Paper ID #42858Board 422: What Does It Take to Implement a Semiconductor Curriculumin High School? True Challenges and The Teachers’ PerspectivesAndrew J. Ash, Oklahoma State University Andrew J. Ash is a PhD student in Electrical Engineering in the school of Electrical and Computer Engineering at OSU and he is a research assistant in Dr. John Hu’s Analog VLSI Laboratory. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Oklahoma Christian University. Andrew’s research interests include hardware security of data converters and engineering curriculum development.James E Stine, Oklahoma State University I am a Professor
, university students are prepared to mentor K-12projects. Projects are conducted during the spring semester and supported by universitylaboratories in the iterative design and integration of laboratory environmental monitoring Pods.High school students engage local community members by monitoring environmental conditionsin local schools, businesses, agricultural settings, homes, and government sites. Communitymembers assist with access to experimental sites, materials, and project promotion. Communitymembers are invited to the symposium. Two mentors will travel monthly to each school in thespring semester and support projects remotely via an on-line curriculum (See Component 2). TheSCENIC projects culminate in a local symposium where students
Paper ID #43691(Board 53/Work in Progress) Engaging the Next-Generation of IC Designerswith Puzzle-Solving CompetitionsProf. Daniel Limbrick, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Daniel Limbrick is an associate professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NC A&T). As director of the Automated Design for Emerging Process Technologies (ADEPT) laboratory, Dr. Limbrick investigates ways to make microprocessors more reliable and secure through cross-layer design.Laura Marcela Garcia SuarezDeriech Cummings II, North Carolina A&T State
Lab Activities for a Course on Fluid Power Design and Development of Pneumatic Lab Activities for a Course on,” 2017.[8] M. Mikhail and G. P. Neff, “A Non-Commercial Pneumatic Trainer with PLC Control,” 2016.[9] A. Alavizadeh and M. Mikhail, “Design and development of Robust Portable Trainers used in PLC and Pneumatic Laboratories,” 2020.[10] L. Anderson et al., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 2nd ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.[11] S. Brown, Play. New York: Penguin Group, 2010.[12] “Milwaukee Tool 40" Steel Work Cart.” Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.milwaukeetool.com/48-22-8590[13
. (2017). Democratizing digital learning: Theorizing the fully online learning community model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-16.[3] Boston, W. E., & Ice, P. (2011). Assessing retention in online learning: An administrative perspective. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(2).[4] Cochran, G. L., Boveda, M., & Prescod-Weinstein, C. (2020). Intersectionality in STEM Education Research. In Handbook of Research on STEM Education (pp. 257-266). Routledge.[5] de la Torre, L., Heradio, R., Jara, C. A., Sanchez, J., Dormido, S., Torres, F., & Candelas, F. A. (2013). Providing collaborative support to virtual and remote laboratories. IEEE Transactions on
Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoJohn Galisky, University of California, Santa BarbaraDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for sev ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Instructors’ Framing of their Instructional PracticeIntroductionThis WIP study stems from a larger project focused on the propagation of educationaltechnology in diverse instructional settings
K-12 students andits results demonstrated that while 80 percent of students enjoyed reading the comic, there wasvaried engagement with the contents and most retained little to no information conveyed. In another study1, two comics titled “DataAnalysis” and “Uncertainty” were distributed to aTransport I Laboratory course where the comic’scontents had already been introduced in class andwere being supported by the comic’s contents.Student feedback was gathered through studentself-assessment on a 1-5 Likert scale, whichindicated that 94 percent of students were moreconfident in the comic’s contents after reading it,and the average grade of students in the courseincreased from 83.0 ± 1.6 to 86.2 ± 1.2. This self-assessment combined with
mobile learning," Journal of E-Learning & Knowledge Society, Article vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 166-177, 2022, doi: 10.20368/1971-8829/1135622.[11] B. Marks and J. Thomas, "Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory," Education and information technologies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1287-1305, 2022 2022, doi: doi:10.1007/s10639- 021-10653-6.[12] N. N. Kuzmina, E. G. Korotkova, and S. M. Kolova, "Implementing E-Learning in the System of Engineering Students Training," ed: IEEE, 2021, pp. 818-823.[13] K. Cook-Chennault and I. Villanueva, Exploring perspectives and experiences of diverse learners' acceptance of online
M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. Dr Self’s engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics. He is a Fellow of the American Society
Paper ID #43454The Use of Animated Visual Aids in the Education of Undergraduate EngineeringStudentsMr. Mohaned Samer Ahmed, Texas A&M Univeristy at QatarOsama Desouky, Texas A&M University at Qatar Osama Desouky is a Technical Laboratory coordinator at Texas A&M University in Qatar. Osama is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in interdisciplinary engineering from Texas A&M University at College Station. He is responsible for assisting with experimental method courses, 3D printing, mechanics of materials, material science, senior design projects, and advanced materials classes. Osama’s professional interests
modeling: applications using mplus. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012.[22] C. Payne and K. J. Crippen, “A structural model of student experiences in a career‐ forward chemistry laboratory curriculum,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1002/tea.21860.
