interviews of officials within Denmark’s ministries, this can only beconsidered a preliminary look at the institutional responses in Denmark. We also note that ouraccess at DTU was also limited by a recent, controversial decision on the part of one of thePROCEED co-investigators to relocate from DTU to Aalborg University. We believe ourfindings to be of significant interest to engineering educators in the United States. While the fullfindings of our study will be released in an edited volume produced by the PROCEED project, asummary of our findings is presented here for the ASEE audience. In the following section, wefirst present a brief introduction of the Bologna Process and the diverse reactions to it acrossnations and institutions.Varied
. As part ofthis group, I regularly train men, both on- and off-campus, to better serve as gender equity allies.I am a member of the Commission on the Status of Women Faculty, a committee that works todevelop and enhance gender-equitable policies at North Dakota State University. I am primaryauthor of a series of broadly distributed advocacy tips, have participated in a national webinar onengaging male faculty as gender equity allies, and have given several conference presentationson the same topics. Additionally, I currently serve on the planning committee for the NSF-funded project Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE), which has thegoal of enhancing women participation and success in engineering programs.Dr. Holmes: I
universities design their pedagogicaltraining to support their growth as instructors? To what extent do new engineering graduatestudent instructors reflect on their pedagogical training and apply the new skills from training totheir classroom experiences?To address these questions, this project was designed to explore first semester engineering GSIs’perceptions of their pedagogical professional development through the lens of Wlodkowski'smotivational factors for adult learners.8 As summarized by Felder, Brent & Prince (2011), thereare five key characteristics for motivating adult learners to engage in professional development(e.g., expertise of the facilitator, relevance of the topic, choice on how to apply best practices,praxis (action and
problem statement and building amodel from fundamental principles using explicit assumptions and application of problem spe-cific information. Thus, the answer produced by the student is supported by an explicit chain oflogic that can be examined by everyone.University of New Haven (UNH)In 2004 Tagliatela College of Engineering at UNH introduced a set of common engineering fun-damentals courses for all engineering programs. The set of courses, collectively referred to as theMultidisciplinary Engineering Foundation Spiral Curriculum (MEFSC)19,20, spanned the fresh-man and sophomore levels. First-year courses include project-based courses to introduce the en-gineering design process, project planning, and the use of spreadsheets with Visual Basic
Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system tech- nology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU- SoE’s 2002, 2008, 2011, and 2014
States, Ecuador, Chile and Argentina and 26 workshops in Mexico, Chile and Argentina. He has participated obtaining projects funded by the European Consortium of Innovative Uni- versities, HP Development Company, Agencia Espa˜nola de Cooperaci´on Internacional para el Desarrollo and the University of Arizona. He is a member of the Mexican Council of Educational Research, Vi- cepresident of the Latin American Physics Education Network (LAPEN), coordinator of the Evaluation of Learning and Instruction Topical Group within the International Research Group on Physics Teach- ing (GIREP for French); member of the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) in which he was member and president of the International
—students wearconcert t-shirts showcasing their favorite music artists, instructors play music during class topromote a particular learning environment, groups of students listen to music as they worktogether on a project or as they attempt to solve a homework question. Previous research haslinked musical preference to personality and values, both of which correlate to social identity,and to a lesser extent, academic study habits. Pierre Bourdieu's landmark text La Distinction alsoasserts that social class influences judgments of taste and choices in cultural activities.Researchers have also used markers such as genre taste as a cultural indicator, focusing on"high" arts, such as classical music, ballet, and art museums as measures of culture.1
theirbachelor’s degrees in engineering. We focus on these individuals due to the scarcity of researchon their experiences and the relevance of their perspectives to engineering education.29-31Implications of this work will focus on recommendations for educational research and practice.Framework and LiteratureThe overall EPS project is broadly situated in social cognitive career theory (SCCT) which positsthat a variety of factors influence career choice including self-efficacy beliefs, outcomeexpectations, and learning experiences.32 SCCT has been used extensively in the study ofengineering students’ career choices.33-37 A main goal of our study has been to identify theschool and workplace factors related to the career choices made by engineering
the distinction between collaborative learning on the one hand and cooperativelearning on the other (see, e.g., Olivares 2 ). Cooperative learning is group learning whose main goal is for everymember of the group to learn 3,4 . Our focus is on this type of learning. By contrast, the goal of collaborative learningis for the group to work together to solve a problem, complete a project, etc.; ensuring that each individual memberof the group learns some particular item of knowledge is secondary. We should also add that not all authors use thesedefinitions of cooperative and collaborative learning with some authors conflating the two and others interchangingthe two terms 5,2 . In any case, there seems to be consensus that there are two types of
construction education and training oppor- tunities, emphasizing construction-based workforce development. He has contributed to, and developed curriculum for, construction management training programs in Mexico, Egypt, and Tunisia. He is pas- sionate about connecting underrepresented and unemployed populations with sustainable employment opportunities in the construction industry. Jon has over five years of experience in construction and his commercial project management experience focused on core and shell office building projects and historic building restoration/rehabilitation in Washington DC Page 26.732.1
