students who participated in the mentoring program andremained engaged in the intervention over a two-year period had significantly higher grades thanthose students who received no active intervention (non-mentored students)17.BackgroundThe National Science Foundation funded a STEP project at the University of Central Florida(UCF) titled “UCF-STEP Pathways to STEM: From Promise to Prominence”. The NSF STEPprogram seeks to increase the number of students (U.S. citizens or permanent residents)receiving associate or baccalaureate degrees in established or emerging fields within science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The STEP project at UCF, called theEXCEL program, was a 5-year program funded in 2006 which has since been
differentfrom his/her home country will not be same as that of the students working in their homecountry. This transcript describes how an NSF funded international research experiences inMexico impacted the Industrial Engineering (IE) students who participated in this project. Thestudents worked with companies that had operations in Queretaro, Mexico, over the summer,including several multi- national firms. The students were required to take Spanish, a researchmethods course at Monterrey Tech, Queretaro, and perform research as part of their program.The impacts of learning, communicating and presenting final results in Spanish are evaluated. This research describes the results two cohorts of students and their experiences over the lastcouple of
Research and Development Engineer and Project Leader for the Automotive Industry in the area of Embedded and Software Systems. She also worked as an Assistant to the Dean of the Graduate Studies of Engineering Division at Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico in 1995 .In 2000 she was a grader at Texas A&M University. In 2001 she interned in the Preamp R&D SP Group at Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, and at Intersil Corporation, Dallas / Milpitas, as a Design Engineer, in the High Performance Analog Group in 2005. She worked at Intersil as a Senior Design Engineer in the Analog and Mixed Signal-Data Converters Group. In 2009 she joined Rochester Institute of Technology in Rochester, New York as an adjunct
different grading process than thosethat have an easily defined solution. This paper explains how, through the use of a blendedcriteria and norm based assessment and evaluation process, to clearly communicate standardsand outcomes, fairly grade dissimilar designs, and effectively encourage continuousimprovement of design products. Evidence of these outcomes will be assessed through thestatistical analysis of student feedback from the United States Military Academy.Introduction United States Military Academy (USMA) civil engineering majors are required tocomplete a one-semester capstone design project as a requirement for graduation. The capstonedesign provides the best integrated experience to assess student performance on the USMA
Lectures Program for the IEEE Education Society.Ms. Mercedes de la Cmara, Universidad Politcnica de Madrid Mercedes de la Cmara is a professor in the School of Computer Science at the Universidad Politcnica de Madrid. She is teaching in the area of languages and information systems, specifically in the area of IT services management, and quality and security computer. She holds the ITIL and CMDB Foundation certificates. She has participated in various ITSM events as a member of the organizing committee and presenting research papers. She has also participated in several European Social Fund projects teaching security and ITSM. In addition, she has actively participated in various projects of educational innovation
reports that we submitted to Boeing.Around the time that our summer fellowships ended, the National Academy of Engineeringreleased their report on The Ingenious Engineer of 2020.1 The NAE also used scenarios on agrand scale. One related to the effects of continued automation and commercialized bio-nanotechnology on a corporate lifestyle. One visualized a natural disaster – a tsunami caused byan asteroid impact, devastating the Pacific Northwest – brought home all too vividly by thecatastrophe in Asia at the end of 2004. A third envisaged global conflict with weapons of massdestruction. Our project is much less ambitious in scope, and is focused on how aerospaceengineering undergraduates must be educated starting this year. We note that the
The Engineering Decision Making Model: Its Importance as Applied through the Context of a World War II Simulation Elias W. Faraclas1 & Catherine Koehler2 1 School of Engineering, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering 2 Neag School of Education, Department of Curriculum & Instruction University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06268Abstract The NSF sponsored Galileo Project, at the University of Connecticut, aims to bringengineering education and experiences to high school level classrooms and curriculum. Inattempting to
POS expressions.3.3.3 In-Lab ExercisesFor this lab, a Xilinx skeleton project is provided to the students. This skeleton project containsan unfinished schematic with only inputs and outputs drawn, a completed test fixture, and correctpin assignments for the 95108 CPLD. The first in-lab task is for the students to enter either theirSOP or POS circuits into the Xilinx schematic editor. Since this is the first time that the studentswill actually use the schematic editor, a short introduction to this portion of the Xilinx softwareis provided. After successfully entering their schematic, students must simulate their design usingthe provided test fixture. Finally, they synthesize their design and download it to a CPLD wherethey can test their
