communication, project based learning, and technical writing. . Thereare two longer writing assignments in the course; the assignment we have focused our researchon is the second project, P2. This assignment required students to design their own staticsresearch question, solve the problem using topics covered in Introduction to Solid Mechanics,and complete a written summary. This written summary contains an abstract, free bodydiagrams, final calculations, and a poster presentation. The purpose of the project is to givestudents experience in designing their own problem and solving it, writing a professionaltechnical paper, and class presentation.The questions that this research seeks to answer are: 1. How did the changes in the assignment worksheet
the basic mechanismanalysis and design process. The students are also given a specific design task, currently thedesign task is to improve the walking motion of the given robot kit.Course DescriptionThe current format of the course contains three components: (1) The use of a commercialParametric Modeling package. Currently the SolidWork and Autodesk Inventor software areused. (2) The practical training of measuring and modeling actual parts. (3) The analyzing andre-designing of an actual product to further reinforces the concepts and principles learned inrelated engineering design courses. By integrating the project into the 2nd half of the course, theinsights and strengths of using the Parametric Modeling software can be better observed.The
population of college-level instructors have been identified.An Introduction to Nonverbal CommunicationThis paper focuses on the nonverbal communication occurring within a classroom, specificallythe nonverbal messages sent by students and received by the teacher. When student verbalfeedback during a lesson is minimal, due to either lesson presentation method or student personalcommunication preference, the teacher must rely on nonverbal cues to determine the effect of Page 26.76.2their communication[1]. From Barry et al.[2], nonverbal communication generally falls within oneof ten categories:1. Chronemics – The timing of verbalizations and
Engaging Freshmen Women in Research – Feedback from Students and Best Practices for FacultyIntroductionIncreasing the participation of diverse populations in engineering and technology fields is achallenge for many universities. A significant means to address this issue is to increase theparticipation of women students. However, this can prove to be challenging. In a studyconducted by Marra and Bogue,1 it was found that although women engineering students enterthe university with high levels of self-confidence and self-esteem, those levels decline quicklyduring the first year. They also found through their research, that the initial levels were neverregained. One method to help retain diversity in engineering and technology
. Page 26.692.2 The ‘peer review’ process is seen as a critical part of team-based modern engineeringeducation. Authors have noted that utilization of peer reviews has offered students new learningopportunities. Such learning opportunities include increased responsibility, higher studentengagement and motivation, and increased problem-solving abilities.1-2 While peer reviewfeedback has been long emphasized and assigned by instructors, it is often only at the end of aterm or course of a project/term/course. This “Ex Post” feedback only provides students withadvice and feedback for how to perform on future teams, but does not provide a mechanism foraccountability on behavioral changes in their current team setting. When a student is
, configurationmanagement, and testing. The knowledge disseminated through lectures seemed to be reinforcedby the case studies. In the spring of 2015, additional course materials that include exercises androle-play videos are expected to be created and delivered. The results of this research work willbe shared during the poster presentation at ASEE. As part of the project dissemination plan, theteaching materials will be made available to interested institutions and professionalorganizations. An invitation-only workshop is also planned for August 2015 to share developedcourse materials and delivery mechanisms.1. Introduction & RationaleEffective teaching requires effective teaching tools. In engineering education, student-centeredlectures have been the
; Environmental Engineering. Previously she worked as the head of the Physical Sciences Library and as an associate in the Government Documents department. She is a past president of the Patent & Trademark Resource Center Association. She holds a M.L.I.S. from the University of South Carolina, a M.A. from the University of Michigan, and a B.A. from Calvin College. Page 26.998.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Integration of Information Literacy to Mechanical Engineering Capstone Projects 1. Abstract Searching for
teams will usually workto define the problem, identify the requirements and constraints, propose solutions, and create a Page 26.1013.2product or process to satisfy the requirements. A variation on the traditional team-based seniorcapstone course sequence at UIC has been introduced for bioengineering students.Interdisciplinary Product Development (IPD) programs have been around since the 1990s [1].Some well-known and well-established IPD programs include Carnegie Mellon University'sMaster of Integrated Innovation (formerly called Master of Product Development), Stanford's D-school, and RISD and MIT's collaborative Product Design and Development
