three universities. This information may assist Construction Management and Engineering programs that are interested in integrating BIM into an existing curriculum. Key Words: BIM, Engineering, Construction, CurriculumIntroductionBuilding information modeling (BIM) has increased at an exponential rate over the past decadein the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. BIM adoption has steadilyincreased since 2007; according to McGraw-Hill Construction’s Smart Market Report [1], 17%of AEC industry utilized BIM software systems in 2007, 49% in 2009, and 71% in 2012. A morerecent McGraw-Hill Construction survey conducted in 2019 states that mechanical and plumbingsubcontractors are responsible for producing
countries, higher education institutions in Latin American arestill dominated by the concept of a ‘traditional education’ that emphasize the transmission ofdisciplinary contents and the paramount role of professors inside the classroom. This modelfocuses more on what is it taught (contents and topics of different subjects), and less on whatstudent will be able to do and how will be able to use acquired knowledge and skills in his or herprofessional life after graduating the program.To switch the traditional focus from teaching to learning is not easy since it implies theassumption of new curriculum concepts that should lead and assure an effective learning [7].It is worth noting, for example, that in some Latin American countries where academic
, ornationality [15]. Although differences exist between the two perspectives, they are moredifferent in emphasis than in kind. Thus, some researchers link the two perspectives to get amore fully integrated view. They view identity as a complex phenomenon that involvesreflexive activities of self-categorization and identification with respect to membership inspecific groups [16][17]. In the following, we prefer the third interpretation as it provides amore comprehensive understanding of identity. Interdisciplinary identity Disciplinary and interdisciplinary identities are two manifestations of identities in termsof disciplinary affiliations and have been regarded as an intrinsic driving force for learningstrategies, learning performance, and
contribution, we focus on providing acase study of our story that features an Enhanced Innovation Schema (i.e., one centered on use of a“Group Genius Approach”, Sawyer [2]) that has been leveraged by this team. This schema allowsinterdisciplinary voices, equitable conversations, and logistic models to be integrated into theprocesses by which funding opportunities are generated (please see more below).To begin, we illustrate the motivation behind this work and offer related and relevant literature tosituate this schema within the extant scholarship on problem identification and innovation-drivenapproaches in engineering education. We then offer theoretical background regarding the two majormodels that have been adopted and adapted to create the anchor
CE Integrated Program. Specifically, the integratedprogram, which began a phased implementation in the Spring of 2001, already covers: • The 11 ABET outcomes • Leadership • Project management/construction • Business principles/public policyWhile the CE Integrated Program addresses nearly all the elements in the proposed BOK,it is uncertain if the elements are provided at the appropriate level of competency toassure civil engineers are successful in the future. Therefore, the BOK CurriculaCommittee invited Iowa State University’s CCEE Department to be one of the selectedinstitutes to develop a model curriculum to satisfy the BOK at the necessary competencylevel. To date, Iowa State University, Colorado
prepared towork collaboratively in culturally diverse and global settings. In order to remain relevant in anevolving field, they must also be creative and innovative, imbued with an entrepreneurial spirit,and educated for leadership and life-long learning. Traditionally, the development of attributessuch as these have not been the primary goals of the undergraduate engineering curriculum,although recent changes in accreditation standards strongly encourage engineering programs tohelp students develop teamwork and lifelong learning skills.While support for what have been understood historically as liberal (or general) education goalsfuels many discussions in engineering education community, the level to which these goalscurrently permeate
number of students working on this project with a wide variety ofclasses and extracurricular work schedules, group members were not always around to answerquestions about a particular subsystem. With access to the proper documentation, the students wereable to find answers to most questions without one-on-one meetings. Consequently, the need to keepdocumentation current for the present design is of utmost importance, so that others can work withthe latest generation of design changes.Large-scale system integration also rarely takes place in either undergraduate or graduate education.The Scorpio project allowed the students to gain valuable experience that is generally not found ineither the on-campus curriculum or through cooperative (co-op
