Formation (PFE: RIEF) program under Award#2024960. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] Patrick, Anita D., and A. N. Prybutok. "Predicting persistence in engineering through anengineering identity scale." International journal of engineering education 34, no. 2a (2018).[2] Marra, Rose M., and Barbara Bogue. "Women engineering students' self efficacy--alongitudinal multi-institution study." Women in Engineering ProActive Network (2006). Surveyavailable at http://aweonline.org/efficacy.html[3] Bilgin, Betul, James W. Pellegrino, and Vikas Berry. "Work-in-Progress: The Design of Up-to-Date
survey.Table 1Project Research Plan Phase Research Question Data Source(s) Quantitative To what extent does engineering USS + PSO surveys students’ social capital predict their opportunities for professional skill development? To what extent do students in different USS survey first-year cohorts have significantly different levels of social capital? To what extent do students in different PSO survey cohorts have different reported levels of opportunities
planning and product design.Based on this review, we developed our survey as follows: • The existing surveys primarily targeted CXOs. Our survey targeted plant technical managers. As the focus of our project is on Industry 4.0 tools and technologies, we anticipate that we can learn more about what is happening on the plant floor if we gather data where “the rubber meets the road.” • In surveying managers about the technologies they are using, we followed Frank et al’s conceptual framework, which provides a useful taxonomy of Industry 4.0 technologies. However, Frank et al.’s sample consisted of Brazilian companies in construction and machinery which may be more traditional and less high-tech than U.S
: Creatingconditions that matter. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass Inc. 2011.[11] V. Tinto, Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL,USA: University of Chicago Press. 1987[12] E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini, How college affects students: A third decade ofresearch, vol. 2, Indianapolis, IN, USA: Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley. 2005 13[13] S. M. Lord, R. A. Layton, and M. W. Ohland, "Multi-institution study of studentdemographics and outcomes in electrical and computer engineering in the USA," IEEETransactions on Education, vol. 58, pp. 141–150, Aug. 2015.[14] S. M. Lord, R. A. Layton, M. W. Ohland, C. E. Brawner, and
: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.67.17. J. S. Ge et al., “A Scoping Literature Review of Engineering Thriving to Redefine Student Success,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 19, Apr. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.9.18. Tal Ben-Shahar, Happier: Learn the Secrets to Daily Joy and Lasting Fulfillment (McGraw Hill professional). The Mcgraw-Hill Companies, Inc, 2007.19. M. E. P. Seligman, Learned optimism. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2018.20. M. E. P. Seligman and M. Csikszentmihalyi, “Positive psychology: An introduction,” American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 5–14, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066x.55.1.5.21. J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry &
play a good role in thecomprehensive questionnaire design.Example 1: The engineering professional code requires that ( ) be given priority.A. Operational standards of the project B. Economic benefits of the projectC. Public safety, health and well-being D. Technological innovations in engineeringExample 2: In the following types,which is/are engineering ethical responsibility(ies): ( ).A. Professional ethical responsibility B. Social ethical responsibilityC. Environmental ethical responsibility D. Corporate ethical responsibilityExample 3: The basic principle(s) for dealing with engineering ethics is/are ( ).A. Humanitarianism -- the basic principle of dealing with the relationship between engineeringand peopleB. Social justice
globalexchange and dialogue of engineering education, and actively participate in theworld’s major engineering education accreditation system. Among the signatories s ofthe Washington Accord, the U.S., Canada, U.K., Ireland and Australia have not onlysigned the Washington Accord, but also accessed important international engineeringeducation cooperation projects such as the Sydney Accord, the Dublin Accord and theSeoul Accord. With these projects, on the one hand, they can actively absorbinternational advanced engineering education concepts and practical experience; Onthe other hand, it actively attracts students from member countries to study andexchange in the country, and provides talent reserves for the development of thecountry. China has only
development of engineering educationgoals and student learning outcomes, and carrying out engineering programassessment and continuous improvement. Among them, participating in theassessment and continuous improvement of engineering programs is the biggestchallenge for teacher. According to the findings of Engineering Change, the potentialimpact of EC2000 on student learning includes three aspects - curriculum, teachingmethods, and teacher culture. [15] These are actually important aspects of academicpower participating in the quality assurance in engineering education. EC2000’s 7emphasis on student learning outcome and continuous improvement assessmentrequires teacher to actively improve the educational