process. Chalupnik4 also concluded that industry will benefitfrom engineers who have better understanding of uncertainty, how it impacts projects, and howprocesses could be made less sensitive to the effects of uncertain events. According to the aboveclaims and others, it has become extremely apparent that the concept of uncertainty isunavoidable in the area of engineering design. Hence, there is a need to train engineers with anappreciation of uncertainty in the design process and for DUU to be part of the undergraduate Page 24.468.6engineering curriculum.Thunnissen5 indicated that in the last two decades, research in uncertainty in the field
at Syracuse University from 2006 to 2007. He is currently working as an assistant professor in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department at Texas A&M University at Kingsville. His current research interests include adaptive array processing, signal processing, and smart antennas.Prof. Reza Nekovei, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Reza Nekovei is a Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Texas A&M University- Kingsville. He has many years of experience in developing graduate and undergraduate programs. Prof. Nekovei is currently co-PI for two NSF projects related in teaching by design research and development, one in Nanotechnology (NSF-NUE) and another in Robotics
students and theircommunity partners and other stakeholders is important [6], [7]. Research suggests that criticalexperiences, where design assumptions are confronted, and immersive experiences are needed todevelop more comprehensive ways of understanding design [8].This past summer, EPICS offered an immersive design experience to a group of 13 students (12undergraduate, 1 graduate) from a variety of majors. Another publication provides a broaderdescription of this course and includes data from the participants’ reflections [9]. The designteam’s goal was to make the camp more accessible to children with physical disabilities throughtwo projects: the design of an accessible tree house and the adaptation of a sailboat to allowcontrol of the steering
academic and co-curricular activities. By design, the group collaborates closely toensure that timelines of academic and co-curricular activities are aligned and reinforce andcomplement each other. Page 23.262.3The academic director has the following principal responsibilities: ● develops the curriculum for the academic program ● coordinates instruction for the academic courses ● manages the teaching assistants and undergraduate mentors required to operate the courses ● establishes interdisciplinary connections and initiatives that provide broad opportunities for course projects ● maintains the quality and safety of the
process design engineer. Once these attributes or criteriahave been established, performance measurements or rubrics can be designed to guide or promptan assessor or evaluator to look for outcomes from a performance activity related to the desiredcriteria. A “performance activity” for the purposes of process design is defined as any activity byan individual, a group or team, or an individual within a group or team that is working towardsachieving the goals and learning outcomes of the design assignment or project. Examples ofperformance activities would include but are not limited to group meetings or work sessions, oralpresentations, meetings and interactions with the “customer” or “client” of the design project (suchas faculty, industrial
include: (1) motivation, (2) technical competence, (3) judgment and decision making,(4) innovation, (5) client/quality focus, (6) business orientation, (7) product development, (8)professional/ethical, (9) teamwork, (10) change management, and (11) communication. Theseattributes span ABET engineering criteria 3 and 4 requirements.A set of broadly-applicable capstone course learning outcomes is presented to address needs fordeveloping the attributes of top quality engineers and to match capstone course objectives withinengineering curricula.Introduction and ObjectivesIntroduction and RationaleCapstone design courses occupy strategic positions in engineering baccalaureate degreeprograms. They provide senior engineering students open-ended project
-basedentrepreneurship by teaming faculty and students in an experiential learning environment anddraws upon the Manufacturing Engineering Education Partnership -Learning Factory. Theobjectives are achieved through dynamically managing and implementing the following tasks:developing a sequence of three team taught (& designed) courses; the active use of an enhancedfacility named Entrepreneurship-Manufacturing Innovation Lab Experience (EMILE);collaboration with industry partners; project assessment; and outreach to different stakeholdersand interested parties.The courses focus on the Enterprise: Conception, Design, and Operation. The teaching/learningstrategy is based on team teaching between the engineering and business faculty with active andexperiential