” as well as generic techniques for resolvingcontradictions. Pugh Analysis was also used to identify the best alternative which wasprogressed to a physical prototype.The other Mechanical Engineering courses implemented TRIZ, Pugh Analysis, and FMEA. ADoD mentor, serving as a content expert and as part of the external reviewer panel during finalproject presentations, supported the senior capstone projects via e-mail and Skype. Thementor also provided final report as well as presentation feedback. Mentor feedback providedboth encouragement and confirmation of students‟ efforts during the course of the semester.Students also had access to two industry experts; one a laboratory head and the other a Chief
becoming engineers or as an activity they were now enthusiastic about doingin upper-level coursework. Related to the design of physical objects was softwareimplementation. In other cases, being able to “tinker” with an object was an appealing aspect ofelectrical engineering or a rationale for entering an engineering program. In a few cases, theywere finally achieving their goal of being able to take everything they had been learning in classand building a car, robot, or other device. In one case, a student identified signal processing astoo theoretical, and her interest in bioengineering stemmed from the applied nature of the courses(e.g., more laboratory experiences and real-life problems). Students’ responses about difficultand important
. Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, Oct. 2005.35. Vandenberghe S, Asseler Y, Van de Walle R, Kauppinen T, Koole M, Bouwens L, Van Laere K, Lemahieu I and Dierckx R: Iterative reconstruction algorithms in nuclear medicine. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 25:105-111, 2001.36. Virtual Imaging Laboratory, Duke University URL: http://dukemil.egr.duke.edu/37. Wangel M, Neimitukia L, Katila T, and Soimakallio S: WWW – an effective way of teaching radiology. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 66:91-98, 2001.38. Zeng G: Image reconstruction – a tutorial. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 25:97-103, 2001
. Liberatore, M.W. Liberatore Rheology Laboratory Home Page. 2010 [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://rheology.mines.edu.10. Sledding failure. [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqLWb0DK1wc11. Windmill/Wind Turbine Explosion. [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nSB1SdVHqQ.12. Flaming Bacon Lance of Death, from Theo Gray's book "Mad Science" [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9dskxN10N0.13. Mythbusters water heater [cited 2010 August 16]; Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmJoyuUJj2Q.14. Water Phase Change - Water to ice in 90 seconds using vacuum [cited 2010 August 16
Willamette Valley (currently a waste product); and 4) A non-woven wool productcurrently sold as a disaster-relief blanket. Activities were developed for a wide range of skill levels todemonstrate the effectiveness of the different technologies, as well as the economics and efficacy ofdeployment of these technologies in the Gulf Coast region (e.g., could the current fishing fleet bedeployed to use these technologies, and how could that be done).Material Presented in this PaperThe format we have chosen to present the material is in the form of two laboratory experiments (oractivities as they are called in K-12) for two distinct grade levels. One is an activity that has been used inthe First Year Engineering Orientation course at Oregon State
in lecture and recognize that these concepts are notsolely academic and can be used in their daily lives. Feedback from the students indicated that in Page 22.1551.14addition to learning the course curriculum, they developed their abilities in teamwork, timemanagement and communication skills, skills crucial to a professional engineer, but oftenunderemphasized in academic settings.References1. Aronson, M.T., R.W. Deitcher, Y. Xi, and R.J. Davis, “New Laboratory Course for Senior-Level ChemicalEngineering Students, Chem. Eng. Educ., 43, 104 (2009)2. Cussler, E.L. “A Different Chemical Industry”, Chem. Eng. Educ., 40, 114 (2006)3. Varma, A