National Science Foundation Award #1928611. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Bailey, R. (2020) “Chaos and Control: How First-Year and Upper-Level Students Experienced Design Differently in a Project-Based Class.” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2020.2. Leung, J.K.L., Chu, S.K.W., Pong, T., Ng, D.T.K., Qiao, S. (2022) “Developing a Framework for Blended Design-Based Learning in a First-Year Multidisciplinary Design Course.” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 65 (2).3. Prince, S.P., Tarazkar, Y. (2013) “Mechanical Engineering Design
students have increased experience with a variety of prototypingtechniques is a foundational requirement for programmatic success.References:[1] Hamburg, Shanti D. "Flipped Lab: Introduction to Prototyping & Manufacturing ScalableInstruction in Making." IJAMM(2020).[2] Epstein, A. W., & Rudolph, S., & Einstein, H. H., & Reis, P. M. (2014, June), EnhancingDesign Students’ Comfort and Versatility in the Shop: A Project-Based Approach Paperpresented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20415[3] Cook, T. V., & Lyle, J. A., & Kerestes, R. J. (2018, June), Board 73 : Work in Progress:Reinforcement of Engineering Education with Hands-on Learning of Technical Skills Paperpresented at
the school’s Green Team led her to grapple with the role science educators play in advancing environmental justice. She holds a MA in Curriculum and Instruction and a BS in Biological Sciences from the University of Connecticut.Dr. Chrystal Smith, National Science Foundation Chrystal A. S. Smith, Ph.D., is a cultural anthropologist with expertise in diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM education. Her research uses social science theoretical frameworks to examine how implicit factors such as culture and social capital influence the persistence of students belonging to groups historically underrepresented in STEM education. Currently, she is a Program Officer in the Division of Equity for Excellence in STEM
other processes for sustainingmovements.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the RED teams for their participation in the RED community ofpractice. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Jelani Ince for his time and effort in providingus with constructive feedback. This research was supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No.’s #1649379, #1649318, #2005244, and #2005307. Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.References[1] D. McAdam, Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970.University of Chicago Press, 1985.[2] B. Edwards and M. Kane, "Resource
, S. D. Blum, and S. D. Blum, Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead). Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, 2020. Accessed: Feb. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/20/edited_volume/book/78367[5] M. E. Selbach-Allen, S. J. Greenwald, A. E. Ksir, and J. E. Thomley, “Raising the Bar with Standards-Based Grading,” PRIMUS, vol. 30, no. 8–10, pp. 1110–1126, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1695237.[6] J. K. Zimmerman, “Implementing Standards-Based Grading in Large Courses Across Multiple Sections,” PRIMUS, vol. 30, no. 8–10, pp. 1040–1053, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2020.1733149.[7] T. Buckmiller, R. Peters, and J. Kruse, “Questioning points and
. 63,no. 3, 2005.[4] H. L. Roediger III, and E. J. Marsh. "The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition vol. 31,no. 5 p. 1155, 2005.[5] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman, Howlearning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.[6] L. B. Nilson, and L. A. Goodson. Online teaching at its best: Merging instructional designwith teaching and learning research. John Wiley & Sons, 2021.[7] D. F. Feldon, "Why magic bullets don't work." Change: The Magazine of HigherLearning vol. 42, no. 2, 15-21, 2010.[8] J. Sweller, J. JG Van Merrienboer, and F. GWC Paas. "Cognitive
challenges or problems when completing thetask(s). The weekly project progress report was completed by the “leader of the week”. Eachteam had a chance to be the project manager for a semester. The project manager'sresponsibilities included setting up meetings, communicating with clients, summarizing thecompleted work, and planning the tasks expected to be completed in the following week. Thefaculty advisor collected these two documents every week and addressed specific issues whennecessary during the weekly team meeting.During the design phase, the client was continually updated throughout the design process toensure satisfaction was guaranteed. For each part of the design, students collected the initialfeedback by sending surveys to the client and
