engineering education programs which necessitatesworking relationships between peers. This group nature brings students of differing identitiestogether, meeting frequently outside of classroom hours or instructor monitored interactions. Thestudents identified group projects, laboratory work, and classroom interactions as a particularhurdle towards engineering peers being a part of their social support networks. This seems tomirror literature which describes a gendered engineering student dynamic where womenexperience negative interactions and diminished project roles in team-based settings [40, 41].The additional layer of being transgender women complicates the ability to draw clear parallelsto existing studies on women in engineering, which often
) and for Science for Clean Energy (S4CE), another European Community Project (both are led by Alberto Striolo at University College London). He is on the advisory board for Fluid Phase Equilibria and is a member of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) Project on Recommended Reference Materials for Phase Equilibria Studies (led by Ala Bezyleva, NIST). He sat until recently on the advisory committee for the National High Magnetic Flux Laboratory Tallahassee (FTICR-MS facil- ity, USA), and the Network Coordination Council for the Canadian Oilsands Network of Research and Development (CONRAD). He was a principal Investigator and theme leader for Carbon Management Canada (a Canadian national
80% lecture as demonstrated in study afterstudy.Student participation in engineering classrooms is limited and highly structured. The studentexperience is largely to solve problems in a methodical fashion, and accessing knowledgethrough sequential presentation of textbook material. Though laboratory assignments arecommon in undergraduate engineering, historically, the majority of the student experience hasconsisted of strictly following prescribed steps to arrive at a predetermined conclusion. In theirseminal work with science, engineering, and math undergraduates Seymour and Hewitt found themajority of engineering teaching to be a deductive transmission of facts, controlled by theteacher, and leaving little room for students to understand
% 0% 1-20 20-50 50-75 75-100 100+ Number of students in section Figure 12. Section sizes in a given courseThe most common section size is 20 to 50 students for both type of introduction courses, but theytend to use different classroom types (Figure 13). Large lecture halls are the most commonclassroom for both course types. Higher fractions of the introduction to engineering courses usesmall classrooms and small group tables, and a higher fraction of the introduction to disciplinecourses use large lecture halls, smart classrooms (multimedia-enhanced), and laboratories. Theinterpretation of the different types of
Laboratory in the School of Engineering at Rens- selaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) and Professor of Practice in the Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering department from 1999 to 2015. He also worked at GE Corporate from 1987 to 1991, con- sulting and introducing world-class productivity practices throughout GE operations. In 1991 he joined GE Appliances and led product line structuring efforts resulting in $18 million annual cost savings to the refrigeration business. Later as a design team leader he led product development efforts and the initial 1995 market introduction of the Built-In Style line of GE Profile refrigerators. His last assignment at GE Appliances was in the Office of Chief Engineer in support of
12.1487.112. Undergraduate Research Fellowships (original program, 2001)Up to fifteen fellowships are granted each year in both the USC College and in the USCViterbi School of Engineering to support summer and academic year research. The goal is tofamiliarize students with laboratory research and link them with a mentor early on. It ishoped that through the experience of first-hand research at the undergraduate level, thechances will increase that students will choose to pursue a graduate degree in science orengineering. Student recipients of the fellowship are expected to work on their researchproject at least 12 hours per week during the academic semester in which they receive theaward ($2,500). For the summer, the expectation is about 300 hours or
laboratory course in which he repeatedly enrolled, building Lego cranes to lift andmove loads and completing other open-ended problems. But it was a voluntary activity as partof a high school English course that helped to cement his love for engineering. As a sophomore, Page 12.1277.8Joe worked with a friend to build a trebuchet that was twelve-feet high and could catapult a one-gallon bottle of water the length of a football field. He even moved the trebuchet to MT tocontinue tinkering with it, and housed it in the garage of his apartment building, while his vehiclesat in the driveway, exposed to the elements. Additionally, as a hobby, Joe began
has 58 systems. In Asia, Japan leads with20 systems, Taiwan has 11, China 10 and India 9 [18]. The No. 1 position goes to the BlueGene/L System, a joint development of IBM and theUS Department of Energy's (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) andinstalled at DOE's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. AlthoughBlueGene/L has been in the No. 1 position since November 2004, the current system is muchfaster at 478.2 teraflops compared to 280.6 teraflops six months ago before its upgrade. BlueGene/P system installed in Germany at the Forschungszentrum Juelich (FZJ) is in theNo. 2 position with the processing speed of 167.3 teraflops while the No. 3 system is at the