additional project features to the site to meetthe students’ learning objectives. The site, building, and some of the student learning objectivesmay vary each time the course is taught. Figure 1 below shows a plan of the building’s roof usedin the development of modules for the structural portion of the DSL course.The desired student goals for this course are: (1) gaining additional knowledge in a specific CivilEngineering sub-discipline, (2) performing experiments and exercises in a sequence thatillustrate the multi sub-disciplinary interaction that typically occurs on Civil Engineeringprojects, (3) developing a better understanding of the role of each Civil Engineering sub-discipline in the practice of Civil Engineering and (4) emphasizing the
, one whomakes “a quick job that produces what is needed, but not well” and then matured to include [onewho makes] “an incredibly good, and perhaps very time-consuming, piece of work that producesexactly what is needed” 1 . Hackathons (or, marathons of hacking) are gatherings of programmersto collaboratively code in an extreme manner over a short period of time on whatever he or shewants 2 , and strive to embody the tone of “No Talk, All Action”. US Deputy CTO for governmentinnovation Chris Vein commends hackathons as exceptional ”sensemaking” tools for government,encouraging agencies to use hackers’ talents to solve in creative and imaginative ways that theywould never have done themselves 3 . Traditionally, hackathons have had a tangible
transportation industry. Address: Donald L. Harrison College of Business, Southeast Missouri State University, One University Plaza – MS 5815, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701; telephone (+1) 573.651.2016; fax: (+1) 573.651.2992; e-mail: gnicholls@semo.edu.Dr. William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University Dr. William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering – Engineering Management from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Industrial and Management Engineering (IME) from Montana State University (MSU). He is an Assistant Professor in IME at MSU with research interests in engineering education and the role of leadership and culture in process im- provement. Prior to his
CourseOverall, the goal of this course was to expose incoming freshmen students to the principles ofengineering design and technical writing, while also increasing their interest and enthusiasm forengineering. This was a relatively small course with only 7 students, providing a lot of directinstructor interaction with the students. Both student groups for the arthrogryposis projectsproduced successful low-fidelity prototypes as shown in figure 1 below. Student performance onthe written and oral communication assignments resulted in a class average of 90.9% ± 3.76%,and demonstrated effective student performance. Figure 1. Low fidelity prototypes for spoons to aid young arthrogryposis patients.After the course concluded, students were
, customer needs, alternativesolutions, environmental and social impact aspects of the design, as well as, their experience indecision-making, are ample reasons why their expertise would enrich students’ learning andbrings them (the students) closer to the realities of the workplace. (1)Employers, by and large, are generally satisfied with the basic technical preparation of today’sgraduates, but find them largely unaware of the vital roles that engineers play in bringingproducts and services from a “concept stage” to the marketplace. An important reason for this“drawback” is that faculty member, today, often lack industrial experience and/ or any other typeof practical experience. This is particularly troubling when faculty members, straight out
contrast the two offerings of the course. Wepresent a portion of these case study analyses, contrasting the data and results from coursesyllabi, student interviews, and course climate surveys.1 Introduction The engineering education community has become increasingly aware that improving theadoption of research-based instructional strategies (RBIS) is a complex process, meriting its ownresearch and development efforts1,2. While there are plenty of evidence-based RBIS inengineering education, their adoption remains low1. Faculty time and student resistance arecommonly cited barriers to the adoption of RBIS2,3, so we developed the low-cost intrinsicmotivation (IM) course conversion as an attempt to create course designs that promote
and field visits make the program directly applicableto the needs of the industry and prepare graduates with the skills and knowledge expectedby their potential employers. In addition, this program is designed to prepare the Page 26.218.7candidates to successfully complete certifications such as the following: A Certified SolidWorks Professional (CSWP) Professional Engineer (P.E. License)The Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs) for the program are listed below. At the end ofthe course students should be able to 1. Combine knowledge and practices needed for working on engineering projects that require innovative and interdisciplinary