with using the software, creating the videos tookapproximately 30 minutes to complete and averaged between 5 – 7 minutes in length.Assessment of student access and performance indicates that the students utilized the videos,appreciated the additional learning tool, and saw a trend in improved exam scores. Theinstructors will continue to create these videos for additional worksheet and possible homeworksolutions and plan to expand the assessment from both a qualitative and quantitative standpoint.References1 O’Neill, Geiger, Csavina, and Orndoff, “Making Statics Dynamic! Combining Lecture and Laboratory into anInterdisciplinary, Problem-Based, Active Learning Environment,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Honolulu, Hawaii, June
, expected to be made available toundergraduates (through electives) if not required for an undergraduate degree. New engineeringanalysis and design tools and techniques are being continuously developed. This “explodingbody of knowledge” is, without question, impacting what and how the next generation will beand is being educated [4]. While certain topics may have or will become obsolete (e.g.,graphical methods in structural analysis) and while certain efficiencies in instruction have beenand will continue to be realized through technology (e.g., asynchronous virtual laboratories),there is little doubt that more is expected out of today’s baccalaureate curricula than ever before.The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a survey of the
., Yarbrough, D., Rothmyer, A., Rajagopalan, G., Otta, S., Caughey, D., Bhaskaran, R., Smith, S., Hutching B., and Moeykens, S., “Development of Hands-On CFD Educational Interface for Undergraduate Engineering Courses and Laboratories”, ASEE, AC 2004-1526, 2004.11. Blekhman, D., “Lessons Learned in Adopting a CFD Package”, ASEE, AC 2007-830, 2007.12. LaRoche, R., Hutchings, B., and Muralikrishnan, R., “FlowLab: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Framework for Undergraduate Education” , ASEE, AC 2002-1520, 2002.13. Ormiston, S., “Incorporating CFD into the Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Programm at the University of Manitoba”, Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada: CFD2001, pp. 333
technologies.Vladimir I Prodanov, California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 Vlad Prodanov received MS and Ph.D. degrees, both in electrical engineering, from the State University of New York at Stony Brook in 1995 and 1997 respectively. He was with Bell Laboratories, Lucent Tech- nologies from 1997 until 2000 and Agere Systems (now LSI Logic) from 2000 to 2004. From 2004 to 2008 he was member of MHI Consulting, New Providence, NJ. Currently, he is an assistant professor with EE Dept., Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA. Mr. Prodanov has worked on various electronic systems for communications and contributed to two dozen peer-reviewed publications, three book chapters, and seventeen granted US patents
Modeling, Design, Simulation, and Diagnoses of Electrical Distribution NetworkAbstractThis paper will present an existing course in smart grid technology and promotes problemsolving and innovations. Some topics of interest are: areas in course development, courseorganization and content; laboratory equipment and experiments; and some concepts in smartgrid. After adapting this course, some student’s project has already been developed, implementedand assessed. The course structure and contents covers topics on educating students on how tobuild a smart gird and use advanced computer application software tools for modeling, designsimulation, and diagnoses of electrical distribution network systems. Computer softwareapplications and case
review for tests and quizzes; (7) providestudents with a ready-made, savable, printable, portfolio useful for Fundamentals of Engineering(FE) review and exam preparation, and (8) work more high-quality problem examples due tothese increased course delivery efficiencies.BackgroundENGR 315 -Engineering Economics is a three credit hour course that does not incorporate aformal laboratory (3-0-3). At our college it is described as the study of the relative economy ofengineering alternatives, compound interest in relation to calculation of annual costs, presentworth and prospective rates of returns on investments, methods of depreciation, sinking cost,increment cost, general studies with emphasis on retirement and replacement of equipment