. Then new teams, inwhich each team member had expertise regarding a different learning activity, were formed andcharged to rank the five activities from least- to best-aligned with formal cooperative learningprinciples. In a separate learning activity, student teams postulated the values and philosophy ofan engineering instructor who incorporates cooperative learning in his/her classes.Student teaching and research philosophies and their elevator speeches went through at least oneiteration cycle, with students receiving feedback from classmates, the course instructors, and, inthe case of the teaching philosophies, peers from the Laboratory for User-Centered EngineeringEducation (LUCEE8) at the University of Washington (LUCEE is devoted to
, demonstrations, laboratory exercises, individual andgroup projects, and field experiences to: 1) enable high school students to directlyexperience authentic learning practices that require them to use higher-order thinkingskills; 2) encourage creative problem-solving skills that require collaborative learning,teamwork, writing, and presentation; 3) cultivate an interest in service learning, in whichstudents are active participants, achieve outcomes that show a perceptible impact, andengage in evaluative reflection; and 4) better motivate and prepare secondary schoolstudents for advanced education. The Fellows have been and continue to be trained tocreate and implement these activities.Through the course of each year, the Fellows complete a specially
. Specific activities guide learners through a platform planning process. In addition toproduct platforming, the cases promote learning concepts of function-based family design,component sharing, modularity, customer needs-driven approach, market analysis, decision-making, etc.Five senior engineering students have studied these three case activities during their summerresearch experience at SMART (Systems Modeling and Realization Technologies) laboratory atVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University4. The students were sponsored by theNational Science Foundation’s Research Experience for Undergraduate (REU) Program forproduct platform planning5. This study involved the students’ learning experiences with the casestudies. First, the students
allow for a little (linguistic) relaxation in a full-time class schedule. • The international professional internship may be paid or unpaid, and is closely-related to the student’s major discipline. Placements in a corporate context are preferred for engineers; placements in a university or governmental research facility or laboratory are often more suitable for natural scientists. • 15 hours of immersion language learning credit are assigned to the internship in special BA in Modern Languages subplans developed for GSEP, meaning that all internship placements are required to be in a primarily non-English-speaking environment. This rules out some placements in overseas offices of US companies to focus
partnership with Sandia National Laboratories.5 Winner of the 2006 NationalAcademy of Engineering’s Gordon Prize for Engineering Education,6 the partners developedshared curriculum materials and degree options in product realization or manufacturing to helpbring real-world experiences into the engineering classroom. For capstone design in particular,the Learning Factory fosters university-industry partnerships whereby industrial sponsors andclients interact with students and faculty through hands-on capstone design projects. Initially,these projects primarily engaged mechanical engineering, industrial engineering (manufacturingtrack), and electrical engineering students at Penn State; however, the program has expandedsignificantly over the past five
like? Is that a good thing or a bad Page 23.795.8 thing? Of all the academic communities you participate in (laboratory groups, informal study groups, the classroom, activities sponsored by the department and so on), which help you the most to engage in your education? How do they help you? Of all the non-academic communities you participate in (athletics, church groups, work communities, international student groups, fraternities & sororities, church groups, and so on), which help you the most to engage in your education? How do they help you? [Probing/Follow-up Questions:] Is there anything else that particularly
reading, assigned homework problems, interactive exercises, andpower-point presentations. Students are responsible for learning basic course material outside ofclass time. Unlike an online class, an IC includes face-to-face time with the instructor inclassroom or laboratory setting where the material learned outside of class is discussed andapplied. The IC allows an educator to present course material in several different formats, and soengages the different learning styles and preferences of students. The IC format encouragesstudents to become self-learners and help prepare them for how they will need to learn aspracticing engineers. Our experience shows that the IC format can free class time for learner-centered activities without sacrificing
bridge construction project en- gineer for a construction contractor and as a research engineer for the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory in Port Hueneme, Calif. His teaching interests include construction equipment, cost estimating and con- struction process design. His research interests include highway and heavy construction methods, road maintenance methods and innovations in construction process administration. Page 23.415.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Development of a Framework for the Online Portion of a Hybrid Engineering
the initial design of the automated control system.Additional information can be found on OSHA's Web site at: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/controlhazardousenergy/There are many reasons why the electrical devices that you will use in the design of yourautomated control system should be listed, approved or registered with a testing laboratory.One reason is to ensure that the device meets standards that will prevent failure that could lead tocatastrophic results. Another reason might be for insurance or compliance purposes. One of themost specified and premier safety testing laboratories is Underwriters Laboratories (UL). Themost applicable area of interest for control systems is UL's Standard for Safety 508A. If yourcontrol system panel