the college environment. Her research interest focuses on higher education policy, access, and representation of marginalized groups in STEM disciplines.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Roberta Rincon is the Associate Director of Research with the Society of Women Engineers, where she oversees the organizationˆa C™s research activities around issues impacting girls and women from elementary through college and into the engineering workDaniel E. Chand, Kent State University Daniel E. Chand is an associate professor of political science and public administration at Kent State University. He earned his Ph.D. in Public Policy from the University of Arkansas in 2013. His research applies policy and
: 10.18260/1-2--5750.[5] L. Berland, W. McKenna, and S.B. Peacock. "Understanding Students' Perceptions On The Utility Of Engineering Notebooks,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26-29, 2011, pp 22.1573.1 - 22.1573.17, doi: 10.18260/1-2--18474.[6] R. Moore, et al., “The engineering design log: A digital design journal facilitating learning and assessment,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26 - August 28, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26153.[7] S. Kerka, “Journal Writing and Adult Learning,” EPIC Digest No. EDO-CE-96-174, 1996.[8] J. D. Hertel, C. M. Cunningham, and G. J. Kelly, “The roles of engineering notebooks in
related to thecognitive/affective domain (“develop[ing] communication skills[,] design experiments[,]deal[ing] with unexpected situations in the lab[,] writ[ing] technical report[s]” [code:communication, experimental planning, problem solving]) and then highlighted their ability tomanipulate equipment (“I can use the equipment which we used in this lab (TFF system)” [code:tactile elements]). Further still, some students mention the same topic(s) consistently both beforeand after and for others, their before and after responses both pertain to several domains.Additionally, some students’ first response mentioned multiple objectives while their postresponse focused on one aspect, as if they arrive with many expectations but after the course
) - Interaction with a Prof/TA/Tutor/Reader during oral exams increased my motivation to learn 6 - Taking oral assessments made me more comfortable (or more likely) to reach out to the instructional team for help (such as office hours, email, or other methods). - Oral assessment(s) in this course have changed my studying strategy for learning - The oral assessment(s) increased my understanding of the
. Brickman, "When Group Work Doesn’t Work: Insights from Students," CBE— Life Sciences Education, vol. 17, no. 3, p. ar52, 2018/09/01 2018, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199.[5] J. A. Gasiewski, M. K. Eagan, G. A. Garcia, S. Hurtado, and M. J. Chang, "From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses," Research in Higher Education, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 229-261, 2012/03/01 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y.[6] D. Gillespie, S. Rosamond, and E. Thomas, "Grouped Out? Undergraduates' Default Strategies For Participating in Multiple Small Groups," The Journal of General Education, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 81-102, 2006, doi: 10.2307/27798042.[7
] S. von Stumm, B. Hell, and T. Chamorro-Premuzic, “The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 6, pp. 574–588, 2011, doi: 10.1177/1745691611421204. [6] C. A. Berg and R. J. Sternberg, “Response to novelty: continuity versus discontinuity in the developmental course of intelligence,” Adv Child Dev Behav, vol. 19, pp. 1–47, 1985, doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60387-0. [7] P. J. Silvia, “Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity,” Cognition and Emotion, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 94–113, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1080/02699930701298481. [8] W. F. Massy, T.A. Sullivan, and C. Mackie, “Improving measurement
US schools,” Environmental Education Research, 13:2, p. 171-188, 2007, DOI: 10.1080/13504620701284944.[5] R. Archibald, “Black Belt students perform far worse in stem than rest of Alabama,” al.com, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.al.com/news/2022/03/black- belt-k-12-students-perform-far-worse-in-math-science-than-rest-of-alabama.html.[6] Alabama STEM Council, “Annual Report 2021,” Alabama STEM Council, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://stemcouncil.alabama.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Stem- Annual-Report-FINAL-1.pdf[7] M. de Guzman, S. Kim, S. Taylor, I. Padasas, “Rural communities as a context for entrepreneurship: Exploring perceptions of youth and business owners,” Journal of Rural Studies
, malicioussoftware, and cryptography. And for the topics that require improvement, we'll focus on enhancingthe supporting information and explanations for better outcomes.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon the work supported by the United States National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1903419 and 1903423 through the Security and Trustworthy CyberspaceEducation (SaTC: EDU) program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)at Purdue University Northwest and the University of Toledo under protocol numbers IRB-2020-1119 and IRB-301407-UT