students to take an introductory engineeringcourse. The course is typically taught by a team of six faculty and has an enrollment of over 200,while the size of a typical class at Bucknell is below 35. While this course has been successful atachieving its objectives in the past, it was felt that it could be improved in terms of class size anddepth of coverage. This year the class was taught in four segments. The first segment was notaltered – lectures were delivered to the whole class in the traditional manner, combined withsmaller laboratory segments. Lectures included: engineering as a profession, the engineeringdesign process, information on each engineering discipline, teamwork and learning styles. Thiswas complemented by a team project in
. Reform OpportunitiesEngineering Design Experiences at MSUIn the context of ABET's major engineering design requirement and EC2000 preparation, a newcourse model was developed for the capstone course in computer engineering, ECE 482—Capstone: Computer System Design 9. The learning objectives for the course state that studentswill learn about embedded systems, i.e., electrical systems that contain embedded computers tocontrol processes. At the completion of the course, each student should have actively participatedas a member of an engineering design team and made significant contributions to achieving theteam’s mission. Each design project involves the collaborative development and evaluation of aproduct that contains an embedded computer. Our
the the Systems Development and Maturity Laboratory (http://www.SysDML.com/), which seeks to advance the state of knowledge and practice in how we manage system lifecycles. He teaches courses in Project Manage- ment of Complex Systems, Designing and Managing the Development Enterprise, Advances in System of Systems Engineering, and Systems Thinking. In addition, he is a National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration Faculty Fellow, Editor-in-Chief of the Systems Research Forum, and Associate Editor of the IEEE Systems Journal.Dr. Brian Emery White, Complexity Are Us - Systems Engineering Strategies Brian E. White received Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in computer sciences from the University of Wisconsin, and S.M
annual programming dollars. Prior to her work in energy, Howard was Assistant Director of ODOD’s Economic Development Division, which directed all statewide busi- ness retention, expansion, and attraction projects. Howard’s professional background also includes work in technology-based economic development as Vice President of the Regional Growth Partnership (RGP) in Toledo, Ohio. At the RGP, she structured Northwest Ohio’s Entrepreneurial Signature Program, cre- ating an organization known as Rocket Ventures, which received $15 million in state funding as well as roughly $7.5 million in private funding to provide a supportive business services environment and pre- seed capital to grow young technology-based
internationally based business and engineering enterprises are using global virtual(GV) teams to connect and collaborate with international partners. To better prepare students tobe successful leaders in this type of international interaction, universities are beginning to addGV teams to their repertoire of learning experiences to develop international outcomes.However, using a GV experience for international collaboration and interaction presents anumber of issues and concerns that need to be resolved prior to implementing GV student teams.Using experience gained through GV team projects in an advanced engineering design course,this paper discusses key lessons learned to efficiently achieve successful results. The paper willfocus on actions a university
extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents, and pre-service and in service teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and Project Direc- tor of a National Science Foundation GK-12 grant, Parry developed a highly effective tiered mentoring model for graduate and undergraduate engineering and education teams, as well as a popular family STEM event offering for both elementary and middle school communities. Projects include providing comprehensive professional development, coaching, and program consulting for multiple elementary en- gineering schools in several states, serving as a regional professional development partner for the Museum of Science, Boston’s
communication [14,15].The challenges of adequately preparing students for this demand in sociotechnical skillsets hasbeen studied by researchers both for general capstone design courses for engineers only and forthose that are multidisciplinary beyond engineering disciplines [9,16,17]. The “2015 Survey ofCapstone Design” [16] not only highlighted the ever-growing focus on technicalcommunications within capstone courses, but also outlined the ubiquitous challenge ofintentionally modeling capstone design courses to prepare students. In the survey however, theconcept of multidisciplinary is one that refers to the diverse kinds of engineering majors and howthey interplay with one another in capstone projects but does not include capstone design modelsthat
learning in engineering coursesAbstractFaculty traditionally have used a variety of individual and group-based learning activitiesincluding homework assignments, exams, projects, reflection papers, and presentations in aneffort to promote, enhance, assess, and evaluate students’ knowledge and learning. More currentresearch has suggested modifications to some of the historic assessment methodologies andtechnological advances that have potentially influenced the use of various assessmentapproaches. The authors pose the following question in this paper: How are faculty currentlyevaluating student learning and encouraging student success in engineering courses?This paper provides a summary of research into grading practices and then shares the results