. Desmarquest Ceramic Femoral Head 4. Bell Laboratories: Research Fraud by Jan Hendrik 5. Space Shuttle Challenger Page 22.1372.4 3The presentation of these cases included both the technical detail pertinent to the ethicaldecisions made by the participants, as well as an evaluation of those decisions in light of theethical theory developed in Section I.In Section III of the course, groups of 2-3 students gave presentations on several high-profileengineering failures with potential ethical components. These included: 1. Ford Pinto Recall 2. DC-10
middle of the state in a rurallocation with a very limited manufacturing base. Thus, the program would have to reach out andgo to industry partners rather than bring problems into a laboratory environment.The department knew a course which met ABET requirements must be developed and added tothe curriculum in the form of a core, required course taken during the last semester. As statedabove, significant challenges to development of this course existed. However, the departmentused the ABET requirements as the primary catalyst or driver for change.1 The department reliedupon the ABET constituent driven approach to overcome at least the cultural, personality, and
programconcentrations.Accreditation Board for Engineering and TechnologyAccording to their website, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)“serves the public through the promotion and advancement of education in applied science,computing, engineering, and technology.” They “provide, operate and maintain an independentand objective accreditation system of the highest quality and effectiveness.” They accreditengineering programs which may be described as “the art of applying the principles ofmathematics and science, experience, judgment and common sense to make things which benefitpeople. Engineering technology programs are characterized by their focus on application andpractice, and by their approximately 50/50 mix of theory and laboratory experience” 6
AC 2011-173: TOOL USE AND ACTIVITIES OF PRACTICING ENGI-NEERS OVER TIME: SURVEY RESULTSMichael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University Johnson is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distri- bution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota for three years. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools; specifically, the cost modeling and analysis of product development and manufacturing
Page 22.1130.9OFDM system. Students can extend this by picking any other block from the OFDM Simulinkmodel and implementing it on hardware or follow this paper to implement the FFT block.References[1] Y. S. Cho, MIMO-OFDM wireless communications with MATLAB: Singapore ; Hoboken, NJ : IEEE Press : J. Wiley & Sons (Asia), c2010, 2010.[2] A. R. S. Bahai, Multi-carrier Digital Communications: Theory And Applications Of OFDM: Springer, 2004.[3] L. L. Hanzo, OFDM and MC-CDMA: A Primer: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2006.[4] G. Martin, B. Bailey, and A. Piziali, ESL Design and Verification. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2007.[5] S. Guzelgoz and H. Arslan, "A Wireless Communications Systems Laboratory Course," Education, IEEE
, College of Engineering, Diversity Programs OfficeClaudia Elena Vergara, Michigan State UniversityJon Sticklen, Michigan State University Jon Sticklen is the Director of the Center for Engineering Education Research at Michigan State Univer- sity. Dr. Sticklen is also Director of Applied Engineering Sciences, an undergraduate bachelor of science degree program in the MSU College of Engineering. He also is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Dr. Sticklen has lead a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task specific approaches to problem solving. Over the last decade, Dr. Sticklen has pursued en- gineering education research focused on early engineering; his current
problems,in laboratory assignments, and in key projects. Qualitative assessment tools such as surveys andfocus groups are also being used for assessment purposes.The program uses direct and indirect measures to determine the attainment of programeducational objectives. The key methods used are: a)periodic alumni surveys, rating theirpreparation and the importance of program emphasis, their salaries, and their level ofprofessional and personal development activities. b) Employer Data: Surveys and focus groups,as well as advisory board panels provide feedback on employer satisfaction. c) Graduate Schooland professional school performance – including placement and graduation rates, as well assubsequent employment. This paper is focused on the results