applications of Smart Lighting ERC while providing greater educational outreach opportunities to many more pre-college students than if the ERC managed its outreach separately. Several School of Engineering faculty members have embraced the Engineering Ambassador philosophy by providing research experiences within their laboratories through the Undergraduate Research Program (URP). The students then develop presentations that tell the story of the research. The faculty members provide a great deal of guidance to the Ambassadors as they prepare presentations and hands-on activities about the technology within the URP laboratories. An additional source of financial support comes from various state funded
Paper ID #7464An Innovative Two-Year Engineering Design Capstone Experience at JamesMadison UniversityDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University OLGA PIERRAKOS is an associate professor and founding faculty member of the James Madison Uni- versity Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pier- rakos is the Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) and Director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer identity, engineering design instruction and
undergraduate education (i.e., courses, curriculumdevelopment, laboratories, and co-curricular activities in undergraduate STEM programs) is aninstitutional responsibility.5 Current directions include efforts to develop strategies fortransforming institutional practice – moving institutions and programs from a historical teachingcentered environment to student-learning centered environments.6, 7 & 8In response to the “shifting” landscape of concerns, the Model Institutions for Excellence (MIE)project at The University of Texas at El Paso, with support from the National ScienceFoundation, has developed and implemented a comprehensive model of undergraduate educationin STEM.9 & 10 The components of the model include an entering students program
the UA, Jim was a visiting scientist, then a research fellow, at the Space Science Laboratory of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala. In 1995, he received the Arizona Mortar Board Senior Honor Society award for outstanding faculty service. In 1997, he was awarded an International Research Fellowship by the National Science Foundation for study at the Uni- versity of Melbourne. In 2009, he was recognized by ChEE and the College for Excellence at the Student Interface. He is a member of the Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi, and Phi Lambda Upsilon honor societies, as well as the College of Fellows at Rice University’s Will Rice College. Jim’s research interests include transport processes in natural
Design (SUTD). Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering (Division of Engineering and Applied Science) at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in Sept. 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory Page 25.752.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 for research in engineering design and manufacturing. He was a National Science Foundation Young Investigator, the Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in
of Physics Department at anotherlarge and well-regarded high school. This academic, perhaps unsurprisingly, has a specialresearch interest in the transition from high school to first-year engineering.This paper reports on the observations of and the conclusions reached by the first author as hespent a full academic year immersed in the University of Auckland’s first-year engineeringprogramme. Few formal requirements were imposed; by choice the teacher sat in on thelectures, tutorials and laboratory sessions of several engineering courses. He also chose toenrol in two university courses in order to learn social-sciences research methods that heapplied during his year at the university. While the teacher did involve himself in several
oral communication to describe the data, calculations, analysis, and experimental results used to substantiate design decisions. (b, g, k) Course Outcome 5 – An ability to recognize ethical dilemmas and make appropriate decisions. (f)Several methods have been used to assess student work in Capstone Design to assign grades andimplement the outcomes assessment process. For week-to-week evaluation, students haveprovided self progress reports and maintained a laboratory-style engineering notebook wherethey have recorded all design work and meeting notes. The course instructor grades these selfreports and notebooks weekly. Students have written individual learning goals based upon the
incorporate best practices from the National Science Foundation’s Engineering EducationCoalitions.1 Among these best practices was the “Implementation of ‘engineering up front’: theexposure of freshmen to hands-on, real world engineering practice early in their undergraduateeducation, ranging from ‘professional level’ laboratory facilities to realistic design projects.”2Two freshman courses designed to provide students early exposure to engineering concepts werecreated. Both were six-credit courses. The first, ICEE 1010 (ICEE stands for IntegratedCollaborative Engineering Environment), was taught in three one-hour lectures and three two-hour lab sessions per week. Topics included graphics, introductions to mechanical and electricalengineering
AC 2010-1626: ON TEACHING THE OPERATING PRINCIPLES OFPIEZORESISTIVE SENSORSRichard Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Richard A. Layton is the Director of the Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education (CPSE) and an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He earned a B.S. in Engineering from California State University, Northridge, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both in Mechanical Engineering, from the University of Washington, Seattle. His areas of scholarship include student team management, assessment, education, and remediation, undergraduate engineering laboratory reform focused on student learning, data analysis