(PSM) after which this program is modeled. For thepast ten years the PSM program has been growing in popularity in US schools of engineering. Itis designed for students who do not wish to continue on to a doctorate leading to an academiccareer but rather to enter the workforce with a master’s degree, a degree now viewed by many ashaving displaced the baccalaureate as the terminal engineering degree. These programs put moreemphasis on applied skills as opposed to those more theoretical in nature. The paper concludeswith a detailed description of the NJIT proposed curriculum and the assessment process used toevaluate defined outcomes.1. Introduction Research engineering universities frequently emphasize long-term research as the processby
MST Academy Page 22.1343.10Environmental Science (AP) New Vision Engineering SENSE IT (4)Environmental Science (2) Physics (AP)Most of the courses had only one section, but 23 percent of the teachers taught two sections ofthe same course and 18 percent taught three or more sections. The number of students in asection varied, from four to 33, with an average of 16.The length of time spent on the curriculum varied enormously. Some teachers integrated thecurriculum into their regular subjects, teaching SENSE IT materials once or twice a week overmany weeks, while others taught it intensively over fewer weeks
. She also conducted an NSF-funded ethnographic study of learning in a problem-driven, project-based bio-robotics research lab at Georgia Tech. In addition to her duties in BME, she is a member of the interdisciplinary research team conducting the Science Learning: Integrating Design, Engineering, and Robotics (SLIDER) project.Dr. Essy Behravesh, Georgia Institute of Technology Essy Behravesh is the Director of Instructional Laboratories in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He holds a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Florida and a Ph.D. in bioengineering from Rice University
support an integrated, comprehensive infrastructurefor assessment, evaluation, and improvement. Specific items of discussion within thepaper will approach TC2K from two levels: • Program Level: Evaluating Outcomes at the program level where multiple inputs integrate to develop a collective view of the state of the program in order to plan and affect future improvement. • Course Level: o Integrating course outcomes into Program Outcomes. o Assessment and evaluation within the classroom.These best practices will address policies, procedures, and associated infrastructure toaccurately describe the operational parameters that are an integral part of success
engineering courses and thus do not have direct interactionwith the AE faculty until their third year in the program. The only exception is one requiredengineering science course, Statics, taught by an AE faculty member during the second year ofthe curriculum. This lack of interaction leaves some students unsure of what it is they have cometo this program to accomplish, which can lead to students deciding to switch majors to one inwhich they better understand the process.To make sure this is not the case in our program, and to expose students to the concepts ofstructural integration early in their education, the three AE faculty members agreed to beinvolved with this Studio I design project, and have been for many years. The interaction withAE
graduate from the curriculum. Feedback will also be used to modify the program.• CEES seminar. One problem that has surfaced as we have implemented cross-course integration of projects (e.g., a soil mechanics class designing an earth dam must interface with a water resources class who is designing the reservoir for water supply) is that the students from the two courses have difficulty finding a common meeting time. Another problem is finding time to assemble students enrolled in Sooner City courses in order to administer questionnaires and diagnostic tests, such as RATs and CATs. Thus, we have revised our curriculum to include a 1-hour seminar course in which all CEES students must enroll. Pending Regent's approval, we
Education at the School of Education and Human Development at the University of Virginia.Blakeley Calhoun Blakeley Calhoun is the Assistant Director of Undergraduate Success in the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science, joining in July 2018. Blakeley has previously worked in Residence Life as an Assistant Community Director at Michigan State where she also completed her Master of Arts in Student Affairs Administration. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Full Paper: First Year Academic Co-Advising Improvement Lisa Lampe
materialand thereby integrated into examinations and homework. We developed set of remotely controlled laboratories covering optical circuits concepts. Thelaboratories are currently implemented in the Engineering Technology Department at the Universityof Houston in an upper division undergraduate course, The experiments have also been used at theUniversity of Colorado at Boulder. Formative assessment provides numerous benefits to measurestudent learning outcome. Other researchers have explored the use of formative assessment toguide online learning. To the best of our knowledge, embedded formative techniques have not beenpreviously used in online laboratories. This paper will present results of embedded assessmenttechniques conducted in this