does not prove, the hypothesis that exposing students to new and upcomingengineering fields, such as energy harvesting, has the potential to plant a seed of inspiration inour students, growing their interest, excitement and dedication to engineering and the service ofsocietal needs. In conjunction with a foundational overview of the field of energy harvesting aimed ateducators and students, the paper includes an exploration of energy harvesters by a group ofsenior-level engineering undergraduates. The students collaborate on a joint project toinnovatively capture energy from the environment to power sensors and transmitters whichdetect cracks, corrosion, and fatigue in bridges in an automated and high-fidelity fashion,replacing manual
master’sprograms to include their names, types (research, project, and/or course only), entry requirements,number of credits required for degree, mode of delivery (on-campus vs. off-campus and face-to-face vs. on-line), and areas of specialization. As a “benchmark” of key quantifiablecharacteristics, the data provided in this paper will be of particular use to engineering faculty inreviewing their own master’s programs. This data will also be useful to students and engineeringpractitioners in understanding the diverse array of domestic master’s programs currentlyavailable.IntroductionFor several decades, educators and practitioners in the civil engineering community have beencalling for reform of civil engineering education. The combination of the
Page 15.1017.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Rebuilding Kabul University Engineering ProgramAbstract:Kansas State University (KSU) and Kabul University (KU) have established an EngineeringPartnership for the purpose of rebuilding the engineering program at Kabul University. Thepartnership is part of the Strengthening Higher Education Program (SHEP) of the Ministry ofHigher Education (MoHE), sponsored by the World Bank. The ten year partnership started in2007. This paper provides an historical backdrop against which the rebuilding project isdescribed. The project was designed on the concept of preparing the engineering programs toqualify for ABET accreditation. A form of the Fundamentals of Engineering
communicate with Civil Engineers of various sub-disciplines, architects, contractors, the public and public agents, scientists and others to design and construct Civil Engineering projects. 3. Begin to develop expertise in one of the sub-disciplines of Civil Engineering and engage in the life-long learning necessary to advance in the Civil Engineering profession; 4. Contribute to society and the Civil Engineering profession through involvement in professional related and/or other service activity, and 5. Conduct their affairs in a highly ethical manner holding paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public and striving to comply with the principles of sustainable
= Angle of Twist, G = Shear Modulus of Elasticity, L = Length of the Bar.II - Objectives of the Experiment and the ProjectThe following major objectives were set at the inception of the project:1. To develop an experiment and apparatus in order to measure the torsion of bars of severaldifferent materials using an “optical measurement process/system”.2. To create an opportunity for collaborative research and design efforts between theundergraduate engineering student(s) and the faculty.3. To design, produce, test, and optimize a cost-effective, reproducible apparatus withoutstanding features.4. To make all information necessary for fabrication of the apparatus and conducting theexperiment available to engineering
, American Society for Engineering Educationused to help underwrite the initial program costs during a three-year transition period. The NSFgrant includes funding for faculty training as well as for hiring support staff to assist faculty.The transition period promises to be gradual in that the three years of the NSF grant, whichbegan December 2000, follow a period of four years during which the microprocessor hasalready been an integral part of all mechanical-engineering Senior Design projects. The three-year period also follows by one year a coincidental move by the College to introducemicroprocessor programming into a 2-course First-Year sequence for all Engineering intents.Another key element is this program is the integration of industry and
Services group of Tetra Tech, Inc. in Tulsa, Okla. He has 39 years of engineering experience with most of his career focusing on municipal water and waste water projects. He has been with Tetra Tech for 28 years. He holds a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Kansas State University and a M.S. degree in Environmental Engineering from Oklahoma State University. Nelson is licensed as a professional engineer in four states and holds Class A operator licenses in Oklahoma for water works and waste water works. Nelson served on the Oklahoma State Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors for twelve years and was board chair for two years. He served as president of the National Council of Examiners for