psychology students read textbooks: A multiple class analysis of reading across the psychology curriculum. J. Instr. Psychol. 31(3), pp. 227-232.[5] A. J. Rockinson-Szapkiw, J. Courduff, K. Carter, and D. Bennett. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers & Education. 63, pp. 259-266.[6] G. Chen, C. Gong, J. Yang, and Y. Li, "The comparison of paper textbook class and electronic textbook class in Technology Rich Classroom," 21st Int. Conf. Computers in Education, Bali, Indonesia, November 2013.[7] S. L. Broschat. (1993). Interactive software for undergraduate electromagnetics. IEEE Trans. Educ. 36(1), pp
LM7 PostLab 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Student# Figure 4. Test Scores by Student for Learning Module#7.An in-depth review of student#3’s answers on the pre-lecture test reveals that he/she was able toproperly calculate one part of question#3 and gained 4 points. It can be seen that essentially nolearning took place on the post-lecture and post-lab tests because question#2 and 3 were scoredthe same for student#3. However, question#1 received the full 10 points on the post-lecture test,but on the post-lab test student#3 made a
these factors affect 19.the goal positively i.e. the four factors (that treatment, patient [13] Michael, O., Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Cerebral Palsy incare & support, clinical processes and patient quality of life) Near-Term/Term Infants. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2008. 51(4): p. 816-828. [14] Krigger, K., Cerebral Palsy: An Overview. American Family Physician,are the major challenges to CP management. 2006. 73(1): p. 91-100. Apart from insights on the application of secondary [15] Dinah, S., et al
. Crafted by S2D participantswith the support of writing coaches, personal statements written during the program reflectparticipant stories and the effectiveness of programming and staff. The exit survey providesfeedback on programming from the participant perspective which will help administrators takesteps toward enhanced curriculum building. Currently, research is being conducted to performpost program analysis. The research details where past S2D participants are now, how S2Dcontributed to their academic journeys, and which component(s) of past S2D programming pastS2D participants found most useful. Post program analysis provides administrators with insightregarding long term outcomes of S2D programming.BiasTwo types of bias to be highlighted
awareness was a movie clip viewed in aclassroom setting by a select group of student respondents. Students participating in that measurewere asked to write tag(s) for the clip. Their tags were then evaluated for technical orengineering thought process and terminology. The written survey consisted of four sections;personal information, course characteristics, plans and expectations, and engineering literacy(Table 7).The personal information section offered checkboxes to standardize student answers. Theselection options provided for ‘Year in School’ were Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior,Graduate, and Other. Grade Point Average (GPA) was broken down into multiple ranges thatcould be selected. The categories offered were; Below 2.0, 2.0-2.49, 2.5
platform to improve e-learning in civil engineering,” 2020 ICETC ‘20: Proceedings of the 12th InternationalConference on Education Technology and Computers, October 2020, pp. 21-26,https://doi.org/10.1145/3436756.3437015[8] Crespo, S., Rodriguez-Paz, M.X., Carrasco, L.H.H. “ A Challenge-based Teaching modelfor Structural Analysis Courses with Strategic Industry Partners,” Paper presented at 2022ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, https://peer.asee.org/a-challenge-based-teaching-model-for-structural-analysis-courses-with-strategic-industry-partners[9] Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L.S., Admiraal, W., “A review of project-based learning inhigher education: Student outcomes and measures,” International Journal of EducationalResearch,Volume 102
theProfessoriate (AGEP) Program Solicitation." NSF21-576, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2021/nsf21576/nsf21576.pdf[19] P. Felder, "On Doctoral Student Development: Exploring Faculty Mentoring in the Shapingof African American Doctoral Student Success." Qualitative Report, vol. 15, no. 2, 2010, pp.455-474.[20] R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown, (2019). “Social cognitive career theory at 25: empirical statusof the interest, choice, and performance models.” J. Vocat. Behav, 115, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004[21] R. W. Lent, H.-B. Sheu, M. J. Miller, M. E. Cusick, L. T. Penn, and N. N. Truong,“Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social–cognitive choice model
: 10.1002/jee.20190.[6] G. Potvin et al., “Gendered interests in electrical, computer, and biomedical engineering: Intersections with career outcome expectations,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 298–304, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TE.2018.2859825.[7] J. DeWaters and B. Kotla, “Using an open-ended socio-technical design challenge for entrepreneurship education in a first-year engineering course,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, no. May, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1198161.[8] C. A. Roberts and S. M. Lord, “Making Engineering Sociotechnical,” Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2020-Octob, pp. 15–18, 2020, doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273957.[9] V. Svihla et al., “The Educative Design Problem Framework