studentperception and the team’s performance.1. Introduction and Literature ReviewCommunication is an important component of education for any discipline, but it is vital toengineering. In the past, engineers’ lack of communication amongst themselves, as well as withcolleagues from different fields, has resulted in devastating outcomes, such as the crash of theMars Climate Orbiter (MCO) in 1999. A lack of communication between the engineers workingfor Lockheed Martin Astronautics (LMA) and those in NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratoryresulted in English units, rather than NASA’s standard metric units, being utilized in softwarethat was used to calculate trajectory models. Furthermore, the absence of communicationbetween NASA engineers working for different
offered students the opportunity to realize how empowered theywere in solving complex and non-familiar problems.1 IntroductionAs Albert Einstein stated, “Physical concepts are free creations of the human mind, and are not,however it may seem, uniquely determined by the external world”. Physical concepts are used tostudy the physical phenomena represented by models. Models that go through iterative cycles ofconjecturing, testing and revising, until they satisfy constrains and provide a feasible explanationof the phenomenon under certain assumptions. In each iterative cycle, knowledge increases and abetter understanding of the phenomenon is attained, and the models become more robust andconnect more concepts. Models and modeling perspective
for research and educational use in the future.Relatively inexpensive common materials and simple manufacturing processes demonstrated thatusing a parabolic dish to concentrate solar radiation onto a tiny 1/2 cm2 multi-junction solar cellchip would produce an electrical output greater than 8 watts. Excess heat generated is dissipatedvia a heat sink assembly the solar cell chip is bonded to. The system is made up from a scalableparabolic mirror, a microprocessor controlled dual-axis tracking mechanism which is guided by afour-quadrant home-made light sensor, and the multi-junction solar cell assembly including itsheat sink. The parabolic mirror is designed by combining strips of off-the-shelf aluminumcoated polycarbonate mirror material, all
record for safety. According to theBureau of Labor Statistics, there were two injuries requiring medical treatment beyond first aidper 100 workers in chemicals manufacturing in 2013. This compares to a rate of 4.0 injuries per100 workers for all manufacturing, and a rate of 3.5 injuries per 100 workers for all of the privatesector.1 There were an average of 1.4 fatalities in chemical manufacturing per 100,000 workersin 2013, compared to 2.0 for all manufacturing and a rate of 3.2 overall.2 Chemical companiesclearly place high emphasis on worker safety and health.As we know, however, the chemical process industries also pose risk. The hazards of chemicalprocesses include toxic material releases, fires and explosions. These hazards have resulted
senate, and is currently the Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education.Dr. Shannon Gilmartin, Stanford UniversityDr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a research scientist in the Designing Education Lab in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of ePortfolio Initiatives in the Office of the Registrar at Stanford University. She is also a member of the research team in the National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter). Helen earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford University in 1998. Her current research interests include: 1) engineering and entrepreneurship education; 2) the pedagogy of
method of GBL that has come to the forefront recently is gamification, or the application ofgame elements to a non-game context11. The idea behind gamification suggests that if activitiescan be made to feel more game-like, participants will feel more engaged by them and will bemore likely to participate11,12. The game elements also give participants additional ways toengage with a certain activity, either through the aesthetic of the game elements or through newproblems to solve. Many of the common elements of games that gamified scenarios use invarious capacities are shown in Figure 1. The specific game elements used in any given contextcan vary by application, as gamification is a tool that can be applied to multiple contexts;however, there is
innovations and research-based instructional strategies, 1, 2, 3, 4yet most engineering faculty continue to rely on traditional methods of delivery in their courses. Over a decade ago, Felder et al.5 explained that the gap between the current state ofknowledge and the practice results are due to the perception and reality that good teaching is notvalued in terms of career advancement. The authors made a compelling case for the need to cre-ate a positive campus climate for good teaching. Further research has shown that many facultywho attempt to implement research-based instructional practices (RBIS) stop using them whenthey encounter challenges or barriers.2 These include lack of class time, lack of instructor time,lack of rewards or recognition
