through Case Studies, Journal of Engineering Education, 88(4), 501-508.10. MIT Engineering Leadership Program. What is Engineering Leadership
Competition presented at the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship (USASBE) annual conference to recognize col- lege educators who have created new and challenging learning activities that actively involve students in the entrepreneurial experience. He is the author of ”The Opportunity Analysis Canvas”, an innovative tool for identifying and analyzing entrepreneurial ideas. Prior to the University of Maryland, Dr. Green held founder, executive, and operational roles with multiple startups to include WaveCrest Laboratories (an innovator in next-generation electric and hybrid-electric propulsion and drive systems), Cyveillance (a software startup and world leader in cyber intelligence and
mid-semester and final oralpresentations provided additional insight. However, the peer-assessments were student biased,and so instructor’s evaluation involved some speculation. An additional teamwork assessment isrecommended in other classes. Also, a single final report was submitted by each group, and so itwas not possible to assess the individual performance for written communication. A more validapproach would be to assess writing skills for individual laboratory reports from other classesduring the senior year. The new rubrics would be much more effective if used in a variety ofcourses.ConclusionA pilot study has been conducted for three new rubrics to assess communication and teamworkskills. Results have been summarized and evaluated
capstoneproject, but meet state requirements for student teaching. Challenges include incorporatingeffective classroom experiences, curriculum development and extracurricular opportunitiesavailable as students in an education program with more typical requirements from engineeringdisciplines such as required laboratories and opportunities for undergraduate research. Seekingaccreditation for the program from the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education(NCATE) as well as ABET affords additional challenge.This paper will describe the unique challenges of establishing this interdisciplinary andinnovative program, including issues related to accreditation of the program from twoperspectives: education and engineering. Further, the paper will
Tech. Engineering Majors, 1993-1998, http://www.ceismc.gatech.edu/ceismc/programs/ingear/study/appe.pdf[7] M. Elizabeth Cannon, Jean E. Wallace, Valerie A. Haines, Academic Choices of Engineering Undergraduates, CCWEST Conference for the Advancement of Women in Engineering, 2000.[8] Barbara Leitherer, Increasing the Number of Women in Computer Fields: A community College Approach, NSF funded project #: DUE-0302845[9] Jane Butler Kahle, Gender Equity in Science Classroom, NSF funded project #ESI-9619139[10] Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Science and Mathematics for All Students, DOE funded project #: RJ96006501[11] The Northwest Girls Collaborative Project (NWGCP), Resource Center, 2003 http
. Electronic submission of work was also utilized, again with no problemsexperienced. Portions of assignments frequently required accessing a website and downloadingfiles, which also wasn’t an issue for this group.A final disturbing development was the numerous cases of academic integrity violations. This isa larger issue that deserves additional study and comment beyond the scope of this paper.Delivery Options – What Worked and What Didn’tThe class was scheduled in a computer laboratory with workstations for each student. It wasequipped with a white board and an instructor’s workstation that was mirrored on monitorsthroughout the room. Numerous delivery techniques were attempted with varying degrees ofsuccess.Initially, faculty would lecture at the
and any best) broad conclusions are not possible. Figure 2 Self Assessment Data for Project Nevertheless the results suggest an Management Team Contribution encouraging direction for exploration.In the laboratory sections for a junior/senior level Rapid Tooling and Prototyping class, eachsection was formed into a team. Each team, which varied in size from 9 to 14, was given thesame assignment of completing a working prototype of a Roots Engine and designing a process
used theelements of the initial camp but eliminated as many of the extraneous (and distracting) activitiesas possible.The interdisciplinary hands on engineering modules developed for the original camp wereoffered as daily activities—girls could choose to go to as few or as many as they registered for.Each module features an active learning experience, exposure to strong role models andengineering career information related to the module. The modules are all interdisciplinary,introducing girls to engineering through interdisciplinary laboratory experiences. This approachaddresses many of the issues that girls face in understanding engineering contextually. (1)Accordingly, MTM aims to prepare girls to succeed through cross-cultural
• Contractor negotiations • Project plans and specifications • Budget, bidding, estimating, planning, scheduling, and time management • Quality assurance, quality control • Dispute resolution, labor, and cost management. CE 304 Construction • Plan and specification reading Management Laboratory • Estimating • Scheduling using software (Microsoft Project) CE 316 Equipment & • Construction operations Methods • Production processes • Equipment utilization
computer vision. They also have opportunity todemonstrate their knowledge through hands-on course projects and laboratory experiences, in theabove fields. In this paper, an example of an image processing application project is developed,in the context of an image-processing course. This paper presents an algorithm that uses stereoimages, obtained from two cameras mounted on the Mars Exploration Rovers, to determine therange of distant objects in the images by using correlation and triangulation. The initial valueobtained by the algorithm was not accurate because it did not take into account the fact that therange of an object beyond the camera’s focal point is non-linear in appearance, and to the non-linearity of the camera lens, thus the range
; Card, David; Jones, Cheryl; Layman, Beth; Clark, Elizabeth; Dean, Joseph; andHall, Fred; Practical Software Measurement. Addison-Wesley, 2002.Thomsett, Rob, Double Dummy Spit and Other Estimating Games. American Programmer,June, 1996. Page 10.1045.8 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition CopyrightÀ 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationAuthor BioIn addition to teaching at Monmouth University, the author, Lee Vallone, is currently employedby Lucent Bell Laboratories. Lee has been leading development teams for over 15 years withteams ranging in