that this phenomenon reflected that students involved in project-based learning activities were more inclined to regard themselves as a part of the engineeringcommunity.The students in Motamedi’s study [19] tended to prefer the flipped classroom because of itsflexibility with their schedules, their ability to watch lectures when they felt motivated tolearn and when they knew that they would be able to stay focused, and their increasedengagement with short video content. A significant disadvantage was their inability to askquestions while learning the material; thus, students would go to class feeling confused andill-prepared. Vidic et al.’s [18] study of flipped classrooms addressed this issue by allowingstudents to post their questions about
in theiroriginal peer-reviewedform, preserving theindividuality among thepapers and reflecting theauthor’s style and method.The TABLE OF CONTENTS(FIG 5) classifies thepapers into sevencategories: Structure,Testing & Evaluation,Metals, Polymers,Ceramics, Composites,Electronic & OpticalMaterials and MaterialsCurriculum.To find desireddocument(s) the user can: Fig 5 - Table of ContentsS Browse the Table of Contents which is organized by types of materials or processes, orS Use the full Text Search capability, searching by: Author Title Subject Text words in contextThe PDFs are indexed for full text search when using the ADOBE™ ACROBAT READER
responsibility and expertise of each member of the team, and the fact that Paulhad been mentoring Deepthi for years, the initial model of the tripartite mentoring relationshipwas conceived in line with Figure 1. Figure 1. Initial model of tripartite mentoring relationshipOur study is unique in that it includes a mentoring triad and the perspective of both the mentorand mentee(s). Most often, mentoring is studied from the perspective of the mentee. Researchincluding the perspective of the mentor as well the mentee is much rarer in the engineeringeducation literature (e.g., Mondisa, 2020). In offering the perspective of all three members of therelationship, we seek to contribute knowledge that could help mentors and mentees in
a GCSP (5.0% (n=1) did not provide enoughinformation to determine their affiliation). Those who were affiliated with a GCSP includeprogram directors, committee members, faculty members, and staff while those who were notaffiliated with a GCSP were either faculty members preparing to start a GCSP at theirinstitution(s) or were unrelated to GCSP. Users were asked to select from a list of options andindicate how they found the online course modules platform. The results show that 40.0% ofusers (n=8) found the modules via the KEEN card on EngineeringUnleashed.com and 40.0% ofusers found the modules via email communication from the NAE GCSP. The modules were alsofound via the KEEN GCSP subnet, forwarded emails/recommendations from colleagues
contextual questions to be answered 3. Gather customer needs and factor values 3.1. Gather customer needs 3.2. Gather factor values 4. Aggregate customer needs into weighted list 5. Aggregate factor values into context scenario(s) Page 11.403.10 Figure 2: Contextual Needs Assessment Methodology Table 5: Context Factor Identification Techniques ‚ Use context factor checklists, such as the template provided (Appendix A) ‚ Translate customer needs and product reviews into factors
question and aided inproducing a thick and rich dataset. The first question asked about the project(s) the student wasworking on and the second asked why he or she chose to participate in the extracurricularproject(s). The next four questions asked the students to discuss how their learning, engagement,confidence, and career prospects are affected by the project(s). The seventh question asked themto describe, in detail, the project building process, while the last two questions had them reflecton the value of the experience and the support they received. After each interview, codingcommenced using a constant comparative technique. Heuristic, discrete units of data was codedand categorized, initially through the note-taking process within the
of thinking that roughly capture patterns in LAs’descriptions and diagnoses of, and imagined responses to, the teamwork troubles: individualaccountability, where the trouble is seen as caused by individual(s) described as “off task” or“checked out” or demonstrating some level of incompetence; delegation of work, where thetrouble was located in the team leader’s inability to delegate tasks effectively to team members,or in the group’s general lack of communication about what tasks need to be completed, whoshould execute the tasks, and what work other groups in the team were doing; and emergentsystems, where trouble was described as a group-level phenomenon emerging from the patternsof interaction amongst group members, contextual features
simulations that provide quick feedbackto researchers in order to improve the initial model.45CMST’s role in scientific and industrial research wasproven beyond doubt when computational predictionsmatched behavior of physical models in high-stake cases(e.g., safety of cars and planes, emissions from engines, andapproaching storms). Its use was uniquely justified when astudy was impossible to do experimentally because of itssize (too big such as the universe or too small such assubatomic systems), environmental conditions (too hot ordangerous) or cost. CMST eventually demonstrated to be Basic concepts, details & factsgenerating innovation and insight, just like experimentaland theoretical research and this ultimately led to the S u b M o d e l