. New York: Random House. [6] R. Felder and R. Brent. 2005. Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education 94, 1 (2005), 57–72. [7] Catherine Good, Aneeta Rattan, and Carol S Dweck. 2012. Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 4 (2012), 700–717. [8] Brett D Jones, Marie C Paretti, Serge F Hein, and Tamara W Knott. 2010. An analy- sis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans. J. Eng. Educ. 99, 4 (Oct. 2010), 319–336. [9] You-Kyung Lee, Emily Freer, Kristy A Robinson, Tony Perez, Amalia K Lira, Daina Briedis, S Patrick Walton, and Lisa
terms of grades did not show any statisticalsignificance, but the students choosing lightboard videos always indicated that they felt theylearned more from those videos. We are designing a study to track these students and see theirperformance in future courses that leverage the content from this course.References[1] Leonard, E. (2015). Great expectations: Students and video in higher education. Sage whitepaper. Retrieved November 25, 2016.[2] Pal, D., & Patra, S. (2021). University students’ perception of video-based learning in timesof COVID-19: A TAM/TTF perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction,37(10), 903-921.[3] Carmichael, M., Reid, A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Assessing the impact of educationalvideo on
of the 12th International Conference onEducation Technology and Computers, October 2020, pp. 161-164,https://doi.org/10.1145/3436756.3437039[7] Sanchez, B., Rodriguez-Paz, M. X., ”Using BIM as a collaborative platform toimprove e-learning in civil engineering”, 2020 ICETC ‘20: Proceedings of the 12thInternational Conference on Education Technology and Computers, October 2020, pp.21-26, https://doi.org/10.1145/3436756.3437015[8] Crespo, S., Rodriguez-Paz, M.X., Carrasco, L.H.H. “ A Challenge-based Teachingmodel for Structural Analysis Courses with Strategic Industry Partners”, Paperpresented at 2022 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access,https://peer.asee.org/a-challenge-based-teaching-model-for-structural-analysis-courses-with
creation zone more quickly. References[1] D. Rothstein and L. Santana, Make just One Change: Teach Students to Ask their OwnQuestions. 2011Available: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED524346.[2] B. Ferri et al, "Use of a MOOC platform to blend a linear circuits course for non-majors," inJun 15, 2014, pp. 24.1304.1.[3] B. Benson and F. Depiero, "Teaching Introduction to Electronic Circuits in a Studio Format,"2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--28919.[4] S. Northrup and J. Burke, "A hybrid approach to a flipped classroom for an introductorycircuits course for all engineering majors," in Jun 14, 2015, Available:https://search.proquest.com/docview
, “Design method for piezoelectric cantilever beam structure under low frequency condition,” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 153–159, 2018.[6] J. Iannacci, RF-MEMS Technology for High-Performance PassivesThe challenge of 5G mobile applications, Nov. 2017.[7] D. Murph, “Georgia Tech researchers develop environmentally-powered nanogenerators,” Engadget, 13-May-2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.engadget.com/2007-04-11-georgia- tech-researchers-develop-environmentall y-powered-nanogen.html. [Accessed: 04-Dec-2022].[8] P. Glynne-Jones, M. J. Tudor, S. P. Beeby, and N. M. White, “An electromagnetic, vibration- powered generator for Intelligent Sensor Systems
study conducted by the Center for DiseaseControl and Prevention indicated that the areas with the speed cameras saw a decrease in thedrivers’ mean speed [4]. They also conducted a phone survey of the drivers within thecommunity and found that 95% of the drivers were aware of the cameras and 76% of themreduced their speed. One such example of a speed radar system is patented by Eliot S. Gerber.Their design utilizes a sign that displays the license plate number, owner’s name, and thevehicle’s speed [5]. It also uses a database to store the license plate numbers, owner’s name, andmake and model of the vehicle. Similar systems were patented by James A. Fowler and Leon O.Stenneth [6], and Carl Kupersmit [7].This paper presents the design
-orientedand the instructor must take into account the student feedback when designing the curriculum.References1. S. Hazari and D. Schno, “Leveraging student feedback to improve teaching in web-based courses”, The Journal, 26(11), 1999, 30-38.2. L.S. Brew, “The role of student feedback in evaluating and revising a blended learning course”, The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 2008, 98-105.3. S.P. Quarrie, “Student peer review as a tool for efficiently achieving subject-specific and generic learning outcomes: Examples in botany at the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade”, Higher Education in Europe, 32(2-3), 2007, 203-212.4. P. Seldin, “Using student feedback to improve teaching”, To Improve the Academy, 16(1), 1997, 335