Hrastinski, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stefan Hrastinski is Associate Professor at the The School of Education and Communication in Engineer- ing Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and Visiting Professor with specialization in e-Learning, Mid Sweden University. His research focuses on online learning and collaboration in educational and or- ganizational settings. Stefan has conducted research and development projects across various contexts, including higher education, school settings, companies, municipalities and the public sector. He teaches courses in e-learning, and supervise theses on bachelor, master and Ph.D. level.Prof. Inga-Britt - Skogh
spring 2014 panels as a service project as achapter officer served as a member of the panel voluntarily, not for credit in CE 3311. Thestudent chapter participated by drafting the survey given to students (survey was reviewed by theinstructor and adjusted slightly) that is presented later in this paper, administering the survey, andproviding the results after grades had been submitted to the instructor.3.0 AssessmentsSchilling et al.5 describes a taxonomy based approach (i.e. to assign a given written commentinto one or more categories) to qualitatively assess written comments on student evaluations. Asimilar approach was used in a few instances for the assessments that follow.3.1 Student EvaluationsFigure 3 provides a summary of
Paper ID #12638Honing Interpersonal Communication Skills for Difficult Situations: Evi-dence for the Effectiveness of an Online Instructional ResourceMs. Amy Elizabeth Dawson, Arizona State University Amy Dawson, M.A., is a doctoral student in the Counseling Psychology program at Arizona State Uni- versity. Amy is also a research assistant for the NSF funded CareerWISE project housed at ASU.Prof. Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University Bianca L. Bernstein, Ph.D. is Professor of Counseling and Counseling Psychology in the College of Let- ters and Sciences at Arizona State University. Dr. Bernstein is Principal Investigator
various active learning methods. Forexample, only 9 percent said they never had students discuss problems in pairs or groups, and Page 26.890.3only 18 percent never had students work on problems sets or projects in pairs or small groups.There are some important limitations of this work. First, it is unclear the extent to whichinstructor self-reporting is accurate (as noted by the author) or the extent to which therespondents were representative of all instructors. Responses might be more likely from facultyactively engaged in trying to teach statics most effectively. The quality of implementation of thevarious methods varies widely. As shown in a
course, students learnthe basic skills necessary for visual technical communications and spatial visualization. Topicsinclude engineering sketching and drafting, orthographic projection of multi, sectional, andauxiliary views, dimensioning, tolerances (the first half of the semester), and solid modelingusing the Computer Aided Design (CAD) tools (the rest of the semester). In a typical class, theinstructor delivers a short lecture followed by a class activity based on the lecture. For example,in a class that teaches multi-view of objects, the class activity is to derive the multi-view for agiven set of objects on an assignment sheet. The instructor helps the students during this activity.Once they complete the class activity, they are allowed to
Paper ID #13484”It’s Too Hard,” to ”I Get It!” – Engaging Developmental Science as a Tool toTransform First Year Engineering EducationProf. Carmela Cristina Amato-Wierda, University of New Hampshire Carmela Amato-Wierda is Associate Professor of Materials Science at the University of New Hampshire. She shifted her research focus several years ago to the area of cognitive development of STEM concepts and practices in grades K-16. She has held NSF funded curriculum projects in General Chemistry and Materials Science, and has recently developed two science courses for non-scientists, titled: The Science of Stuff and
were achieving their goals.”4 This challenge led to some programs being dropped fromconsideration due to a lack of documentation and evaluation data.4 In addition, minorityretention issues in STEM are complex phenomena, compounding the research and evaluationchallenge.6 While the need for more qualitative studies to understand these complex nuances isevident, there is also a need for more rigorous quantitative work. For example, in a review of 28Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation (LSAMP) projects, although studies wereprimarily quantitative or mixed methods designs, the focus was on participation numbers andgraduation rates of URMs in STEM with no experimental designs.6Tinto7 argues for improved assessment and evaluation efforts
exam was administered. Improved security measures haveprevented additional problems. Development of new problem resources puts considerabledemands on instructor time. During the initial implementation period for the surveying coursesand BREG 321, the author’s time was allocated for LON-CAPA resource development. Oncethe project was underway, all conventional homework problems in those courses were convertedto online delivery through LON-CAPA. Page 26.37.7Table 1. Information about courses in the study. # of Course Title and Notes
implemented with the intention ofmaking assessment more formative, though the differences in perceptions between in classexams and out of class homework may make a difference for students. Though the data onstudent learning is limited in these studies, they did indicate that students reported giving moreattention to instructor feedback [9] and that the mastery system was more “fair” [10], showingpromise for the methods and echoing similar results found in this study.Because the focus of this project was on homework assignments conducted outside of theclassroom, the design of the automated assessment systems were used as a starting point, thoughthe evaluation itself would not be automated. The authors instead focused on emulating theprocess of
stories to the overall project and to the community to “hear” the testimonies and to facilitate adhering to of engineering education the participants’ reality during analysis. -We co-construct meaning-making within the research team so as not to mis-construe or stray from participants’ testimony The concepts underlying the research design The knowledge produced needs to be meaningful