), as higher competency is demonstrated for each construct. For example, for Cultural SelfAwareness (Knowledge), criteria for meeting the Benchmark Level is “Shows minimal awareness of own cultural rules and biases (even those shared with own cultural group(s)) (e.g. uncomfortable with identifying possible cultural differences with others.)” To achieve the Capstone level of this construct, one must articulate “insights into own cultural rules and biases (e.g. seeking complexity; aware of how her/his experiences have shaped these rules, and how to recognize and respond to cultural biases, resulting in a shift in selfdescription.)”. Overview of diversity and inclusion awareness in monthly program meetings Since February 2015, most monthly
education at allgrade levels in public schools. This model was adopted and recommended by the NationalCenter for Engineering and Technology Education as an appropriate model for describing K-12engineering activity. 10 The following section briefly reviews Hynes et al.’s model of K-12engineering design processes and reviews the available literature on what is known about howadolescents approach each stage of the design process.Step 1: Identify and define problems. Clients oftentimes identify problems for the engineerswhom they hire, describing their problems or needs with varying degrees of specificity while attimes leaving several aspects of the problem unstated. 17 Although adolescents “are capable ofidentifying a need or a problem in a given
theoutcomes of student learning from the program of structured construction internships which are requiredfor the ABET-accredited, Bachelor of Science degree in Construction Engineering and Management atPurdue University.The term “internship” has a wide range of connotations in engineering education. In this study, and toextrapolate its conclusions, certain characteristics of an internship program and of the students’ status andexperience apply. An “effective internship” as used in this study is characterized by:a. Completing the internship assignment(s) is an integral component of the engineering degree program andconstitutes a significant educational objective of the program;b. The university takes an active role in the quality and the
. Asgari, S., Trajkovic, J., Rahmani, M., Zhang, W., Lo, R. C., and A. Sciortino, (2021). An Observational Study of Engineering Online Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. PLOS ONE. 16(4): e0250041. 5. Xu J., Tao Y., and H. Lin, (2016). Semantic word cloud generation based on word embeddings. In: 2016 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis): 239–243. 6. Felix C., Franconeri S., and E. Bertini, (2018). Taking word clouds apart: an empirical investigation of the design space for keyword summaries. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph, 24(1): 657–666. 7. Savage, N., Birch, R. and E. Noussi, (2011). Motivation of engineering students in higher education. Eng. Educ., 6:39-46. 8. Sadikin, A.N., Mohd-Yusof, K
technology must practically considerprerequisites in mathematics for the students so that any new prerequisites other than the onesalready required by the electrical engineering technology program.It becomes necessary for the instructors to carefully assess each topic covered in the course andimplement a teaching strategy that only utilizes the practical level of math and physics. Thepracticality must come from the understanding of how the topic is being utilized and practiced inthe field to avoid any unnecessary complexity. Running a pilot course before the final courseimplementation can help assess and adjust to the proper level of prerequisites. For example, withtwo-port S-parameters, it is more important to understand the physical meanings of
] Syaputra, Adi & Hasanah, Enung. (2022). Learning Strategies In The Digital Era. International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation. 3. 74-83. 10.12928/ijemi.v3i1.5507.[2] Athanasios Christopoulos & Pieter Sprangers — Shuyan Wang (Reviewing editor) (2021) Integration of educational technology during the Covid-19 pandemic: An analysis of teacher and student receptions, Cogent Education, 8:1, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1964690[3] Ayodele Abosede Ogegbo & Umesh Ramnarain (2022) A systematic review of computational thinking in science classrooms, Studies in Science Education, 58:2, 203-230, DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2021.1963580[4] S. N. S. Yasin, R. Ibrahim and R. C. M. Yusoff, ”Mobile Educational Games User Experience
alignment, vertical alignment, and cross section that are integral part of highwaydesign.HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENTHorizontal alignment of a roadway includes the straight line path and curves as seen from a plan view.Figure 1 below shows a neighborhood with new horizontal alignments (red lines). This drawing and otherassociated exercise files were taken from linkedin resource [7] available for penn state students. In the labsession(s) associated with horizontal alignment, students are taught the following in Civil 3D, • Creating alignment using objects and alignment creating tools. • Edit an alignment with grips and alignment editing tools. • Create criteria based design and use design check set.The criteria based design and design check