area of curriculum and academic program development, construction management, construction material waste minimization, sustainable residential construction, greenhouse gas reduction, green building rating programs and process evaluation. Don possesses diverse work experience in the design, construction and project management of various types of building and infrastructure projects.Mrs. Neetu Sharma, MacEwan University Neetu Sharma is an Associate Professor with the Department of Accounting and Finance at MacEwan University in Edmonton, Canada. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Experiential Student Learning through Collaborative Simulated
about their specific major so thatthey can make an informed decision. Thus, a new freshman program is being established toaddress these concerns both in and out of the classroom. These efforts are being implemented inconjunction with the redesign of the introductory engineering course (ES 130) offered atVanderbilt University from a skills-based approach to a problem-solving approach. An integral part of the introductory engineering course is a semester long project. In order to(a) familiarize the freshman with the different engineering majors and (b) incorporate theengineering design process into the curriculum, discipline-specific engineering design projectshave been implemented into the freshman Engineering course. The discipline-specific
interplay between mechanical and electrical principles that apply to agrowing number of industrial products and processes. Despite the importance of thisinterdisciplinary area, many of today’s engineering graduates are unprepared to functioncompetently in environments that require them to integrate electrical and mechanical knowledgeareas. In addition, engineers with better communication and teamwork skills are needed toensure U.S. competitiveness in today’s global economy.In order to address this competency gap a team of faculty members (consisting of faculty fromboth ME and EE departments) started work in the mid-nineties to integrate mechatronics-basedactivities at all levels of the undergraduate engineering curriculum at University of
paper will discussthe advantages and disadvantages of each technique as well as what we have learned by introducingmethodical changes in these techniques over the past several years.IntroductionMany first year engineering students face the dilemma of choosing which engineering discipline fits hisor her interests and career goals the best. Because of this, it is common for engineering schools to have acourse early in the curriculum to introduce engineering students to each of the engineering disciplines.The choice of engineering discipline can have a very important effect on the futures of these students.This poses a daunting task to the instructors of these courses: How does one portray as many disciplinesas possible in an unbiased fashion, and
paper will discussthe advantages and disadvantages of each technique as well as what we have learned by introducingmethodical changes in these techniques over the past several years.IntroductionMany first year engineering students face the dilemma of choosing which engineering discipline fits hisor her interests and career goals the best. Because of this, it is common for engineering schools to have acourse early in the curriculum to introduce engineering students to each of the engineering disciplines.The choice of engineering discipline can have a very important effect on the futures of these students.This poses a daunting task to the instructors of these courses: How does one portray as many disciplinesas possible in an unbiased fashion, and
theorganizational systems. These applications requirements require a much higher degree of cross-functional application knowledge and ability to understand many different industrial needsmodels, than what can be offered in the typical Engineering curriculum. Theoretical designmodels and the use of design tools are not within the scope of the Technologist.Academic requirements in AOT include: technical courses at the direct application level;communications and management coursework designed to teach the interdisciplinary skillsnecessary to integrate the cross functional needs of the wide variety of user/customer needs.Successful completion of the AOT curriculum meets the requirements of the Federal AviationAdministration (FAA) under Federal Air Regulation
demonstration as well as a more sophisticated lab-oratory experiment so that we could also provide students with data showing a quantitative comparison. Adetailed write-up documenting the required hardware completed each HOH developed. In addition, undergraduate students needing design credits are also working on HOHS. A typical, chal-lenging HOH is assigned one credit when successfully completed.Evaluation and Impact Ultimately, hands-on-homework assignments will be liberally sprinkled throughout the engineeringcurriculum at UCB. They will be an integral part of an overall curriculum revision taking place to accommo-date and utilize the Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory (ITLL) at the University of Colorado atBoulder. The ITL is
Project PROCEEDAn engineering student project is an exercise that usually requires integrating several tasks toachieve a defined goal. It can be an individual project or a team project, or even some form ofboth. The Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin hasembarked on systemic educational reform throughout the ME curriculum. Called PROCEED,for Project-Centered Education, this curriculum reform is an attempt to bring real-world projectsinto the classroom that underscore the need to learn fundamental principles while addingexcitement and relevance to the experience. One important aspect of PROCEED is garneringsupport from industrial partners who supply project ideas and personnel for the student projects.Two