Paper ID #13824Developing an Intensive Math Preparation Program to Enhance the Successof Underrepresented Students in Engineering ˜Prof. Denise Hum, Canada College Denise Hum is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at Ca˜nada College in the San Francisco Bay Area. She received her M.S. in statistics at California State University, East Bay. Her academic interests in- clude accelerated math pathways, Reading Apprenticeship, and increasing the number of women and underrepresented groups in STEM.Ms. Anna Marbella Camacho, Canada College As Project Director for a $5.9 million Hispanic-Serving Institution
of the course, students have atleast 33 hours of hands-on activities. The knowledge gained via theoretical and practicalexercises is reinforced by the computer projects utilizing MATLAB simulation software.In 2009, the first attempt at converting the existing traditional model of the EM course into theblended version has been made. Utilizing the hybrid methodology, several lectures wereconverted into the online format and gradually introduced to the class of 40 students. Feedbackcollected from the students showed an interest in the hybrid/blended version of the course. Astandard assessment model previously conducted for traditionally taught EM coursesdemonstrated an increase in comprehension of the subject. The last contribution was due to
Paper ID #11436Epistemic Network Analysis as a Tool for Engineering Design AssessmentMs. Golnaz Arastoopour, University of Wisconsin, Madison Before becoming interested in education, Golnaz studied Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign with a minor in Spanish. While earning her Bachelor’s degree in engineering, she worked as a computer science instructor at Campus Middle School for Girls in Urbana, IL. Along with a team of undergraduates, she headlined a project to develop a unique computer science curriculum for middle school students. She then earned her M.A. in mathematics
from a broad viewpoint to a specific focus (converge). Divergence is associated with activitieslike brainstorming, ideation, building, and prototyping. Convergence is associated with activities such asanalysis, selection, evaluation, and testing.Altogether, five stages comprise this framework. The shape in figure 1 was created to represent and showthis framework as an iterative process versus a linear one. Stage 1 focuses on conversations or actionspertaining to defining requirements, project scoping, and gathering information about a particular project Page 26.1038.5or the needs of stakeholders. Stage 2 focuses on conceptual
the third track involveda relatively new pre-existing AS degree program6 that would be updated.Furthermore, one of the faculty members on the SET curriculum feasibility committee alreadyhad a $.5 million National Science Foundation (NSF) Advanced Technology Education (ATE)grant titled, “Intelligent Infrastructure Systems Education Project”, with its foremost projectgoals being curriculum development (including course material and labs) and two-year collegefaculty development activities. Today, this technology is better known as the Internet of Things(IoT) or cyber-physical systems (CPSs) technology. Cyber-physical systems technology refers toembedded control systems that are “tightly coupled” to the real world and require timing toperform
process the studentcomes to class, listens to a lecture, takes notes of key points made, reviews the materialsometime after the lecture, uses the combination of class notes, homework solutions, anddiscussions with classmates to prepare homework, complete projects, write reports and study forexams. A major component of academic student engagement occurs outside of the classroomafter the lecture. This activity is often backend loaded with increasing independent effortexpended as an exam or deadline approaches.A flipped learning environment includes the activities found in a traditional setting, but also hasadditional activities that promise to increase academic engagement. The key difference is that thestudent must come to class prepared to
Administration from Harvard University. One of his major research interests has been the impact of gender on science careers. This research has resulted in two books (both authored with the assistance of Gerald Holton): Who Succeeds in Science? The Gender Dimension and Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study.Dr. Philip Michael Sadler, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Philip Sadler holds a B.S. in Physics from MIT and an Ed.D. from Harvard. He co-authored the first integrated computer and laboratory introductory calculus course in 1975. He has taught middle school mathematics, engineering, and science and both undergraduate science and graduate teaching courses at Harvard. His research
recognized, has contributed to scholarship more than 140 articles, presentations, books and reviews on software development methodologies, management, organizational change, and program management. Dr. Springer sits on many university and community boards and advisory committees. He received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Executive Development from Ball State University. Dr. Springer is certified as a Project Management Professional (PMP), Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR), in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), and, in civil and domestic mediation. He is a State of Indiana Registered domestic
. Like I just learned the universal [coefficient] theorem and how it connects to my research project. Once I understand and can apply it, then I get it. I work twice as hard [as others] to understand, but once I get it then I really see the connection and it’s much easier for me. I have to see how it’s applied in a conceptual way for me to get it.Carina: Honestly, I'm a little lazy, to be honest, especially when it doesn't really interest me. Ifit's something I have to do and I know I'm not going to like it. I guess I come to the point where,if it's too much material to where is overwhelming just to learn one simple thing, its just toomuch, and I get lazy about it and I don't even want to pursue reading it.Jasmine: I prefer to work by myself
Paper ID #14160Transportation System Based Summer Academy for Teachers (RTP, Strand4)Dr. Shashi S. Nambisan P.E., University of Tennessee, Knoxville Shashi Nambisan is a Professor of Civil Engineering at University of Tennessee, Knoxville (UT). Since 1989, he has led efforts on more than 165 research, education, and outreach projects that have addressed local, statewide, regional and national issues in transportation and infrastructure systems management related to policy, planning, operations, safety, and risk analysis. He has authored or co-authored more than 125 peer reviewed journal and conference publications. Along