Edition. Microsoft Press, 2003.3. Kaufman, Deborah B., Richard M. Felder, Hugh Fuller. "Peer Ratings in Cooperative Learning Teams." ASEEAnnual Conference. Charlotte, NC, 1999.4. Pressman Toy Inc. "Hi-Q Instructions." 1998. JAMES A. REISING is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Evansville, Evansville,Indiana, where he has taught since 1980. Prior to that time he was employed by Eagle-Picher Industries at theMiami Research Laboratories and the Electro-Optic Materials Department. He is a senior member of IEEE. Page 10.75.6 "Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
assistant professor at the Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Development at TuftsUniversity. She completed her Ph.D. in 2001 at the MIT Media Laboratory. Her research involves the design andstudy of "identity construction environments," technological learning tools to support children's exploration ofidentity through the creation of a participatory community. Page 10.1281.8 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005 America Society of Engineering Education
three years of experience in Lecturing andDeveloping Network and Data Communication units at Edith Cowan University. Gurpreet is currentlyinvestigating web services and capacity planning of e-business sites as part of his research at ECU. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationPAUL MAJAssociate Professor S. P. MAJ is a recognized authority in the field of industrial and scientificinformation systems integration and management. He is the author of a text book, 'The Use ofComputers in Laboratory Automation', which was commissioned by the Royal Society of Chemistry(UK). His first book, 'Language Independent
Professor S. P. MAJ is a recognized authority in the field of industrial and scientificinformation systems integration and management. He is the author of a text book, 'The Use ofComputers in Laboratory Automation', which was commissioned by the Royal Society of Chemistry(UK). His first book, 'Language Independent Design Methodology - an introduction', wascommissioned by the National Computing Centre (NCC). Dr Maj has organized, chaired and beeninvited to speak at many international conferences at the highest level. He has also served on manynational and international committees and was on the editorial board of two international journalsconcerned with the advancement of science and technology. As Deputy Chairman and Treasurer of theInstitute of
. The course is four credit/six contact hours, three hours lecture andthree hours laboratory. In the first semester of applying this concept, the author asked hisstudents in both sections to produce mind maps for every other chapter. The author usually givesa quiz every week that covers one chapter. He then compared students’ performance with andwithout mind mapping. Early maps were produced manually but later maps were produced usingthe MindManager software (www.mindject.com). The software license for 15 seats costsapproximately $1800 after educational and volume discounts. A student sample Mind Maprepresenting Chapter 2 from the required textbook [9] is shown in Figure 2. The chapter coversvoltage, current, and resistance including resistor
Processing, 1998.[5] S.L Wood, A Concept Oriented Freshman Introductory Course Utilizing Multimedia Presentations andGroup Laboratory Experience. Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998.[6] J.A. Orr, W. Eggimann, D. Nicoletti, D. Cyganski, An Electrical Engineering Curriculum Beginning inthe First Year. Frontiers in Education Conference, 1994. Biographical InformationJAMES BRYANT received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Dayton,Dayton, Oh, in 1965, the MBA degree from the University of Dayton in 1985, and the degree of M.S. inEngineering from Wright State University in 1996. He is currently a professor and department chair of theelectronics engineering technology program at the
).The International ISU Alumni OrganizationThe International ISU Alumni Organization and its national and regional chapters maintaincomprehensive online databases and provide support and networking opportunities to theirmembers. Today, there are over 2200 ISU alumni in 28 countries of the world, that have Page 10.1301.7attended the ISU Summer Session Program (SSP) alone. ISU graduates can be found in “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”leadership positions in universities, research laboratories, space
, American Society for Engineering Education”A final common challenge for faculty is to provide “hands-on” experience with new technologywhile teaching core concepts. Typically, this challenge is addressed through the inclusion oflaboratory sessions that reinforce concepts taught in lecture. Unfortunately, the laboratories havea tendency to be scientifically-oriented and are often completed on equipment that is notcommon to industry. Experiments are designed to minimize thee effect of assumptions on thestudents’ analysis of the experiment. This is an effective way to demonstrate a concept, but itdoes not represent a typical industrial environment.3The AMC SolutionThe AMC program was designed to meet all three challenges while also fulfilling the
, M, and N engineering technology knowledge Ability to apply ethics and quality concepts to design tasks J, K, and L Ability to apply engineering economy concepts and societal B, D, F, J, K, and L issues to design tasks Ability to apply laboratory skills to an open ended design A, B, C, D, F, and N project and selection and purchase of components Understanding of research in project development and A, I, J, and K component determinationAs a result of the student work done in this capstone project course, and in all of the otherprogrammatic courses, the programs were received very favorably by the accreditation team.Senior Projects Course Grading During the initial semester of this
Professor of Environmental Engineering and Director of the Air Pollution Control Laboratory ofthe University of Cincinnati (UC). Dr. Keener also directs the UC Environmental Training Institute which providesshort course training to environmental professionals. Dr. Keener is the recipient of the Lyman A. Ripperton Awardfrom the Air & Waste Management Association in recognition of his distinguished achievements as an educator.EUGENE RUTZEugene Rutz is director of distance learning in the College of Engineering at the University of Cincinnati andManager of the ACCEND programs. Mr. Rutz has worked in industry as a mechanical design engineer and nuclearengineer. His academic experience includes program development, engineering and educational
Experience in a Laboratory Environment”, 1996 ASEE Annual Conference, Proceedings on CD-Rom 5. Jorgensen, Jens; Kumar, Vipin; Lamancusa, John; Torres, Miguel “Learning Engineering by Product Dissection”,1996 ASEE Annual Conference, Proceedings on CD-Rom Page 10.406.9 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education 6. Anderson, J.; Colgate, J.E.; Hirsch, P.; Kelso, D.; Olson, G.; Shwom, B.; “Engineering Design and Communication: Jump-starting the Engineering