enhancing the graduate mathematics curriculum with statistics courses. She is the 2017 recipient of the College of Arts and Sciences Excellence in Teaching Award. Weems earned her BS in mathematics from Spelman College and her MA and PhD in applied mathematics from the University of Maryland, College Park. She completed postdoctoral studies in the Statistics Depart- ment at NC State University, where she later joined the faculty and served for two years as Co-Director of Statistics Graduate Programs until moving to NCCU. She is a member of the American Statistical As- sociation and the National Association of Mathematicians as well as an advisory board member of the Infinite Possibilities Conference for women of color in
-assessment and a leadership capabilities framework linked tointeractive leadership laboratories (LLabs). This is part of a curriculum that also includes theteaching of best practices in effective product development and the scientific principlesunderlying major engineering disciplines. Experience-based practice and mastery of methods isgained via the Challenge Project, an intense, tightly-scheduled, deliverable-orienteddemonstration of human leadership, project and resource management and engineering problemsolving.The Gordon Engineering Leadership Program (GEL), in the graduate school of engineering atNortheastern University, targets the development of the soft skills, organizational awareness andtechnical agility key to mastering leadership in an
2006-567: VIRTUAL CONTROL WORKSTATION DESIGN USING SIMULINK,SIMMECHANICS, AND THE VIRTUAL REALITY TOOLBOXKain Osterholt, Belcan Corp. Kain Osterholt received the B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Bradley University in May 2005. He is currently an electrical engineer with Belcan Corporation working on the Caterpillar backhoe-loader research and controls team. His work includes system integration using C++.Adam Vaccari, Caterpillar Incorporated Adam Vaccari received the B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Bradley University in May 2005. He is currently an electrical engineer in the Electronics Department with Caterpillar Incorporated. His current work includes developing and
a curriculum to expand the use of virtual reality environments with real engineeringapplications in computer science courses to teach human technology interaction theory.1. IntroductionTechnical theory can be extremely abstract at the educational level. This leads to extensivereliance on students’ engagement with the material outside of the classroom through researchand internships to provide real-life context. The use of technology in the classroom is a way tobridge these experience gaps [1-3]. However, there is a question of how to integrate thistechnology effectively [4-5]. Considering this, a current project at San Francisco State University(SFSU) is exploring the use of a structural engineering project to explore and reinforce human
positives.I suggest that ABET needs to review engineering programs with the following principles inplace:1. Examine programs in a minimally invasive manner.2. Determine whether the curriculum, as delivered, meets minimal standards for the degree awarded.3. Determine whether the faculty and facilities are sufficient to deliver the degree program.4. Investigate whether there is an active, periodic mechanism for program improvement that involves review by and input from external constituencies (alumni, employers, colleagues).Some might claim that this is exactly what ABET 2000 accomplishes, but many faculty woulddiffer. In their minds, how should ABET change? Here are several suggestions
projects in industry encompassing principles of professional engineering. These coursesare capstone courses taken at the end of the MEP curriculum. 10. Elective or Independent Study (3 credits):Can be substituted for one of the industrial projects. Approval of advisor required.6. Implementation It is anticipated that the first cadre will be made up of approximately 20 students. Theprogram will be structured in an executive format. In this structure, professional engineers fromindustry or the military will remain together as one cadre and take courses in a prescribedsequence. Each course will be offered during the latter part of the week and during weekends andbe completed in approximately ten weeks. A distance learning format may be
the software development.The requirements will be operationalized into student learning objectives and described asconsistent with Bloom’s Taxonomy for the cognitive and/or psychomotor domains, dependingupon the task involved. Incorporation of course plans, exercises, quizzes, exams and laboratorymanuals into the appropriate modules at the appropriate level into relevant courses will follow.Instructors can use this reference documentation to create various scenarios by manipulatingvarious parameters reflective of those experienced by a technician in the A2 environment. To beeffective, student learning assessments must be integrated into an academic department’smeasurement system. Consequently, it must not impose an unreasonable workload in