only what motivates women (and subsequently what is likely to Page 26.543.4prompt them to leave the profession), but also what is unique about these motivations whencompared to male engineers at similar times in their careers.MethodsFor this analysis, 11 men and 11 women were interviewed during 2010. All interviewees earnedtheir first engineering degrees between 2000 and 2006. This analysis is part of a larger study(described in Figure 1) that began with a screening survey designed to elicit basic demographicinformation and completed by 630 participants from three different higher education institutions.From this screening survey, target
Paper ID #11920STEM Collaboration Assessment Leading to Curriculum Changes and GreaterLong-Term STEM EngagementDr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well as served in
assessment data areincluded so that interested groups can begin their own programs.1.0 IntroductionSmall universities with primary undergraduate programs have historically been teaching-focusedwith research being a secondary priority or even non-existent. In recent years, there has been ashift toward involving undergraduate students in mentored research activities.1 The benefits andrewards for the students, faculty mentors, the institution, and the greater scientific andengineering community have been recognized. However, there are many challenges toimplementing a successful teaching research program at the undergraduate level. Within theengineering education community, the topic of undergraduate research, and in particular theissues facing
learning.Educational Philosophy of Experiential LearningIn his seminal work, Kolb draws upon the work of Dewey, Lewin, and Piaget to discuss thecharacteristics associated with the process of experiential learning; key among thesecharacteristics, given the context of the research presented in this paper, are the propositions that“learning is a continuous process grounded in experience,” and that “learning involves Page 26.1280.2transactions between the person and the environment.”1 Experiential learning places an emphasison the emergent process where thoughts and ideas are not fixed but are formed and reformedthrough experiences instead of specific outcomes
workforce can expect to participate in virtual teamswhose members collaborate through a variety of powerful Information Technology (IT) tools.Lipnack and Stamps call virtual teams “the peopleware for the 21st century”(1, p. 2). In response toglobalization and the need to be flexible and competitive, industry increasingly relies on virtualteams to bring together resources and expertise that are geographically distributed(2). It isestimated that 30 million US workers were engaged in virtual teams in 2000(3); today the numberis even higher. A 2012 survey by the Society for Human Resource Management indicated that 46percent of organizations use virtual teams(4). This significant professional trend provided thecontext for experimenting with virtual
females [1]. The Women’sEngineering Institute will provide academic, career, social and extracurricular activities, plusresearch and professional development opportunities for women in engineering. The center willnot only focus on recruitment and retention, but also on providing excellent financial andprofessional development opportunities to all female engineering students at Embry-Riddle. Anumber of other universities have already established similar centers of excellence that havegreatly benefitted their female students and faculties, e.g., the WiSE program at the University ofWashington [2] and University of Iowa [3], the Advance initiative at Lehigh University [4].Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University has already made considerable strides in
questions: (1) What is thenature of the progress of a small group of invested faculty focused on interactive pedagogy? (2)How do faculty experienced in interactive pedagogy analyze student learning? The first questionbecame the core of what we investigated over the life of the project. The second questionevolved into understanding how faculty implemented teaching strategies that provided moreformative assessment data and information about students’ learning in an ongoing fashion.MethodologyIn year one, a pilot group was formed. This group consisted of four faculty members, all fromdifferent institutions. These faculty members would become group leaders in the second phaseof the project, but in the first year they met monthly (via phone conference
inthis context, three dominant research faculty roles are identified and described in this paper: (1)entrepreneur, (2) inventor, and (3) consultant.A comprehensive role-based model will be useful for researchers and practitioners to clearlydiscern the types of relationships that are relevant to the work they conduct in university-industryresearch partnerships. A key factor in improving university-industry research partnershipexperiences is advancing our understanding of the nature of the roles and relationships amongparticipants. Finally, clarifying these roles will be helpful for moving forward with a morefocused research agenda for university-industry research partnerships.Introduction There is increasing national interest in the U.S